Literature DB >> 32722090

Course and Outcome of Erythema Migrans in Pregnant Women.

Vera Maraspin1, Lara Lusa2,3, Tanja Blejec4, Eva Ružić-Sabljić5, Maja Pohar Perme3, Franc Strle1.   

Abstract

Information on Lyme borreliosis (LB) during pregnancy is limited. In the present study, the course and outcome of erythema migrans (EM) in 304 pregnant women, diagnosed in the period 1990-2015, was assessed and compared with that in age-matched non-pregnant women. The frequency of unfavorable outcome of pregnancies was also evaluated. The pregnant women reported constitutional symptoms less frequently than the non-pregnant women (22.4% vs. 37.2%, p < 0.001). Pregnant women diagnosed with EM later during pregnancy had a lower probability of reporting constitutional symptoms (odds ratio = 0.97 for 1-week difference in gestation week at diagnosis of EM, 95% CI: 0.94-0.99, p = 0.02). The outcome of pregnancy was unfavorable in 42/304 (13.8%) patients: preterm birth in 22/42 (52.4%), fetal/perinatal death in 10/42 (23.8%), and/or anomalies in 15/42 (35.7%). Several patients had potential explanation(s) for the unfavorable outcome. In conclusion, the course of early LB during pregnancy is milder than in age-matched non-pregnant women. The outcome of pregnancy with the treatment approach used in the present study (i.v. ceftriaxone 2 g once daily for 14 days) is favorable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato; Lyme borreliosis; erythema migrans; gestation; pregnancy outcome

Year:  2020        PMID: 32722090      PMCID: PMC7463612          DOI: 10.3390/jcm9082364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med        ISSN: 2077-0383            Impact factor:   4.241


1. Introduction

Lyme borreliosis (LB) usually presents as the skin lesion erythema migrans (EM). The lesion, which is the result of tick bite inoculation of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (s.l.) into the skin, develops early in the course of the disease. The causative agent can disseminate in some patients, resulting in secondary skin lesions and involvement of the nervous system, joints, heart, and/or eye [1]. Information on LB during pregnancy is limited. According to general belief, there are no differences in the course of the disease in pregnant and non-pregnant women. However, a PubMed literature search has found no straightforward data on the course of the infection in pregnant women, and information on the outcome of their pregnancies is limited [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. The aim of our study was to evaluate and compare the course and outcome of early LB in non-pregnant and pregnant women and to assess the outcomes of the pregnancies.

2. Patients and Methods

2.1. Selection of Patients

Prospectively acquired data on women with EM who were examined at the LB Outpatient Clinic of the Department of Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Slovenia, in the period 1990–2015 were analyzed. All pregnant women diagnosed with EM according to the European criteria [24] were enrolled in the study.

2.2. Clinical Evaluation

Patients were evaluated before commencing treatment with antibiotics, again two weeks later, and then at two, six, 12, and 18 months. Pre-treatment characteristics were assessed using a standardized questionnaire that included demographic, epidemiologic, and clinical data as follows: the number, location, appearance, and diameter of EM; the presence of symptoms at the site of EM (itching, burning, pain); constitutional symptoms (fatigue, headache, myalgia, arthralgia, dizziness, nausea, fever) defined as complaints that newly developed or intensified since the beginning of EM, and the presence of extracutaneous manifestations of LB.

2.3. Laboratory and Microbiological Evaluation

Basic laboratory tests were performed at the first visit and two weeks later. Serum antibodies to B. burgdorferi s.l. were determined at baseline and at follow-up examinations using either an indirect immunofluorescent assay with a local isolate of B. afzelii as antigen [25] or an indirect chemiluminescence immunoassay (LIAISON®) with antigens OspC and VlsE for the detection of IgM antibodies and VlsE for IgG antibodies. As of 1994, a sample of citrated blood (5 mL until 2000, 9 mL subsequently) was taken at presentation for cultivation of borreliae in modified Kelly Pettenkofer medium [26]. Isolates were identified to species level using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis after MluI restriction of genomic DNA or by PCR-based restriction fragment length polymorphism of the intergenic region [27,28].

2.4. Treatment

At the first visit, patients received either i.v. ceftriaxone 2 g once daily, i.v. penicillin G 10,000,000 units twice daily, or oral phenoxymethylpenicillin 1 g three times per day. The duration of antibiotic treatment was 14 days.

2.5. Assessment of Outcome

The course and outcome of early LB in the pregnant women and the frequency of unfavorable outcome of their pregnancies (appraised by fetal death, pre-term birth, offspring malformations) were evaluated. The medical history was taken at each visit, including information on the presence of subjective symptoms, and patients were examined clinically. A gynecologist regularly monitored the course of gestation. At the first visit after delivery, detailed information about the birth and the infant was collected. A pediatrician monitored the babies at birth and after 6 months; however, several babies had more frequent and/or longer follow-ups.

2.6. Control Group

The course and outcome of EM in pregnant women was compared with that in age-matched non-pregnant woman diagnosed with EM at our institution in the same year.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The characteristics of the pregnant women and the control group were compared using the Mann–Whitney test for numeric covariates and Fisher’s exact test for categorical covariates. Categorical variables were summarized with frequencies and percentages and 95% confidence intervals (CI), numeric variables with medians and interquartile ranges. To control for false positives, the p values shown in Table 1 were adjusted using a multivariate permutation procedure [29].
Table 1

Basic demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of 304 pregnant women before antibiotic treatment of erythema migrans in comparison with 304 sex- and age-matched patients diagnosed with erythema migrans in the same year.

Pregnant WomenControl Group p Adjusted p
No. of patients304304
Age (years)29.5 (27–33)29 (26–33)
Tick bite a191 (62.8; 57.1–68.3)190 (62.5; 56.8–68.0)>0.99>0.99
Interval from bite to EM onset (days) b14 (7–24)13 (8–21)0.92>0.99
Interval from EM onset to diagnosis and treatment (days)7 (4–18)8 (4–22)0.100.55
Location of EM c: 0.0090.062
Extremities256 (84.2; 79.6–88.1)227 (74.7; 69.4–79.5)
Trunk43 (14.1; 10.4–18.6)73 (24.0; 19.3–29.2)
Head, neck5 (1.6; 0.5–3.8)4 (1.3; 0.4–3.3)
Size of EM c (cm)10 (7–16)10 (7–17)0.54>0.99
Ring-like appearance of EM c:129 (42.4; 36.8–48.2)168 (55.3; 49.5–60.9)0.0020.016
Local symptoms170 (55.9; 50.1–61.6)182 (59.9; 54.1–65.4)0.370.97
Itching d154 (50.7; 44.9–56.4)163 (53.5; 47.8–59.3)
Burning d26 (8.6; 5.7–12.3)33 (10.9; 5.6–14.9)
Pain d26 (8.6; 5.7–12.3)39 (12.8; 9.3–17.1)
Constitutional symptoms 68 (22.1; 17.8–27.5)113 (37.2; 31.7–42.9)<0.0010.002
Fatigue d29 (9.5; 6.5–13.4)62 (20.4; 16.0–25.4)
Headache d33 (10.9; 7.6–14.9)62 (20.4; 16.0–25.4)
Myalgias d12 (4.0; 2.1–6.8)24 (7.9; 5.1–11.5)
Arthralgias d18 (5.9; 3.5–9.2)32 (10.5; 7.3–14.5)
Fever d5 (1.6; 0.5–3.8)8 (2.6; 1.1–5.1)
Dizziness d7 (2.3; 0.9–4.7)11 (3.6; 1.8–6.4)
Multiple EM14 (4.6; 2.5–7.6) *16 (5.3; 3.0-8.4) **0.71>0.99
Other manifestations of LB e20

Data are medians (interquartile range) or frequencies (percentage; 95% confidence interval). p values were obtained with Mann–Whitney tests for numeric variables and chi-squared Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables. Abbreviations: EM, erythema migrans; LB, Lyme borreliosis. a At site of later EM skin lesion; b data for 189/191 pregnant and 185/190 non-pregnant women who recalled a tick bite at the site of later EM; c findings for the primary lesion in patients with multiple EM; d number (%) of patients reporting an individual symptom; e one patient with associated borrelial lymphocytoma, one with transitory cardiac conduction disorder; * number of skin lesions: 2–13 (IQR 2–6); ** number of skin lesions: 2–12 (IQR 2–3).

The association between gestation week at diagnosis of EM and the presence of constitutional symptoms was investigated using a logistic regression model. A possible departure from the assumption of a linear association between gestation week at which EM was diagnosed and the logit of probability of reporting the symptoms was assessed by fitting an additional model that included a restricted cubic spline transformation (with five knots) of the covariate. The risk of an adverse outcome of pregnancy varies with week of gestation, and this was used as the timescale. We compared the risk for women in the same gestation week with respect to gestation week at diagnosis of EM. Four additional preselected possible confounders (age, duration of EM at diagnosis in weeks, multiple EM or borreliae isolated from blood, presence of constitutional symptoms) were included in univariable and multivariable Cox regression models. To account for a possible selection bias of the pregnant patients, 39 patients enrolled in the first eight weeks of pregnancy were included in the risk set only after week 9 of their pregnancy. R statistical language was used for all the analyses [30].

2.8. Ethical Considerations

The study was performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Slovenia (35/04/09). The Ethics Committee waived the need for written informed consent.

3. Results

Among 14,010 patients diagnosed with EM at our institution during a 26-year period, 307 were pregnant, and, for 304 (99%), the natural outcome of the pregnancy was available; 105 of these 304 patients have been reported previously [18,20,23].

3.1. Pre-Treatment Characteristics

In the comparison of basic clinical characteristics of pregnant and non-pregnant women with EM, findings were analogous for the majority of parameters, with the exceptions that the pregnant women less often had a ring-like EM (42.4% vs. 55.3%, p = 0.002), less often had EM located on the trunk (14.1% vs. 24.0%, p = 0.009), and less often reported constitutional symptoms (22.4% vs. 37.2%, p < 0.001). When the analyses were adjusted for multiple comparisons, the differences remained significant for ring-like EM and the presence of constitutional symptoms (Table 1). Patients who were diagnosed in the later stages of pregnancy had a lower probability of reporting constitutional symptoms (OR = 0.97 for 1-week difference in gestation week at diagnosis of EM, 95% CI: 0.94–0.99, p = 0.02). Our data do not prove a non-linear association between gestation week and the logit of probability (p = 0.20). When including the non-linear term, the estimated prevalence of constitutional symptoms decreased very markedly only in the first 20 weeks of pregnancy but afterwards remained low (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Estimated probability of reporting constitutional symptoms in pregnant and non-pregnant women with erythema migrans. EM, erythema migrans.

In both groups of women, the proportion of patients with borrelial IgM and/or IgG serum antibodies at presentation (63/295, 21.4% vs. 72/289, 24.9%), the isolation rate of borreliae from blood (8/216, 3.7% vs. 4/187, 2.1%), and the ratio between the isolated Borrelia species (six B. afzelii and two B. garinii vs. three B. afzelii and one B. garinii) were similar. At the initial visit, dissemination of borreliae was identified in 22 pregnant women: 14/304 (4.6%) had multiple EM; B. burgdorferi s.l. was isolated from the blood in 8/216 (3.7%) patients (all had solitary EM).

3.2. Treatment

Of 304 patients, 299 (98.4%) were treated with i.v. ceftriaxone 2 g once daily, three (1.0%) were treated with i.v. penicillin G 10,000,000 units twice daily, and two (0.7%) with oral phenoxymethylpenicillin 1 g three times per day.

3.3. Post-Treatment Course and Outcome

3.3.1. Comparison of Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Women

After antibiotic treatment, the course and outcome of borrelial infection was uneventful in both groups of women: the EM disappeared in 14 (5–18) days in pregnant women and in 11 (3.5–15) days in non-pregnant women (p = 0.25). None of the 304 patients in either group developed any new objective manifestation of LB following treatment. Persistence of EM, defined as visible EM at follow-up 2–3 months after the beginning of antibiotic treatment, was found in 3/304 (1%) patients in each group. At the 2-month visit, only 5/304 (1.6%) pregnant women reported symptoms that newly developed or intensified after the beginning of EM; at 6 months, 1/300 (0.3%) reported such symptoms. The corresponding findings for the control group were 2/293 (0.7%) and 0/287, respectively.

3.3.2. Outcome of Pregnancies

The outcome of pregnancy was unfavorable in 42/304 (13.8%) patients: preterm birth in 22/42 (52.4%), fetal/perinatal death in 10/42 (23.8%), and/or anomalies detected at birth or within the first year of life in 15/42 (35.7%). Several patients had a potential explanation for the unfavorable outcome (Table 2). At a significance level of alpha = 0.01, none of the chosen factors were associated with a higher risk of unfavorable outcome (Table 3).
Table 2

Unfavorable outcome of pregnancy in 42 patients after antibiotic treatment of erythema migrans.

Pregnancy TrimesterCase No. (Year of Diagnosis)Tick BiteOnset of EMDiagnosis of EMPreterm BirthFetal a/Perinatal b DeathAnomalies (Evident at Birth or Later c), Other AbnormalitiesPotential Explanations for Unfavorable Outcome
Week of Gestation
First trimester1 (1998)no2311 a
2 (1996)234syndactylyanomaly present in family members
3 (2002)34416 auterus septus
4 (2008)no1410 a*
5 (1997)35533 dpre-eclampsia at week 31
6 (1997)no2510 a
7 (1999)−2 e45lacrymal canal stenosisc
8 (2008)25610 amultipara (6 children, 2 spontaneous abortions previously) *
9 (1996)6 e−2 e62525 bchorioamnionitis, vasculitis of umbilical vessels
10 (2010)46710 a
11 (1993)no679 auterus bicornus
12 (2013)no4832 d
13 (1997)99102525 b
14 (1996)991036thyroiditis during pregnancy
15 (2010)891035 dpartus imminens (hospitalization from gestational week 24)
16 (2006)8101230 dpreterm premature rupture of membranes
17 (2008)8101234 d
18 (2009)no101212 a
19 (1997)no1116ureteral stenosis, hydronephrosis, hydroureter dex c (apparent 10 months after birth)
20 (2010)no1116fetal growth retardation, CVI in perinatal period with consequent spasticity, left ovarian cyst
21 (2001)11121336
Summary 13/21 (62%) 6 (−2–12) 7 (3–16) 9/69 (13%) 10/69 (14%) 4/69 (6%) 9/69 (13%)
Second trimester22 (2005)no131436
23 (2000)121516stenosis of pulmonary arteria, open foramen ovale
24 (2004)15151636hypospadia
25 (1994)12151636 dASD, VSDcervical insufficiency
26 (1993)no151636
27 (2001)no1819-extrasystoles (shortly after birth, duration 3 weeks)
28 (2006)162020ASD, open foramen ovale, stenosis of pulmonary artery c (apparent 3 months after birth)
29 (2000)172020VUR
30 (2001)181920hearing deficit
31 (1993)19202126 duterus septus; cervical insufficiency
32 (1994)18192236
33 (2010)21232336month: ASD
34 (2010)no232436
35 (1992)22232436
36 (2001)no243036*
37 (2003)21252536
38 (2004)15262835 f
39 (2004)26282836**
Summary 13/18 (72%) 19 (13–28) 20 (14–28) 13/150 (9%) 8/150 (5%) 2/150 (1%)
Third trimester40 (1995)3132325th month: VUR c
41 (2007)333434ASD, VSD, open ductus arteriosus Botalli
42 (1992)no32357th month: bilateral ureteral stenosis, hydronephrosis c
Summary 2/3 (67%) 32 (32–34) 34 (32–35) 0/85 3/85 (4%) 0/85

Abbreviations: EM, erythema migrans; CVI, cerebrovascular insult; ASD, atrial septum defect; VSD, ventricular septum defect; VUR, vesicoureteral reflux. a Fetal death due to missed abortion (six patients) or spontaneous abortion (two patients); b live at birth, death occurred within few minutes; c later diagnosis of anomalies (within the first year after birth); d respiratory difficulties at birth; e weeks prior to conception; f respiratory distress syndrome and severe icterus at birth; * patient had multiple EM; ** isolation of Borrelia afzelii from blood.

Table 3

Factors associated with unfavorable outcome of pregnancy.

CovariateUnivariable AnalysisHR (95% CI); pMultivariable AnalysisHR (95% CI); p
Gestation week at diagnosis (1-week difference)0.97 (0.93–1.00); 0.0670.95 (0.92–0.99); 0.013
Age (10-year difference)1.35 (0.76–2.40); 0.311.43 (0.78–2.62); 0.25
Duration of EM before diagnosis (10 days difference)0.82 (0.65–1.04); 0.110.79 (0.61–1.02); 0.07
Multiple EM or borreliae isolated from blood1.52 (0.54–4.28); 0.431.88 (0.65–5.41); 0.24
Presence of systemic symptoms0.53 (0.22–1.26); 0.150.46 (0.19–1.11); 0.08

Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

4. Discussion

Several mechanical and pathophysiologic changes occur during pregnancy, and immune adaptations develop to accommodate the fetus [31]. As pregnancy progresses, hormone levels (estradiol, progesterone) increase markedly in association with several immunologic changes, including a shift from Th1 to Th2 immunity, which results in decreasing robustness of cell mediated immunity [32]. Consequently, the acquisition, clinical presentation, and course of infectious diseases in pregnant women may be altered [33]. Although clinical findings indicate that the course of most infections in pregnant and non-pregnant women are similar, some diseases (for example, listeriosis and malaria) are more frequent during gestation, and several (such as influenza, hepatitis E, herpes simplex virus infections, malaria) are more severe in pregnant women [31]. While it is well known that some non-infectious diseases, such as multiple sclerosis, have a milder course during pregnancy [34], no infectious disease has been reported to have a less severe course during gestation. There is a concept that pregnancy does not affect the course and outcome of early LB; however, studies that directly compare the course of LB in pregnant and in non-pregnant women are lacking. Our study has shown that the majority of basic clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of EM before treatment with antibiotics were analogous in the two groups of women and consonant with previous findings in Slovenian patients with EM [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42] and that the outcome after antibiotic treatment was excellent regardless of pregnancy. No subsequent objective manifestations of LB were established in either of the two groups, and the proportion of patients with symptoms at follow-up visits was even lower than found in other recent studies from Slovenia [37,38,39,40,41,42], possibly because only young, previously healthy patients were included in the present study. Nevertheless, there were also several differences. We do not have a reliable explanation for the observation that the pregnant women less often had ring-like EM despite similar duration of the skin lesion before treatment, but we stress that the findings in our control group are in agreement with previous reports in Slovenian patients with EM [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42]. Furthermore, the proportion of reported constitutional symptoms accompanying EM was lower in the pregnant women, indicating that the course of EM during pregnancy was milder than in the age-matched non-pregnant women (Table 1, Figure 1), as also shown in previous reports on EM from the same region [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42]. Our results indicate that the probability of reporting constitutional symptoms systematically decreases with gestation week at diagnosis of EM (EM was diagnosed a median 7 days after the appearance of the skin lesion) and that women infected during the later stages of pregnancy report fewer constitutional symptoms compared with those infected during the early phases of pregnancy, who are more similar to non-pregnant women. Since B. burgdorferi s.l. does not produce its own toxins or extracellular matrix-degrading proteases, most manifestations of LB result from inflammation generated by the host immune response to the spirochete [43]. Thus, fewer symptoms, as found in the present study of pregnant women with EM, may be associated with lower levels of inflammation. This assumption parallels findings in animal models where, for example, Lyme arthritis in pregnant mice was less severe. The amelioration of arthritis was associated with a shift in inflammatory responses—that is, the down-regulation of Th1 responses, most likely via the progesterone-mediated up-regulation of Th2 cytokine production, resulting in the reduction in pathogenic inflammatory responses during gestation in the mice [44]. In addition, our previous work has shown that higher numbers of constitutional symptoms in EM patients are associated with greater Th1 or Th17-associated cytokine responses, which is consistent with findings that immune responses shift towards a Th2 response in the course of pregnancy [45]. Information on the outcomes of pregnancy in women who develop LB during gestation is limited [46]. Findings of a PubMed literature search for the period of 1985 to January 2020 are shown in Table 4. The search found several individual case reports and a few series on unfavorable outcome of pregnancy in patients who were treated or not treated with antibiotics, the large majority of studies being from the two decades after recognition of LB [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. The described cases show no uniform pattern of abnormalities. In the majority of cases, only a temporal association with maternal LB was described but no causal relationship was confirmed or searched for, and, in some articles, the proof of borrelial infection was imprecise by present standards. In addition, in patients in whom spirochetes were identified microscopically or by culture of placenta or autopsied infants, no signs of inflammation, granuloma formation, or necrosis in the affected tissues were detected. Moreover, Mather et al. reported the absence of the transplacental transmission of Lyme disease spirochetes from reservoir mice to their offspring [47], though the human placenta could be different to that of the mouse. Thus, the association between maternal borrelial infection and unfavorable outcome of pregnancy remains unclear, and the risk of adverse outcomes from maternal Lyme borreliosis has been interpreted to be negligible.
Table 4

Reports on unfavorable outcomes of pregnancy in patients with Lyme borreliosis during gestation.

Author(s) and Year Type of StudyPregnant WomenOutcome of Pregnancy
Tick Bite Gestational Week of LB Onset/DiagnosisLB Signs/LB Symptoms/Antibiotic Treatment Other Clinical DataLB SerologyPreterm Birth: Week (Weight)Fetal or Perinatal Death: Week (Weight)Anomalies, Other AbnormalitiesEvidence of Borrelia burgdorferi Sensu Lato Infection of Fetus or Child
Schlesinger et al. 1985Case reportNo6–7/8MEM, stiff neck/headache, malaise, arthralgias/noNoPositive35 (ND)35 (ND)Respiratory distress, death 39 h after deliveryAortic valvular stenosis, patent ductus arteriosus, coarctation of aorta, tubular hypoplasia of aorta and aortic arch, endocardial fibroelastosisNoA few spirochetes in spleen, renal tubule, bone marrow seen in paraffin block sections stained using modified Dieterle method.No evidence of inflammation, necrosis, or granuloma in any organ. Placenta not available.Later examination: immunohistochemical detection of spirochetes in cardiac tissue
MacDonald 1986, 1989 MacDonald et al. 1987Retrospective analysis of perinatal autopsies 1978–1985; prospective study on perinatal deaths 1985–1988No1–2/LB not diagnosedEM, arthritis/no/noNoPositiveNoAt term (2500 g) StillbirthVSDRetardation of intrauterine growthCulture of spirochetes from fetal liver tissue; IFA detection of spirochetes in fetal liver, heart, adrenal glands, subarachnoid space; silver stains: spirochetes in myocardium, brain, liver, placenta.No inflammation in fetal tissues, rare plasma cells in isolated placental villi.
NoND/LB not diagnosedNo/no/noToxemia in w 17Negative19 (514 g)19 (514 g) StillbirthASDNoCulture of spirochetes from fetal liver tissue; IFA detection of spirochetes in fetal liver and placenta.
NDND/LB not diagnosedNo/arthralgias/noToxaemia in w 22Negative23 (490 g)23 (490 g) StillbirthCoarctation of aortaNoCulture of spirochetes from fetal liver tissue; IFA detection of spirochetes in fetal liver and placenta.No tissue inflammation.
NDND/LB not diagnosedNo/no/noNoNegative15 (85 g)15 (85 g) StillbirthNoNoCulture of spirochetes from fetal liver tissue; IFA detection of spirochetes in fetal liver, placentaNo tissue inflammation
NDND/LB not diagnosedNo/no/noVaginal bleeding in 1st trimesterNDNo39 (2250 g) Respiratory distress, death in 4 hVSD, hydrocephalus, meningomyelocele, omphalocele, spina bifida, club footNoImmunohistochemical detection of spirochetes in fetal tissue
NDND/LB not diagnosedNo/no/noNoNDNo40 (1950 g) Respiratory distress, death in 30 minVSD, absent left hemidiaphragmRetardation of intrauterine growth, cardiac dysfunctionIndirect IFA detection of spirochetal fragments in fetal tissue
NDND/LB not diagnosedNo/no/noVaginal bleeding in 2nd trimesterNegative17 (30 g)17 (30 g)HydrocephalusNoIndirect IFA detection of spirochetes in fetal brain
NDND/LB not diagnosedNo/no/noVaginal bleeding in 2nd trimesterNegative16 (150 g)16 (150 g)NoNoSpirochetes identified in fetal brain using immunohistochemical technique with monoclonal antibodies. No inflammation found in fetal viscera
NDND/LB not diagnosedNo/no/noNoND12 (294 g)12 (294 g)NoNoCulture of fetal viscera in BSK medium yielded B. burgdorferi and other bacteria from fetal kidney; immunohistochemistry negative for spirochetes in fetal viscera
NDND/LB not diagnosedNo/arthralgias, myalgias, headache/noNoNegative25 (ND)25 (ND)Intrauterine fetal deathVSDNoIndirect IFA detection of spirochetes in fetal tissue
NDND/LB not diagnosedNo/no/noNoNDNo40 (3746 g)NoNeonatal sepsis, respiratory distress in 1st hour of lifeRare spirochetes found in “normal” placental villi
NDND/LB not diagnosedNo/no/noToxemia in w 37ND37 (2157 g)NoNoNeonatal sepsis, respiratory distress in 1st day of lifeMany spirochetes identified in placenta using Warthin–Starry silver impregnation technique
Markowitz et al. 1986 Retrospective study on 19 pregnant women with LBND6/8EM, stiff neck, arthritis/headache/penicillin V 10 daysNoPositive20 (ND)20 (ND)Intrauterine fetal deathNoNoCulture and indirect IFA negative.No inflammation found in fetal tissues.
ND10/LB not diagnosedFacial palsy, arthritis/headache/noNoND36 (2100 g)NoNoHyperbilirubinemiaND
ND20/21EM, stiff neck/headache, arthralgia/ erythromycin 10 days (in w 21), penicillin V 10 days (in w 27)NoNDNoNoSyndactylyNoND
ND27/27EM/no/penicillin V 10 days NoNDNoNoCortical blindnessDevelopmental delayND
ND39/39EM, meningitis/no/noNoNDNoNoNoGeneralized rash,hyperbilirubinemiaND
Ciesielski et al.1987 Prospective study on 17 pregnant patients with LBNDND/4Not specified/not specified/data on prescribed antibiotic not availableNDPositive13 (ND)13 (ND)Spontaneous abortionNoNoNo evidence of borrelial infection on stains or cultures of fetal tissues.
NDND/7Not specified/not specified/data on prescribed antibiotic not availableNDPositiveNoNoSyndactylyNoND
Weber et al. 1988Case reportYes10/12EM/no/penicillin 1g tid 7 days NoSeroconversionNoAt term (3400 g)Respiratory distress, death 23 h after deliveryNoNoSilver stain and monoclonal antibody identification of spirochetes in brain and liver.No significant inflammation found in any organ.
Andrásová et al. 1988 Case reportNDND/23EM, facial palsy/arthralgias, low fever/yes (antibiotic not specified)Vaginal bleeding in 1st trimesterPositive32 (1450 g)NoNoRespiratory distress, anemiaPlacenta: no spirochetes and no inflammation.
Nadal et al. 1989 Serologic study on 1416 pregnant women and their offspringYes1st trimester/LB not diagnosedEM, arthritis/no/noNoPositiveNoNoVSDNoND
Lavoie et al. 1990Case reportNoND/LB not diagnosedNo/arthralgia, malaise/noNoNegativeNoAt term (ND)Respiratory distress, myocardial dysfunction, death 8 days after deliveryNoNoIsolation of B. burgdorferi from frontal cerebral cortex;silver staining: spirochetes in brain and heart.
Hercogová et al. 1993, 1994 Prospective studies on 15 and 19 pregnant patients with EMNo6/10EM/arthralgia, paresthesias/penicillin V 5 days (in w 10), penicillin V retreatment (in w 14)NoPositive15 (ND)15 (ND) Intrauterine fetal deathNoNoBorrelia-like organism in ultrathin sections of the decidua detected using monoclonal antibody H9724 against flagellin.
Yes16/18EM/fatigue/ampicillin 21 daysNoPositive18 (ND)18 (ND)Spina bifida, hydrocephalusNoND
Yes4/8EM/no/penicillin V 24 daysNoNegativeNoNoUnclosed ductus arteriosus Botalli NoND
Yes25/30EM/no/penicillin V 14 daysNoNegativeNoNoCryptorchidism (established at 2 years)NoND
NDND/NDEM/ND/yes (antibiotic not specified)NoNDNoNoNoHypotrophiaND
NDND/NDEM/ND/yes (antibiotic not specified)NoNDNoNoNoHyperbilirubinemiaND
No18/24EM/no/penicillin V 14 days, benzanthine penicillinNoNegativeNoNoEnamel defectNoND
No31/33EM/low fever/penicillin V 14 daysNoPositiveNoNoEnamel defectNoND
Yes20/23EM/no/penicillin V14 daysNoPositiveNoNoNoDevelopmental delayND
Williams et al. 1995 Serologic study on 5011 newborns and their mothersNDND/ND/yes (antibiotic not specified)NDPositiveNoNoHypospadiaNoND
Maraspin et al. 1996, 1999 Prospective cohort studies on 58 and 105 pregnant patients with EMYesBefore conception/6EM/no/ceftriaxone 2 g i.v. 14 daysNoNegative25 (610 g)25 (610 g)Death in few minutesNoNoWarthin–Starry silver impregnation of fetal tissues: no spirochetes. No inflammation. Normal placenta. Chorioamnionitis and vasculitis of umbilical vessels.
Yes9/10EM/no/ceftriaxone 2 g i.v. 14 daysNoNegative25 (450 g)25 (450g)Death in few minutesNoNoWarthin–Starry silver impregnation of fetal tissues: no spirochetes. No inflammation. Normal placenta.
Yes5/5EM/no/ceftriaxone 2 g i.v. 14 daysPreeclampsia in w 31Negative33 (1720 g)NoNoRespiratory distress, hyperbilirubinemiaNot tested
Yes20/21EM/no/ceftriaxone 2 g i.v. 14 daysNoNegative26 (840 g)NoNoRespiratory distress, bilateral ventricular and periventricular bleedingNot tested
Yes23/24EM/no/ceftriaxone 2 g i.v. 14 daysNoNegative36NoNoNoNot tested
Yes15/16EM/no/ceftriaxone 2 g i.v. 14 daysNoNegative36 (2940 g)NoASD, VSDRespiratory distress, pneumothoraxNot tested
No32/35EM/no/ceftriaxone 2 g i.v. 14 daysNoNegativeNoNoBilateral ureteral stenosis NoNot tested
Yes32/32EM/no/ceftriaxone 2 g i.v. 14 daysNoNegativeNoNoVesicoureteral reflux NoNot tested
No11/16EM/no/ceftriaxone 2 g i.v. 14 daysNoNegativeNoNoUreteral stenosis, hydronephrosis,hydroureter dexNoNot tested
Yes3/4EM/no/ceftriaxone 2 g i.v. 14 daysNoNegativeNoNoSyndactylyNoNot tested
No6/7EM/no/ceftriaxone 2 g i.v. 14 daysNoNegative9 (ND)9 (ND) Missed abortionNoNoNot tested
No2/5EM/no/ceftriaxone 2 g i.v. 14 daysNoNegative10 (ND)10 (ND)Spontaneous abortionNoNoNot tested
Lakos et al. 2010 Clinical experiences obtained using miscellaneous approachesa ND1–5/NDEM/ND/ND/4/6 pts oral antibiotic (ND on antibiotic type); 2/6 untreatedND8 (ND)—5 pts, 13 (ND)—1 pt8–13 (ND) Spontaneous abortionNoNoND
ND5/NDEM/ND/NoNDND22 (ND)22 (ND) StillbirthNoNoND
ND 17/NDEM/ND/cefuroxime axetil NDND35 (ND)NoNoNoND
ND13/NDEM/ND/ceftriaxone 2 g i.v. 15 days NDNDNoNoNoSmall for date (2200 g at 39 w)ND
b ND13–27/NDEM/ND/penicillin G i.v. or ceftriaxone ivNDNDNoNoCavernous hemangiomaNoND
ND/13/NDEM/ND/ceftriaxone 2 g i.v. 15 daysNDNDNoNoNoHyperbilirubinemia *ND
ND/38/NDEM/ND/erythromycin 150 mg qid 30 days **NDNDNoNoDysplasia coxaeHyperbilirubinemia *ND
ND18/NDEM/ND/ceftriaxone 2 g i.v. 15 daysNDNDNoNoDysplasia coxaeNoND
NDBefore conception/NDEM/ND/ceftriaxone 2 g i.v. 15 daysNDNDNoNoPyloric stenosis, dysplasia coxaeNoND
ND38/NDEM/ND/NoNDNDNoNoNoPapulovesicular eruption at birthND
ND4/NDEM/ND/NoNDNDNoNoNoCerebral bleeding, developmental delayND
ND27/NDEM/ND/NoNDNDNoNoHypospadia, cavernous hemangiomaNoND
ND13/NDEM/ND/ceftriaxone 2 g i.v. 15 daysNDNDNoNoSkeletal anomalyNoND
Maraspin et al. 2011Study on 7 pregnant patients with EM and borreliae isolated from bloodYes28/28EM/No/ceftriaxone 2 g i.v., 14 daysNoNegative36 (2500 g)NoNoNoNot tested

Abbreviations: LB, Lyme borreliosis; MEM, multiple erythema migrans; EM, erythema migrans; ND, no data; pt, patient; pts, patients; VSD, ventricular septum defect; w, week; ASD, atrial septum defect; IFA, immunofluorescence assay; tid, three times daily; quid, four times daily. a Summarized data for six patients with spontaneous abortion; b summarized data for three patients with cavernous hemangioma; * exchange transfusion required; ** persistent EM, therefore patient treated after delivery with ceftriaxone 2 g i.v. for 15 days.

In the present study, 42/304 (13.8%) patients had an unfavorable outcome of pregnancy. However, several of these patients had a potential explanation for the unfavorable outcome (Table 2), and none of the tested parameters were associated with unfavorable pregnancy outcome (Table 3). Although our multivariable analyses showed an association between the week of pregnancy in which EM was diagnosed and unfavorable outcome, suggesting that patients infected earlier during pregnancy might have a higher risk of such an outcome, the diminishment of the odds of unfavorable outcome with the duration of pregnancy is an expected finding that is valid for the overall population of pregnant women. Thus, unfavorable outcome of pregnancy in women who had LB during pregnancy does not in any way signify that borrelia infection was the cause of the adverse result. Furthermore, the frequency of unfavorable outcome of pregnancy as found in the present study is comparable to the findings described in the literature for the general population, with the exception that the miscarriage rate in our study (11.6%) is somewhat lower than in the majority of previous reports (15–20%) [48,49,50,51] yet still in agreement with a Swedish study [51]. The findings of the present study are also in accord with the pregnancy outcomes reported for the general Slovenian population in the corresponding time frame [52], including miscarriage rate (11.6% in the present study versus 12% in the general population), preterm birth (7.2% versus 6.1%), and anomalies detected at birth (2.6% versus 1.7%). However, we would like to stress that we did not perform a cohort study, where all women enter the study at the beginning of their pregnancy, and therefore we did not attempt to analyze the approximate prevalence of unfavorable outcomes by trimester or to compare them with values observed in the overall population of pregnant women. In our study, pregnant women were enrolled at the gestation week when they were diagnosed with EM and left the study at delivery or at the gestation week of an unfavorable event. Consequently, women experiencing abortion or early delivery were less likely to be included in the sample of pregnant women diagnosed with EM compared with those who did not experience such unfavorable events. All but five pregnant women were treated for their EM with i.v. ceftriaxone for 14 days. According to current knowledge, this is clearly overtreatment of EM in non-pregnant and possibly also in pregnant women. However, 30 years ago, the understanding of LB was somewhat rudimentary, and information on the course and outcome of pregnancy in patients with early LB was limited to individual case reports, several of them indicating unfavorable outcomes after treatment of EM with oral antibiotics [3,10]. At that time, we decided on a treatment protocol that would achieve high enough levels of antibiotics not only in skin but also in the placenta and fetus; the decision being based on the premise that damage to the fetus probably results from the direct dissemination of borreliae or indirectly through damage to the placenta. In the years since, a concept has been developed in which the outcome of pregnancy with this treatment approach is similar to that in the general population [20]. However, because cases of LB during gestation are not numerous, we did not alter our approach and have been waiting to see whether studies from other research groups would confirm that the same outcome would follow oral antibiotic treatment, as recommended for EM in the non-pregnant population. A report published in 2010 (the most recent available information) states that the proportion of unfavorable pregnancy outcomes in patients with LB was the highest in patients who received no antibiotic treatment for their LB, followed by those who received oral antibiotics, and it was the lowest in patients treated with parenteral antibiotics [22]. The report, although it has several methodologic drawbacks, has influenced us to not change our treatment approach. The consequence of this “wait and watch” tactic is that we know that the outcome of pregnancies is relatively favorable using our treatment protocol, but we do not know whether the same results could be obtained with oral treatment, as is usually recommended for EM. Furthermore, since we did not demonstrate the direct detection of borreliae in fetal tissue or umbilical blood, etc., which is a substantial limitation of the present study, we do not know whether a relatively favorable outcome of pregnancy is the result of our efficacious antibiotic treatment or a consequence of very rare or perhaps even non-existent borrelial involvement in the offspring.

5. Conclusions

The course of early LB during pregnancy is milder than in age-matched non-pregnant women. The smaller proportion of pregnant patients reporting constitutional symptoms at the time of EM diagnosis might be the result of immunologic changes during gestation. The outcome of pregnancy with the treatment approach used in the present study (i.v. ceftriaxone 2 g once daily for 14 days) is favorable. Multivariable analyses showed that patients who develop EM in the early stages of pregnancy might have a higher risk of unfavorable outcome.
  44 in total

1.  A prospective longitudinal population-based study of clinical miscarriage in an urban Swedish population.

Authors:  F Blohm; B Fridén; I Milsom
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 6.531

2.  Lyme disease during pregnancy.

Authors:  L E Markowitz; A C Steere; J L Benach; J D Slade; C V Broome
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-06-27       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Lyme borreliosis: clinical case definitions for diagnosis and management in Europe.

Authors:  G Stanek; V Fingerle; K-P Hunfeld; B Jaulhac; R Kaiser; A Krause; W Kristoferitsch; S O'Connell; K Ornstein; F Strle; J Gray
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 8.067

4.  Treatment of erythema migrans in pregnancy.

Authors:  V Maraspin; J Cimperman; S Lotric-Furlan; D Pleterski-Rigler; F Strle
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Comparison of erythema migrans caused by Borrelia burgdorferi and Borrelia garinii.

Authors:  Franc Strle; Eva Ružić-Sabljić; Mateja Logar; Vera Maraspin; Stanka Lotrič-Furlan; Jože Cimperman; Katarina Ogrinc; Daša Stupica; Robert B Nadelman; John Nowakowski; Gary P Wormser
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.133

Review 6.  Lyme borreliosis.

Authors:  Gerold Stanek; Gary P Wormser; Jeremy Gray; Franc Strle
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Comparison of Clinical Course and Treatment Outcome for Patients With Early Disseminated or Early Localized Lyme Borreliosis.

Authors:  Daša Stupica; Vera Maraspin; Petra Bogovic; Katarina Ogrinc; Rok Blagus; Tjaša Cerar; Franc Strle
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 10.282

8.  [Early-stage lyme borreliosis during pregnancy: treatment in 15 women with erythema migrans].

Authors:  J Hercogová; M Tománková; D Frösslová; D Janovská
Journal:  Cesk Gynekol       Date:  1993-10

9.  Maternal-fetal transmission of the Lyme disease spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi.

Authors:  P A Schlesinger; P H Duray; B A Burke; A C Steere; M T Stillman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 10.  Factors associated with onset, relapses or progression in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kyla A McKay; Shayesteh Jahanfar; Tom Duggan; Stacey Tkachuk; Helen Tremlett
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 4.294

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of Lyme Disease in the United States and Europe.

Authors:  Adriana R Marques; Franc Strle; Gary P Wormser
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 6.883

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.