Literature DB >> 32720046

Assessment of Quality Outcomes and Learning Curve for Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive McKeown Esophagectomy.

Yang Yang1, Bin Li1, Rong Hua1, Xiaobin Zhang1, Haoyao Jiang1, Yifeng Sun1, Giulia Veronesi2,3, Sara Ricciardi4, Monica Casiraghi5, Marion Durand6, Raul Caso7, Inderpal S Sarkaria8, ZhiGang Li9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to identify the results of the quality assessment and the learning curve of robot-assisted minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy (RAMIE-MK).
METHODS: The study retrospectively reviewed the data of 400 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer who underwent RAMIE-MK by a single surgeon from November 2015 to March 2019. Cumulative summation analysis of the learning curve was performed. The patients were divided into decile cohorts of 40 cases to minimize demographic deviations and to maximize the power of detecting statistically significant changes in performance.
RESULTS: The 90-day mortality rate for all the patients was 0.5% (2 cases). The authors' experience was divided into the ascending phase (40 cases), the plateau phase (175 cases), and the descending phase (185 cases). After 40 cases, significant improvements in operative time (328 vs. 251 min; P = 0.019), estimated blood loss (350 vs. 200 ml; P = 0.031), and conversion rates (12.5% vs. 2.5%; P < 0.001) were observed. After 80 cases, a decrease in the rates of anastomotic leakage (22.5% vs. 8.1%; P = 0.001) and vocal cord palsy (31.3% vs. 18.4%; P = 0.024) was observed. The number of harvested lymph nodes increased after 40 cases (13 vs. 23; P < 0.001), especially for lymph nodes along the recurrent laryngeal nerve (3.0 vs. 6.0; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The learning phase of RAMIE-MK consists of 40 cases, and quality outcomes can be improved after 80 procedures. Several turning points related to the optimization of surgical outcomes can be used as benchmarks for surgeons performing RAMIE-MK.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32720046      PMCID: PMC8410169          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08857-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  1 in total

1.  A novel method for lymphadenectomy along the left laryngeal recurrent nerve during thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Yong Xi; Zhenkai Ma; Yaxing Shen; Hao Wang; Mingxiang Feng; Lijie Tan; Qun Wang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.895

  1 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Current status of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: what is the real benefit?

Authors:  Jun Kanamori; Masayuki Watanabe; Suguru Maruyama; Yasukazu Kanie; Daisuke Fujiwara; Kei Sakamoto; Akihiko Okamura; Yu Imamura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.540

2.  Operative outcomes and long-term survival of patients undergoing colon interposition after esophagectomy for cancer.

Authors:  Tomohiro Akutsu; Takeo Fujita; Daisuke Kajiyama; Asako Ozaki; Kazuma Sato; Hisashi Fujiwara; Takashi Kojima; Hiroyuki Daiko
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  Robot-assisted esophagectomy may improve perioperative outcome in patients with esophageal cancer - a single-center experience.

Authors:  Johanna Betzler; Lea Elfinger; Sylvia Büttner; Christel Weiß; Nuh Rahbari; Alexander Betzler; Christoph Reißfelder; Mirko Otto; Susanne Blank; Sebastian Schölch
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hao Chen; Yiyang Liu; Hao Peng; Rongchun Wang; Kang Wang; Demin Li
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 1.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.