Literature DB >> 32719751

Dissemination of Carbapenemases (KPC, NDM, OXA-48, IMP, and VIM) Among Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Isolated From Adult and Children Patients in China.

Renru Han1,2, Qingyu Shi1,2, Shi Wu1,2, Dandan Yin1,2, Mingjia Peng1,2, Dong Dong1,2, Yonggui Zheng1,2, Yan Guo1,2, Rong Zhang3, Fupin Hu1,2.   

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the dissemination and characteristics of bla KPC, bla NDM, bla OXA-48-like , bla IMP, and bla VIM among the carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) strains isolated from adult and children patients. A total of 935 non-duplicate CRE strains were collected from 36 hospitals in 24 provinces or cities across China from 2016 to 2018. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by broth microdilution method and carbapenemase genes bla KPC, bla NDM, bla OXA-48-like , bla IMP, and bla VIM were screened by PCR and confirmed by DNA sequencing. Overall, carbapenemases were produced in 97.4% (911/935) of CRE strains, including KPC-2 (51.6%, 482/935), NDM (35.7%, 334/935), and OXA-48-like carbapenemases (7.3%, 68/935). Overall, the most prevalent carbapenemase gene was bla KPC-2 among Klebsiella pneumoniae (64.6%, 457/709) and the CRE strains isolated from adult patients (70.3%, 307/437), and bla NDM among Escherichia coli (96.0%, 143/149) and the CRE strains from children (49.0%, 247/498). The bla OXA-232-positive carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (9.3%, 66/709) were all isolated from children. Sixteen strains were positive for bla IMP and 9 strains produced multiple carbapenemases. No strain was positive for bla VIM. Most of the CRE strains (>90%) were resistant to cephalosporins and carbapenems, more than half (>50%) were resistant to aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones, but the majority (95.8 and 98.4%) were susceptible to polymyxin B and tigecycline. Ceftazidime-avibactam showed excellent in vitro activity against bla KPC-2 and bla OXA-48-like positive strains (100% susceptible). In China, KPC-2, NDM, and OXA-48-like carbapenemases were predominant among CRE clinical isolates. The most prevalent carbapenemase gene was bla KPC-2 among K. pneumoniae isolates from adult patients, and bla NDM among E. coli isolates from children.
Copyright © 2020 Han, Shi, Wu, Yin, Peng, Dong, Zheng, Guo, Zhang, Hu and the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET) Study Group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blaIMP; blaKPC-2; blaNDM; blaOXA-48-like; carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32719751      PMCID: PMC7347961          DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol        ISSN: 2235-2988            Impact factor:   5.293


Introduction

Enterobacteriaceae are opportunistic pathogens causing severe hospital-acquired infections (Feil, 2016). The spread of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) has been a global threat to public health. Carbapenems have conventionally been used for treating infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, and are still considered as last resort antibiotics to date (van Duin and Doi, 2016). According to the data from China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET, www.chinets.com), the resistance rate of K. pneumoniae to meropenem and imipenem rapidly increased from 2.9 and 3.0% in 2005 to 26.3 and 25% in 2018, respectively. In Europe, carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae are most widespread in the Mediterranean and Balkan countries with a prevalence of 60% in Greece and 40% in Italy, respectively (Perez and Villegas, 2015; Feil, 2016). The production of carbapenemases including KPC, NDM, and OXA-48-like is the most common resistance mechanism among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates (Nordmann et al., 2012; Goodman et al., 2016). The blaKPC-positive Enterobacteriaceae were widespread in the United States, Latin America, Italy, Greece, the Middle East, and China (Albiger et al., 2015; Feil, 2016; Villegas et al., 2016; Iovleva and Doi, 2017). The blaNDM-positive Enterobacteriaceae were widespread in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Italy, Poland, Denmark, Latin America, and African countries (Yong et al., 2009; Albiger et al., 2015; van Duin and Doi, 2016). The blaOXA−48−like-positive strains remained rare in the US, in contrast to the prevalence in Turkey, Spain, France, Belgium, Romania, Middle East, Africa, Asia, and South America as well (Albiger et al., 2015). These infections are usually associated with very poor prognosis and high mortality, especially in neonates or high-risk immunocompromised patients (Falagas et al., 2014; Feil, 2016). In China, the presence of blaKPC and blaNDM is responsible for phenotypic resistance in most of the CRE strains (Zhang et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2018). Most researches currently focus on the dissemination of carbapenemases among CRE strains isolated from adult patients, while only a few are available to investigate the distribution of carbapenemases among CRE strains isolated from children. To obtain the comprehensive characteristic of carbapenemases among CRE isolated from both adults and children patients in China, we conducted this study to characterize the dissemination and characteristics of carbapenemases (including KPC, NDM OXA-48, IMP, and VIM) among CRE clinical isolates and the susceptibility to antimicrobial agents.

Materials and Methods

Clinical Strains

From January 2016 to December 2018, a total of 935 non-duplicate sequential CRE strains were collected from 36 hospitals in 24 provinces or cities across China (Figure 1), including K. pneumoniae (n = 709, 75.8%), E. coli (n = 149, 15.9%), Enterobacter cloacae (n = 36, 3.9%), Citrobacter freundii (n = 14, 1.5%), Serratia marcescens (n = 8, 0.9%), Enterobacter aerogenes (n = 7, 0.7%), Klebsiella oxytoca (n = 7, 0.7%), Morganella morganii (n = 3, 0.3%), Proteus vulgaris (n = 1, 0.1%), Providencia rettgeri (n = 1, 0.1%). In this study, 46.7% (437/935) of CRE strains were collected from adult patients and 53.3% (498/935) from children patients. The Enterobacteriaceae strains resistant to at least one of the carbapenem antibiotics (ertapenem, meropenem, doripenem, or imipenem) or producing a carbapenemase (an enzyme that can make them resistant to carbapenem antibiotics) were defined as CRE by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of USA (https://www.cdc.gov/hai/organisms/cre/technical-info.html#Definition). These CRE strains were isolated from sputum (27.5%), blood (27.1%), urine (17.0%), secreta (6.9%), bile (5.0%), ascites (3.2%), catheter (2.8%), drainage (2.8%), pus (1.4%) and other aseptic body fluid (6.4%). Species identification was confirmed by MALDI-TOF/MS system (bioMérieux, France). E. coli ATCC 25922, E. coli ATCC 35218, and K. pneumoniae ATCC 700603 were tested as the quality control strains for antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
Figure 1

The map of CRE clinical strains collected from 24 provinces or cities in China.

The map of CRE clinical strains collected from 24 provinces or cities in China.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST)

AST was performed by the broth microdilution method recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of piperacillin, cefoperazone-sulbactam, piperacillin-tazobactam, cefazolin, cefuroxime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime-avibactam, cefepime, cefmetazole, aztreonam, ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem, amikacin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, polymyxin B, nitrofurantoin, tigecycline were determined. The MIC breakpoints for Enterobacteriaceae (susceptible, ≤2 mg/L; resistant, ≥8 mg/L) issued by the Food and Drug Administration were used as the breakpoints for tigecycline.

Detection of Carbapenemase and mcr-1 Genes

All the CRE strains were tested for the presence of the most common carbapenemase genes (blaKPC, blaNDM, blaOXA-48-, blaIMP, and blaVIM) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with specific primers and conditions as described previously (Poirel et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2016). The colistin resistance gene mcr-1 was also detected by PCR, as previously described (Liu et al., 2016). The positive PCR amplicons were sequenced and compared with the reported sequences from GenBank by Blast (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/).

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the epidemiologic characteristics of CRE strains. For categorical variables, the percentage of CRE strains in each category was calculated. All analyses were performed using WHONET (version 5.6) and the IBM SPSS Statistics (version 21).

Results

In vitro Antimicrobial Susceptibility

Most of the CRE strains (>90%) were resistant to cephalosporins, piperacillin, cefoperazone-sulbactam, piperacillin-tazobactam, aztreonam, and carbapenems. Overall, 61.4, 50.1, and 45.2% of the strains were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam, amikacin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, respectively, followed by gentamicin (31.8%), levofloxacin (22.9%), ciprofloxacin (19%), and nitrofurantoin (18.8%). Polymyxin B and tigecycline showed excellent antibacterial activity against CRE strains (95.8 and 98.4% susceptible, respectively) (Table 1). Ceftazidime-avibactam had potent activity against both KPC-2-producing and OXA-48-like producing Enterobacteriaceae (100% susceptible) and inhibited all of blaKPC-2-positive and blaOXA-48--positive strains at 8 mg/L. However, all NDM-producing Enterobacteriaceae were resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC90 > 32 mg/L). The MICs of ceftazidime-avibactam were higher than 32 mg/L against IMP- and multi-carbapenemase producing Enterobacteriaceae (KPC and NDM co-producers, NDM and OXA-48 co-producer). Most of the blaNDM-positive strains were susceptible to amikacin (86.2% susceptible) (Table 1).
Table 1

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing results of clinical CRE strains (MICs, mg/L).

Antimicrobial agentAll CRE (n = 935)KPC-producers (n = 482)NDM-producers (n = 334)OXA-48-like producers (n = 68)
MICMIC50MIC90%R%SMIC50MIC90%R%SMIC50MIC90%R%SMIC50MIC90%R%S
range
Piperacillin4->256>256>25698.90.9>256>25699.40.2>256>25699.70.3>256>2561000
Cefoperazone-sulbactam1->128>128>12898.31.2>128>12898.11.2>128>12899.40>128>1281000
Piperacillin-tazobactam2->256>256>25697.21.5>256>25698.80.6>256>25699.40>256>2561000
Cefazolin32->32>32>321000>32>321000>32>321000>32>321000
Cefuroxime2->64>64>6499.90.1>64>641000>64>641000>64>641000
Ceftazidime0.5->32>32>3298.60.7>32>3298.10.8>32>3299.70>32>321000
Ceftriaxone0.12-64>32>3299.40.6>32>3299.40.6>32>3299.70.3>32>321000
Ceftazidime-avibactam0.25->322>3238.661.4240100>32>3210000.540100
Cefepime0.25->32>32>3298.10.9>32>3297.91>32>3299.40>32>321000
Cefmetazole1->64>64>6492.74.5>64>6492.35.6>64>6497.61.264>6473.513.2
Aztreonam0.25->128>128>12893.24.2>128>128990.8>128>12885.37.8>128>1281000
Ertapenem0.25->32>32>3298.91>32>32991>32>3299.70.3>32>321000
Imipenem0.12->16>16>1696.12.1>16>1699.20.616>1699.40.3>16>1673.517.6
Meropenem0.12->16>16>16971.9>16>1698.11.5>16>1699.70.3>16>1685.34.4
Amikacin1->12816>12849.650.1>128>12869.729.91>12813.886.2>128>1281000
Gentamicin1->128128>12867.931.8>128>12883.816112840.459.3>128>1281000
Ciprofloxacin0.06->8>8>878.419>8>895.63.78>853.641.3>8>81000
Levofloxacin0.06->16>16>1676.322.9>16>1694.64.84>1649.449.7>16>161000
Trimethoprim- Sulfamethoxazole0.25->3232>3254.845.21>3247.952.1>32>3254.545.5>32>321000
Polymyxin B0.125->160.251495.80.2514.495.40.2513.696.10.50.51.598.5
Nitrofurantoin4->128>128>12864.118.8>128>12892.94.664>12822.841.9128>12864.78.8
Tigecycline0.12–80.520.398.40.520.497.70.510.399.1120100

CRE, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae; MIC.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing results of clinical CRE strains (MICs, mg/L). CRE, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae; MIC.

Prevalence of blaKPC, blaNDM, blaOXA-48, blaIMP, and blaVIM Carbapenemase and mcr-1 Genes

Carbapenemase gene was positive in 97.4% (911/935) of the CRE strains, including blaKPC-2 in 51.6% (482/935), blaNDM in 35.7% (334/935), blaOXA-48- in 7.3% (68/935), blaIMP in 1.7% (16/935), blaKPC and blaNDM in 1.0% (9/935), blaNDM-24 and blaOXA-48 in 0.1% (1/935), blaNDM-1 and blaIMP-4 in 0.1% (1/935) of the strains (Table 2). KPC-2 was the most prevalent carbapenemase among K. pneumoniae (64.5%, 457/709) and S. marcescens (100%, 8/8) strains. NDM-5 was the predominant type carbapenemase among E. coli (74.5%, 111/149), E. cloacae (66.7%, 24/36) and C. freundii (64.3%, 9/14). Among all OXA-48-like producing K. pneumoniae, PCR and DNA sequencing results showed the presence of blaOXA-232 (97.1%, 66/68) and blaOXA-48 (2.9%, 2/68) (Table 2).
Table 2

Prevalence of different carbapenemase genes among 935 CRE strains.

SpeciesStrains tested, NblaKPC-2, n (%)blaNDM, n (%)blaOXA-48-like, n (%)blaIMP, n (%)Two genes, n (%)Any gene, n (%)
K. pneumoniae709457 (64.5)blaNDM-1, 64 (9.0)blaOXA-48, 2 (0.3)blaIMP-4, 6 (0.8)blaKPC-2+blaNDM-1, 6 (0.8)693 (97.7)
blaNDM-5, 85 (12.0)blaOXA-232, 66 (9.3)blaIMP-69, 3 (0.4)blaKPC-2+blaNDM-5, 1 (0.1)
blaNDM-3, 1 (0.1)blaNDM-1+blaIMP-4, 1 (0.1)
blaNDM-24+blaOXA-48, 1 (0.1)
E. coli1494 (2.7)blaNDM-1, 31 (20.8)147 (98.7)
blaNDM-5, 111 (74.5)
blaNDM-3, 1 (0.7)
E. cloacae363 (8.3)blaNDM-1, 24 (66.7)blaIMP-4, 4 (11.1)blaKPC-2+blaNDM-1, 1 (2.8)36 (100)
blaNDM-5, 3 (8.3)blaIMP-6, 1 (2.8)
C. freundii143 (21.4)blaNDM-1, 9 (64.3)12 (85.7)
S. marcescens88 (100)8 (100)
E. aerogenes71 (14.3)blaNDM-1, 1 (14.3)3 (42.9)
blaNDM-5, 1 (14.3)
K. oxytoca73 (42.9)blaNDM-1, 2 (28.6)blaIMP-4, 1 (14.3)blaKPC-2+blaNDM-1, 1 (14.3)7 (100)
M. morganii32 (66.7)blaNDM-1, 1 (33.3)3 (100)
P. vulgaris11 (100)1 (100)
P. rettgeri1blaIMP-4, 1 (100)1 (100)
Total935482 (51.6)334 (35.7)68 (7.3)16 (1.7)11 (1.2)911 (97.4)

CRE, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.

Prevalence of different carbapenemase genes among 935 CRE strains. CRE, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Of the CRE strains isolated from adult patients, 70.3% (307/437) were KPC-2-producers; 20.6% (90/437) were NDM-producers (including 12.1% of NDM-1-producers, 8.2% of NDM-5-producers, and 0.2% of NDM-3-producer); and 0.5% (2/437) were OXA-48-producers (Table 3, Figure 2) (P < 0.01). However, of the CRE strains isolated from children, 49.0% (244/498) were NDM-producers (including 32.9% of NDM-5-producers, 15.9% of NDM-1-producers and 0.2% of NDM-3-producer); 35.1% (175/498) were KPC-2-producers and 13.3% (66/498) were OXA-232-producers (Table 3, Figure 2) (P < 0.01). The blaOXA-232-positive K. pneumoniae were only isolated from children patients while blaOXA-48-positive K. pneumoniae were isolated from adults. One polymyxin B resistant E. coli was positive for mcr-1 with co-producing blaNDM-5.
Table 3

Distribution of different carbapenemase genes in 935 CRE strains isolated from adults and children patients.

Carbapenemase genesAll CRE, n (%)E. coli, n (%)K. pneumoniae, n (%)
From childrenFrom adultsFrom childrenFrom adultsFrom childrenFrom adults
blaKPC-2175 (35.1)307 (70.3)3 (2.8)1 (2.3)169 (44.7)288 (87.0)
blaNDM-179 (15.9)53 (12.1)21 (19.8)10 (23.3)50 (13.2)14 (4.2)
blaNDM-5164 (32.9)36 (8.2)82 (77.4)29 (67.4)81 (21.4)4 (1.2)
blaNDM-31 (0.2)1 (0.2)1 (2.3)1 (0.3)
blaOXA-482 (0.5)2 (0.6)
blaOXA-23266 (13.3)66 (17.5)
blaIMP-43 (0.6)9 (2.1)2 (0.5)4 (1.2)
blaIMP-61 (0.2)
blaIMP-692 (0.4)1 (0.2)2 (0.5)1 (0.3)
blaKPC-2+blaNDM-12 (0.4)6 (1.4)1 (0.3)5 (1.5)
blaKPC-2+blaNDM-51 (0.2)1 (0.3)
blaNDM-1+ blaIMP-41 (0.2)1 (0.3)
blaNDM-24+ blaOXA-481 (0.2)1 (0.3)
Others5 (1.0)19 (4.3)2 (4.7)5 (1.3)11 (3.3)
Total49843710643378331

CRE, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.

Figure 2

Carbapenemase distribution among the carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae strains isolated from adult and children patients.

Distribution of different carbapenemase genes in 935 CRE strains isolated from adults and children patients. CRE, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Carbapenemase distribution among the carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae strains isolated from adult and children patients.

Discussion

Previous studies have proved that the presence of carbapenemase genes, including blaKPC-2 and blaNDM, was the major mechanism of carbapenem resistance among CRE strains in China, which were the most prevalent in K. pneumoniae and E. coli, respectively (Zhang et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2018). However, the researches on CRE strains isolated from children patients are limited in China. This study provided a comprehensive and updated carbapenemase profile of 935 CRE strains isolated from both adult and children patients. We found that blaKPC-2 (51.6%) and blaNDM (35.7%) were the most common carbapenemase genes among CRE strains, while the emergence of blaOXA-232, blaIMP, and other multi-carbapenemase genes have been increasing in recent years. KPC-2 was the most frequently detected carbapenemase gene in K. pneumoniae, while NDM was the most prevalent one in E. coli. This pattern in China is significantly different from that in Europe. In Europe, the prevalence of OXA-48-like producing Enterobacteriaceae was 38% (333/927), next to KPC- (42%, 393/927), but higher than NDM-producing Enterobacteriaceae (12%, 113/927) (Grundmann et al., 2017). The distribution of carbapenemase-producers also varied with bacterial species. In K. pneumoniae, KPC-producers were the most prevalent, followed by OXA-48-like (37%, 310/850) and NDM-producers (11%, 93/850). In E. coli, OXA-48-like producers were the most prevalent (56%, 43/77), followed by NDM- (26%, 20/77) and KPC-producers (18%, 14/77). K. pneumoniae and E. coli were the two main species in China with a ratio of 5:1 (4:1 in children, 8:1 in adults) in this study, which differed from the prevalence trends (ratio of 11:1) in EuSCAPE (Grundmann et al., 2017). Notably, KPC-2-producers were widespread in adult patients, followed by NDM-producers, while NDM-producers were prevalent in children patients, followed by KPC-2- and OXA-48-like producers. These findings described the different patterns of carbapenemases among CRE strains from adults and children. In contrast to the previous finding that NDM-1 was the most common carbapenemase among children patients, we have found that NDM-5-producers (32.9%) were most frequently detected CRE strains from children (Tian et al., 2018; Yin et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018). The outbreak of NDM-5-producing ST48 K. pneumoniae was first reported in Shanghai (Tian et al., 2018). We speculated that outbreak of NDM-5-producers accounted for the spread of NDM-5 among children patients in this study (Tian et al., 2018; Li et al., 2020). Further study is needed to track the type of plasmids harboring these carbapenemase genes. Unlike the previous report that few OXA-48-like producing Enterobacteriaceae (0.1%, 2/1801) were detected in China from 2012 to 2016 (Wang et al., 2018), we found 7.3% (68/935) OXA-48-like producing K. pneumoniae between 2016 and 2018. Since the first OXA-232-producing K. pneumoniae isolated from neonate in 2017, the outbreaks of OXA-232-producing Enterobacteriaceae have been successively reported in children patients (Yin et al., 2017; Tian et al., 2018). Subsequently, 10 strains of OXA-232-producing K. pneumoniae were isolated from elderly patients in the intensive care unit in 2019 and the blaOXA-232 was located in a 6.1-kb ColKP3-type non-conjugative plasmid, which was highly similar to the pkNICU5 first reported (similarity about 99%) in 2017 (Yin et al., 2017; Shu et al., 2019). We speculated that the presence of blaOXA-232 on a mobile element and its spread among different strains were responsible for the recent dissemination of OXA-232-producing Enterobacteriaceae, which would make it possible to become the “third epidemic” carbapenemase after KPC-2 and NDM in China (Yin et al., 2017; Tian et al., 2018). All of the CRE strains were highly resistant to cephalosporins, carbapenems, aminoglycosides, and fluoroquinolones but susceptible to polymyxin B and tigecycline. Ceftazidime-avibactam, launched last year in China, showed excellent in vitro antibacterial activity against both KPC-2- and OXA-48-like producers, but not active against metallo-β-lactamases producers. Most (86.2%) of NDM-producers were susceptible to amikacin. In addition, we found a blaNDM-5 and mcr-1 co-harboring E. coli resistant to polymyxin B. These findings limited the utility of ceftazidime-avibactam and polymyxin B and prompted the development of novel or combinational therapies to combat CRE strains. For example, aztreonam plus meropenem-vaborbactam and aztreonam plus ceftazidime-avibactam showed good antibacterial activity against NDM- and non-OXA-48-like producing Enterobacteriaceae (Biagi et al., 2019). The combination of colistin and amikacin showed consistently bactericidal against NDM-5-bearing mcr-1-positive E. coli, which might be an alternative therapeutic option for the treatment of lethal infections (Zhou et al., 2017).

Conclusions

In conclusion, KPC-2, NDM, and OXA-48-like enzymes were the most prevalent carbapenemases among CRE clinical isolates in China. The most prevalent carbapenemase gene was blaKPC-2 among K. pneumoniae isolated from adult patients, and blaNDM among E. coli isolates from both children and adult patients. The blaOXA-232 was only detected among K. pneumoniae isolates from children.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher.

Ethics Statement

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Huashan Hospital, Fudan University (Number: 2018-408).

Author Contributions

FH and RZ designed the study. RH, QS, SW, and MP performed the experimental work. RH and DY collected the data. FH analyzed the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer YY declared a shared affiliation with one of the authors RZ to the handling editor at time of review.
  23 in total

1.  Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Europe: assessment by national experts from 38 countries, May 2015.

Authors:  Barbara Albiger; Corinna Glasner; Marc J Struelens; Hajo Grundmann; Dominique L Monnet
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2015

Review 2.  Infection control implications of heterogeneous resistance mechanisms in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE).

Authors:  K E Goodman; P J Simner; P D Tamma; A M Milstone
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 5.091

3.  Multiplex PCR for detection of acquired carbapenemase genes.

Authors:  Laurent Poirel; Timothy R Walsh; Vincent Cuvillier; Patrice Nordmann
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 2.803

4.  Clonal Dissemination of OXA-232 Carbapenemase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in Neonates.

Authors:  Dandan Yin; Dong Dong; Ke Li; Lei Zhang; Jianliang Liang; Yang Yang; Nana Wu; Yiyan Bao; Chuanqing Wang; Fupin Hu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  The global epidemiology of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  David van Duin; Yohei Doi
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 5.882

6.  Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: Data From a Longitudinal Large-scale CRE Study in China (2012-2016).

Authors:  Qi Wang; Xiaojuan Wang; Juan Wang; Pengwen Ouyang; Chunmei Jin; Ruobing Wang; Yawei Zhang; Longyang Jin; Hongbin Chen; Zhanwei Wang; Feifei Zhang; Bin Cao; Liangyi Xie; Kang Liao; Bing Gu; Chunxia Yang; Zhiwu Liu; Xiaobo Ma; Liang Jin; Xiaoqian Zhang; Sijin Man; Wei Li; Fengyan Pei; Xiuli Xu; Yan Jin; Ping Ji; Hui Wang
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Searching for the Optimal Treatment for Metallo- and Serine-β-Lactamase Producing Enterobacteriaceae: Aztreonam in Combination with Ceftazidime-avibactam or Meropenem-vaborbactam.

Authors:  M Biagi; T Wu; M Lee; S Patel; D Butler; E Wenzler
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Characterization and Clinical Impact of Bloodstream Infection Caused by Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae in Seven Latin American Countries.

Authors:  Maria Virginia Villegas; Christian J Pallares; Kevin Escandón-Vargas; Cristhian Hernández-Gómez; Adriana Correa; Carlos Álvarez; Fernando Rosso; Lorena Matta; Carlos Luna; Jeannete Zurita; Carlos Mejía-Villatoro; Eduardo Rodríguez-Noriega; Carlos Seas; Manuel Cortesía; Alfonso Guzmán-Suárez; Manuel Guzmán-Blanco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Nationwide Surveillance of Clinical Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) Strains in China.

Authors:  Rong Zhang; Lizhang Liu; Hongwei Zhou; Edward Waichi Chan; Jiaping Li; Ying Fang; Yi Li; Kang Liao; Sheng Chen
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 8.143

10.  Emergence of an NDM-5-Producing Escherichia coli Sequence Type 410 Clone in Infants in a Children's Hospital in China.

Authors:  Jun Li; Ting Yu; Xiao-Yan Tao; Yong-Mei Hu; Hai-Chen Wang; Jian-Long Liu; Hai-Jian Zhou; Ming-Xiang Zou
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 4.003

View more
  47 in total

1.  In Vitro Activity of Cefepime-Zidebactam, Ceftazidime-Avibactam, and Other Comparators against Clinical Isolates of Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii: Results from China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET) in 2018.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Yan Guo; Dandan Yin; Yonggui Zheng; Shi Wu; Demei Zhu; Fupin Hu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Epidemiology and Genomic Characteristics of Bloodstream Infection Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae With Decreased Susceptibility to Aztreonam/Avibactam in China.

Authors:  Wei Yu; Ping Shen; Yunbo Chen; Kai Zhou; Xiaohui Chi; Yonghong Xiao
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 6.073

3.  Molecular epidemiological characteristics of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae among children in China.

Authors:  Zhengjiang Jin; Zhenhui Wang; Lin Gong; Lu Yi; Nian Liu; Lan Luo; Wenting Gong
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 4.126

4.  Detection of NDM-1-Positive Aeromonas caviae from Bacteremia by Using Whole-Genome Sequencing.

Authors:  Xiaohui Chi; Hao Xu; Shuguang Xu; Jinjing Tu; Liang Zhang; Yinv Chen; Xiaoqi Dong
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.177

5.  Prevalence of KPC-producing bacteria in negative gram of clinical samples obtained from patients.

Authors:  Ali Kharazmkia; Mehran Amirizadeh; Zahra Goudarzi; Mehdi Birjandi; Alireza Barfipoursalar; Samareh Mir
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-04-29

6.  Multiple Novel Ceftazidime-Avibactam-Resistant Variants of blaKPC-2-Positive Klebsiella pneumoniae in Two Patients.

Authors:  Qingyu Shi; Renru Han; Yan Guo; Yang Yang; Shi Wu; Li Ding; Rong Zhang; Dandan Yin; Fupin Hu
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-05-19

7.  Characterization of the First Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudocitrobacter faecalis Harboring blaOXA-181 in China.

Authors:  Qingyu Shi; Yan Guo; Yang Yang; Shi Wu; Renru Han; Li Ding; Dandan Yin; Fupin Hu
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-30

8.  Molecular characteristics of global β-lactamase-producing Enterobacter cloacae by genomic analysis.

Authors:  Jincao Hu; Jia Li; Chang Liu; Yan Zhang; Hui Xie; Chuchu Li; Han Shen; Xiaoli Cao
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 4.465

9.  Prevalence and characterisation of carbapenemase encoding genes in multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  Sayran Hamad Haji; Safaa Toma Hanna Aka; Fattma A Ali
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Evaluation of the Immunochromatographic NG-Test Carba 5, RESIST-5 O.O.K.N.V., and IMP K-SeT for Rapid Detection of KPC-, NDM-, IMP-, VIM-type, and OXA-48-like Carbapenemase Among Enterobacterales.

Authors:  Renru Han; Yan Guo; Mingjia Peng; Qingyu Shi; Shi Wu; Yang Yang; Yonggui Zheng; Dandan Yin; Fupin Hu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.