| Literature DB >> 32719668 |
Paul Loubet1, Jérémy Ranfaing2, Aurélien Dinh3, Catherine Dunyach-Remy2, Louis Bernard4,5, Franck Bruyère4,6, Jean-Philippe Lavigne2, Albert Sotto1.
Abstract
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) mainly caused by Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC), are common bacterial infections. Many individuals suffer from chronically recurring UTIs, sometimes requiring long-term prophylactic antibiotic regimens. The global emergence of multi-drug resistant uropathogens in the last decade underlines the need for alternative non-antibiotic therapeutic and preventative strategies against UTIs. The research on non-antibiotic therapeutic options in UTIs has focused on the following phases of the pathogenesis: colonization, adherence of pathogens to uroepithelial cell receptors and invasion. In this review, we discuss vaccines, small compounds, nutraceuticals, immunomodulating agents, probiotics and bacteriophages, highlighting the challenges each of these approaches face. Most of these treatments show interesting but only preliminary results. Lactobacillus-containing products and cranberry products in conjunction with propolis have shown the most robust results to date and appear to be the most promising new alternative to currently used antibiotics. Larger efficacy clinical trials as well as studies on the interplay between non-antibiotic therapies, uropathogens and the host immune system are warranted.Entities:
Keywords: alternative therapeutics; bacteriophages; cranberry; immunomodulating agents; nutraceuticals; probiotics; urinary tract infection; vaccines
Year: 2020 PMID: 32719668 PMCID: PMC7350282 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01509
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Non-antibiotic therapeutic options for the treatment of urinary tract infections.
| Therapeutic options | References | Mechanism | Benefits | Drawbacks |
| Targeting adhesion | ( | • Block the liaison adhesin-host cell receptor (pili vaccine) • Reduction of adhesion and protection against cystitis (FimH vaccine) | • Decrease the bacterial colonization • Protection of the bladder and the kidneys | • Heterogeneity of the proteins of the bacterial membrane |
| Targeting capsule | ( | • Promising animal model results | • No human studies • Great heterogeneity in antigen used making creation of a vaccine with broad protection difficult | |
| Targeting toxins | ( | • Reduction of renal injury | • Decrease virulence | • No long-term protection |
| Targeting iron metabolism | ( | • Effective immunologic reaction against specific molecules | • Protection of the bladder and the kidneys • Reduce UTI recurrence | • Cannot target all UPEC strains (heterogeneity of the targets) |
| Pillicide | ( | • Prevent the formation of pili • Decrease the expression of genes related to fimbriae | • Reduce adhesion, virulence and biofilm formation of UPEC | • No |
| Mannoside | ( | • Diminution of bladder colonization • Orally bioavailable | • Reduction of the adhesion | • Clinical study in progress |
| Hydroxamic acid | ( | • Prevent urine alkalization | • Prevent the formation of urinary stones • Decrease bladder inflammation | • Side effects (mutagenic power) |
| Phenyl phosphoramidates | ( | • Prevent urine alkalization | • Prevent the formation of urinary stones • Decrease bladder inflammation | • Poor stability |
| Capsule inhibitor | ( | • Reduce biofilm formation | • Affects a large proportion of UPEC strains | • Antigenicity in human • Poor bioavailability • Conflicting results |
| Cranberry | ( | • Reduction of adhesion, motility, and biofilm formation | • Impacts UPEC strains and also | • Conflicting results |
| Hyaluronic acid | ( | • Reduction of adhesion | • Promising results in humans | • Only retrospective studies |
| D-mannose | ( | • Reduction of adhesion | • Fast effect after oral administration | • Conflicting results |
| Galabiose | ( | • Reduction of adhesion | • Diminution of kidney infections | • Not enough |
| Chinese Medical Herb and other plants | ( | • Reduction of adhesion | • Reduction of UTI recurrences | • Small size studies • Little safety data |
| COX-2 inhibitor | ( | • Reduction of inflammation linked to cystitis | • Substantial reduction of UTI recurrences | • No significant results in clinical trials |
| Green Tea Extract | ( | • Reduction of inflammation | • Reduction of UTI recurrences | • Mechanisms of action unclear • Not proved in humans |
| Vaginal lactobacilli | ( | • Competition, reduction of adhesion and virulence | • Natural production of antimicrobial compounds • No known side effects | • Not enough |
| ( | • Colonization of the bladder by avirulent strain | • Reduction of UPEC colonization | • Not enough inclusions in clinical studies | |
| Predatory bacteria | ( | • Decrease of bacterial number and biofilm formation | • Efficient against Gram-negative bacteria | • Not yet tested to treat UTIs |
| ( | • Direct bacteria killing | • Interesting animal models and human case reports. | • More human studies are required | |
FIGURE 1Recapitulative scheme of the alternative therapeutic options against UPEC. CHM: Chinese Herbal Medicine.