| Literature DB >> 32718266 |
Baskaran Chandrasekaran1, Thiru Balaji Ganesan2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Though viewed as a critical measure to prevent the spread of the virus, a prolonged homestay may result in unfavourable sedentary behaviour and chronic disease risk. This systematic review focuses on sedentary behaviour resulting from this quarantine period which may elevate the cardiovascular disease risk, obesity, hypertension, cancer and mental health illness.Entities:
Keywords: Sitting; cardiovascular disease; chronic disease; exercise; obesity; physical activity
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32718266 PMCID: PMC8685753 DOI: 10.1177/0036933020946336
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Scott Med J ISSN: 0036-9330 Impact factor: 0.729
Table showing the studies included in the systematic review and the key findings.
| References | Country | Objective | Design | Participants | Method | Sedentary behaviour measurement | Key findings | Physiology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| Megan Crowe et al.[ | Canada | To find out the risk associated with combined MVPA and screen time on overweight or obesity | Cross-sectional study | 9913 students of 7–12 grades | MVPA (active >60 min/day; inactive <60 min/day) and sedentary (>2 h of screen time; not sedentary (<2 h of screen time) were related with overweight and obesity | Sedentary > 2 h screen time/day; not sedentary < 2 h/day (questionnaire) | The inactive and sedentary the group was likely to have overweight or obesity than the active and not sedentary group (OR = 1.71; 95% CI, 1.26–2.32) | The body composition and energy expenditure were the possible reasons |
| Saeidifard et al.[ | USA | To find out the differences in EE between sitting and standing | Systematic review and meta-analysis | 46 studies (1184 participants) | The literature was searched until June 2017 for studies involving EE between sitting and standing in non-pregnant adults | EE was measured using accelerometers and indirect calorimeters | The mean difference in EE between standing and standing was 0.15 kcal/min (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12–0.17) | Sitting reduces muscle recruitment and reduces the EE. Postures other than sitting improves NEAT and reduces obesity |
| Henson et al.[ | United Kingdom | To examine associations between sedentary time and adiposity | A nested study from a large RCT | 124 participants at the risk of diabetes | Accelerometers objectively measured sedentary time and MRI measured adiposity | Accelerometer (Actigraph) | Sixty minutes of sedentary time was adversely associated with 1.74 L higher total abdominal fat, 0.62 L higher visceral fat, 1.14 L higher subcutaneous fat, and 1.86% higher liver fat. | Partially explained by excess visceral fat, in which non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA), glycerol, and hormones released from adipose tissue |
|
| ||||||||
| Lavie et al.[ | USA | To establish the relationship between cardiovascular outcomes and physical inactivity | Scoping review | Heterogenous population. 15 studies (4,58,879 men & 4,66,106 women) | The study reviewed several studies and elaborated the physiological mechanisms relating to chronic diseases and physical inactivity | Heterogenous measurement: subjective and objective measures | • Fit men were found to have reduced mortality by 52% then unfit men | Reduced mitochondrial content and respiration, increased inflammation in skeletal muscles, β adrenergic receptor desensitization |
| Carter et al.[ | Netherlands | To review the studies establishing the relation between cardiometabolic risk and prolonged sitting | Scoping review | Eight studies(198 participants) | Several studies were reviewed. The cardiometabolic outcomes were associated with the physical inactivity or prolonged sitting bouts | Not mentioned | Sitting reduces flow-mediated dilatation by 2.2%; inflammatory cytokines increased, endothelial shear 2.2% ± 2.15% | Endothelial stress, cardiac remodelling and endurance, inflammatory markers (IL-6, IL-12), adiposity and atherogenesis |
|
| ||||||||
| Rangul et al.[ | Norway | To examine the association between physical activity and sitting time with cancer incidence | Prospective study | 8,154 healthy participants from the Norwegian community | adults in the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT) followed up for 17–19 years for cancer incidence | Sitting time was measured subjectively through the questionnaire | • sitting ≥eight hr/day was associated with 22% (95% CI, 1.05–1.42) higher risk of prostate cancer compared to sitting <8 h/day. | Possibly attributed to insulin resistance, adiponectin levels, insulin-like growth factors testosterone, muscle- and fat-related proteins as follistatin, myostatin, activin and inhibin. |
| Nguyen et al.[ | USA | To see whether sedentary behaviour related to colorectal cancer incidence | Cross-sectional study | 89,278 women in the Nurses' Health Study II ages 25–42 years | The participants from Nurses' Health Study II ages 25–42 years (1991–2011) were assessed for sedentary behaviour and colorectal cancer | TV viewing time through the questionnaire | If TV viewing hours is more than 7 hours increased the risk of colorectal cancer (RR:1.25). If more than 14 hours of RR increased by 1.69. Inspite of cumulative exercise, prolonged sitting time increases the risk of colorectal cancer | unbroken sitting results in extended exposure to faecal carcinogens, such as secondary bile acids, impair glucose homeostasis and decrease vitamin D levels |
| Lynch et al.[ | Canada | To systematically review studies examining associations of sedentary behaviourwith cancer risk | Systematic review and meta-analysis | 176 studies were retrieved investigating the effect on adiposity, sex hormones, inflammation and metabolic function | Literature search on peer-reviewed databases with SB and cancer risk. Also, the study investigated other health risks in cancer survivors. | 95% of the studies measured SB through subjective measures | A significant association between SB time and cancer risk factors (OR 1.02 – 1.17). TV times were found significantly related to cancer risk and early mortality | SB increases adiposity, sex hormones, inflammation and metabolic dysfunction predisposing to cancer |
|
| ||||||||
| Asvold et al.[ | Norway | To find whether prolonged sitting is a risk for diabetes | Prospective trial | 28,051 adult participants of the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (the HUNT Study) were followed for diabetes incidence from 1995–1997 to 2006–2008 (11 years) | The trial used the HUNT2 Survey as the baseline risk factor examination. Diabetes risk was assessed at 11 years follow-up Self-reported sitting time | Sitting time was estimated from the questionnaires | • Sitting ≥ eight hr/day was associated with a 17% higher risk of developing diabetes compared with sitting ≤four hr/day. | Hyperinsulinemia, postprandial hyperglycaemia, impaired glucose tolerance was observed. |
| Yates et al.[ | United Kingdom | To investigate whether prolonged sitting or any interruption alter the postprandial glycemia | Cross over randomized trial | 60 participants (30 south Asians and 30 Europeans) | Sitting, sitting with interruptions was administered and postprandial blood glucose was measured | Objective measure through accelerometer (ActivPAL) | insulin response was reduced by 22.4 (12.4, 32.4) mU/L (27%) during walking breaks compared to prolonged sitting | Possible mechanisms were insulin sensitivity and GLUT4 transporters sensitivity |
|
| ||||||||
| Dale et al.[ | Canada | To examine the relationship between physical activity and mental health outcomes | Systematic review | 32 studies were included | Studies were searched until 2017 relating physical activity and self-esteem, anxiety and depression | Included both subjective and objective measures of physical activity included | Studies showed physical activity is inversely related to depression, anxiety and directly related to self-esteem | Self-esteem has found to reduce anxiety and depression. Possibly by endorphins and autonomic stability |
Supplementary file: Table 2. Breaking Sitting Behavior through Exercises during COVID-19 lockdown.
Figure 1.An infographic showing the relation between excessive sitting and possible biological mechanisms of chronic diseases. The inner dotted circle shows the potential physiology behind sitting leads to chronic diseases. The outer coloured circle shows the possible chronic diseases associated with excessive sitting.29