Literature DB >> 31830309

An Evolutionary Perspective on Sedentary Behavior.

John R Speakman1,2,3.   

Abstract

Most people are aware of the health benefits of being physically active. The question arises then why people so easily fall into sedentary habits. The idea developed here is that sedentary behavior is part of a suite of behaviors to reduce levels of physical activity that were strongly selected in the evolutionary past, likely because high levels of physical activity had direct negative consequences for survival. However, hunter-gatherer populations could not reduce activity indefinitely because of the need to be active to hunt for, and gather food. Hence they never experienced low levels of activity that are damaging to health, and no corresponding mechanism avoiding low activity evolved. Consequently, gene variants promoting efficiency of activity and increased sedentariness were never selected against. Modern society facilitates reduced activity by providing many options to become less active and divorcing food intake from the need to be active. Choosing the less active option is hard wired in the genes; this explains why being sedentary is so common, and why reversing it is so difficult. Incentivizing activity may be enabled using modern technology, but ultimately may only end up replacing one set of health issues with others. Also see the video abstract here https://youtu.be/ekHbUwPw-v4.
© 2019 WILEY Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  evolution; genetics; internet of things; physical inactivity; sedentary behavior; smart technology

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31830309     DOI: 10.1002/bies.201900156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioessays        ISSN: 0265-9247            Impact factor:   4.345


  2 in total

1.  Development of a Smart Chair Sensors System and Classification of Sitting Postures with Deep Learning Algorithms.

Authors:  Taraneh Aminosharieh Najafi; Antonio Abramo; Kyandoghere Kyamakya; Antonio Affanni
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Sedentarism and chronic disease risk in COVID 19 lockdown - a scoping review.

Authors:  Baskaran Chandrasekaran; Thiru Balaji Ganesan
Journal:  Scott Med J       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 0.729

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.