| Literature DB >> 32718062 |
Jingwei Lv1, Xiaoming Zhang2, Xuntao Yu3, Haiwei Mu1, Qiang Liu1, Chao Liu1, Tao Sun4, Paul K Chu5,6,7.
Abstract
An optical nanoantenna consisting of a Au-dielectric core-shell nanocube dimer with switchable directionality was designed and described. Our theoretical model and numerical simulation showed that switching between forward and backward directions can be achieved with balanced gain and loss, using a single element by changing the coefficient κ in the core, which can be defined by the relative phase of the polarizability. The optical response indicated a remarkable dependence on the coefficient κ in the core as well as frequency. The location of the electric field enhancement was specified by the different coefficient κ and, furthermore, the chained optical nanoantenna and coupled electric dipole emitted to the optical nanoantenna played significant roles in unidirectional scattering. This simple method to calculate the feasibility of unidirectional and switchable scattering provides an effective strategy to explore the functionalities of nanophotonic devices.Entities:
Keywords: backscattering; forward scattering; nanoantenna; spectra
Year: 2020 PMID: 32718062 PMCID: PMC7466381 DOI: 10.3390/nano10081440
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Schematic of the core-shell nanocube dimer with balanced gain and loss. (a) three-dimensional diagram (b) x-z plane graph.
Figure 2Calculated optical cross-section spectra of the core-shell nanocube dimer with a different coefficient κ in the core. (a) κ = 0 (b) κ = 0.397 (c) κ = 0.398.
Figure 3(a) Far-field forward-to-backward directionality for different frequencies. (b) Scattering pattern for κ = 0.36. (c) Scattering pattern for κ = 0.78.
Figure 4(a) Schematic of the coupled dipole mode and (b) Spherical coordinates for the core-shell nanocube dimer with balanced gain and loss.
Figure 5(a) Power difference spectrum with face-to-face distance of the core-shell nanocube dimer (b) Power difference spectrum with different face-to-face distance obtained by the analytic expression and finite element method (FEM) (c) Power difference spectrum with different κ obtained by the analytic expression and FEM (d) Phase difference between the electric dipoles (EDs), (e) Far-field distributions at κ = 0.268, and (f) Far-field distributions at κ = 0.84.
Figure 6(a) Electric field distribution and (b) Current density of the core-shell nanocube dimer for κ = 0.268 and κ = 0.84.
Figure 7(a) Schematic of the core-shell nanocube dimer in a chain (b) Far-field forward-to-backward directionality and (c) Scattering patterns of the chained core-shell nanocube dimer for N = 1, 2, 3, and 4.
Figure 8Electric dipole excitation: (a) Purcell factor and (b) Far-field forward-to-backward directionality versus the coefficient κ for different distances.