Literature DB >> 32716506

Vancomycin Area Under the Curve to Predict Timely Clinical Response in the Treatment of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections.

Sara Alosaimy1, Kyle P Murray2, Evan J Zasowski3,4, Taylor Morrisette1, Abdalhamid M Lagnf1, Thomas P Lodise5,6, Michael J Rybak1,2,7.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Although recent guidelines have recommended monitoring vancomycin (VAN) area under the curve (AUC)/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) to ensure clinical efficacy and minimize toxicity in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) for various infections, there are no recommendations regarding complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs). We aimed to evaluate the association between VAN AUC and clinical outcomes in MRSA cSSTIs.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients treated with ≥72 hours of VAN for MRSA cSSTI from 2008 to 2013 at Detroit Medical Center. The primary outcome was timely clinical success (TCS) defined as (1) resolution of signs and symptoms of infection within 72 hours, (2) stabilization and/or reduction in lesion size, (3) alternative agents not required due to VAN failure or toxicity as elected by the prescribing clinician. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was performed to determine the AUC associated with TCS in the cohort. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between VAN-AUC and the primary outcome.
RESULTS: A total of 154 patients were included in this analysis. CART identifed an AUC ≥435 mg*hr/L for TCS. Overall, 60.9% of patients experienced TCS; 69.7% in the target-AUC group versus 52.5% in the below-target AUC group, (P = .013). Target-AUC attainment was independently associated with increased odds of TCS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.208; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.047-4.659).
CONCLUSIONS: In adults treated with VAN for MRSA cSSTI, target-AUC attainment was independently associated with improved clinical outcomes and maybe most warranted for patients at high risk of VAN failure or VAN-associated toxicity.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gram-positive infections; skin and soft tissue; vancomycin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32716506      PMCID: PMC8662764          DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  24 in total

1.  Are vancomycin trough concentrations adequate for optimal dosing?

Authors:  Michael N Neely; Gilmer Youn; Brenda Jones; Roger W Jelliffe; George L Drusano; Keith A Rodvold; Thomas P Lodise
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases society of america for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children.

Authors:  Catherine Liu; Arnold Bayer; Sara E Cosgrove; Robert S Daum; Scott K Fridkin; Rachel J Gorwitz; Sheldon L Kaplan; Adolf W Karchmer; Donald P Levine; Barbara E Murray; Michael J Rybak; David A Talan; Henry F Chambers
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Individualizing vancomycin dosage regimens: one- versus two-compartment Bayesian models.

Authors:  R D Pryka; K A Rodvold; M Garrison; J C Rotschafer
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.681

4.  Vancomycin exposure in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections: how much is enough?

Authors:  Thomas P Lodise; George L Drusano; Evan Zasowski; Amanda Dihmess; Victoria Lazariu; Leon Cosler; Louise-Anne McNutt
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Area under the inhibitory curve and a pneumonia scoring system for predicting outcomes of vancomycin therapy for respiratory infections by Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  P A Moise; A Forrest; S M Bhavnani; M C Birmingham; J J Schentag
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 2.637

Review 6.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity associated with dosing schedules that maintain troughs between 15 and 20 milligrams per liter.

Authors:  S J van Hal; D L Paterson; T P Lodise
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  A Quasi-Experiment To Study the Impact of Vancomycin Area under the Concentration-Time Curve-Guided Dosing on Vancomycin-Associated Nephrotoxicity.

Authors:  Natalie A Finch; Evan J Zasowski; Kyle P Murray; Ryan P Mynatt; Jing J Zhao; Raymond Yost; Jason M Pogue; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Pilot Study of a Bayesian Approach To Estimate Vancomycin Exposure in Obese Patients with Limited Pharmacokinetic Sampling.

Authors:  Joseph J Carreno; Ben Lomaestro; John Tietjan; Thomas P Lodise
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Therapeutic Monitoring of Vancomycin for Serious Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections: A Revised Consensus Guideline and Review by the American Society of Health-system Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists.

Authors:  Michael J Rybak; Jennifer Le; Thomas P Lodise; Donald P Levine; John S Bradley; Catherine Liu; Bruce A Mueller; Manjunath P Pai; Annie Wong-Beringer; John C Rotschafer; Keith A Rodvold; Holly D Maples; Benjamin Lomaestro
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 10.  The Whole Price of Vancomycin: Toxicities, Troughs, and Time.

Authors:  Meghan N Jeffres
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.