Literature DB >> 32715400

Augmented reality for base plate component placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a feasibility study.

Philipp Kriechling1, Simon Roner2, Florentin Liebmann3, Fabio Casari2, Philipp Fürnstahl3, Karl Wieser2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate glenoid positioning in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is important to achieve satisfying functional outcome and prosthesis longevity. Optimal component placement can be challenging, especially in severe glenoid deformities. The use of patient-specific instruments (PSI) and 3D computer-assisted optical tracking navigation (NAV) are already established methods to improve surgical precision. Augmented reality technology (AR) promises similar results at low cost and ease of use. With AR, the planned component placement can be superimposed to the surgical situs and shown directly in the operating field using a head mounted display. We introduce a new navigation technique using AR via head mounted display for surgical navigation in this feasibility study, aiming to improve and enhance the surgical planning.
METHODS: 3D surface models of ten human scapulae were printed from computed tomography (CT) data of cadaver scapulae. Guidewire positioning of the central back of the glenoid baseplate was planned with a dedicated computer software. A hologram of the planned guidewire with dynamic navigation was then projected onto the 3D-created models of the cadaver shoulders. The registration of the plan to the anatomy was realized by digitizing the glenoid surface and the base of the coracoid with optical tracking using a fiducial marker. After navigated placement of the central guidewires, another CT imaging was recorded, and the 3D model was superimposed with the preoperative planning to analyze the deviation from the planned and executed central guides trajectory and entry point.
RESULTS: The mean deviation of the ten placed guidewires from the planned trajectory was 2.7° ± 1.3° (95% CI 1.9°; 3.6°). The mean deviation to the planned entry point of the ten placed guidewires measured 2.3 mm ± 1.1 mm (95% CI 1.5 mm; 3.1 mm).
CONCLUSION: AR may be a promising new technology for highly precise surgical execution of 3D preoperative planning in RSA.
© 2020. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Augmented reality; Experimental; Reverse total shoulder; Shoulder

Year:  2020        PMID: 32715400     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03542-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  6 in total

Review 1.  Benefit of intraoperative navigation on glenoid component positioning during total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Patrick Sadoghi; Julia Vavken; Andreas Leithner; Patrick Vavken
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Views on a new surgical assistance method for implanting the glenoid component during total shoulder arthroplasty. Part 2: From three-dimensional reconstruction to augmented reality: Feasibility study.

Authors:  Julien Berhouet; Mohamed Slimane; Maxime Facomprez; Min Jiang; Luc Favard
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.256

3.  Head-Mounted Display Use in Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rafa Rahman; Matthew E Wood; Long Qian; Carrie L Price; Alex A Johnson; Greg M Osgood
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 2.058

4.  Pedicle screw navigation using surface digitization on the Microsoft HoloLens.

Authors:  Florentin Liebmann; Simon Roner; Marco von Atzigen; Davide Scaramuzza; Reto Sutter; Jess Snedeker; Mazda Farshad; Philipp Fürnstahl
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Use of Patient-Specific Instrumentation (PSI) for glenoid component positioning in shoulder arthroplasty. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guillaume Villatte; Anne-Sophie Muller; Bruno Pereira; Aurélien Mulliez; Peter Reilly; Roger Emery
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Surgery guided by mixed reality: presentation of a proof of concept.

Authors:  Thomas M Gregory; Jules Gregory; John Sledge; Romain Allard; Olivier Mir
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.717

  6 in total
  6 in total

1.  Augmented reality through head-mounted display for navigation of baseplate component placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Philipp Kriechling; Rafael Loucas; Marios Loucas; Fabio Casari; Philipp Fürnstahl; Karl Wieser
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 2.  Clinical applications of augmented reality in orthopaedic surgery: a comprehensive narrative review.

Authors:  Johnathan R Lex; Robert Koucheki; Jay Toor; David J Backstein
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.479

3.  Glenoid Component Placement Assisted by Augmented Reality Through a Head-Mounted Display During Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  J Tomás Rojas; Alexandre Lädermann; Sean Wei Loong Ho; Mustafa S Rashid; Matthias A Zumstein
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2022-04-22

Review 4.  Review and Future/Potential Application of Mixed Reality Technology in Orthopaedic Oncology.

Authors:  Kwok Chuen Wong; Yan Edgar Sun; Shekhar Madhukar Kumta
Journal:  Orthop Res Rev       Date:  2022-05-16

Review 5.  Augmenting Performance: A Systematic Review of Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Displays in Surgery.

Authors:  Mitchell Doughty; Nilesh R Ghugre; Graham A Wright
Journal:  J Imaging       Date:  2022-07-20

6.  UltrARsound: in situ visualization of live ultrasound images using HoloLens 2.

Authors:  Felix von Haxthausen; Rafael Moreta-Martinez; Alicia Pose Díez de la Lastra; Javier Pascau; Floris Ernst
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.421

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.