Literature DB >> 32715273

qtl2pleio: Testing pleiotropy vs. separate QTL in multiparental populations.

Frederick Boehm1, Brian Yandell1, Karl W Broman2.   

Abstract

Modern quantitative trait locus (QTL) studies in multiparental populations offer opportunities to identify causal genes for thousands of clinical and molecular traits. Traditional analyses examine each trait by itself. However, to fully leverage this vast number of measured traits, the systems genetics community needs statistical tools to analyze multiple traits simultaneously (Jiang & Zeng, 1995; Korol, Ronin, & Kirzhner, 1995). A test of pleiotropy vs. separate QTL is one such tool that will aid dissection of complex trait genetics and enhance understanding of genetic architecture.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 32715273      PMCID: PMC7380654          DOI: 10.21105/joss.01435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Open Source Softw        ISSN: 2475-9066


Jiang & Zeng (1995) developed a pleiotropy test for two-parent crosses. For a pair of traits that map to a single genomic region, they formulated the test with the null hypothesis being pleiotropy (the two traits are affected by a single QTL) against the alternative hypothesis of two separate QTL, with each QTL affecting exactly one trait in the pair. The test of Jiang & Zeng (1995) doesn’t directly apply to multiparental populations because Multiparental populations have more than two founders Multiparental populations have complicated pedigrees Additionally, the test statistic distribution, under the null hypothesis of pleiotropy, doesn’t follow a distribution with tabulated quantiles, like the chi-square with 1 degree of freedom. Thus, we need to implement a method for determining p-values. We addressed the first two challenges by adding a fixed effect for every founder line and incorporating a multivariate polygenic random effect into the linear model, which resulted in a multivariate linear mixed effects model (Kang et al., 2008; Zhou & Stephens, 2014). We implemented a parametric bootstrap procedure to determine p-values for test statistics (Efron, 1979; Tian et al., 2016). We describe details of our statistical methods elsewhere (Boehm, Chesler, Yandell, & Broman, 2019). qtl2pleio offers a convenient interface for those already analyzing data with qtl2. The primary functions in qtl2pleio are scan_pvl, to perform the multivariate multi-QTL scan, and boot_pvl, to obtain bootstrap samples. We also include functions for visualizing results. qtl2pleio features three R package vignettes that demonstrate these and other qtl2pleio functions. One vignette provides examples for performing bootstrap analysis with a computing cluster. For quality assurance purposes, we incorporated unit tests into qtl2pleio via the R package testthat (Wickham, 2011). qtl2pleio uses C++ code for model fitting via generalized least squares. We use the R package Rcpp to interface with our C++ code (Eddelbuettel et al., 2011). We also make use of the C++ library Eigen via the R package RcppEigen (D. Bates & Eddelbuettel, 2013).
  6 in total

1.  The Dissection of Expression Quantitative Trait Locus Hotspots.

Authors:  Jianan Tian; Mark P Keller; Aimee Teo Broman; Christina Kendziorski; Brian S Yandell; Alan D Attie; Karl W Broman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Efficient control of population structure in model organism association mapping.

Authors:  Hyun Min Kang; Noah A Zaitlen; Claire M Wade; Andrew Kirby; David Heckerman; Mark J Daly; Eleazar Eskin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Interval mapping of quantitative trait loci employing correlated trait complexes.

Authors:  A B Korol; Y I Ronin; V M Kirzhner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Multiple trait analysis of genetic mapping for quantitative trait loci.

Authors:  C Jiang; Z B Zeng
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Testing Pleiotropy vs. Separate QTL in Multiparental Populations.

Authors:  Frederick J Boehm; Elissa J Chesler; Brian S Yandell; Karl W Broman
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  Efficient multivariate linear mixed model algorithms for genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Xiang Zhou; Matthew Stephens
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-02-16       Impact factor: 28.547

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.