Literature DB >> 18385116

Efficient control of population structure in model organism association mapping.

Hyun Min Kang1, Noah A Zaitlen, Claire M Wade, Andrew Kirby, David Heckerman, Mark J Daly, Eleazar Eskin.   

Abstract

Genomewide association mapping in model organisms such as inbred mouse strains is a promising approach for the identification of risk factors related to human diseases. However, genetic association studies in inbred model organisms are confronted by the problem of complex population structure among strains. This induces inflated false positive rates, which cannot be corrected using standard approaches applied in human association studies such as genomic control or structured association. Recent studies demonstrated that mixed models successfully correct for the genetic relatedness in association mapping in maize and Arabidopsis panel data sets. However, the currently available mixed-model methods suffer from computational inefficiency. In this article, we propose a new method, efficient mixed-model association (EMMA), which corrects for population structure and genetic relatedness in model organism association mapping. Our method takes advantage of the specific nature of the optimization problem in applying mixed models for association mapping, which allows us to substantially increase the computational speed and reliability of the results. We applied EMMA to in silico whole-genome association mapping of inbred mouse strains involving hundreds of thousands of SNPs, in addition to Arabidopsis and maize data sets. We also performed extensive simulation studies to estimate the statistical power of EMMA under various SNP effects, varying degrees of population structure, and differing numbers of multiple measurements per strain. Despite the limited power of inbred mouse association mapping due to the limited number of available inbred strains, we are able to identify significantly associated SNPs, which fall into known QTL or genes identified through previous studies while avoiding an inflation of false positives. An R package implementation and webserver of our EMMA method are publicly available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18385116      PMCID: PMC2278096          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.080101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  44 in total

1.  Genomic control for association studies.

Authors:  B Devlin; K Roeder
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Comparative methods for the analysis of gene-expression evolution: an example using yeast functional genomic data.

Authors:  Todd H Oakley; Zhenglong Gu; Ehab Abouheif; Nipam H Patel; Wen-Hsiung Li
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2004-09-08       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Alkes L Price; Nick J Patterson; Robert M Plenge; Michael E Weinblatt; Nancy A Shadick; David Reich
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-07-23       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Estimation of effects of single genes on quantitative traits.

Authors:  B W Kennedy; M Quinton; J A van Arendonk
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Uncovering regulatory pathways that affect hematopoietic stem cell function using 'genetical genomics'.

Authors:  Leonid Bystrykh; Ellen Weersing; Bert Dontje; Sue Sutton; Mathew T Pletcher; Tim Wiltshire; Andrew I Su; Edo Vellenga; Jintao Wang; Kenneth F Manly; Lu Lu; Elissa J Chesler; Rudi Alberts; Ritsert C Jansen; Robert W Williams; Michael P Cooke; Gerald de Haan
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2005-02-13       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Effect of within-strain sample size on QTL detection and mapping using recombinant inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  J K Belknap
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.805

Review 7.  Construction of phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  W M Fitch; E Margoliash
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-01-20       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  An integrated in silico gene mapping strategy in inbred mice.

Authors:  Alessandra C L Cervino; Ariel Darvasi; Mohammad Fallahi; Christopher C Mader; Nicholas F Tsinoremas
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-10-08       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Population structure and eigenanalysis.

Authors:  Nick Patterson; Alkes L Price; David Reich
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Use of a dense single nucleotide polymorphism map for in silico mapping in the mouse.

Authors:  Mathew T Pletcher; Philip McClurg; Serge Batalov; Andrew I Su; S Whitney Barnes; Erica Lagler; Ron Korstanje; Xiaosong Wang; Deborah Nusskern; Molly A Bogue; Richard J Mural; Beverly Paigen; Tim Wiltshire
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-11-09       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  718 in total

1.  Genetic control of murine invariant natural killer T-cell development dynamically differs dependent on the examined tissue type.

Authors:  Y-G Chen; S-W Tsaih; D V Serreze
Journal:  Genes Immun       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.676

2.  Using control genes to correct for unwanted variation in microarray data.

Authors:  Johann A Gagnon-Bartsch; Terence P Speed
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Quantitative trait Loci association mapping by imputation of strain origins in multifounder crosses.

Authors:  Jin J Zhou; Anatole Ghazalpour; Eric M Sobel; Janet S Sinsheimer; Kenneth Lange
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Predicting white matter integrity from multiple common genetic variants.

Authors:  Omid Kohannim; Neda Jahanshad; Meredith N Braskie; Jason L Stein; Ming-Chang Chiang; April H Reese; Derrek P Hibar; Arthur W Toga; Katie L McMahon; Greig I de Zubicaray; Sarah E Medland; Grant W Montgomery; Nicholas G Martin; Margaret J Wright; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 7.853

5.  Altered structural brain connectivity in healthy carriers of the autism risk gene, CNTNAP2.

Authors:  Emily L Dennis; Neda Jahanshad; Jeffrey D Rudie; Jesse A Brown; Kori Johnson; Katie L McMahon; Greig I de Zubicaray; Grant Montgomery; Nicholas G Martin; Margaret J Wright; Susan Y Bookheimer; Mirella Dapretto; Arthur W Toga; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2011

6.  Genome-wide association analysis to identify chromosomal regions determining components of earliness in wheat.

Authors:  J Le Gouis; J Bordes; C Ravel; E Heumez; S Faure; S Praud; N Galic; C Remoué; F Balfourier; V Allard; M Rousset
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Population structure and linkage disequilibrium in elite barley breeding germplasm from the United States.

Authors:  Hao Zhou; Gary Muehlbauer; Brian Steffenson
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.066

8.  The robustness of generalized estimating equations for association tests in extended family data.

Authors:  Bhoom Suktitipat; Rasika A Mathias; Dhananjay Vaidya; Lisa R Yanek; J Hunter Young; Lewis C Becker; Diane M Becker; Alexander F Wilson; M Daniele Fallin
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 0.444

9.  Genome-wide association study using cellular traits identifies a new regulator of root development in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Mónica Meijón; Santosh B Satbhai; Takashi Tsuchimatsu; Wolfgang Busch
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Genome-wide association mapping combined with reverse genetics identifies new effectors of low water potential-induced proline accumulation in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Paul E Verslues; Jesse R Lasky; Thomas E Juenger; Tzu-Wen Liu; M Nagaraj Kumar
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 8.340

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.