Aleena Mary Cherian1, John Joseph1, Manitha B Nair1, Shantikumar V Nair1, Vijayakumar Maniyal2, Deepthy Menon1. 1. Amrita Centre for Nanosciences and Molecular Medicine, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Ponekkara P.O, Cochin, 682041 Kerala, India. 2. Department of Cardiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Science and Research Centre, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Ponekkara P.O, Cochin, 682041 Kerala, India.
Abstract
Bare metal stents (BMSs) of stainless steel (SS) were surface engineered to develop nanoscale titania topography using a combination of physical vapor deposition and thermochemical processing. The nanoleafy architecture formed on the stent surface remained stable and adherent upon repeated crimping and expansion, as well as under flow. This titania nanoengineered stent showed a preferential proliferation of endothelial cells over smooth muscle cells in vitro, which is an essential requirement for improving the in vivo endothelialization, with concurrent reduction of intimal hyperplasia. The efficacy of this surface-modified stent was assessed after implantation in rabbit iliac arteries for 8 weeks. Significant reduction in neointimal thickening and thereby in-stent restenosis with complete endothelial coverage was observed for the nanotextured stents, compared to BMSs, even without the use of any antiproliferative agents or polymers as in drug-eluting stents. Nanotexturing of stents did not induce any inflammatory response, akin to BMSs. This study thus indicates the effectiveness of a facile titania nanotopography on SS stents for coronary applications and the possibility of bringing this low-priced material back to clinics.
Bare metal stents (BMSs) of stainless steel (SS) were surface engineered to develop nanoscale titania topography using a combination of physical vapor deposition and thermochemical processing. The nanoleafy architecture formed on the stent surface remained stable and adherent upon repeated crimping and expansion, as well as under flow. This titania nanoengineered stent showed a preferential proliferation of endothelial cells over smooth muscle cells in vitro, which is an essential requirement for improving the in vivo endothelialization, with concurrent reduction of intimal hyperplasia. The efficacy of this surface-modified stent was assessed after implantation in rabbit iliac arteries for 8 weeks. Significant reduction in neointimal thickening and thereby in-stent restenosis with complete endothelial coverage was observed for the nanotextured stents, compared to BMSs, even without the use of any antiproliferative agents or polymers as in drug-eluting stents. Nanotexturing of stents did not induce any inflammatory response, akin to BMSs. This study thus indicates the effectiveness of a facile titania nanotopography on SS stents for coronary applications and the possibility of bringing this low-priced material back to clinics.
Drug-eluting
stents have to a large extent reduced restenosis rates
compared to bare metal stents (BMSs) and hence are the preferred choice
currently in the clinics for the treatment of coronary artery diseases.[1] However, concerns remain around delayed healing,
prolonged thrombosis risk,[2,3] and long-term endothelial
dysfunction, resulting in neoatherosclerosis in arteries implanted
with drug-eluting stents (DESs).[4−7] Thus, there is still a requirement to develop stents
that retain the low restenosis rates of the current DESs and concurrently
not compromise re-endothelialization.Stainless steel (SS) stents
have been the material of choice for
coronary stenting for several decades. However, the high restenosis
rates preclude the use of bare metallicSS stents in the clinics.
Several researchers have investigated surface modification strategies
as a convenient method to improve re-endothelialization and thereby
reduce in-stent restenosis. One such surface modification strategy
exploited the benefits of biocompatible titanium nitride oxide surface
coating (TiNOx) on SS stents. These stents (TITAN) showed a significant
reduction in neointimal hyperplasia in comparison to bare SS in porcine
model[8] and in clinical trials.[9−11] Additionally, topographical modifications at the nanoscale,[12−14] including studies from our own group, have demonstrated the success
of surface-modified SS[15] and titanium (Ti)[16,17] substrates in promoting endothelial cell proliferation. Research
has shown that titanium surfaces having submicron patterns with lateral
dimensions >100 nm could efficiently promote endothelial cell adhesion,[18] whereas titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanostructures
displayed a concomitant reduction in smooth muscle cell (SMC) proliferation
with good endothelialization in vitro.[19,20] The highest
endothelial cell attachment with an intact endothelial cell layer
under flow conditions and fastest migration of endothelial cells (ECs)
was seen on nanometer to submicron features than flat surfaces. Significantly
less platelet adhesion and improved endothelial responses were observed
on nanometer rough titanium compared to flat counterparts, indicating
the potential of these surface features in nanometer regime on titanium
for vascular stent applications.[21] Nanotopography
was shown to provide nanoscale cues that facilitated cell sensing,
migration, and probing, with more organized actin cytoskeletal filaments
and locomotive features, which was not observed on a flat substrate
of titanium.[22] It has also been demonstrated
that TiO2 nanotubes represent a promising platform for
stent as it could selectively regulate EC growth and SMC inhibition.[19,23] Our group has also demonstrated in-depth studies on various titania
nanofeatures developed by hydrothermal processing on Ti substrates
and the impact of nanoarchitecture in regulating cell response, blood
compatibility, and so forth.[16,17] All nanostructured
surfaces showed significantly enhanced cellular viability and proliferation
of ECs and substantially reduced SMC proliferation and platelet adhesion
in comparison to unmodified titanium substrates.[17] However, all these works are confined to in vitro studies,
and only a few have been taken further for in vivo implantation. One
such in vivo study was the development of titania nanotubular structures
on metallicTi stents that showed reduced restenosis (by ∼30%)
in comparison to bare Ti stents[24] and promoted
faster functional endothelialization. Nevertheless, this technology
cannot be translated to clinical use on BMSs as Ti is not a stent
material. Moreover, an inflammatory response that would ordinarily
result from exposure to bare metalSS stent was observed to be significantly
reduced upon nanotexturing because of the masking of the underlying
metallic ions by an oxide or nitride-rich surface layer.[25]Hence, with the aim of bringing an old
horse back to the race,
we explore the potential of SS stents having a titania surface nanotopography
for reduced in-stent restenosis, as a sequel to the in vitro work
that reported beneficial effects of this nanotexturing. This material
displayed improved mechanical properties and corrosion resistance,
with minimal metal-ion leaching from the surface.[15] An interesting observation was the preferential adhesion
and proliferation of ECs over SMCs in vitro.[15] Herein, we extend this evaluation in vivo to prove that nanotexturing
of BMSs without the use of any polymers or drugs helps to evade the
problem of in-stent restenosis which is routinely observed in BMSs.
How effective is the nanotextured titania layer on SS stents in promoting
endothelialization is investigated after implantation of the stents
in a rabbit iliac artery for 8 weeks, in comparison to BMSs.
Results and Discussion
Nanosurface Modification
and Characterization
In the present study, titania nanotexturing
was obtained on commercial
bare metalSS stents after sputter depositing TiO2 and
its subsequent hydrothermal treatment as reported earlier.[15] A distinctive uniform titania nanotopography
[called hereafter as titania nanoleaf (TNL)] was generated on the
abluminal and luminal surfaces of the SS stent (SS TNL), as can be
noted from the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images at different
magnifications [Figures A(i–iv) and S1]. Individual nanoleaves
having average dimensions of 115 ± 20 nm (thickness) and 650
± 30 nm (length) were seen in the atomic force microscopy (AFM)
images as well (Figure B). The sputtering current and time were optimized at 1 A for 20
min with an oxygen flow at 80 sccm after various trials to obtain
a uniform nanotexturing on the stent surface that was mechanically
stable without peeling off. Lower sputtering currents 0.5, 0.7, and
0.85 A and time 10, 20, or 30 min did not generate distinct and uniform
nanostructures on the titania-coated SS surfaces (Figure S2). This could be mainly because lower deposition
duration and current would not be sufficient to generate a uniform
coverage of TiO2 on the stent surface, whereas higher sputtering
currents and time resulted in peeling off of the nanotextured titania
layer from the stent surface upon expansion (Figure S3). This could be attributed to the formation of thicker TiO2 films after sputter deposition for longer durations. It is
already established that titanium oxide coatings thicker than ∼25
nm can be unstable and are prone to peeling off under crimping and
expansion.[26] The thickness of the deposited
titania layer after sputter coating in our study was analyzed by AFM
and was ∼30 nm (Figure S4). This
thin titania layer would ensure intactness of the nanostructures on
the stent surface after expansion. Roughness analysis using AFM showed
that titania nanotexturing produced a nanorough surface having an
average roughness of 99.3 ± 5.1 nm in comparison to the surface
devoid of nanotexturing, but with titania deposition (9.96 ±
4.3 nm) (Figure S5). It was remarkable
to note that upon titania nanotexturing, bare metal surfaces turned
highly hydrophilic with a water contact angle of 4.9 ± 0.7°
in comparison to bare surface (74.5 ± 2.7°) (Figure S6). Surface compositional analysis of
titania nanotextured SS stents carried out using XPS confirmed the
formation of an oxide layer of TiO2 in both the wide and
high-resolution spectra (Figure S7). Although
SS TNL had distinct peaks at 458.5 and 464.4 eV corresponding to the
4+ oxidation state of TiO2, this was totally absent in
bare SS stents, proving that the stent has a titania-rich surface.
Similar results were obtained on the samples when analyzed using energy-dispersive
spectroscopy (EDAX) (Figure C), which reaffirmed the deposition of ∼8% of titanium
and 40% oxygen, signifying titanium dioxide formation in comparison
to bare SS (Figure S8).
Figure 1
(A) SEM images of the
nanotextured SS TNL stent at different magnifications
showing uniformity in nanotexturing over the entire surface. (B) AFM
images confirming the nanoleafy architecture on SS TNL. (C) EDAX measurements
demonstrating the presence of titanium and oxygen on SS TNL.
(A) SEM images of the
nanotextured SS TNL stent at different magnifications
showing uniformity in nanotexturing over the entire surface. (B) AFM
images confirming the nanoleafy architecture on SS TNL. (C) EDAX measurements
demonstrating the presence of titanium and oxygen on SS TNL.Stents being endovascular devices repeated crimping,
and expansion
is required for proper deployment. Moreover, it is important that
the structures can withstand the shear stress because of continuous
blood flow in the artery. Stent coating durability was studied under
accelerated flow conditions in a simulated blood vessel to complete
20 million cycles, which is equivalent to 6 months of stent implantation
in humans. As can be seen from the SEM images, there was no delamination
or flaking of the nanotextures, indicating the mechanical stability
of the coating [Figure B(i,iii)], with BMS as the control [Figure A(i–iii)]. No particulate matter could
be retrieved from the circulating fluid at the end of the study duration
when analyzed using SEM (data not shown), again pointing to the good
adhesion of the nanostructures on the stent. The circulating fluid
was also tested for any metallic ion release using inductively coupled
plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP–MS) analysis at different time
points (2, 14, and 21 days). Results from ICP revealed the absence
of any metallic ion content at all of the time points in PBS circulated
through the nanotextured stent (data not shown). Nanotextured stents
during their development are subjected to high temperature and pressure
conditions in a hydrothermal chamber. To understand if this thermochemical
treatment in any way altered its balloon expansion profiles, experiments
were carried out in comparison to an unmodified bare SS stent. The
graphs shown in Figure C clearly portray that the chemical processing of stents did not
affect its expansion profile with increasing balloon expansion pressures.
Moreover, regardless of the repeated crimping and expansion of stents
during this experiment, the nanotextures remained adherent onto the
stent surface as evident from SEM (Figure S9). All these results confirmed the usability of the nanotextured
stent for in vivo implantation.
Figure 2
SEM images of (A) bare SS and (B) SS TNL
stents at different magnifications
after completion of 20 million cycles under flow. (C) Balloon expansion
profiles of bare and nanotextured SS TNL stents.
SEM images of (A) bare SS and (B) SS TNL
stents at different magnifications
after completion of 20 million cycles under flow. (C) Balloon expansion
profiles of bare and nanotextured SS TNL stents.
Cell Material Interaction Studies
In any
physiological environment, protein adsorption always precedes
cellular adhesion. Hence, to investigate the impact of nanotexturing
on protein adsorption, analysis of total protein was carried out on
the different substrates. Results shown in Figure S10 indicate that very fewer proteins (<5 μg cm–2) adhered onto SS TNL in comparison to the bare SS
(∼9 μg cm–2). This can be attributed
to the super hydrophilic nature of the nanotextured surface, which
is known to influence protein adsorption in a significant way.[27]To understand the influence of the nanoscale
architecture on vascular cell adhesion and proliferation, in vitro
studies were carried out using human umbilical vein endothelial cells
(HUVECs) and SMCs as a function of time. The results of live–dead
staining done on the surfaces at early time periods (6 h) showed remarkable
differences in the adhesion of HUVECs versus SMCs (Figure ). It was seen that HUVECs
at 6 h were dispersed evenly, with less spreading on the SS TNL substrate
[Figure C(i)], perhaps
owing to its superhydrophilicity, whereas cells on bare SS were clustered
and found to be more spread [Figure A(i)]. These adhered cells on SS TNL showed significant
proliferation with time, both quantitatively (Figure S11) and qualitatively [Figure C(ii,iii)], as against that of bare SS [Figure A(ii,iii)], correlating
with our earlier results.[15] These observations
were in contrast to the results obtained using SMCs, wherein on SS
TNL very few cells got adhered and proliferated from 6 to 72 h [Figure D(i–iii)],
unlike those on bare substrates [Figure B(i–iii)]. These results clearly demonstrate
the distinctive role of nanotopography in cellular adhesion and proliferation,
with a preferential cell response.[12,13] Such a preferential
response is reported on titania surfaces having nanoscale topography
(e.g., nanotubes).[19]
Figure 3
Live–dead fluorescence
images of ECs seeded on (A) bare
SS and (C) SS TNL stents at 6 [A(i),C(i)], 24 [A(ii),C(ii)], and 72
h [A(iii),C(iii)] and SMCs seeded on (B) bare SS and (D) SS TNL stents
at 6 [B(i),D(i)], 24 [B(ii),D(ii)], and 72 h [B(iii),D(iii)].
Live–dead fluorescence
images of ECs seeded on (A) bare
SS and (C) SS TNL stents at 6 [A(i),C(i)], 24 [A(ii),C(ii)], and 72
h [A(iii),C(iii)] and SMCs seeded on (B) bare SS and (D) SS TNL stents
at 6 [B(i),D(i)], 24 [B(ii),D(ii)], and 72 h [B(iii),D(iii)].Additionally, complete endothelialization with
stable cell-to-cell
contacts, evident from the CD-31 staining, which is indicative of
the formation of an integral endothelial monolayer, was apparent on
the SS TNL surface (Figure S12B), whereas
on the bare surface this was lacking (Figure S12A). This endothelium was also found to be functional as expressed
by its nitric oxide release as depicted in Figure S12C. This preferential response observed on nanorough versus
smooth surfaces can be ascribed perhaps to the differences in the
specific proteins that adsorb to the surfaces which favor ECs to SMCs.
This aspect of the study is currently underway.
In Vivo Stent Implantation in Rabbit Iliac
Arteries
To confirm if this extraordinary in vitro response
of HUVECs versus SMCs will be replicated in vivo, SS TNL stents (n = 8) were implanted in rabbit iliac arteries for 8 weeks,
with BMS as the control. No procedural deaths occurred, and all of
the stents were successfully deployed and intact within the artery
as manifested in the angiogram images taken on the day of implantation
[Figure A(i),C(i)].
Stent patency and blood flow after 8 weeks of implantation were analyzed
by angiogram and color Doppler images. There was no occlusion observed
in any of the stent groups after 8 weeks of deployment, which confirmed
stent patency [Figure A(ii),C(ii)]. This could also be established from the representative
angiogram videos of both the study groups, after 8 weeks prior to
euthanasia (Supporting Information Videos 1 and 2).
Figure 4
Angiogram and ultrasound images of bare
[A(i),B(i)] and SS TNL
[C(i),D(i)] stents on the day of implantation and after 8 weeks prior
to euthanasia [A(ii),B(ii) for bare; C(ii),D(ii) for SS TNL]. Arrows
in the angiogram point to the stented site in the artery. The value
for the blood flow velocity of the respective animal is depicted in
the ultrasound panel.
Angiogram and ultrasound images of bare
[A(i),B(i)] and SS TNL
[C(i),D(i)] stents on the day of implantation and after 8 weeks prior
to euthanasia [A(ii),B(ii) for bare; C(ii),D(ii) for SS TNL]. Arrows
in the angiogram point to the stented site in the artery. The value
for the blood flow velocity of the respective animal is depicted in
the ultrasound panel.Blood flow velocities
were also monitored using color Doppler before
and after stent implantation [Figure B,D], clearly revealing no significant variations in
the blood flow velocities. Moreover, post implantation Doppler data
demonstrated no hindrances to the blood flow nor any thrombus occlusion
in any of the stented arteries [Figure B(ii),D(ii)]. Movies portraying the pulsatile blood
flow through stented arteries are displayed in Supporting Information Videos 3 and 4.
Histology and Histomorphometric Analysis
One of the most exciting observations was evident from the histological
analysis of stented arteries after 8 weeks of implantation. Significant
lumen narrowing due to tissue ingrowth was noted in bare SS stent-implanted
arteries [Figure A(i–iii)]
and counter-to-minimal neointimal thickening was noted for SS TNL
[Figure B(i–iii)].
Also, no in-stent thrombosis was seen in any of the stent groups.
This implied that nanotextured SS stent (SS TNL) without the use of
any drugs or polymers as in commercial DESs could inhibit the hyperproliferation
of SMCs and thereby yielded minimal intimal thickening.
Figure 5
H&E images
of (A) bare and (B) SS TNL stented vessels at 4×
[A(i),B(i)], 10× [A(ii),B(ii)], and 20× [A(iii),B(iii)]
magnifications.
H&E images
of (A) bare and (B) SS TNL stented vessels at 4×
[A(i),B(i)], 10× [A(ii),B(ii)], and 20× [A(iii),B(iii)]
magnifications.These results mean that the nanotexturing
approach was able to
reduce in-stent restenosis which is commonly observed upon implantation
of BMSs. This marked difference in the qualitative results from H
& E imaging is apparent from the quantitative histomorphometric
measurements.The lumen area for SS TNL was notably higher than
that for bare
SS, as can be seen from Figure A. A noteworthy decrease in neointimal thickness and neointimal
area was noted in the arteries implanted with nanotextured SS TNL
stents (0.02 ± 0.005 mm and 0.58 ± 0.07 mm2)
in comparison to bare (0.19 ± 0.9 mm and 1.65 ± 0.6 mm2) stents (Figure B,C). On an average, nearly 50% decrease in neointimal stenosis
(restenosis %) was observed in arteries with SS TNL stents (17.24
± 1.85%) as against that of bare metalSS stents (48.82 ±
5.83%) (Figure D).
These values correspond to an average of all of the stented sections
from the proximal to the distal ends of the stented artery, wherein
neointimal thickening was relatively high at the stent edges in comparison
to the midpart of the stent as shown in Figure S13 for both bare and SS TNL stents.
Figure 6
Histomorphometric analysis
showing the (A) lumen area (mm2), (B) neointimal area (mm2), (C) neointimal thickness
(mm), (D) restenosis (%), (E) inflammation score, and (F) injury score
of the bare and nanotextured SS TNL stent-implanted vessel sections.
Histomorphometric analysis
showing the (A) lumen area (mm2), (B) neointimal area (mm2), (C) neointimal thickness
(mm), (D) restenosis (%), (E) inflammation score, and (F) injury score
of the bare and nanotextured SS TNL stent-implanted vessel sections.The in vivo results obtained in our study indeed
correlated well
with the preferential vascular cell response observed in vitro, wherein
the excessive hyper proliferation of SMCs is known to induce intimal
thickening and thereby in-stent restenosis.[28] A plausible reason for this excellent in vivo result can be the
inhibition of SMC proliferation coupled with the promotion of faster
functional endothelium imparted by the nanotopography, very similar
to the in vitro results. This apart, the nanotexturing approach on
BMSs did not induce any inflammation or any injury at the stented
site (Figure E,F).
The major type of cells observed in the stented artery were neutrophils
and lymphohistiocytes, in minimal numbers, implying the negligible
inflammation induced by SS TNL.
Stent
Strut Coverage and Endothelialization
To understand if the
implanted stents had complete cell coverage
at the end of 8 weeks, SEM and immunofluorescence staining for ECs
were carried out. It is widely reported in the literature that drug-eluting
stents owing to the continuous elution of antiproliferative drugs
lead to incomplete endothelialization, thereby exposing the stent
struts.[29] To assess if nanotexturing would
offer a different response, the luminal side of the explanted stents
were imaged as shown in Figure A,B to see that all of the struts were totally covered with
a cell-like layer for both bare and SS TNL. To reaffirm if this cell-like
layer corresponds to an endothelium, an en face staining
of the stent lumen was performed using an endothelium-specific FITC
labeled wheat germ agglutinin (WGA), which stained the endothelial
glycocalyx green, counter-stained with propidium iodide. Prior to
this, a native blood vessel was stained with WGA vividly implying
the specificity of this marker for ECs (Figure S14).
Figure 7
SEM images of [A(i–iii)] bare SS and [B(i–iii)]
nanotextured
SS TNL stent-implanted arteries at different magnifications and representative
immunofluorescent en face stained images of wheat
germ agglutinin on ECs in the [C(i)] bare and [C(ii)] SS TNL stented
artery at a depth of 2 μm from the luminal surface (scale bar:
10 μm).
SEM images of [A(i–iii)] bare SS and [B(i–iii)]
nanotextured
SS TNL stent-implanted arteries at different magnifications and representative
immunofluorescent en face stained images of wheat
germ agglutinin on ECs in the [C(i)] bare and [C(ii)] SS TNL stented
artery at a depth of 2 μm from the luminal surface (scale bar:
10 μm).Representative confocal images
of the stented artery at a depth
of 2 μm from the surface of the lumen showed the presence of
agglutinin-stained ECs, indicating a perfect endothelial coverage
throughout the luminal surface over the stent struts in both bare
and SS TNL groups [Figure C(i,ii)]. This could also be confirmed from the videos depicting
the staining through the entire thickness of the stented vessel (Supporting
Information Videos 5 and 6). BMSs are known to get endothelialized with total stent
strut coverage within a duration of 4 weeks in rabbits,[30] supporting our results. The main highlight of
our material is the good endothelialization together with minimal
in-stent restenosis observed in vivo.
Conclusions
In this study, an innovative titania nanosurface engineering of
SS bare metal coronary stents using a facile thermochemical processing
technique provided a novel stent that exhibited remarkable in vivo
performance when tested in rabbit iliac artery for 8 weeks. The features
offered by this nanostent include (i) efficient endothelialization,
(ii) minimal SMC adhesion, and (iii) no thrombus formation, thereby
presenting a material endowed with minimal in-stent restenosis, a
major complication otherwise encountered with BMSs. Notably, these
characteristics are observed in the absence of any drug or polymer
as in commercial DESs, which makes the material promising for a clinical
translation.
Experimental Section
Surface Modification of Bare Metal Stainless
Steel Stents
Nanoscale topographies were formed on bare metalSS stents (Crypton coronary stents, Meril Life Sciences, India) with
length 8 mm and crimped diameter of 1.4 mm and medical grade 316L
SS circular discs of 14 mm diameter procured from JayonSurgicals Pvt.
Ltd., India. Silicon carbide abrasive papers with different grit sizes,
diamond, and alumina suspensions (all procured from Buehler Inc. USA)
were used to mechanically polish the SS discs. The polished discs
were ultrasonically cleaned in acetone, ethanol, and distilled water
and dried in air.Stents and the polished discs were subjected
to sputter coating by varying various parameters: (i) sputtering current
(0.5, 0.7, 0.85, and 1 A), (ii) sputter duration (10, 20, and 30 min),
and (iii) oxygen flow (50, 70, and 80 sccm) within a DC sputter coating
unit (Cluster tool model-CT-150, Hind High Vacuum Pvt. Ltd, Bangalore,
India). A sputtering current of 1 A for 20 min using pure Ti target
with 80 sccm oxygen flow generated a homogeneously thin TiO2 coating. In this experiment, to confirm the development of a uniform
coating, the stents were mounted onto a motor shaft rotated at a constant
speed (6000 rpm) inside the sputtering chamber. Nanotexturing of SS
stents/discs was carried out by a facile hydrothermal modification
in 1 M sodium hydroxide solution at elevated temperature (200 °C)
for 4 h to produce a discrete nanomorphology as reported earlier by
our own group.[31] After hydrothermal treatment,
the stents/discs were rinsed in distilled water for 10 min using an
ultrasonic water bath and air-dried.
Surface
Characterization of Nanotextured Surfaces
Surface nanotexturing
on the luminal and abluminal areas of hydrothermally
modified stents were examined using SEM (JEOL JSM-6490L, Japan). Additionally,
the surface topography was analyzed by AFM (Agilent 5500 series).
The dimensions of the nanoleaves were deduced from the AFM images
using ImageJ software. Surface compositional analysis of the surfaces
was investigated using energy-dispersive analysis (JOEL JSM- 7610
fPlus) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) (Axis Ultra DLD,
Kratos Analyticals, UK) over a binding energy range of 0–1000
eV.
Durability and the Balloon Expansion Profile
of Nanotextured Stents
Durability of the nanotexturing on
SS stents was analyzed under flow in a simulated blood vessel with
normal physiological conditions. The stents were expanded to its maximum
diameter using a balloon catheter within a latex tubing (3 mm inner
diameter) which was connected to a peristaltic pump (Masterflex L/S,
Cole Palmer) with 600 rpm. Bare SS and SSTNL stents were deployed
in two tubes with different reservoirs, and phosphate-buffered saline
(ph 7.4) was circulated through the tubings. The reservoir was placed
in a water bath at 37 °C. The pump was set at 600 rpm, and the
fluid was circulated for 22 days to complete 20 million cycles which
is equivalent to 6 months of stent implantation in humans. The wall
shear stress was calculated to be 1.5 Nm–2 from
the Hagen Poiseullie equation. After completion of 22 days, in-flow
stents were analyzed for the stability of nanostructures and the circulated
fluid was visualized for any particulate matter using SEM. The circulated
fluid was also aliquot at different time points 2, 7, and 22 days
and checked for the metallic ion (Ti, Fe, Ni, and Cr) content using
ICP–MS.The balloon expansion profile of the nanotextured
stents was studied in comparison to bare metalSS stents by using
a pressure volume controller (GDS from USA). The stents were mounted
onto a balloon catheter and was expanded to their maximum diameter
by applying increasing pressures from 0 to 14 atm. After each expansion,
the diameter of the stent was measured using a laser micrometer (Keyence
LS3034), following which the same stent was crimped back onto the
balloon and expanded further. This was done consecutively up to 14
atm. After the completion of the experiment, the stent was given for
SEM analysis to visualize the stability of nanostructures on the stent
surface after repeated crimping and expansion.
Cell
Material Interaction Studies
HUVECs and human artery smooth
muscle cells (HASMCs) were isolated
from umbilical cord after informed patient consent. HUVECs were cultured
in an EBM-2 (Lonza) endothelial cell basal medium with EGM-2 SingleQuots
(Lonza) containing VEGF and HASMCs in SmBM (Lonza) SMC basal medium
with SmGM-2 SingleQuots (Lonza) containing hFGF-B.To study
the viability of cells on nanotextured surfaces in comparison to the
bare, HUVECs and HASMCs were seeded on both the substrates at a seeding
density of 20,000 and 10,000 cells, respectively, for culture durations
of 6, 24, and 72 h. After each time point, substrates with cells were
taken out and washed in PBS once, following which the cells were stained
with calcein, AM, and ethidium homodimer-1 live–dead viability/cytotoxicity
staining kit (L3224, Invitrogen by Thermo Fisher Scientific) to visualize
the live and dead cells on the substrates. HUVECs and HASMCs on both
substrates were then viewed under a fluorescence microscope (Leica
DMI3000 B, Leica Microsystems) and imaged. Alamar blue assay was carried
out to assess cell proliferation on nanotextured SS in comparison
to bare SS at 6, 24, and 72 h by seeding both the substrates with
HUVECs and HASMCs at a seeding density of 16,000 cells cm–2. At the end of each time point, cells were incubated with 10% Alamar
blue (Invitrogen Bioservices Pvt. Ltd, Bangalore) in media for 4 h,
and the optical density was recorded using a microplate reader (Synergy
HI, Biotek) at 570 and 600 nm. The graphs were plotted as percentage
cell viability with cells grown on control tissue culture plates normalized
as 100%. To study the endothelialization potential, HUVECs were seeded
on both the substrates at a seeding density of 16,000 cells cm–2 and incubated for 72 h in complete medium. After
3 days in culture, HUVECs cultured samples were washed and fixed using
4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Cells were then blocked with 1% fetal
bovine serum in PBS for 15 min followed by incubation with primary
CD31/PECAM-1 antibody (JC/70A, Thermo Scientific) overnight at 4 °C.
The cells were then stained with secondary Texas red conjugated anti-mouse
secondary antibody (Thermo Scientific) for 1 h at room temperature
(RT) followed by counter staining using DAPI and observed under a
fluorescent microscope (Leica DMI3000 B, Leica Microsystems).To assess
the functionality of ECs seeded on the substrates, nitric oxide (NO)
release was estimated by modified Greiss assay. HUVECs were seeded
on bare and SS TNL substrates at a seeding density of 16,000 cells
cm–2 in complete EGM-2 media and cultured for 24
and 72 h. The culture medium was then isolated, and Greiss agent (Sigma-Aldrich,
USA) was added to it and incubated for 15 min at RT. The NO released
was quantified by optical density measurements at 540 nm, from the
serially diluted sodium nitrate standard calibration curve.
In Vivo Stent Implantation in Rabbit Iliac
Artery Model
In vivo stent implantation studies were done
on New Zealand white rabbits (2.5–3 kg) after obtaining an
approved ethical consent from the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee
(Ref. no. IAEC/2015/3/8). A rabbit iliac artery model was used to
investigate the effect of nanotextured SS stents in comparison to
bare metalSS stents on in-stent restenosis post 8 weeks implantation.
A total of eight rabbits (n = 16 stents) were stented,
with four animals each receiving bare SS stents and nanotextured stents
in both the iliac arteries. All of the animals were fed a regular
diet and premedicated with aspirin (20 mg kg–1)
and clopidogrel (15 mg kg–1) daily for 3 days prior
to surgery. The anesthesia was administered with an intramuscular
dose of xylazine (3 mg kg–1), ketamine (50 mg kg–1), and midazolam (0.3 mg kg–1),
and the condition was maintained using isoflurane throughout the surgery
procedure. The vascular access was obtained after the left carotid
artery was exposed through surgical cut-down. Carotid artery was mobilized
in position using 3–0 silk sutures, and the carotid artery
was punctured using a 24G canula, followed by insertion of a 0.014″
BMW guide wire under fluoroscopic guidance using a C-Arm (OEC 9800,
GE Healthcare). A 4-Fr introducer sheath was advanced through the
guide wire and held in position during the stenting procedure. The
animal was heparinized (750 IU). Under fluoroscopic guidance by injecting
contrast, the left and right iliac arteries were selected for stent
deployment based on the targeted vessel diameter of 2–2.5 mm.
Each stent was hand crimped on a 3.0 mm noncompliant angioplasty balloon
and deployed (12 atm balloon inflation for 30 s) in the iliac artery
of the rabbit to obtain an approximate balloon-to-artery ratio of
1.2:1. At the end of the procedure, a post deployment angiography
was carried out. The arterial access site was then ligated using the
silk sutures, and the incision was closed. The animals after recovery
from anesthesia were moved to postoperative care. Eight weeks post
stent deployment, animals underwent follow-up angiography to validate
the patency of the arteries after stent placement. Animals were then
euthanized, and stents were harvested and prepared for histopathology.
Ultrasound Imaging of Stented Arteries
Ultrasound images are taken using a color Doppler ultrasound (My
Sono U6, Samsung health care) before the stenting procedure to obtain
the iliac artery diameter and blood velocity. Post 8 weeks before
the animals are sacrificed, ultrasound images of the stented arteries
are taken. The site of stent implantation was located using an angiogram
and marked following ultrasound imaging to obtain the blood flow velocity
of the stented iliac arteries. The blood flow through the arteries
and the blood velocity was recorded.
Histopathology
and Histomorphometric Measurements
Histopathological evaluation
of each implanted iliac artery was
performed, after vessels surrounding the stents were isolated and
embedded in methyl methacrylate and stained with hematoxylin–eosin
(H&E). Histopathological sections were viewed under a microscope
(Leica), and the measurements were taken using ImageJ software. Borders
of lumen and internal elastic lamina were traced by hand, and the
area circumscribed was calculated using the software. Lumen area,
neointimal area, intimal thickness, and percentage stenosis were calculated
from the H&E images. Internal elastic lamina area minus lumen
area measured from the images denoted the morphometric measurement
of neointimal area for the stented artery, and in-stent restenosis
area was calculated as [1 – (lumen area/internal elastic lamina
area)] × 100.
Evaluation of Arterial
Injury
The
arterial injury at the struts was determined based on the penetration
of each strut into the vessel wall. Scores were assigned according
to Schwartz et al.[32] and were 0 when there
was no injury, 1 for tear in the internal elastic lamina, 2 when struts
perforated into the medial layer of the vessel, and 3 when the struts
penetrated the external elastic membrane into the adventitia. Sum
of individual injury scores was divided by the total number of struts
in the section to obtain the average injury score.
Evaluation of Inflammation Scores
Inflammatory cells
around the individual stent struts were observed
under a microscope and graded. The sections were scored 0 for the
absence of any kind of inflammatory cells surrounding the stent struts,
1 when light and very few inflammatory cells were present, 2 when
moderate inflammation with more localized cellular aggregates were
observed surrounding the struts, and 3 when dense lymphohistiocytic
infiltration was present around the struts. Average of individual
scores was divided by the total number of struts to obtain the total
inflammation score for each stented section.[33]
Stent Strut Coverage
The stent strut
coverage was analyzed for all of the stented sections. The vessel
sections were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and cut open
to expose the luminal side of the stent. The stented sections were
then dehydrated in gradients of ethanol (50–100%) and dried.
The dehydrated stented vessel sections were then gold-coated and imaged
using SEM.
Endothelialization of
the Stented Iliac Arteries
En face staining of stented iliac
arteries was carried out using
confocal microscopy (Leica TCS SP5II, Leica Microsystems). The tissue
sections were cut open with the luminal side facing outward. The sections
were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), followed by an antigen
retrieval step in which sections are boiled in citrate buffer (pH
∼ 6) on a water bath for 20 min. The sections were then rinsed
twice in PBS following permeabilization using 0.5% triton and then
incubation in 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 h at room temperature.
The samples were again rinsed with PBS and stained with 10 μg
mL–1 FITC Agglutinin (WGA, Vector labs) antibody
for 1 h. The tissue samples are then counterstained with propidium
iodide (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific) nuclear stain for 10
min. Tissue samples are then incubated in Sudan black to eliminate
autofluorescence followed by sandwiching between two confocal cover
glasses.
Statistical Analysis
All of the
measurements are denoted as mean ± standard deviation. To compare
between two groups, Student’s t-test was used
and analysis of variances (ANOVA) was done for multiple group comparisons.
All of the statistical analyses were completed using graph pad prism
software, and p values less than 0.05 were considered
statistically significant.
Authors: Tobias Koppara; Qi Cheng; Kazuyuki Yahagi; Hiroyoshi Mori; Oscar David Sanchez; Julia Feygin; Eric Wittchow; Frank D Kolodgie; Renu Virmani; Michael Joner Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 6.546
Authors: S Windecker; I Mayer; G De Pasquale; W Maier; O Dirsch; P De Groot; Y P Wu; G Noll; B Leskosek; B Meier; O M Hess Journal: Circulation Date: 2001-08-21 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Petri O Tuomainen; Antti Ylitalo; Matti Niemelä; Kari Kervinen; Mikko Pietilä; Jussi Sia; Kai Nyman; Wail Nammas; K E Juhani Airaksinen; Pasi P Karjalainen Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2012-12-03 Impact factor: 4.164