| Literature DB >> 32714284 |
Musrat Zahan Surovy1, Nur Uddin Mahmud1, Pallab Bhattacharjee1, Md Shaid Hossain1, Md Shabab Mehebub1, Mosaddiqur Rahman1, Bhaskar Chandra Majumdar2, Dipali Rani Gupta1, Tofazzal Islam1.
Abstract
Wheat blast diseasepan> caused by the Magnaporthe oryzae Triticum (MoT) pathotype exerts a significant impact on grain development, yield, and quality of the wheat. The aim of this study was to investigate morphological, physiological, biochemical, and nutritional properties of wheat cv. BARI Gom 24 under varying levels of blast disease severity in wheat spikes. Grain morphology, volume, weight, and germination of the infected grains were significantly affected by MoT. Biochemical traits specifically grain N, Ca, Mg, and Fe content significantly increased (up to threefold; p > 0.05), but organic carbon, Cu, Zn, B, and S content in wheat grains significantly decreased with increased severity of MoT infection. The grain crude protein content was about twofold higher (up to 18.5% in grain) in severely blast-infected grains compared to the uninfected wheat (9.7%). Analysis of other nutritional properties such as secondary metabolites revealed that total antioxidant activity, flavonoid, and carotenoid concentrations remarkably decreased (up to threefold) with increasing severity of blast infestation in wheat grain. Grain moisture, lipid, and ash content were slightly increased with the increase in blast severity. However, grain K and total phenolic concentration were increased at a certain level of blast infestation and then reduced with increase in MoT infestation.Entities:
Keywords: BARI Gom 24; antioxidant activity; disease severity; grain mineral content; protein content
Year: 2020 PMID: 32714284 PMCID: PMC7344263 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01174
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1Morphological features of intact grains of blast affected and unaffected wheat cv. BARI Gom 24 spike. (a) Category 1: unaffected (control). (b) Category 2: 1–19% damaged. (c) Category 3: 30–39% damaged. (d) Category 4: 40–59% damaged. (e) Category 5: 60–79% damaged. (f) Category 6: 80–99% damaged wheat grains.
FIGURE 2Wheat blast symptoms in the field and spikes. (a) Almost 100% bleached spikes (arrows) of a severely blast-infected wheat cv. BARI Gom 24 in the field in Meherpur district of Bangladesh. (b) Characteristic wheat blast disease symptom in wheat spikes (head blast) of varying levels of severity (from left to right), category of damage 1–6. Upper part of the point of infection of the spikes became bleached due to blockage and/or blocking of vascular system of the rachis by the mycelial growth of Magnaporthe oryzae Triticum (MoT).
Effects of Magnaporthe oryzae Triticum (MoT) infestation on physical changes and germination percentage of wheat cv. BARI Gom 24.
| 1 (No infection) | 6.96 ± 0.01a | 2.80 ± 0.03a | 92.92 ± 0.10a | 20.07 ± 0.05a |
| 2 (1–19%) | 6.90 ± 0.02a | 2.70 ± 0.01a | 90.86 ± 0.47b | 20.03 ± 0.41a |
| 3 (20–39%) | 5.83 ± 0.02b | 2.28 ± 0.01b | 90.48 ± 0.29b | 16.00 ± 0.18b |
| 4 (40–59%) | 5.65 ± 0.03c | 2.09 ± 0.01c | 90.84 ± 0.11b | 12.5 ± 0.19c |
| 5 (60–79%) | 4.98 ± 0.02 d | 1.57 ± 0.05d | 90.39 ± 0.15b | 7.87 ± 0.11d |
| 6 (≥80%) | 4.86 ± 0.03e | 1.30 ± 0.02e | 86.46 ± 0.22c | 5.89 ± 0.07e |
| CV | 0.0581 | 0.0875 | 0.7980 | 0.6136 |
FIGURE 3Influence of MoT infection in 1,000 grain of wheat cv. BARI Gom 24. Mean values in the bars followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different as assessed by Fisher’s protected LSD (least significant difference) at p ≤ 0.05.
Effects of MoT infestation on mineral contents of wheat cv. BARI Gom 24.
| 1 (No infection) | 1.70 ± 0.10e | 4.00 ± 0.36a | 0.21 ± 0.02c | 0.10 ± 0.01a | 1.0 ± 0.005b | 3.1 ± 0.02a | 4.20 ± 0.27a | 53.20 ± 0.50d | 52.20 ± 0.23a | 52.00 ± 0.41a | 0.36 ± 0.02a |
| 2 (1–19%) | 2.37 ± 0.02d | 3.79 ± 0.12a | 0.22 ± 0.01c | 0.10 ± 0.003a | 1.50 ± 0.02a | 3.0 ± 0.005a | 4.00 ± 0.03a | 54.20 ± 0.49cd | 48.43 ± 0.27b | 30.00 ± 0.07b | 0.33 ± 0.005a |
| 3 (20–39%) | 2.78 ± 0.09c | 3.59 ± 0.04a | 0.25 ± 0.01c | 0.11 ± 0.01a | 1.50 ± 0.017a | 2.8 ± 0.02ab | 3.80 ± 0.08ab | 54.20 ± 0.25cd | 42.00 ± 0.26c | 28.00 ± 0.08c | 0.28 ± 0.01b |
| 4 (40–59%) | 2.92 ± 0.02bc | 3.29 ± 0.18a | 0.41 ± 0.01b | 0.12 ± 0.01a | 1.50 ± 0.01a | 2.7 ± 0.01ab | 3.20 ± 0.10bc | 55.20 ± 0.28c | 34.87 ± 0.07d | 25.00 ± 0.13d | 0.26 ± 0.01bc |
| 5 (60–79%) | 3.18 ± 0.03ab | 3.20 ± 0.13a | 0.47 ± 0.02b | 0.12 ± 0.02a | 1.00 ± 0.12b | 2.3 ± 0.02b | 2.60 ± 0.14c | 73.20 ± 0.41b | 14.05 ± 0.11e | 20.00 ± 0.11e | 0.23 ± 0.006c |
| 6 (≥80%) | 3.25 ± 0.02a | 2.00 ± 0.02b | 0.67 ± 0.03a | 0.13 ± 0.005a | 1.00 ± 0.03b | 2.4 ± 0.005b | 1.20 ± 0.06d | 89.40 ± 0.22a | 12.00 ± 0.03f | 17.00 ± 0.26f | 0.11 ± 0.01d |
| CV | 0.176 | 0.555 | 0.051 | 0.035 | 0.1520 | 0.037 | 0.4218 | 1.165 | 0.570 | 0.671 | 0.031 |
Effect of MoT infestation on moisture, lipid, and ash contents in wheat cv. BARI Gom 24.
| 1 (No infection) | 18.36 ± 0.32a | 3.28 ± 0.10a | 1.99 ± 0.05a |
| 2 (1–19%) | 18.39 ± 0.14a | 3.39 ± 0.007a | 2.10 ± 0.09a |
| 3 (20–39%) | 18.58 ± 0.21a | 3.40 ± 0.12a | 2.15 ± 0.12a |
| 4 (40–59%) | 18.62 ± 0.42a | 3.44 ± 0.05a | 2.21 ± 0.02a |
| 5 (60–79%) | 18.71 ± 0.04a | 3.49 ± 0.08a | 2.26 ± 0.14a |
| 6 (≥80%) | 18.73 ± 0.26a | 3.55 ± 0.10a | 2.35 ± 0.03a |
| CV | 0.8105 | 0.2811 | 0.2716 |
FIGURE 4Enhancement of crude protein content (%) by the severity of MoT infection in wheat cv. BARI Gom 24. Mean values in the bars followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different as assessed by Fisher’s protected LSD (least significant difference) at p ≤ 0.05.
FIGURE 5Changes in total flavonoids, total phenolic, total carotenoid concentrations, and antioxidant activity in variously damaged wheat grains cv. BARI Gom 24 infected by MoT. (A) Reduction in total flavonoid concentration (μg quercetin equivalent/g). (B) Changes in total phenolic concentration (μg gallic acid equivalent/g). (C) Reduction in total carotenoid concentration in mg lutein equivalent/g). (D) Total antioxidant activity (μg BHT equivalent/g). Mean values in the bars followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different as assessed by Fisher’s protected LSD (least significant difference) at p ≤ 0.05.