| Literature DB >> 32714238 |
Bo Chen1, Yi Feng2,3, Jinlu Sun4, Jingwen Yan5.
Abstract
Environmental protection activities based on digital technology have cultivated many online green users (OGUs) and may become a critical means to combat global climate change. This paper explores individuals' motivation to participate in online environmental protection activities and whether the activities have significantly increased individuals' intention to participate in global collaboration on climate change. Taking Ant Forest as an example, this paper first summarized 14 trigger reasons for users' participation in online environmental protection activities through interviews, then surveyed 600 OGUs through questionnaires, and studied the behavioral motivation from the four dimensions of environmental awareness, social motivation, online immersion, and global cooperation intention by using a structural equation model. The study found that both environmental awareness and social motivation had significant positive promotional effects on OGUs' online immersion, and environmental awareness was higher than social motivation. Environmental awareness as a long-term motivation is conducive to the achievement of long-term climate goals, and social motivation is focused on short-term entertainment functions. There is a significant positive interactive relationship between environmental awareness and social motivation under the effect of digital technology, which jointly promote the improvement of OGUs' online immersion, and online immersion is conducive to enhancing OGUs' global cooperation intention. This study demonstrated that digital technology can effectively improve individuals' intention to protect the environment and found a means to quickly identify the best OGUs (most willing to participate in global cooperation), which provided a new opportunity to inspire greater public participation in the global action against climate change.Entities:
Keywords: Ant Forest; climate change; digital technology; international cooperation; motivation
Year: 2020 PMID: 32714238 PMCID: PMC7344309 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01335
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
FIGURE 1Each motivation was assessed with three to four items including online immersion (a1–a4), social motivation (b1–b4), environmental awareness (c1–c4), and global cooperation intention (d1–d3). Q16 was eliminated by exploratory analysis. For each item, participants indicated their level of agreement from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
Factor loadings for the items in the questionnaire.
| Factor | ||||
| Items | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| a1. Entertaining | 0.84 | |||
| a2. Game ability | 0.73 | |||
| a4. Incentive level of collect energy | 0.58 | |||
| a3. Curiosity | 0.47 | |||
| b3. Incentive level by others | 0.77 | |||
| b2. Recognition of position ranking | 0.68 | |||
| b4. Transaction value | 0.58 | |||
| b1. Social skills | 0.50 | |||
| c4. Certificates for planting | 0.73 | |||
| c3. Credibility of growth | 0.68 | |||
| c2. Credibility of function | 0.61 | |||
| c1. Recognition of close others | 0.52 | |||
| d2. Concern for nature | 0.82 | |||
| d3. Global activities | 0.78 | |||
| d1. Social responsibility | 0.52 | |||
Spearman’s correlations between main variables.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 1 Gender | 1 | |||||
| 2 Age | −0.15** | 1 | ||||
| 3 Social motivation | 0.03 | 0.00 | 1 | |||
| 4 Environmental awareness | –0.01 | –0.04 | 0.35** | 1 | ||
| 5 Online immersion | –0.01 | 0.05 | 0.30** | 0.36** | 1 | |
| 6 Global cooperation intention | 0.04 | –0.05 | 0.31** | 0.47** | 0.32** | 1 |
FIGURE 2Parameter estimation of the structural equation model. All parameter estimates are all significant at the significance level of 0.001. The results showed that social motivation and environmental awareness jointly influenced online immersion and further determined the global cooperation intention.
FIGURE 3Six steps to quickly identify target users with high global cooperation intention. These six steps represent the six questions in the questionnaire (a1, b1, b2, a2, d2, and d3).
FIGURE 4The shape of the OGU best user searching curve indicates that it becomes smoother after the third step.