| Literature DB >> 32714198 |
Dmitriy Yu Uryumtsev1, Valentina V Gultyaeva1, Margarita I Zinchenko1, Victor I Baranov1, Vladimir N Melnikov1, Natalia V Balioz1, Sergey G Krivoschekov1.
Abstract
Understanding the mechanisms of oxygen supply regulation, which involves the respiratory and cardiovascular systems, during human adaptation to intense physical activity, accompanied by hypoxemia, is important for the management of a training process. The objectives of this study were to investigate the cardiorespiratory coherence (CRC) changes in the low-frequency band in response to hypoxic exposure and to verify a dependence of these changes upon sports qualification level in athletes. Twenty male runners aged 17-25 years were exposed to acute normobaric hypoxia (10% O2) for 10 min. Respiration, gas exchange, and heart rate were measured at baseline, during hypoxia, and after the exposure. To evaluate cardiorespiratory coupling, squared coherence was calculated based on 5-s averaged time series of heart and respiratory rhythms. Based on sports qualification level achieved over 4 years after the experimental testing, athletes were retrospectively divided into two groups, one high level (HLG, n = 10) and the other middle level (MLG, n = 10). No differences in anthropometric traits were observed between the groups. In the pooled group, acute hypoxia significantly increased CRC at frequencies 0.030-0.045 Hz and 0.075 Hz. In response to hypoxia, oxygen consumption decreased in HLG, and carbon dioxide production and ventilation increased in MLG. At 0.070-0.080 Hz frequencies in hypoxia, the CRC in HLG was higher than in MLG. Thus, highly qualified athletes enhance intersystem integration in response to hypoxia. This finding can be a physiological sign for the prognosis of qualification level in runners.Entities:
Keywords: athletes; cardiorespiratory coupling; cross-spectral analysis; heart rate; hypoxia; squared coherence; training
Year: 2020 PMID: 32714198 PMCID: PMC7340006 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00630
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Anthropometric characteristics of the subjects, Mean (SD).
| Group | Height (cm) | Body weight (kg) | BMI (kg/m2) |
| Pooled | 180.7 (5.7) | 68.7 (8.0) | 21.1 (1.6) |
| HLG | 179.4 (6.7) | 68.8 (8.9) | 21.5 (1.8) |
| MLG | 181.9 (4.6) | 68.5 (7.5) | 20.6 (1.4) |
Respiratory, cardiac, and gas exchange parameters at baseline and during hypoxia.
| Baseline | Hypoxia | ANOVA, | ||||||
| Parameter | Group | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Group | State | Group × State |
| SpO2 (%) | Pooled | 97.5 | (1.1) | 76.8 | (6.1) | 0.000 | ||
| HLG | 97.3 | (0.9) | 74.9 | (7.6) | NS | 0.000 | NS | |
| MLG | 97.8 | (1.2) | 78.7 | (3.4) | ||||
| HR (beats × min−1) | Pooled | 65.3 | (9.0) | 85.4 | (11.4) | 0.000 | ||
| HLG | 61.3 | (8.9) | 83.4 | (15.2) | NS | 0.000 | NS | |
| MLG | 69.2 | (7.7) | 87.4 | (5.8) | ||||
| BR (breaths × min−1) | Pooled | 13.5 | (4.0) | 14.0 | (5.1) | NS | ||
| HLG | 13.3 | (4.1) | 12.8 | (3.4) | NS | NS | NS | |
| MLG | 13.8 | (4.1) | 15.2 | (6.2) | ||||
| VCO2 (mL × min−1) | Pooled | 236.2 | (40.2) | 266.5 | (76.4) | 0.044 | ||
| HLG | 243.6 | (43.5) | 244.9 | (83.9) | NS | 0.028 | 0.034 | |
| MLG | 228.8 | (37.4) | 288.1 | (65.0)* | ||||
| VO2 (mL × min−1) | Pooled | 255.1 | (35.8) | 211.7 | (59.0) | 0.000 | ||
| HLG | 259.4 | (35.2) | 199.1 | (68.7)* | NS | 0.000 | 0.082 | |
| MLG | 250.8 | (37.9) | 224.3 | (47.7) | ||||
| VE (L × min−1) | Pooled | 10.3 | (1.8) | 12.2 | (4.2) | 0.026 | ||
| HLG | 10.4 | (2,3) | 10.8 | (2.7) | NS | 0.018 | 0.066 | |
| MLG | 10.2 | (1,4) | 13.6 | (5.0)* | ||||
FIGURE 1Squared coherence between cardiac and respiratory rhythms by frequency at baseline, during hypoxia, and after hypoxia (recovery). Mean ± SE. ∗Significant difference between baseline and hypoxia (p < 0.050).
FIGURE 2Squared coherence between cardiac and respiratory rhythms by frequency at baseline (solid lines) and during hypoxia (dashed lines) in MLG (red) and HLG (blue). Mean ± SE. *significant difference between groups for the hypoxic state (p < 0.030).