Literature DB >> 32713726

Long-Term Results of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modern Extensively Porous-Coated Femoral Stem.

Charles N Wallace1, Justin S Chang1, Babar Kayani1, Peter D Moriarty1, Jenni E Tahmassebi2, Fares S Haddad1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of an extensively porous-coated uncemented cobalt-chrome monoblock femoral stem for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is well established with excellent mid-term results. The aim of this study is to report the long-term survivorship of these implants in femoral stem revisions.
METHODS: This is a long-term retrospective review of prospectively collected data of 55 femoral stem revisions in 55 patients using a contemporary, cementless extensively porous-coated cobalt-chrome monoblock stem. All patients between 2001 and 2006 who underwent first time femoral stem revision with a contemporary, cementless extensively porous-coated cobalt-chrome monoblock stem were included. Harris Hip Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index, and University of California Los Angeles activity scores were recorded preoperatively and at latest follow-up. Radiographs were analyzed for evidence of loosening, subsidence, osteolysis, and bony union. This study included 55 patients, comprising of 36 females (66%) and 19 males (34%) with a mean age of 66.4 ± 9.3 years at the time of surgery. The mean time interval from index procedure was 9.8 ± 2.9 years. Mean time from revision THA to final follow-up was 13.2 ± 2.17 years with a minimum of 10 years of follow-up.
RESULTS: Indications for revision included aseptic loosening (33), prosthetic joint infection (13), and periprosthetic fracture (10). Significant improvement in Harris Hip Score (85.1 ± 1.77 vs 51.8 ± 2.3, P < .001), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index (17.6 ± 0.77 vs 33.3 ± 0.8, P < .001), and University of California Los Angeles (5.25 ± 0.2 vs 2.7 ± 0.36, P < .001) scores were found at latest follow-up compared to preoperative. Fifty-four patients (98%) achieved stable bony ingrowth on radiographic analysis. All 10 patients treated for periprosthetic fractures achieved bony union of their fractures. Two patients suffered intraoperative periprosthetic fractures and were treated with a cable-plating system. There were no mechanical failures and no femoral stem re-revisions. One patient was diagnosed with a deep infection and was treated with chronic suppressive antibiotic therapy due to significant medical comorbidities.
CONCLUSION: Revision of the femoral component with a contemporary extensively porous-coated cobalt-chrome femoral stem has excellent functional outcomes, radiographic outcomes, and long-term survivorship with minimal complications.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  extensively porous-coated femoral stem; hip; long-term survivorship; monoblock; revision total hip arthroplasty

Year:  2020        PMID: 32713726     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  5 in total

1.  Minimum ten-year results in revision total hip arthroplasty using titanium fully porous long stem.

Authors:  Masahiro Hasegawa; Shine Tone; Yohei Naito; Hiroki Wakabayashi; Akihiro Sudo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Novel Design of the Compound Sleeve and Stem Prosthesis for Treatment of Proximal Femur Bone Defects Based on Topology Optimization.

Authors:  Haowen Xue; Haotian Bai; Rongqi Zhou; Jincheng Wang; Bin Zhou; Xiaonan Wang; Wenbin Luo; Xin Zhao
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-24

3.  Survival and outcome of total elbow arthroplasty for distal humeral fracture at long term follow-up.

Authors:  Paolo Schiavi; Francesco Pogliacomi; Alice Garzia; Piergiulio Valenti; Francesco Ceccarelii; Filippo Calderazzi
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2020-12-30

4.  Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with Primary Stem or Full-Porous-Coated Long Stem for Aseptic Femoral Component Loosening: A Matched-Pair Study.

Authors:  Meng-Huan Tsai; Chun-Chieh Chen; Chih-Hsiang Chang; Yuhan Chang; Pang-Hsin Hsieh; Chih-Chien Hu
Journal:  Orthop Res Rev       Date:  2022-02-15

5.  A Comparison of Risks and Benefits Regarding Hip Arthroplasty Fixation.

Authors:  Julia Matthias; Mathias P Bostrom; Joseph M Lane
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2021-11-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.