Literature DB >> 32713275

Isolated Diastolic Hypertension in the UK Biobank: Comparison of ACC/AHA and ESC/NICE Guideline Definitions.

John W McEvoy1,2, Nilanjan Chatterjee3, Brian P McGrath1, Prosenjit Kundu3, Natalie Daya2, Josef Coresh2, Elizabeth Selvin2.   

Abstract

The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline defines hypertension as a blood pressure ≥130/80 mm Hg, whereas the 2018 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and 2019 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines use a ≥140/90 mm Hg threshold. Our objective was to study the associations between isolated diastolic hypertension (IDH), diagnosed using these 2 blood pressure thresholds, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in a large cohort of UK adults. We analyzed data from UK Biobank, which enrolled participants between 2006 and 2010 with follow-up through March 2019. We excluded persons with systolic hypertension or baseline CVD. We defined incident CVD as a composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death. We used Cox regression to quantify associations between IDH and CVD, as well as the individual outcomes included in the composite outcome. We studied 151 831 participants with normal systolic blood pressure (mean age 54 years, 40% male). Overall, 24.5% had IDH by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association definition compared with 6% by the ESC/NICE definition. Compared with normal diastolic blood pressure, IDH by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association definition was not significantly associated with CVD risk (hazard ratio, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.98-1.18]) whereas IDH by the ESC/NICE definition was significantly associated with a modest increase in CVD (hazard ratio, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.04-1.29]). Similar results were found by sex and among participants not taking baseline antihypertensives. Furthermore, neither IDH definition was associated with the individual outcomes of nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke. In conclusion, the proportion of UK Biobank participants with IDH was significantly higher by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association definition compared with the ESC/NICE definitions; however, only the ESC/NICE definition was statistically associated with increased CVD risk.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood pressure; cardiovascular disease; hypertension; myocardial infarction; prevalence

Year:  2020        PMID: 32713275      PMCID: PMC7429304          DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  19 in total

1.  Reconsidering the cut-off diastolic blood pressure for predicting cardiovascular events: a nationwide population-based study from Korea.

Authors:  You-Jung Choi; Sun-Hwa Kim; Si-Hyuck Kang; Chang-Hwan Yoon; Hae-Young Lee; Tae-Jin Youn; In-Ho Chae; Cheol-Ho Kim
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Bryan Williams; Giuseppe Mancia; Wilko Spiering; Enrico Agabiti Rosei; Michel Azizi; Michel Burnier; Denis L Clement; Antonio Coca; Giovanni de Simone; Anna Dominiczak; Thomas Kahan; Felix Mahfoud; Josep Redon; Luis Ruilope; Alberto Zanchetti; Mary Kerins; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Reinhold Kreutz; Stephane Laurent; Gregory Y H Lip; Richard McManus; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Frank Ruschitzka; Roland E Schmieder; Evgeny Shlyakhto; Costas Tsioufis; Victor Aboyans; Ileana Desormais
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Isolated systolic hypertension in young and middle-aged adults and 31-year risk for cardiovascular mortality: the Chicago Heart Association Detection Project in Industry study.

Authors:  Yuichiro Yano; Jeremiah Stamler; Daniel B Garside; Martha L Daviglus; Stanley S Franklin; Mercedes R Carnethon; Kiang Liu; Philip Greenland; Donald M Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Outcomes.

Authors:  Sandra Quinn; John W McEvoy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Isolated diastolic hypertension. A favorable finding among young and middle-aged hypertensive subjects.

Authors:  J Fang; S Madhavan; H Cohen; M H Alderman
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 10.190

6.  Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies.

Authors:  Sarah Lewington; Robert Clarke; Nawab Qizilbash; Richard Peto; Rory Collins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-12-14       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate.

Authors:  Andrew S Levey; Lesley A Stevens; Christopher H Schmid; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Alejandro F Castro; Harold I Feldman; John W Kusek; Paul Eggers; Frederick Van Lente; Tom Greene; Josef Coresh
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Association of Isolated Diastolic Hypertension as Defined by the 2017 ACC/AHA Blood Pressure Guideline With Incident Cardiovascular Outcomes.

Authors:  John W McEvoy; Natalie Daya; Faisal Rahman; Ron C Hoogeveen; Roger S Blumenthal; Amil M Shah; Christie M Ballantyne; Josef Coresh; Elizabeth Selvin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Ambulatory hypertension subtypes and 24-hour systolic and diastolic blood pressure as distinct outcome predictors in 8341 untreated people recruited from 12 populations.

Authors:  Yan Li; Fang-Fei Wei; Lutgarde Thijs; José Boggia; Kei Asayama; Tine W Hansen; Masahiro Kikuya; Kristina Björklund-Bodegård; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Jørgen Jeppesen; Yu-Mei Gu; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Eamon Dolan; Yan-Ping Liu; Tatiana Kuznetsova; Katarzyna Stolarz-Skrzypek; Valérie Tikhonoff; Sofia Malyutina; Edoardo Casiglia; Yuri Nikitin; Lars Lind; Edgardo Sandoya; Kalina Kawecka-Jaszcz; Luis Mena; Gladys E Maestre; Jan Filipovský; Yutaka Imai; Eoin O'Brien; Ji-Guang Wang; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 10.  Isolated diastolic hypertension.

Authors:  Thomas G Pickering
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.738

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Is Isolated Diastolic Hypertension an Important Phenotype?

Authors:  Cesar A Romero; Aldo H Tabares; Marcelo Orias
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-10-16       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Hypertension Subtypes, Mortality Risk, and Differential Effects Between Two Hypertension Guidelines.

Authors:  Hui Mai; Chao Li; Kangyu Chen; Zhenqiang Wu; Xuanyi Liang; Yongjuan Wang; Tao Chen; Fengjian Chen
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-05

3.  Association of isolated diastolic hypertension based on different guideline definitions with incident cardiovascular risk in a Chinese rural cohort.

Authors:  Shiru Zhang; Sitong Liu; Yundi Jiao; Liqiang Zheng; Yingxian Sun; Zhaoqing Sun
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Isolated Diastolic Hypertension and Risk of Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies With 489,814 Participants.

Authors:  Mingyan Huang; Linzi Long; Ling Tan; Aling Shen; Mi Deng; Yuxuan Peng; Wenwen Yang; Hongzheng Li; Yue Wei; Meng Li; Feifei Liao; Chao Liu; Aimei Lu; Hua Qu; Changgeng Fu; Keji Chen
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-01-05

5.  The total and direct effects of systolic and diastolic blood pressure on cardiovascular disease and longevity using Mendelian randomisation.

Authors:  Io Ieong Chan; Man Ki Kwok; C Mary Schooling
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Prevalence, Predictors, Progression, and Prognosis of Hypertension Subtypes in the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Maximillian T Bourdillon; Rebecca J Song; Ibrahim Musa Yola; Vanessa Xanthakis; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 6.106

7.  Prevalence of isolated diastolic hypertension and the risk of cardiovascular mortality among adults aged 40 years and older in northeast China: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ling Yue; Hongyun Chen; Qun Sun; Lei Shi; Jixu Sun; Guangxiao Li; Liying Xing; Shuang Liu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  Associations of the Cardiometabolic Index with the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Hypertension and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Results of a Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Authors:  Xintian Cai; Junli Hu; Wen Wen; Jingyu Wang; Mengru Wang; Shasha Liu; Qing Zhu; Jing Hong; Yujie Dang; Xiaoguang Yao; Le Sun; Delian Zhang; Qin Luo; Nanfang Li
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 7.310

9.  A cohort study and meta-analysis of isolated diastolic hypertension: searching for a threshold to guide treatment.

Authors:  Alan P Jacobsen; Mahmoud Al Rifai; Kelly Arps; Seamus P Whelton; Matthew J Budoff; Khurram Nasir; Michael J Blaha; Bruce M Psaty; Roger S Blumenthal; Wendy S Post; John W McEvoy
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 35.855

10.  Isolated Diastolic Hypertension in the IDACO Study: An Age-Stratified Analysis Using 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurements.

Authors:  John W McEvoy; Wen-Yi Yang; Lutgarde Thijs; Zhen-Yu Zhang; Jesus D Melgarejo; José Boggia; Tine W Hansen; Kei Asayama; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Eamon Dolan; Katarzyna Stolarz-Skrzypek; Sofia Malyutina; Edoardo Casiglia; Lars Lind; Jan Filipovský; Gladys E Maestre; Yan Li; Ji-Guang Wang; Yutaka Imai; Kalina Kawecka-Jaszcz; Edgardo Sandoya; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Eoin O'Brien; Thomas Vanassche; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 10.190

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.