| Literature DB >> 32712860 |
Musashi Yahagi1, Takuma Maeda2,3, Hiroko Kanazawa2, Kenji Yoshitani2,3, Yoshihiko Ohnishi2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is no fully recommended methodology for surgery for Barlow's disease. Various methods have been proposed. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) measurements for selecting the optimal annuloplasty ring size and determining the length of artificial chordae in patients with Barlow's disease who underwent robot-assisted mitral valvuloplasty (R-MVP).Entities:
Keywords: Barlow’s disease; Loop technique; Mitral valve repair; Robotic surgery; Transesophageal echocardiography
Year: 2020 PMID: 32712860 PMCID: PMC7382665 DOI: 10.1186/s40981-020-00363-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JA Clin Rep ISSN: 2363-9024
Fig. 1Sizing of the mitral valve when treating Barlow’s disease was performed using three-dimensional TEE at the end of systole. The optimal ring size was determined mainly with reference to the intercommissural (IC) distance. When changing the predetermined ring size, the height of the A2 segment of the anterior leaflet (A-height) was considered. In cases with a short A-height and long IC, size was determined by considering the intertrigonal (IT) distance, longitudinal diameter (LD), and transverse diameter (TD). Abbreviations: TEE, transesophageal echocardiography
Fig. 2Two-dimensional, transgastric, two-chamber view to determine the optimal artificial chordae length. The optimal length of the artificial chordae was defined as equivalent to the length of the native secondary chordae adjacent to the prolapse site
Detailed mitral measurements and the planned ring sizes by the anesthesiologist
| Cases | Intercommissural distance | A-height | Intertrigonal distance | Longitudinal diameter | Transverse diameter | Planned ring size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32.7 | 23.1 | 32.1 | 33.8 | 40.9 | 34 |
| 2 | 34.2 | 25.0 | 33.9 | 31.3 | 37.5 | 34 |
| 3 | 32.3 | 20.8 | 31.9 | 31.5 | 40.0 | 32 |
| 4 | 35.0 | 22.7 | 34.0 | 36.4 | 42.0 | 35 |
| 5 | 34.5 | 19.0 | 34.7 | 34.5 | 50.7 | 35 |
| 6 | 30.4 | 20.2 | 29.0 | 32.3 | 40.4 | 30 |
| 7 | 31.8 | 23.0 | 31.0 | 32.8 | 42.9 | 32 |
| 8 | 34.3 | 22.9 | 31.9 | 35.5 | 41.5 | 35 |
| 9 | 32.3 | 20.9 | 31.1 | 34.8 | 37.0 | 32 |
| 10 | 35.6 | 22.0 | 34.9 | 36.7 | 38.2 | 36 |
| Median (IQR) | 33.5 (32.3–34.5) | 22.4 (20.8–23.0) | 32.0 (31.3–34.0) | 34.2 (31.3–32.4) | 40.7 (38.7–41.9) |
Each case: mm
Abbreviations: A-height the height of A2 segment of anterior leaflet
Departure site of the mitral valve, loop set count, planned and actually used ring sizes, changes in surgical plan, and residual postoperative MR
| Cases | Prolapse site | Suggested loop (set) | Suggested AC length (Pm/Al) | Ring size suggested/implanted | Difference between suggested and implanted | Residual MR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | P1P2 | 4 | 13/17 | 34/34 | - | - |
| 2 | A1P1 | 4 | 17/19 | 34/34 | - | - |
| 3 | A3P3Pcom | 6 | 16/18 | 32/32 | 3-mm extension of artificial chordae | - |
| 4 | P1P2P3 | 8 | 20/21 | 35/35 | - | - |
| 5 | A1A2 | 8 | 21/24 | 35/35 | - | Mild |
| 6 | A1A2A3 | 6 | 20/22 | 30/30 | - | - |
| 7 | A2A3P2P3 | 6 | 20/21 | 32/30 | Changed ring size | - |
| 8 | A2A3P2P3 | 4 | 21/- | 35/33 | Changed ring size, one additional 19-mm artificial chord | - |
| 9 | P1P2P3 | 8 | 20/20 | 32/32 | - | - |
| 10 | P1P2P3 | 8 | 20/20 | 36/36 | - | - |
Each case: mm
Abbreviations: A anterior leaflet; P posterior leaflet; Com commissure; AC artificial chordae; Pm posteromedial papillary muscle; Al anterolateral papillary muscle; MR mitral regurgitation