| Literature DB >> 32712433 |
Kaifan Yu1, Yanlin He2, Ilirjana Hyseni3, Zhou Pei3, Yongjie Yang3, Pingwen Xu3, Xing Cai3, Hesong Liu3, Na Qu3, Hailan Liu3, Yang He3, Meng Yu3, Chen Liang3, Tingting Yang3, Julia Wang3, Pierre Gourdy4, Jean-Francois Arnal4, Francoise Lenfant4, Yong Xu5, Chunmei Wang6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Estrogen protects animals from obesity through estrogen receptor α (ERα), partially by inhibiting overeating in animals fed ad libitum. However, the effects of estrogen on feeding behavior in hungry animals remain unclear. In this study, we examined the roles of 17β-estradiol (E2) and ERα in the regulation of feeding in hungry female animals and explored the underlying mechanisms.Entities:
Keywords: E2; ERα; Feeding; Glucose-sensing; Hypothalamus
Year: 2020 PMID: 32712433 PMCID: PMC7484552 DOI: 10.1016/j.molmet.2020.101053
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Metab ISSN: 2212-8778 Impact factor: 7.422
Figure 1E2 promotes acute adaptive refeeding after starvation. Body weight (A), daily ad libitum food intake (B), and 2-hour fasting-induced refeeding (C) in the sham, OVX-V, and OVX-E mice measured 10 weeks after surgery. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. N = 5 mice per group. ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01 in one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey's multiple comparisons; #p < 0.05 in the two-sided t-test. (D) Correlation of the relative body weight loss and 2-hour fasting-induced refeeding in the sham, OVX-V, and OVX-E mice.
Figure 2Membrane-bound ERα activity is required for acute adaptive refeeding after starvation. (A) Body weight of the control and ERα-C541A mice before fasting. (B) Two-hour fasting-induced refeeding of the control and ERα-C541A mice. N = 4 or 6 mice per group. (C) Correlation of the relative body weight loss and 2-hour fasting-induced refeeding in the control and ERα-C451A mice. (D) Body weight of the control and ERα-AF20 and mice. (E) Two-hour fasting-induced refeeding of the control and ERα-AF20 mice. N = 6 or 7 mice per group. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01 in the two-sided t-tests. (F) Correlation of the relative body weight loss and 2-hour fasting-induced refeeding in the control and ERα-AF20 mice.
Figure 3Membrane-bound ERα activity is required for feeding induced by central glucopenia. (A) Food intake in the satiated control and ERα-C541A mice after ICV injection of saline or 2-DG. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. N = 4 or 6 mice per group. ∗p < 0.05 between the control 2-DG and ERα-C451A 2-DG groups; $p < 0.05 between the control saline and control 2-DG groups; #p < 0.05 between the ERα-C451A saline and ERα-C451A 2-DG groups in two-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey's multiple comparisons. (B) Food intake in the satiated control and ERα-AF20 mice after ICV injection of saline or 2-DG. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. N = 6 or 7 mice per group. $, p < 0.05 between the control saline and control 2-DG groups; #p < 0.05 between the ERα-AF20 saline and ERα-AF20 2-DG groups in two-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey's multiple comparisons.
Figure 4Membrane-bound ERα is required for the neuronal responsiveness to PPT. ZsGreen fluorescent (A) and brightfield illumination (B) of a recorded ERα-positive neuron. Scale bar = 10 μm. The shadow in (B) corresponding to the dashed lines in (A) is the recording pipette. (C) Representative traces of an ERαARH neuron from a control mouse that was activated by PPT. (D) Representative traces of an ERαARH neuron from an ERα-C451A mouse that was not responsive to PPT. (E) Representative traces of an ERαARH neuron from an ERα-AF20 mouse that was activated by PPT. (F) PPT-induced increases in the firing rate of the ERαARH neurons. Data are presented as mean ± SEM with individual data points. N = 20–48 neurons per group. (G) PPT-induced increases in the firing rate of the ERαvlVMH neurons. Data are presented as mean ± SEM with individual data points. N = 18–50 neurons per group. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001 in one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey's multiple comparisons.
Figure 5Membrane-bound ERα activity is required for glucose-sensing functions. Representative traces of a GE neuron (A), GI neuron (B), and non-glucose-sensing neuron (C). (D) Percentage of GE, GI, and non-glucose-sensing neurons within the ERαARH populations among the control, ERα-C451A, and ERα-AF20 mice, respectively. N = 35–49 neurons in each group. (E) Hypoglycemia-induced decreases in the firing rate of the GE-ERαARH neurons. (F) Hypoglycemia-induced increases in the firing rate of the GI-ERαARH neurons. (G) Percentage of GE and GI neurons within the ERαvlVMH populations among the control, ERα-C451A, and ERα-AF20 mice respectively. N = 44–62 neurons in each group. (H) Hypoglycemia-induced decreases in the firing rate in the GE-ERαvlVMH neurons. (I) Hypoglycemia-induced increases in the firing rate in the GI-ERαvlVMH neurons. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. N = 6–38 neurons per group. ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01 in one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey's multiple comparisons.