Literature DB >> 32712068

Nursing Activities Score is increased in COVID-19 patients.

P Reper1, M A Bombart2, I Leonard2, B Payen2, O Darquennes2, S Labrique2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32712068      PMCID: PMC7250773          DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2020.102891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs        ISSN: 0964-3397            Impact factor:   3.072


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, Lucchini and colleagues recently demonstrated that the nursing workload in COVID-19 critically ill population assessed by the Nursing Activities Score (NAS) is dramatically increased in Covid 19 patients admitted in their ICU and suggested that the ideal nurse-to-patient ratio for these patients should be around 1:1.5 (Lucchini et al., 2020, Padilha et al., 2015, Miranda et al., 2003). Unfortunately, the need to provide new ICU beds makes impossible to guarantee this specific nurse-to-patient ratio. Our observations also suggest an increase of nursing workload in the ICU (10 beds) confirmed by a significant higher NAS during the period between 14 March 2020 and 30 April 2020. Our ICU was transformed in a Covid 19 ICU; non Covid patients were admitted in the recovery room transformed in an additional ICU where anesthesiologists (supported by the intensivists) and operating and recovery nurses were responsible to care for the non Covid ICU patients. Higher NAS results in the Covid ICU reflect the general higher workload secondary to Covid 19 infections which is responsible for various severe complications (Tavazzi et al., 2020, Guan et al., 2020, Clerkin et al., 2020). We routinely monitor in our ICU all main and secondary diagnosis, patients characteristics, ICU scores (like SAPS III and SOFA), invasive techniques, catheters used, infectious complications, antibiotic use, microbiological ecology, adverse events and also nursing workload by daily NAS measurements (three times a day). Covid 19 patients developed more acute respiratory failure, septic shock and renal insufficiency compared with the ICU patients admitted during the same period in 2019 (14 March to 30 April 2020) but also compared with the global data of our ICU during one year (13 March 2019 to 13 March 2020). Not only complex procedures like prone position or ECMO or elevated risk procedures (environmental factors with risk of exposure) could explain these observations about nursing activities for Covid 19 patients. Most of the monitored parameters are significantly modified during the six weeks of the actual Covid 19 epidemic in Belgium. We observed more ventilatory days, more infectious episodes, more vasoactive and antibiotic use, more renal support and more adverse events during these difficult days. This contributes to the higher NAS measured during these periods by Lucchini and coll and in our ICU (Table 1 ).
Table 1

Comparison of ICU patients characteristics (Age, gender, patients with artificial ventilator support), NAS results and mortality between Covid 19 patients (period between 14 March and 30 April 2020) and ICU patients (same period in 2019 (14 March and 30 April) and during one year between 13 MARCH 2019 and 13 March 2020).

COVID-19 patients n = 31 MD ± SD03/2019 04/2019 ICU patients n = 71 MD ± SD03/2019 03/2020 ICU patients n = 549 MD ± SDp value
Age, years63,97 ± 7 (49–81)67,46 ± 1267,69 ± 140.810*
Gender, females (%)35,48%39,44%48,45%0.001#
ICU length of stay, days8,1 ± 75,5 ± 54,9 ± 4<0.001*
Pts with ventilatory support (%)50%23,70%21,60%<0.001#
NAS81,83 ± 8,863,13 ± 9,6167,12 ± 8,53<0.001*
ICU mortality (%)18,80%11,80%10,70%<0.001#

Data are expressed as mean ± SD or absolute frequency (%).

Student’s T-test.

Chi square test.

Comparison of ICU patients characteristics (Age, gender, patients with artificial ventilator support), NAS results and mortality between Covid 19 patients (period between 14 March and 30 April 2020) and ICU patients (same period in 2019 (14 March and 30 April) and during one year between 13 MARCH 2019 and 13 March 2020). Data are expressed as mean ± SD or absolute frequency (%). Student’s T-test. Chi square test. So nursing workload assessed by NAS measurements and workload in general during the actual Covid 19 pandemic raised confirmed by the parameters followed in modern ICU for quality and security evaluations. This could be explained by the pathophysiology of the illness responsible for a broad spectrum of severe complications, acute respiratory failure, sepsis, acute renal insufficiency and thromboembolic phenomenons (Clerkin et al., 2020) leading to a significant increasing in mortality in the Covid 19 population compared with the mortality before the epidemic period (Table 1). We certainly confirm the need of an adequate reinforced nursing staff in the ICU for Covid 19 patients (estimated nursing staff per patient 0,82 according to the NAS data in our series) but also suggest the need of a multidisciplinary team collaboration including nurses and doctors from different hospital wards (ICU, operating theatre, emergency room, recovery room, and internal medicine). Covid 19 pandemic needs for its control the intervention of all forces of an acute hospital at the moment.

Financial support

None.
  6 in total

1.  Nursing Activities Score: an updated guideline for its application in the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Katia Grillo Padilha; Siv Stafseth; Diana Solms; Marga Hoogendoom; Francisco Javier Carmona Monge; Om Hashem Gomaa; Konstantinus Giakoumidakis; Margarita Giannakopoulou; Maria Cecília Gallani; Edyta Cudak; Lilia de Souza Nogueira; Cristiane Santoro; Regina Cardoso de Sousa; Ricardo Luis Barbosa; Dinis Dos Reis Miranda
Journal:  Rev Esc Enferm USP       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.086

2.  Nursing activities score.

Authors:  Dinis Reis Miranda; Raoul Nap; Angelique de Rijk; Wilmar Schaufeli; Gaetano Iapichino
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 3.  COVID-19 and Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Kevin J Clerkin; Justin A Fried; Jayant Raikhelkar; Gabriel Sayer; Jan M Griffin; Amirali Masoumi; Sneha S Jain; Daniel Burkhoff; Deepa Kumaraiah; LeRoy Rabbani; Allan Schwartz; Nir Uriel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2020-03-21       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Nursing Activities Score is increased in COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Alberto Lucchini; Marco Giani; Stefano Elli; Silvia Villa; Roberto Rona; Giuseppe Foti
Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.072

5.  Myocardial localization of coronavirus in COVID-19 cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Guido Tavazzi; Carlo Pellegrini; Marco Maurelli; Mirko Belliato; Fabio Sciutti; Andrea Bottazzi; Paola Alessandra Sepe; Tullia Resasco; Rita Camporotondo; Raffaele Bruno; Fausto Baldanti; Stefania Paolucci; Stefano Pelenghi; Giorgio Antonio Iotti; Francesco Mojoli; Eloisa Arbustini
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 15.534

6.  Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China.

Authors:  Wei-Jie Guan; Zheng-Yi Ni; Yu Hu; Wen-Hua Liang; Chun-Quan Ou; Jian-Xing He; Lei Liu; Hong Shan; Chun-Liang Lei; David S C Hui; Bin Du; Lan-Juan Li; Guang Zeng; Kwok-Yung Yuen; Ru-Chong Chen; Chun-Li Tang; Tao Wang; Ping-Yan Chen; Jie Xiang; Shi-Yue Li; Jin-Lin Wang; Zi-Jing Liang; Yi-Xiang Peng; Li Wei; Yong Liu; Ya-Hua Hu; Peng Peng; Jian-Ming Wang; Ji-Yang Liu; Zhong Chen; Gang Li; Zhi-Jian Zheng; Shao-Qin Qiu; Jie Luo; Chang-Jiang Ye; Shao-Yong Zhu; Nan-Shan Zhong
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 91.245

  6 in total
  7 in total

1.  The value of human resources: Experience of critical care nurses during the COVID-19 epidemic.

Authors:  M T González-Gil; C Oter-Quintana; M Martínez-Marcos; M T Alcolea-Cosín; M V Navarta-Sánchez; J Robledo-Martín; A Palmar-Santos; A Pedraz-Marcos; C González-Blázquez; A I Parro-Moreno; L Otero-García
Journal:  Enferm Intensiva (Engl Ed)       Date:  2022-05-05

2.  Burnout and resilience in intensive care Nursing professionals in the face of COVID-19: A multicenter study.

Authors:  Lizandra Santos Vieira; Wagner de Lara Machado; Daiane Dal Pai; Tânia Solange Bosi de Souza Magnago; Karina de Oliveira Azzolin; Juliana Petri Tavares
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2022

3.  Healthcare-associated infections in adult intensive care unit patients: Changes in epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention and contributions of new technologies.

Authors:  Stijn Blot; Etienne Ruppé; Stephan Harbarth; Karim Asehnoune; Garyphalia Poulakou; Charles-Edouard Luyt; Jordi Rello; Michael Klompas; Pieter Depuydt; Christian Eckmann; Ignacio Martin-Loeches; Pedro Povoa; Lila Bouadma; Jean-Francois Timsit; Jean-Ralph Zahar
Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.235

4.  Stress of conscience of COVID-19 among perianaesthesia nurses having worked in a COVID-ICU during the coronavirus pandemic: an international perspective.

Authors:  Ulrica Nilsson; Jan Odom-Forren; Mette Ring; Hanneke van Kooten; Joni M Brady
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2022-04-07

5.  The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of medical staff considering the interplay of pandemic burden and psychosocial resources-A rapid systematic review.

Authors:  Julian Hannemann; Alan Abdalrahman; Yesim Erim; Eva Morawa; Lucia Jerg-Bretzke; Petra Beschoner; Franziska Geiser; Nina Hiebel; Kerstin Weidner; Susann Steudte-Schmiedgen; Christian Albus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  [The value of human resources: experience of critical care nurses during the COVID-19 epidemic].

Authors:  M T González-Gil; C Oter-Quintana; M Martínez-Marcos; M T Alcolea-Cosín; M V Navarta-Sánchez; J Robledo-Martín; A Palmar-Santos; A Pedraz-Marcos; C González-Blázquez; A I Parro-Moreno; L Otero-García
Journal:  Enferm Intensiva       Date:  2021-12-02

Review 7.  Burnout in Intensive Care Nurses during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review on Its Prevalence and Risk and Protective Factors.

Authors:  Ferdinando Toscano; Francesco Tommasi; Davide Giusino
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-09       Impact factor: 4.614

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.