Literature DB >> 12576939

Nursing activities score.

Dinis Reis Miranda1, Raoul Nap, Angelique de Rijk, Wilmar Schaufeli, Gaetano Iapichino.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The instruments used for measuring nursing workload in the intensive care unit (e.g., Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System-28) are based on therapeutic interventions related to severity of illness. Many nursing activities are not necessarily related to severity of illness, and cost-effectiveness studies require the accurate evaluation of nursing activities. The aim of the study was to determine the nursing activities that best describe workload in the intensive care unit and to attribute weights to these activities so that the score describes average time consumption instead of severity of illness.
DESIGN: To define by consensus a list of nursing activities, to determine the average time consumption of these activities by use of a 1-wk observational cross-sectional study, and to compare these results with those of the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System-28.
SETTING: A total of 99 intensive care units in 15 countries. PATIENTS: Consecutive admissions to the intensive care units. INTERVENTION: Daily recording of nursing activities at a patient level and random multimoment recording of these activities.
RESULTS: A total of five new items and 14 subitems describing nursing activities in the intensive care unit (e.g., monitoring, care of relatives, administrative tasks) were added to the list of therapeutic interventions in Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System-28. Data from 2,041 patients (6,451 nursing days and 127,951 multimoment recordings) were analyzed. The new activities accounted for 60% of the average nursing time; the new scoring system (Nursing Activities Score) explained 81% of the nursing time (vs. 43% in Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System-28). The weights in the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System-28 are not derived from the use of nursing time.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the Nursing Activities Score measures the consumption of nursing time in the intensive care unit. These results should be validated in independent databases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12576939     DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000045567.78801.CC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  38 in total

1.  MEASURING WORKLOAD OF ICU NURSES WITH A QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY: THE NASA TASK LOAD INDEX (TLX).

Authors:  Peter Hoonakker; Pascale Carayon; Ayse Gurses; Roger Brown; Kerry McGuire; Adjhaporn Khunlertkit; James M Walker
Journal:  IIE Trans Healthc Syst Eng       Date:  2011-10-12

Review 2.  [Scoring systems for daily assessment in intensive care medicine. Overview, current possibilities and demands on new developments].

Authors:  F Brenck; B Hartmann; M Mogk; A Junger
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Measuring the nursing workload per shift in the ICU.

Authors:  Dieter P Debergh; Dries Myny; Isabelle Van Herzeele; Georges Van Maele; Dinis Reis Miranda; Francis Colardyn
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Recommendations on basic requirements for intensive care units: structural and organizational aspects.

Authors:  Andreas Valentin; Patrick Ferdinande
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  [Influence of personnel staffing on patient care and nursing in German intensive care units. Descriptive study on aspects of patient safety and stress indicators of nursing].

Authors:  M Isfort
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2013-01-13       Impact factor: 0.840

6.  The continuing imperative to measure workload in ICU: impact on patient safety and staff well-being.

Authors:  Ruth Endacott
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Financial impact of nursing professionals staff required in an Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Thamiris Ricci de Araújo; Mayra Gonçalves Menegueti; Maria Auxiliadora-Martins; Valéria Castilho; Lucieli Dias Pedreschi Chaves; Ana Maria Laus
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2016-11-21

Review 8.  Clinical review: scoring systems in the critically ill.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Vincent; Rui Moreno
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Multicenter validation of a computer-based clinical decision support tool for glucose control in adult and pediatric intensive care units.

Authors:  B Taylor Thompson; James F Orme; Hui Zheng; Peter M Luckett; Jonathon D Truwit; Douglas F Willson; R Duncan Hite; Roy G Brower; Gordon R Bernard; Martha A Q Curley; Jay S Steingrub; Dean K Sorenson; Kathy Sward; Ellie Hirshberg; Alan H Morris
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-05

10.  Pandemic influenza and excess intensive-care workload.

Authors:  Raoul E Nap; Maarten P H M Andriessen; Nico E L Meessen; Dinis dos Reis Miranda; Tjip S van der Werf
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 6.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.