Literature DB >> 32711801

Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (JADE MONO-1): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Eric L Simpson1, Rodney Sinclair2, Seth Forman3, Andreas Wollenberg4, Roland Aschoff5, Michael Cork6, Thomas Bieber7, Jacob P Thyssen8, Gil Yosipovitch9, Carsten Flohr10, Nina Magnolo11, Catherine Maari12, Claire Feeney13, Pinaki Biswas14, Svitlana Tatulych15, Hernan Valdez14, Ricardo Rojo16.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Abrocitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor, was effective and well tolerated in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in a phase 2b trial. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of abrocitinib monotherapy in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.
METHODS: In this multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial (JADE MONO-1), patients (aged ≥12 years) with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (Investigator Global Assessment score ≥3, Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI] score ≥16, percentage of body surface area affected ≥10%, and Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale score ≥4) with a bodyweight of 40 kg or more, were enrolled at 69 sites in Australia, Canada, Europe, and the USA. Patients were randomly assigned (2:2:1) to oral abrocitinib 100 mg, abrocitinib 200 mg, or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. Randomisation was done using an interactive response technology system, stratified by baseline disease severity and age. Patients, investigators, and the funder of the study were masked to study treatment. The coprimary endpoints were the proportion of patients who had achieved an Investigator Global Assessment response (score of 0 [clear] or 1 [almost clear] with a ≥2-grade improvement from baseline), and the proportion of patients who achieved at least a 75% improvement in EASI score from baseline (EASI-75) score, both assessed at week 12. Efficacy was assessed in the full analysis set, which included all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study medication. Safety was assessed in all randomised patients. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03349060.
FINDINGS: Between Dec 7, 2017, and March 26, 2019, 387 patients were enrolled: 156 were assigned to abrocitinib 100 mg, 154 to abrocitinib 200 mg, and 77 to placebo. All enrolled patients received at least one dose of study treatment and thus were evaluable for 12-week efficacy. Of the patients with available data for the coprimary endpoints at week 12, the proportion of patients who had achieved an Investigator Global Assessment response was significantly higher in the abrocitinib 100 mg group than in the placebo group (37 [24%] of 156 patients vs six [8%] of 76 patients; p=0·0037) and in the abrocitinib 200 mg group compared with the placebo group (67 [44%] of 153 patients vs six [8%] of 76 patients; p<0·0001). Of the patients with available data for the coprimary endpoints at week 12, compared with the placebo group, the proportion of patients who had achieved an EASI-75 response was significantly higher in the abrocitinib 100 mg group (62 [40%] of 156 patients vs nine [12%] of 76 patients; p<0·0001) and abrocitinib 200 mg group (96 [63%] of 153 patients vs nine [12%] of 76 patients; p<0·0001). Adverse events were reported in 108 (69%) of 156 patients in the abrocitinib 100 mg group, 120 (78%) of 154 patients in the abrocitinib 200 mg group, and 44 (57%) of 77 patients in the placebo group. Serious adverse events were reported in five (3%) of 156 patients in the abrocitinib 100 mg group, five (3%) of 154 patients in the abrocitinib 200 mg group, and three (4%) of 77 patients in the placebo group. No treatment-related deaths were reported.
INTERPRETATION: Monotherapy with oral abrocitinib once daily was effective and well tolerated in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. FUNDING: Pfizer.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32711801     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30732-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  49 in total

Review 1.  Skin barrier dysfunction and filaggrin.

Authors:  Yeonjoon Kim; Kyung-Min Lim
Journal:  Arch Pharm Res       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 4.946

Review 2.  Janus Kinase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis: Focus on Abrocitinib, Baricitinib, and Upadacitinib.

Authors:  Miguel Nogueira; Tiago Torres
Journal:  Dermatol Pract Concept       Date:  2021-10-01

3.  Association of Risk of Incident Venous Thromboembolism With Atopic Dermatitis and Treatment With Janus Kinase Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tai-Li Chen; Ling-Ling Lee; Huei-Kai Huang; Li-Yu Chen; Ching-Hui Loh; Ching-Chi Chi
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 11.816

Review 4.  Novel Targeted Biological Agents for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis.

Authors:  Nan Yang; Zeyu Chen; Xilin Zhang; Yuling Shi
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 5.807

Review 5.  Experimental Drugs with the Potential to Treat Atopic Eczema.

Authors:  Kam Lun Ellis Hon; Vivian P Y Chan; Alexander K C Leung
Journal:  J Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2021-05-12

Review 6.  Current Perspectives on the Systemic Management of Atopic Dermatitis.

Authors:  Danielle R Davari; Elizabeth L Nieman; Diana B McShane; Dean S Morrell
Journal:  J Asthma Allergy       Date:  2021-06-01

7.  Impact of Oral Abrocitinib Monotherapy on Patient-Reported Symptoms and Quality of Life in Adolescents and Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Pooled Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Jonathan I Silverberg; Jacob P Thyssen; Eric L Simpson; Gil Yosipovitch; Sonja Ständer; Hernan Valdez; Ricardo Rojo; Pinaki Biswas; Daniela E Myers; Claire Feeney; Marco DiBonaventura
Journal:  Am J Clin Dermatol       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 7.403

Review 8.  A Decade of JAK Inhibitors: What Have We Learned and What May Be the Future?

Authors:  Christine Liu; Jacqueline Kieltyka; Roy Fleischmann; Massimo Gadina; John J O'Shea
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 15.483

Review 9.  Update on the Pathogenesis and Therapy of Atopic Dermatitis.

Authors:  Huaguo Li; Zhen Zhang; Hui Zhang; Yifeng Guo; Zhirong Yao
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 10.  Effectiveness and Safety of Abrocitinib in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Hammad Ali Fadlalmola; Muayad Saud Albadrani; Amal Mohamed Elhusein; Wahieba E Mohamedsalih; Veerabhadra D S Swamy; Daniel Mon Mamanao
Journal:  Dermatol Res Pract       Date:  2021-06-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.