Literature DB >> 32711725

Urine steroid metabolomics for the differential diagnosis of adrenal incidentalomas in the EURINE-ACT study: a prospective test validation study.

Irina Bancos1, Angela E Taylor2, Vasileios Chortis3, Alice J Sitch4, Carl Jenkinson2, Caroline J Davidge-Pitts5, Katharina Lang3, Stylianos Tsagarakis6, Magdalena Macech7, Anna Riester8, Timo Deutschbein9, Ivana D Pupovac10, Tina Kienitz11, Alessandro Prete3, Thomas G Papathomas2, Lorna C Gilligan12, Cristian Bancos5, Giuseppe Reimondo13, Magalie Haissaguerre14, Ljiljana Marina15, Marianne A Grytaas16, Ahmed Sajwani17, Katharina Langton18, Hannah E Ivison12, Cedric H L Shackleton19, Dana Erickson5, Miriam Asia20, Sotiria Palimeri6, Agnieszka Kondracka7, Ariadni Spyroglou8, Cristina L Ronchi21, Bojana Simunov10, Danae A Delivanis5, Robert P Sutcliffe22, Ioanna Tsirou6, Tomasz Bednarczuk7, Martin Reincke8, Stephanie Burger-Stritt9, Richard A Feelders23, Letizia Canu24, Harm R Haak25, Graeme Eisenhofer18, M Conall Dennedy17, Grethe A Ueland16, Miomira Ivovic15, Antoine Tabarin14, Massimo Terzolo13, Marcus Quinkler11, Darko Kastelan10, Martin Fassnacht26, Felix Beuschlein27, Urszula Ambroziak7, Dimitra A Vassiliadi6, Michael W O'Reilly3, William F Young5, Michael Biehl28, Jonathan J Deeks4, Wiebke Arlt29.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cross-sectional imaging regularly results in incidental discovery of adrenal tumours, requiring exclusion of adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). However, differentiation is hampered by poor specificity of imaging characteristics. We aimed to validate a urine steroid metabolomics approach, using steroid profiling as the diagnostic basis for ACC.
METHODS: We did a prospective multicentre study in adult participants (age ≥18 years) with newly diagnosed adrenal masses. We assessed the accuracy of diagnostic imaging strategies based on maximum tumour diameter (≥4 cm vs <4 cm), imaging characteristics (positive vs negative), and urine steroid metabolomics (low, medium, or high risk of ACC), separately and in combination, using a reference standard of histopathology and follow-up investigations. With respect to imaging characteristics, we also assessed the diagnostic utility of increasing the unenhanced CT tumour attenuation threshold from the recommended 10 Hounsfield units (HU) to 20 HU.
FINDINGS: Of 2169 participants recruited between Jan 17, 2011, and July 15, 2016, we included 2017 from 14 specialist centres in 11 countries in the final analysis. 98 (4·9%) had histopathologically or clinically and biochemically confirmed ACC. Tumours with diameters of 4 cm or larger were identified in 488 participants (24·2%), including 96 of the 98 with ACC (positive predictive value [PPV] 19·7%, 95% CI 16·2-23·5). For imaging characteristics, increasing the unenhanced CT tumour attenuation threshold to 20 HU from the recommended 10 HU increased specificity for ACC (80·0% [95% CI 77·9-82·0] vs 64·0% [61·4-66.4]) while maintaining sensitivity (99·0% [94·4-100·0] vs 100·0% [96·3-100·0]; PPV 19·7%, 16·3-23·5). A urine steroid metabolomics result indicating high risk of ACC had a PPV of 34·6% (95% CI 28·6-41·0). When the three tests were combined, in the order of tumour diameter, positive imaging characteristics, and urine steroid metabolomics, 106 (5·3%) participants had the result maximum tumour diameter of 4 cm or larger, positive imaging characteristics (with the 20 HU cutoff), and urine steroid metabolomics indicating high risk of ACC, for which the PPV was 76·4% (95% CI 67·2-84·1). 70 (3·5%) were classified as being at moderate risk of ACC and 1841 (91·3%) at low risk (negative predictive value 99·7%, 99·4-100·0).
INTERPRETATION: An unenhanced CT tumour attenuation cutoff of 20 HU should replace that of 10 HU for exclusion of ACC. A triple test strategy of tumour diameter, imaging characteristics, and urine steroid metabolomics improves detection of ACC, which could shorten time to surgery for patients with ACC and help to avoid unnecessary surgery in patients with benign tumours. FUNDING: European Commission, UK Medical Research Council, Wellcome Trust, and UK National Institute for Health Research, US National Institutes of Health, the Claire Khan Trust Fund at University Hospitals Birmingham Charities, and the Mayo Clinic Foundation for Medical Education and Research.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32711725      PMCID: PMC7447976          DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30218-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol        ISSN: 2213-8587            Impact factor:   32.069


Introduction

Adrenal masses are discovered incidentally in about 5% of cross-sectional imaging examinations.1, 2 The prevalence of these so-called incidentalomas increases with age and is estimated to be about 3% among people aged 40 years and 10% among those aged 70 years. Because of widespread use of CT and MRI, the number of adrenal incidentalomas identified is increasing worldwide. In the USA, more than 100 million CT and MRI examinations are done per year, which could potentially reveal around 5 million adrenal masses. Diagnostic assessment and therapeutic management of incidentalomas is a challenging health-care issue.5, 6 Evidence before this study The discovery of an adrenal mass requires further assessment to determine whether the tumour is a malignant adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) or a benign adrenocortical adenoma (ACA). Imaging tests are the mainstay in detection of ACC, but the available methods have poor diagnostic accuracy. In 2016 we did a systematic review and meta-analysis of the accuracy of imaging modalities. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Science Citation Index, the Conference Proceedings Citation Index, and Zetoc for reports published from Jan 1, 1990, to Aug 31, 2015, to identify all studies that had assessed the diagnostic accuracy of imaging methods employed in the differential diagnosis of adrenal masses (CT, MRI, and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose [18F-FDG] PET) in comparison with histology or imaging-based follow-up as the reference standard. The search terms used for these database searches were reported in that study. Based on data from only two eligible studies involving 102 participants, an unenhanced CT tumour attenuation value of more than 10 Hounsfield units (HU) was shown to have high sensitivity (100%) but poor specificity (72%) for the detection of ACC. Studies assessing 18F-FDG PET, MRI with chemical shift analysis, and CT with contrast washout had even smaller sample sizes (n=25–75) and generated sensitivity and specificity estimates with very wide CIs. In 2019 we updated our previous search with a PubMed search using the same search terms and covering the dates Sept 1, 2015–Jan 31, 2019. We found no studies that altered the conclusions of the 2016 systematic review and meta-analysis, nor any newly published meta-analyses addressing the same question. We did a retrospective proof-of-principle study in 45 participants with ACC and 102 with ACA, in which we showed that urine steroid metabolomics (ie, mass spectrometry-based steroid metabolite profiling of 24 h urine samples combined with machine-learning-based data analysis) could detect ACC with high sensitivity and specificity. Although similar diagnostic accuracies were reported in several other retrospective studies, we did not identify any previous prospective test validation studies. Added value of this study In this prospective, multicentre, test validation study, we assessed the diagnostic accuracy of urine steroid metabolomics for the detection of ACC in patients with newly diagnosed adrenal masses compared with routinely employed imaging strategies (measurement of tumour size and assessment of imaging characteristics). As a single test, urine steroid metabolomics had a higher positive predictive value (PPV) than either imaging test (34·6% [95% CI 28·6–41·0] vs 19·7% [16·2–23·5] for tumour size and 19·7% [16·3–23·5] for imaging characteristics). Additionally, in a comparison with the standarad cutoff of 10 HU for unenhanced CT tumour attenuation, a cutoff of 20 HU increased specificity from 64% to 80% while sensitivity remained similar. The best diagnostic performance was provided by the combination of tumour diameter greater than 4 cm, unenhanced CT tumour attenuation greater than 20 HU, and urine steroid metabolomics indicating a high risk of ACC, which provided a PPV of 76·4% and a negative predictive value of 99·7% for ACC. Implications of all the available evidence This study prospectively validated the diagnostic accuracy of urine steroid metabolomics seen in retrospective studies. Use of radiation-free, non-invasive urine steroid metabolomics has a higher PPV than two standard imaging tests, and best performance was seen with the combination of all three tests. Implementation of urine steroid metabolomics in the routine diagnostic assessment of newly discovered adrenal masses could reduce the number of imaging procedures required to diagnose ACC and avoid unnecessary surgery of benign adrenal tumours, potentially yielding beneficial effects with respect to patient burden and health-care costs. The discovery of an adrenal mass prompts two major questions to be addressed by the diagnostic investigations. The first question is whether the tumour causes adrenal hormone excess, which requires exclusion of pheochromocytoma, Cushing's syndrome, and primary aldosteronism via biochemical testing.7, 8, 9 The second question is whether the adrenal mass is an adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). These tumours account for 2–12% of adrenal incidentalomas.10, 11, 12, 13 Prognosis of ACC is poor and cure is achievable only with early detection and surgery. Multimodal and repeated imaging is routinely used to detect and exclude ACC, despite an insufficient evidence base to support this approach due to small studies in heterogeneous populations and with poor reference standards. Based on available data, an unenhanced CT tumour attenuation of less than 10 Hounsfield units (HU) is thought to be indicative of a lipid-rich mass, which is a common characteristic of benign adrenal tumours. European guidelines, therefore, recommend that unenhanced CT should be the primary imaging test to exclude ACC. However, the 10 HU cutoff has poor specificity for malignancy because of the existence of many lipid-poor benign adrenal masses.11, 15, 17 Patients therefore frequently undergo repeated imaging by multiple modalities and the unnecessary surgical removal of adrenal masses that are revealed postoperatively to be benign.10, 11 Urine steroid metabolomics is the combination of mass spectrometry-based urinary steroid metabolite profiling and machine-learning-based data analysis. In a retrospective proof-of-principle study, we showed that this approach was highly promising for the detection of ACC, with high sensitivity (90%) and specificity (88%). Similar findings were reported in several subsequent retrospective studies.19, 20, 21 To validate the use of urine steroid metabolomic testing in this context, we did the prospective, multicentre Evaluation of Urine Steroid Metabolomics in the Differential Diagnosis of Adrenocortical Tumours (EURINE-ACT) study in adult participants with newly diagnosed adrenal masses. We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of urine steroid metabolomics alone and in combination with standard imaging protocols, and compared our findings with histopathology and clinical and imaging follow-up investigations as the reference standard.

Methods

Study design and participants

EURINE-ACT was a prospective test validation study performed according to the STARD guidelines for studies of diagnostic accuracy (appendix pp 36–37) and done in adult participants (age ≥18 years) with a newly identified adrenal mass of more than 1 cm diameter. Exclusion criteria were biochemical evidence of pheochromocytoma (appendix p 5), pregnancy, lactation, and current or recent (<6 months) intake of drugs known to alter steroid synthesis or metabolism. Patients with an adrenal mass discovered during imaging for cancer staging or monitoring were also not eligible. Participants were recruited through specialist centres participating in the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumours ([ENSAT]; appendix p 4). The study was advertised to all ENSAT members, and 21 centres in 14 countries (Brazil, Croatia, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Serbia, the UK, and the USA) agreed to participate and initiated enrolment. We asked centres to recruit prospectively consecutive eligible individuals willing to participate (ie, non-selective recruitment), from Jan 17, 2011, to July 15, 2016. All participating centres obtained local ethics approval for recording of pseudonymised and standardised data in the ENSAT registry relevant to the study (demographic characteristics, method of tumour identification, tumour diameter and imaging characteristics, endocrine testing results, clinical and radiological follow-up data, surgery details, and histopathology data) and for collection and use of participant-related biomaterial (appendix pp 4–5). All participants provided written informed consent before inclusion.

Reference standard

The reference standard for ACC was based on histopathology or, alternatively, the presence of a large adrenal tumour and mixed steroid excess typical of ACC, with no other feasible alternative diagnosis. Adrenal masses were classified as benign based on histopathology after surgical removal, or, in those not removed, by lack of growth on imaging after 6 months or clinical folllow-up of at least 12 months (appendix p 23).

Imaging assessments

Diagnostic investigation for adrenal tumours by imaging was done as part of routine care at the clinical centres in accordance with their standard guidelines. Local centres made decisions about the need for adrenalectomy (and in rare cases adrenal biopsy) based on imaging, without any access to urine steroid metabolomics data. The imaging index tests we recorded were maximum tumour diameter at the time of discovery and imaging characteristics. Tumour diameter of 4 cm or greater indicated suspicion of ACC. Imaging characteristics regarded as suspicious of ACC11, 15 were as follows (in order of ranking): unenhanced CT tumour tissue attenuation (<10 HU, 10–20 HU, or >20 HU in homogeneous tumours or heterogeneous tumours precluding HU measurement); MRI chemical shift analysis with no loss of signal intensity in the tumour area on out-of-phase images; 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET with a tumour standardised uptake value higher than that in the liver; follow-up imaging showing an increase of the maximum diameter of at least 20% 6 months or more after the index scan; and CT contrast washout assessment showing absolute contrast washout from less than 60% of the tumour area. If participants underwent multiple imaging modalities, a positive or negative result for ACC was based on the highest ranking imaging characteristic reported.

Urine steroid metabolomics testing

Enrolled participants collected a 24 h urine sample that was used for multisteroid profiling by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS), with quantification of 15 urinary steroid metabolites (appendix p 19) and application of a machine-learning algorithm. The algorithm was developed by applying generalised matrix learning vector quantisation to steroid excretion data from a retrospective cohort of 139 patients with adrenal masses (40 ACC and 99 adrenocortical adenoma [ACA]) measured retrospectively by use of the LC–MS/MS method used in this study (appendix pp 7–9). Based on the distances of the entirety of the steroid metabolome of ACC and ACA prototypes, the generalised matrix learning vector quantisation classifier provides a test outcome score. The corresponding thresholds were selected to ensure the post-test probability of ACC was greater than 65% in the high-risk group and less than 10% in the low-risk group, giving a moderate risk range of 10–65% (appendix p 9). Urine steroid metabolomics analyses were done after all routine tests in the study centres were completed, but without access to the reference standard findings or other diagnostic information. This timing also prevented urine steroid metabolomics results being communicated to the study centres and affecting the normal diagnostic process.

Statistical analysis

We aimed to include 2000 participants and expected an ACC rate of 5%, based on the results of our proof-of-principle study (appendix p 4), and loss to follow-up of 10%. We calculated that observing 100 ACC cases would provide 95% sensitivity with a 95% CI range of less than 10% and more than 99% power to detect a difference of 3% in specificity (87% vs 90%) between standard imaging protocols and urine steroid metabolomics at the 5% significance level. Characteristics of participants are reported for each type of tumour assessed (ACC, other malignant tumours, ACA, and other benign tumours), with data presented as median (IQR) for categorical results or number (%) for continuous data. For each diagnostic test (maximum tumour diameter [≥4 cm vs <4], imaging characteristics [positive vs negative], or urine steroid metabolomics [low, medium, or high risk of ACC]), we computed the percentage of ACC cases with each test result (giving sensitivity for a positive result in the binary tests); the percentage of non-ACC cases with each test result (giving specificity for a negative result in the binary tests); and the likelihood ratio for each test result. Additionally, we assessed the tests in combinations of two (tumour diameter plus imaging characteristics, tumour diameter plus urine steroid metabolomics, and imaging characteristics plus urine steroid metabolomics) and as a triple test strategy (tumour diameter, followed by imaging characteristics followed by urine steroid metabolomics). We also calculated the proportions of participants with ACC who had each test result to estimate the probability of ACC (ie, positive predictive value [PPV] for positive results and 1 minus negative predictive value [NPV] for negative test results). All results are reported with 95% CIs, computed by use of the exact binomial method for proportions and the Wald-based methods for likelihood ratios. Finally, we investigated the diagnostic utility of increasing the unenhanced CT tumour attenuation threshold from the recommended 10 HU to 20 HU. For urine steroid metabolomics, we calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) with 95% CIs. A sensitivity analysis was done that excluded participants with ACC who had mixed or aberrant steroid excess, clinical presentation of large adrenal mass with extra-adrenal metastases, or bilateral macronodular adrenal hyperplasia and isolated cortisol excess identifying presumed benign tumours. All statistical analyses were done with Stata version 16 and graphs were created in R.

Role of the funding source

The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Results

Between Jan 17, 2011, and July 15, 2016, 2169 eligible participants were recruited from the 21 participating centres and provided 24 h urine samples (figure 1, appendix p 14). However, review of the data showed that only 14 of the 21 centres had a high median annual recruitment rate (33 participants per year) and a median centre-specific proportion of ACC of 3·9%. These 14 centres recruited a total of 2068 participants. By contrast, the seven remaining centres jointly recruited only 101 participants (median annual recruitment rate 6·7), but the median proportion of ACC cases was 35% (appendix p 21). Investigators at these seven sites confirmed that they had recruited selectively, favouring large and suspicious masses, compared with non-selective consecutive recruitment at the other 14 centres. Therefore, we excluded the 101 participants from these seven centres. An additional 51 participants were excluded from the analysis because of sample loss during storage, transport, or processing; therefore, the final analysis cohort consisted of 2017 participants (figure 1). No participants were lost to follow-up.
Figure 1

Study profile

Study profile The median age of included participants was 59 years, 62% were women, and 84% of the adrenal tumours were discovered incidentally (table 1). Diagnosis by the reference standards was ACC in 98 (4·9%), other malignant tumours in 65 (3·2%), ACA in 1767 (87·6%), and other benign tumours in 87 participants (4·3%; table 1, appendix pp 11, 22). Histopathology results were used to provide the diagnosis for 91 (92·9%) of the ACCs, 65 (100·0%) of other malignant tumours, 370 (20·9%) of ACAs, and 59 (67·8%) of other benign tumours. Clinical and radiological follow-up assessments were used to provide the diagnosis for all remaining tumours (appendix p 23).
Table 1

Clinical characteristics and radiological findings of participants included in the study cohort

ACC (n=98)Other malignant tumours (n=65)ACA (n=1767)Other benign tumours (n=87)Total (n=2017)
Sex
Men37 (37·8%)38 (58·5%)663 (37·5%)37 (42·5%)775 (38·4%)
Women61 (62·2%)27 (41·5%)1104 (62·5%)50 (57·5%)1242 (61·6%)
Age at diagnosis (years)50 (42–61)64 (53–70)59 (50–67)52·5 (44–62)59 (49–67)
Incidentally discovered
Yes43 (43·9%)56 (86·2%)1513 (85·6%)74 (85·1%)1686 (83·6%)
No*55 (56·1%)9 (13·8%)254 (14·4%)13 (14·9%)331 (16·4%)
Location of tumour
Right adrenal38 (38·8%)23 (35·4%)556 (31·5%)43 (49·4%)660 (32·7%)
Left adrenal60 (61·2%)35 (53·8%)843 (47·7%)35 (40·2%)973 (48·2%)
Both adrenals07 (10·8%)368 (20·8%)9 (10·3%)384 (19·0%)
Maximum tumour diameter (cm)9·6 (6·5–13·5)6·5 (3·7–10·0)2·5 (1·7–3·5)4·7 (2·7–7·0)2·7 (1·8–3·9)
<206 (9·2%)559 (31·6%)11 (12·6%)576 (28·6%)
2 to <42 (2·0%)13 (20·0%)912 (51·6%)26 (29·9%)953 (47·2%)
≥496 (98·0%)46 (70·8%)296 (16·8%)50 (57·5%)488 (24·2%)
Unenhanced CT tumour attenuation
<10 HU00905 (51·2%)23 (26·4%)928 (46·0%)
10–20 HU1 (1·0%)1 (1·5%)223 (12·6%)9 (10·3%)234 (11·6%)
>20 HU32 (32·7%)38 (58·5%)200 (11·3%)30 (34·5%)300 (14·9%)
Heterogeneous§65 (66·3%)21 (32·3%)01 (1·1%)87 (4·3%)
Not done05 (7·7%)439 (24·8%)24 (27·6%)468 (23·2%)
MRI
Chemical shift present01 (1·5%)247 (14·0%)5 (5·7%)253 (12·5%)
Chemical shift absent1 (1·0%)8 (12·3%)65 (3·7%)15 (17·2%)89 (4·4%)
Not done97 (99·0%)56 (86·2%)1455 (82·3%)67 (77·0%)1675 (83·0%)
18F-FDG PET
Low uptake00123 (7·0%)10 (11·5%)133 (6·6%)
High uptake2 (2·0%)17 (26·2%)4 (0·2%)5 (5·7%)28 (1·4%)
Not done96 (98·0%)48 (73·8%)1640 (92·8%)72 (82·8%)1856 (92·0%)
CT absolute contrast washout
≥60%0019 (1·1%)019 (0·9%)
<60%002 (0·1%)02 (0·1%)
Not done98 (100·0%)65 (100·0%)1746 (98·8%)87 (100·0%)1996 (99·0%)
Maximum diameter on CT after ≥6 months
Stable or reduced05 (7·7%)611 (34·6%)26 (29·9%)642 (31·8%)
Increased >20%08 (12·3%)6 (0·3%)8 (9·2%)22 (1·1%)
Not done98 (100·0%)52 (80·0%)1150 (65·1%)53 (60·9%)1353 (67·1%)
Invasive intervention
Adrenalectomy84 (85·7%)50 (76·9%)370 (20·9%)59 (67·8%)563 (27·9%)
Biopsy7 (7·1%)11 (16·9%)0018 (0·9%)
None7 (7·1%)4 (6·2%)1397 (79·1%)28 (32·2%)1436 (71·2%)

Data are n (%) or median (IQR). ACC=adrenocortical carcinoma. ACA=adrenocortical adenoma. HU=Hounsfield units. 18F-FDG=18F-fluorodeoxyglucose.

Non-incidental modes of discovery included adrenal masses discovered after imaging done for either clinical signs and symptoms indicative of possible steroid excess or suggestive of a tumour (ie, mass effect with abdominal discomfort or symptoms with weight loss, low grade fever, or both).

Negative for ACC.

Positive for ACC.

HU could not be reliably measured and the tumour was classified as positive.

Clinical characteristics and radiological findings of participants included in the study cohort Data are n (%) or median (IQR). ACC=adrenocortical carcinoma. ACA=adrenocortical adenoma. HU=Hounsfield units. 18F-FDG=18F-fluorodeoxyglucose. Non-incidental modes of discovery included adrenal masses discovered after imaging done for either clinical signs and symptoms indicative of possible steroid excess or suggestive of a tumour (ie, mass effect with abdominal discomfort or symptoms with weight loss, low grade fever, or both). Negative for ACC. Positive for ACC. HU could not be reliably measured and the tumour was classified as positive. 563 (27·9%) of 2017 participants underwent adrenalectomy, including 370 with ACA and 59 with other benign tumours (appendix p 22). 186 of these ACAs (50·3%) were either non-functioning (n=81) or showed only mild autonomous cortisol secretion (n=105). Thus, 245 (43·5%) of 563 surgically managed participants would not have required adrenalectomy. Even if mild autonomous cortisol secretion was used as an indication for adrenalectomy, which is not current clinical practice, 140 (24·9%) of 563 adrenal masses would still have not required adrenalectomy. 2737 imaging tests were done in the 2017 participants (appendix p 18). A tumour diameter of at least 4 cm was seen in most participants with ACC and other malignant tumours, around two-thirds of those with other benign tumours and nearly 17% of those with ACA (table 1, figure 2, appendix p 24). The highest-ranking imaging characteristics results were obtained by unenhanced CT in 1549 (76·8%), MRI chemical shift analysis in 227 (11·3%), 18F-FDG PET in 43 (2·1%), follow-up CT in 155, and CT contrast washout assessment in six participants (appendix p 18). All 98 participants with ACC had homogeneous tumours with unenhanced CT tumour attenuation of at least 10 HU or heterogeneous tumours precluding HU measurement (table 1). However, among 1328 participants with ACA, unenhanced CT attenuation was greater than the cutoff of 10 HU (ie, false positive) in 423 participants (31·9%; table 1). With attenuation greater than 20 HU, 97 (99%) participants with ACC remained true positive and false-positive results in ACAs decreased to 200 (15·1%). This change in cutoff from 10 HU to 20 HU therefore improved the specificity for ACC from 64·0% (95% CI 61·4–66.4) to 80·0% (77·9–82·0; appendix p 24). Changing the cutoff from 10 to 20 HU improved specificity across the whole study cohort (figure 2, appendix p 24). For the other imaging modalities, false-positive results in ACAs were seen in 65 (20·8%) of 312 participants with MRI, four (3·1%) of 127 with 18F-FDG PET, and six (1·0%) of 617 with follow-up CT. Tumour diameter and imaging characteristics yielded similar PPVs and NPVs for ACC (table 2, appendix p 24).
Figure 2

Imaging test results

Maximum tumour diameter in patients with ACC (A), other malignant tumours (B), ACA (C), and other benign tumours (D) and distributions of patients with ACC according to positive or negative results for tumour diameter and imaging characteristics with unenhanced CT tumour attenuation cutoff of 10 HU (E) or 20 HU (F). ACA=adrenocortical adenoma. ACC=adrenocortical carcinoma. HU=Hounsfield units.

Table 2

Performance of tests and combination test strategies

ACC (n=98)Other malignant tumours (n=65)All non-ACC tumours (n=1919)ACA (n=1767)Other benign tumours (n=87)Total (n=2017)Percentage of ACC cases (95% CI)Percentage of non-ACC cases (95% CI)Likelihood ratio (95% CI)Post-test probability of ACC (per 100 participants with results)
Single-test strategies
Tumour diameter
≥4 cm96463922965048898·0% (92·8–99·8)*20·4% (18·6–22·3)4·8 (4·4–5·3)19·7 (16·2–23·5)
<4 cm219152714713715292·0% (0·2–7·2)79·6% (77·7–81·4)0·03 (0·01–0·10)0·1 (0·0–0·5)
Imaging characteristics
Positive97633962894449399·0% (94·4–100·0)*20·6% (18·8–22·5)4·8 (4·4–5·3)19·7 (16·3–23·5)
Negative12152314784315241·0% (0·0–5·6)79·4% (77·5–81·2)0·01 (0·00–0·09)0·1 (0·0–0·4)
Urine steroid metabolomics
High risk of ACC837157143724084·7% (76·0–91·2)8·2% (7·0–9·5)10·4 (8·7–12·3)34·6 (28·6–41·0)
Moderate risk of ACC13286555784966813·3% (7·3–21·6)34·1% (32·0–36·3)0·39 (0·23–0·65)1·9 (1·0–3·3)
Low risk of ACC230110710463111092·0% (0·2–7·2)57·7% (55·4–59·9)0·04 (0·01–0·14)0·2 (0·0–0·6)
Combined-test strategies
Tumour diameter and imaging characteristics
≥4 cm and positive9545152832424796·9% (91·3–99·4)*7·9% (6·8–9·2)12·2 (10·5–14·3)38·5 (32·4–44·8)
<4 cm, negative, or both320176716846317703·1% (0·6–8·7)92·1% (90·8–93·2)0·03 (0·01–0·10)0·2 (0·0–0·5)
Tumour diameter and urine steroid metabolomics
≥4 cm and high risk of ACC8274633612883·7% (74·8–90·4)2·4% (1·8–3·2)34·9 (25·9–47·1)64·1 (55·1–72·3)
≥4 cm and moderate risk of ACC1220130852514212·2% (6·5–20·4)6·8% (5·7–8·0)1·8 (1·0–3·2)8·5 (4·4–14·3)
<4 cm, low risk of ACC, or both438174316495617474·1% (1·1–10·1)90·8% (89·4–92·1)0·04 (0·02–0·12)0·2 (0·0–0·6)
Imaging characteristics and urine steroid metabolomics
Positive and high risk of ACC8264335212583·7% (74·8–90·4)2·2% (1·6–3·0)37·3 (27·4–50·8)65·6 (56·6–73·9)
Positive and moderate risk of ACC1328155973016813·3% (7·3–21·6)8·0% (6·9–9·4)1·69 (1·00–2·87)7·7 (4·2–12·9)
Negative, low risk of ACC, or both331172116355517243·1% (0·6–8·7)89·7% (88·2–91·0)0·03 (0·01–0·10)0·2 (0·0–0·5)
Tumour diameter, imaging characteristics, and urine steroid metabolomics
≥4 cm, positive, and high risk of ACC8162517210682·7% (73·7–89·6)1·3% (0·8–1·9)63·4 (42·5–94·6)76·4 (67·2–84·1)
≥4 cm, positive, and moderate risk of ACC12205823157012·2% (6·5–20·4)3·0% (2·3–3·9)4·1 (2·3–7·3)17·1 (9·2–28·0)
<4 cm, negative, low risk of ACC, or a combination539183617277018415·1% (1·7–11·5)95·7% (94·7–96·5)0·05 (0·02–0·13)0·3 (0·0–0·6)

Data in columns one to six are numbers of participants. ACC=adrenocortical carcinoma. ACA=adrenocortical adenoma.

Sensitivity.

Specificity.

Positive was classified as unenhanced CT attenuation >20 Houndsfield units in homogeneous tumours or heterogeneous tumours precluding measurement of attenuation.

Imaging test results Maximum tumour diameter in patients with ACC (A), other malignant tumours (B), ACA (C), and other benign tumours (D) and distributions of patients with ACC according to positive or negative results for tumour diameter and imaging characteristics with unenhanced CT tumour attenuation cutoff of 10 HU (E) or 20 HU (F). ACA=adrenocortical adenoma. ACC=adrenocortical carcinoma. HU=Hounsfield units. Performance of tests and combination test strategies Data in columns one to six are numbers of participants. ACC=adrenocortical carcinoma. ACA=adrenocortical adenoma. Sensitivity. Specificity. Positive was classified as unenhanced CT attenuation >20 Houndsfield units in homogeneous tumours or heterogeneous tumours precluding measurement of attenuation. The accuracy of urine steroid metabolomics was high (AUROC 94·6%, 95% CI 92·2–96·9; appendix p 29). Urine steroid metabolomics profiles indicating high risk of ACC were seen in 83 (84·7%) of 98 participants with ACC and 157 (8·2%) of 1919 with non-ACC masses (table 2, appendix p 29). High risk of ACC indicated by urine steroid metabolomics substantially improved PPV compared with imaging tests, while a low-risk score had similar ability to imaging tests to rule out ACC (table 2). A urine steroid metabolomics profile indicating moderate risk of ACC (n=668 [33·1%]) was associated with a PPV of 1·9% (table 2). Cross-tabulation of urine steroid metabolomics results against results obtained with the three most frequently used imaging modalities—unenhanced CT, MRI chemical shift, and 18F-FDG PET—showed that high risk of ACC based on urine steroid metabolomics was consistently associated with lower false-positive rates (appendix pp 26–28). Imaging performance was generally better in non-ACC tumours smaller than 4 cm than in those 4 cm or larger. Unenhanced CT had a higher true-positive rate for ACC than a urine steroid metabolomics result indicating high risk of ACC (appendix p 26); MRI or 18F-FDG PET were used to assess very few ACCs (appendix pp 27–28), precluding comparisons with these methods. 247 (12·2%) of 2017 participants had positive results for tumour diameter and imaging characteristics. Among these, 95 of the 98 ACCs were true positives, leaving 152 false-positive results (figure 3). Participants with a urine steroid metabolomics result indicating a high risk of ACC and a positive result for either tumour diameter or imaging characteristics increased the PPV for ACC compared with having combined positive tumour diameter and imaging characteristic results (table 2, figure 3, appendix p 29). When urine steroid metabolomics was combined with tumour diameter, only four participants with ACC were dismissed, and when combined with imaging characteristics only three were dismissed (table 2).
Figure 3

Diagnostic accuracy of single-test and multiple-test strategies for detecting ACC

(A) Diagnostic accuracy of the three index tests (tumour diameter, imaging characteristics [unenhanced CI attenuation >20 HU], and urine steroid metabolomics) as single tests, in double combinations, and as a triple-test strategy. (B) Flowchart illustrating the distribution of ACC cases when applying the triple-test strategy in the order: tumour diameter, imaging characteristics (unenhanced CT attenuation >20 HU), and urine steroid metabolomics. ACC=adrenocortical carcinoma. HU=Hounsfield units. ImChar=imaging characteristics. USM-HR=urine steroid metabolomics profile indicating high risk of ACC. USM-LR=urine steroid metabolomics profile indicating low risk of ACC. USM-MR=urine steroid metabolomics profile indicating moderate risk of ACC.

Diagnostic accuracy of single-test and multiple-test strategies for detecting ACC (A) Diagnostic accuracy of the three index tests (tumour diameter, imaging characteristics [unenhanced CI attenuation >20 HU], and urine steroid metabolomics) as single tests, in double combinations, and as a triple-test strategy. (B) Flowchart illustrating the distribution of ACC cases when applying the triple-test strategy in the order: tumour diameter, imaging characteristics (unenhanced CT attenuation >20 HU), and urine steroid metabolomics. ACC=adrenocortical carcinoma. HU=Hounsfield units. ImChar=imaging characteristics. USM-HR=urine steroid metabolomics profile indicating high risk of ACC. USM-LR=urine steroid metabolomics profile indicating low risk of ACC. USM-MR=urine steroid metabolomics profile indicating moderate risk of ACC. In the triple testing strategy, a result of tumour diameter larger than 4 cm, positive imaging characteristics (attenuation >20 HU), and a urine steroid metabolomics result indicating high risk of ACC, yielded a group of 106 participants, including 81 of the 98 participants with ACC (figure 3), giving a PPV for ACC of 76·4% (table 2). The triple testing strategy classified 70 participants as having moderate risk of ACC, including 12 of the 98 participants with ACC (PPV 17·1%, table 2). The ability of the triple testing strategy to rule out ACC was high (table 2). In a sensitivity analysis, when participants with mixed or aberrant steroid excess (n=42), clinical presentation of large adrenal mass with extra-adrenal metastases (n=13), and bilateral macronodular adrenal hyperplasia and isolated cortisol excess (n=22) were excluded, the high accuracy of urine steroid metabolomics compared with imaging was confirmed, as was the improvement of accuracy when urine steroid metabolomics was used in combination with imaging modalities (appendix pp 16, 30–32). Among the 65 non-ACC malignant tumours, 46 (70·8%) had a tumour diameter greater than 4 cm, 63 (97·0%) had positive imaging characteristics, and seven (10·8%) had a urine steroid metabolomics profile indicating high risk of ACC. These tumours could not be reliably differentiated from ACA and other benign tumours with any of the combined testing strategies (appendix pp 17, 33–35)

Discussion

Our results have validated the diagnostic utility of urine steroid metabolomics in detecting ACC in participants with newly diagnosed adrenal masses. Diagnostic accuracy of urine steroid metabolomics was high compared with maximum tumour diameter and imaging characteristics, and the best performance was seen when these three methods were combined. We also showed that using a cutoff of 20 HU for unenhanced CT tumour attenuation increases the accuracy of imaging characteristic assessment for exclusion of ACC compared with the currently recommended cutoff of 10 HU, which has immediate implications for clinical practice. 1686 (83·6%) of the adrenal tumours in our study cohort had been discovered incidentally, yielding to our knowledge the largest prospective cohort of participants with adrenal incidentaloma. We achieved this study size via a comprehensive, multicentre, non-selective approach, completing recruitment in 5·5 years. This cohort size compares favourably with the largest retrospective adrenal incidentaloma cohort, in which 1096 patients were identified over a 15-year period (1980–95). The distribution of underlying pathologies in our cohort was similar to those in retrospective studies,10, 11 showing the representativeness of our cohort for clinical practice. 96 of 98 ACCs in our study were larger than 4 cm. This cutoff was previously suggested to be sensitive (93%) for differentiating ACC from ACA, but to have poor specificity.10, 11, 15, 17, 22 Given the non-selective nature of recruitment in EURINE-ACT and the small number of ACCs less than 4 cm in diameter, growth velocity of these tumours seems to be very rapid, making early-stage detection unlikely. 1549 (76·8%) of participants in the study underwent unenhanced CT. Only one ACC had attenuation below 20 HU, giving this cutoff considerably improved specificity compared with the 10 HU cutoff recommended in the European guidelines.11, 15, 16, 17 Applying cutoffs of 4 cm for maximum tumour diameter and 20 HU for unenhanced CT tumour attenuation would, therefore, help to avoid unnecessary imaging procedures and adrenalectomies. PPV was greater with urine steroid metabolomics than with tumour diameter and imaging characteristics. Combination of all three approaches gave the best overall detection of ACC, even when ACC tumours potentially identifiable by other parameters, such as mixed or aberrant steroid patterns or clinical presentations, were excluded. Based on our triple test strategy in the whole study cohort (n=2017), following the initial scan that provided tumour size measurements, only 488 participants (24·2%) would have required further imaging. Additionally, participants with a urine steroid metabolomics result indicating high risk of ACC could have undergone surgery for ACC earlier and fewer unnecessary surgeries for benign tumours would have been done. For participants with urine steroid metabolomics results indicating moderate risk of ACC in the triple strategy, the PPV was 17%. Rather than blanket surgical removal, these participants could be managed individually, such as with detailed re-review of scans by a multidisciplinary team and consideration of biopsy. Although histopathology of an adrenal biopsy cannot differentiate between ACC and ACA, it can be informative in patients with other benign and malignant adrenocortical tumours, including metastases of extra-adrenal cancers. Strengths of our study include its prospective, consecutive, and non-selective recruitment, and the relatively short time needed for recruitment (avoiding biases due to change in diagnostic technologies and standards). Our previous proof-of-principle study of urine steroid metabolomics for ACC detection involved urinary steroid profiling by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, which is a low-throughput method requiring highly specialised expertise. In this study, we used the high-throughput LC–MS/MS approach, which is much more widely available. Although a similar multisteroid profiling method has been described elsewhere, our method includes a machine-learning algorithm that was trained on steroid data measured by LC–MS/MS in a retrospective cohort, precluding error due to non-standardised assessment of steroid profiling results. Other strengths of our study include the exclusion of participants undergoing imaging for cancer monitoring and the non-communication of urine steroid metabolomics results to clinical centres so as not to influence the usual diagnostic process. Weaknesses of this study include its observational nature; notably, recruitment centres could use their preferred imaging modalities and, therefore, the numbers assessed by MRI or 18F-FDG PET were too low for comprehensive assessment. Participating centres were specialist adrenal tumour centres, but in non-specialised secondary care settings the proportions of large and malignant tumours might be lower. Histopathology was done only for participants who had surgery or biopsy, meaning that our reference standard was heterogeneous. However, it was of higher quality than most earlier diagnostic studies15, 24 and is representative of clinical practice. We did not do a centralised pathology review, but as the study sites were high-volume specialist centres with established adrenal pathology expertise, all pathologists applied relevant multifactorial scoring systems for assessment of malignant potential in adrenal cortical neoplasms.25, 26 In conclusion, our findings suggest that use of urine steroid metabolomics in diagnostic pathways could improve detection of ACC. We recommend a combined testing strategy of assessment with unenhanced CT, with a tumour attenuation cutoff of 20 HU, and urine steroid metabolomics. We anticipate that these changes would substantially lessen the burden on and morbidity in patients with benign adrenal tumours and suspicious imaging findings, and lead to reductions in health-care costs due to decreased numbers of imaging procedures, time to surgery in ACC, and numbers of unnecessary surgeries.

Data sharing

We will consider sharing de-identified, individual participant-level data that underlie the results reported in this Article on receipt of a request detailing the study hypothesis and statistical analysis plan. All requests should be sent to the corresponding author. The corresponding author and lead investigators of this study will discuss all requests and make decisions about whether data sharing is appropriate based on the scientific rigour of the proposal. All applicants will be asked to sign a data access agreement.
  23 in total

Review 1.  The clinically inapparent adrenal mass: update in diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Georg Mansmann; Joseph Lau; Ethan Balk; Michael Rothberg; Yukitaka Miyachi; Stefan R Bornstein
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 19.871

2.  The diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Lynnette K Nieman; Beverly M K Biller; James W Findling; John Newell-Price; Martin O Savage; Paul M Stewart; Victor M Montori
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 3.  Adrenocortical carcinoma.

Authors:  Tobias Else; Alex C Kim; Aaron Sabolch; Victoria M Raymond; Asha Kandathil; Elaine M Caoili; Shruti Jolly; Barbra S Miller; Thomas J Giordano; Gary D Hammer
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 19.871

4.  Clinical utility of noncontrast computed tomography attenuation value (hounsfield units) to differentiate adrenal adenomas/hyperplasias from nonadenomas: Cleveland Clinic experience.

Authors:  Amir H Hamrahian; Adriana G Ioachimescu; Erick M Remer; Gaspar Motta-Ramirez; Hari Bogabathina; Howard S Levin; Sethu Reddy; Inderbir S Gill; Allan Siperstein; Emmanuel L Bravo
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-11-30       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 5.  Incidentally discovered adrenal masses.

Authors:  R T Kloos; M D Gross; I R Francis; M Korobkin; B Shapiro
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 19.871

6.  The incidental adrenal mass on CT: prevalence of adrenal disease in 1,049 consecutive adrenal masses in patients with no known malignancy.

Authors:  Julie H Song; Fakhra S Chaudhry; William W Mayo-Smith
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Different Types of Urinary Steroid Profiling Obtained by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry in Patients with Adrenocortical Carcinoma.

Authors:  L I Velikanova; Z R Shafigullina; A A Lisitsin; N V Vorokhobina; K Grigoryan; E A Kukhianidze; E G Strelnikova; N S Krivokhizhina; L M Krasnov; E A Fedorov; I V Sablin; A L Moskvin; E A Bessonova
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.869

8.  Case detection, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with primary aldosteronism: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  John W Funder; Robert M Carey; Carlos Fardella; Celso E Gomez-Sanchez; Franco Mantero; Michael Stowasser; William F Young; Victor M Montori
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Urine steroid metabolomics as a biomarker tool for detecting malignancy in adrenal tumors.

Authors:  Wiebke Arlt; Michael Biehl; Angela E Taylor; Stefanie Hahner; Rossella Libé; Beverly A Hughes; Petra Schneider; David J Smith; Han Stiekema; Nils Krone; Emilio Porfiri; Giuseppe Opocher; Jerôme Bertherat; Franco Mantero; Bruno Allolio; Massimo Terzolo; Peter Nightingale; Cedric H L Shackleton; Xavier Bertagna; Martin Fassnacht; Paul M Stewart
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 5.958

10.  Clinical, Biochemical, and Radiological Characteristics of a Single-Center Retrospective Cohort of 705 Large Adrenal Tumors.

Authors:  Nicole M Iñiguez-Ariza; Jacob D Kohlenberg; Danae A Delivanis; Robert P Hartman; Diana S Dean; Melinda A Thomas; Muhammad Z Shah; Justine Herndon; Travis J McKenzie; Wiebke Arlt; William F Young; Irina Bancos
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2017-12-21
View more
  26 in total

1.  ASO Author Reflections: How Should Adrenal Incidentalomas be Managed in the Current Era?

Authors:  Eren Berber
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  Surgical treatment of adrenal tumors during pregnancy.

Authors:  Marisa A Bartz-Kurycki; Sophie Dream; Tracy S Wang
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Congenital adrenal hyperplasia in patients with adrenal tumors: a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  F Sahlander; J Patrova; B Mannheimer; J D Lindh; H Falhammar
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 5.467

Review 4.  Urine steroid profile as a new promising tool for the evaluation of adrenal tumors. Literature review.

Authors:  Marta Araujo-Castro; Pablo Valderrábano; Héctor F Escobar-Morreale; Felicia A Hanzu; Gregori Casals
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 5.  Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia-Current Insights in Pathophysiology, Diagnostics, and Management.

Authors:  Hedi L Claahsen-van der Grinten; Phyllis W Speiser; S Faisal Ahmed; Wiebke Arlt; Richard J Auchus; Henrik Falhammar; Christa E Flück; Leonardo Guasti; Angela Huebner; Barbara B M Kortmann; Nils Krone; Deborah P Merke; Walter L Miller; Anna Nordenström; Nicole Reisch; David E Sandberg; Nike M M L Stikkelbroeck; Philippe Touraine; Agustini Utari; Stefan A Wudy; Perrin C White
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 19.871

6.  18F-FDG-PET/CT Evaluation of Indeterminate Adrenal Masses in Noncancer Patients.

Authors:  Xin He; Elaine M Caoili; Anca M Avram; Barbra S Miller; Tobias Else
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 7.  Steroid profiling in the diagnosis of mild and overt Cushing's syndrome.

Authors:  Shobana Athimulam; Stefan Grebe; Irina Bancos
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 4.690

8.  Presentation and outcomes of adrenal ganglioneuromas: A cohort study and a systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Kelley N Dages; Jacob D Kohlenberg; William F Young; Mohammad Hassan Murad; Larry Prokop; Michael Rivera; Benzon Dy; Trenton Foster; Melanie Lyden; Travis McKenzie; Geoffrey Thompson; Irina Bancos
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.523

Review 9.  Adrenocortical carcinoma: current state of the art, ongoing controversies, and future directions in diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Omair A Shariq; Travis J McKenzie
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 10.  Approach to the Patient With Adrenal Incidentaloma.

Authors:  Irina Bancos; Alessandro Prete
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 6.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.