| Literature DB >> 32708084 |
Laura Rey-Barroso1, Mónica Roldán2,3, Francisco J Burgos-Fernández1, Susanna Gassiot3,4, Anna Ruiz Llobet5, Ignacio Isola3,4, Meritxell Vilaseca1.
Abstract
Hemoglobinopathies represent the most common single-gene defects in the world and pose a major public health problem, particularly in tropical countries, where they occur with high frequency. Diagnosing hemoglobinopathies can sometimes be difficult due to the coexistence of different causes of anemia, such as thalassemia and iron deficiency, and blood transfusions, among other factors, and requires expensive and complex molecular tests. This work explores the possibility of using spectral confocal microscopy as a diagnostic tool for thalassemia in pediatric patients, a disease caused by mutations in the globin genes that result in changes of the globin chains that form hemoglobin-in pediatric patients. Red blood cells (RBCs) from patients with different syndromes of alpha-thalassemia and iron deficiency (including anemia) as well as healthy (control) subjects were analyzed under a Leica TCS SP8 confocal microscope following different image acquisition protocols. We found that diseased RBCs exhibited autofluorescence when excited at 405 nm and their emission was collected in the spectral range from 425 nm to 790 nm. Three experimental descriptors calculated from the mean emission intensities at 502 nm, 579 nm, 628 nm, and 649 nm allowed us to discriminate between diseased and healthy cells. According to the results obtained, spectral confocal microscopy could serve as a tool in the diagnosis of thalassemia.Entities:
Keywords: autofluorescence; confocal microscopy; red blood cells; spectral imaging; spectroscopy; thalassemia
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32708084 PMCID: PMC7412432 DOI: 10.3390/s20144039
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Indices for control, thalassemic, and iron-deficient patients: hemoglobin (Hb) in g/dL; medium corpuscular volume (MCV) in fL; medium corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) in pg.
| Indices | Hb (g/dL) | MCV (fl) | MCH (pg) |
|---|---|---|---|
| TC1 | 14.1 ± 0.32 | 87 ± 0.71 | 29.4 ± 0.42 |
| TC2 | 11.8 ± 0.49 | 80 ± 1.77 | 26.9 ± 0.46 |
| TC3 | 13.3 ± 0.03 | 89 ± 1.41 | 29.5 ± 0.46 |
| TC4 | 13.7 ± 0.18 | 85 ± 0.00 | 28.5 ± 0.11 |
| TC5 | 13.6 ± 0.14 | 83 ± 0.71 | 28.0 ± 0.07 |
| TC6 | 13.3 ± 0.03 | 80 ± 1.77 | 26.7 ± 0.53 |
| TC7 | 12.3 ± 0.32 | 88 ± 1.06 | 28.6 ± 0.14 |
| TC8 | 13.5 ± 0.11 | 86 ± 0.35 | 28.2 ± 0.00 |
| Mean | 13.2 ± 0.00 | 85 ± 0.00 | 28.2 ± 0.00 |
| T1 | 7.8 ± 1.17 | 68 ± 1.51 | 16.8 ± 2.08 |
| T1_2 | 9.0 ± 0.72 | 75 ± 1.13 | 18.2 ± 1.55 |
| T2 | 10.8 ± 0.04 | 63 ± 3.40 | 19.4 ± 1.09 |
| T3 | 10.4 ± 0.19 | 74 ± 0.76 | 25.1 ± 1.06 |
| T4 | 14.3 ± 1.29 | 74 ± 0.76 | 25.4 ± 1.17 |
| T5 | 11.3 ± 0.15 | 75 ± 1.13 | 25.4 ± 1.17 |
| T6 | 12.6 ± 0.64 | 78 ± 2.26 | 25.6 ± 1.24 |
| Mean | 10.9 ± 0.00 | 72 ± 0.00 | 22.3 ± 0.00 |
| TA1 | 9.9 ± 0.69 | 81 ± 4.04 | 25.0 ± 0.98 |
| TA2 | 12.9 ± 1.04 | 77 ± 1.73 | 26.0 ± 1.55 |
| TA3 | 10.6 ± 0.29 | 65 ± 5.19 | 18.9 ± 2.54 |
| Mean | 11.1 ± 0.00 | 74 ± 0.00 | 23.3 ± 0.00 |
Figure 1Intensity vs. wavelength (top) and images from autofluorescence of red blood cells (RBCs) (bottom) corresponding to 453 nm, 502 nm, 579 nm, 628 nm, and 649 nm wavelengths, for the following samples: (a) TC1, from a control patient; (b) T1, HbH (severely diseased); (c) T2, SEA heterozygous deletion; (d) TA3, from a patient with iron-deficiency anemia. It can be appreciated that cellular structures appear brighter in T1, T2, and TA3.
Average emission intensity (a.u.) at principal screening wavelengths and their associated standard error, depending on variability of the spectrum within the selected regions of interest (ROIs) and number of fields analyzed within the sample. Only data from some subjects of each group are shown.
| Wavelength (nm) | 450 | 502 | 579 | 628 | 649 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC1 | 42.0 ± 13.0 | 58.8 ± 13.5 | 26.5 ± 3.5 | 9.5 ± 1.2 | 6.2 ± 0.8 |
| TC5 | 30.2 ± 6.8 | 46.0 ± 11.6 | 26.6 ± 6.7 | 14.7 ± 3.7 | 11.8 ± 3.1 |
| T1 | 13.5 ± 1.9 | 24.2 ± 3.3 | 12.6 ± 1.4 | 37.9 ± 7.8 | 31.6 ± 4.1 |
| T1_2 | 7.6 ± 1.3 | 13.3 ± 2.6 | 8.7 ± 1.3 | 42.9 ± 4.0 | 20.3 ± 2.1 |
| T2 | 6.5 ± 0.3 | 7.3 ± 0.8 | 5.2 ± 1.1 | 36.6 ± 12.5 | 37.9 ± 5.1 |
| T5 | 12.8 ± 0.4 | 16.6 ± 0.7 | 9.7 ± 0.7 | 11.1 ± 2.3 | 8.5 ± 2.0 |
| TA2 | 16.0 ± 0.6 | 15.7 ± 0.6 | 35.0 ± 4.9 | 36.9 ± 2.5 | 19.1 ± 1.3 |
| TA3 | 9.6 ± 0.2 | 10.9 ± 0.2 | 16.9 ± 1.2 | 18.4 ± 1.3 | 19.2 ± 1.3 |
Figure 2Intensity vs. wavelength (average curves) computed from autofluorescence images of samples (a) TC1 and TC5 (healthy subjects); (b) T1 and T1_2 (HbH disease); (c) T2 (SEA heterozygous deletion) and T5 (3,7 kb heterozygous deletion); (d) TA2 and TA3 (iron deficiency).
Averaged ratios for main emission peaks. Iλ: intensity at different wavelengths; RBC: average number of RBCs per field.
| Patient | Ratio 1 | Ratio 2 | Ratio 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| TC1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.97 |
| TC3 | 0.12 | 0.20 | 1.54 |
| TC4 | 0.41 | 0.52 | 1.53 |
| TC5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.72 |
| TC6 | 0.36 | 0.47 | 1.41 |
| TC7 | 0.45 | 0.79 | 1.76 |
| TC8 | 0.63 | 0.72 | 1.16 |
| T1 | 2.96 | 3.55 | 1.95 |
| T1_2 | 1.15 | 2.42 | 1.66 |
| T2 | 0.99 | 1.11 | 1.80 |
| T3 | 0.68 | 0.94 | 1.71 |
| T5 | 2.09 | 2.72 | 1.70 |
| T6 | 0.80 | 1.10 | 1.18 |
| TA1 | 6.43 | 6.29 | 1.69 |
| TA2 | 1.53 | 2.96 | 0.98 |
| TA3 | 2.90 | 2.79 | 0.92 |
Figure 3Graphical representation of averaged ratios of main peaks of emission. (a) Circles represent values of ratio 1, (I502/I628)·RBC, and X’s correspond to ratio 2, (I502/I649)·RBC. (b) Ratio 3, I502/I579.