| Literature DB >> 32708022 |
Byeong-Ho Jeong1, Jeffrey Ng2, Suk Hyeon Jeong1, Hojoong Kim1.
Abstract
Background andEntities:
Keywords: benign tracheobronchial stenosis; metallic stent; silicone stent
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32708022 PMCID: PMC7466364 DOI: 10.3390/medicina56080367
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) ISSN: 1010-660X Impact factor: 2.430
Clinical characteristics at the time of the first intervention at our institution.
| Variables | |
|---|---|
| Age, year | 40 (26–62) |
| Sex, female | 12 (60) |
| Comorbidities | |
| No | 6 (30) |
| Old tuberculosis | 7 (35) |
| Cerebrovascular disease | 4 (20) |
| Diabetes | 3 (15) |
| Lobectomy status * | 2 (10) |
| Leukemia | 1 (5) |
| Etiology of benign tracheobronchial stenosis | |
| Post-tuberculous tracheobronchial stenosis | 7 (35) |
| Post-intubation tracheal stenosis | 5 (25) |
| Post-tracheostomy tracheal stenosis | 5 (25) |
| Others † | 3 (15) |
| ASA physical status ‡ | |
| Class 1 | 2 (10) |
| Class 2 | 12 (60) |
| Class 3 | 4 (20) |
| Class 4 | 2 (10) |
| Intubation or tracheostomy due to respiratory failure before intervention | 4 (20) |
| Stenosis site | |
| Trachea | 14 (70) |
| Left main bronchus | 5 (25) |
| Bronchus intermedius | 1 (5) |
| Severity of stenosis (Myer and Cotton Grade) § | |
| I | 1 (5) |
| II | 2 (10) |
| III | 14 (70) |
| IV | 3 (15) |
| Spirometry ( | |
| FEV1/FVC | 69 (58–75) |
| FEV1, L | 1.95 (1.68–2.10) |
| FEV1, % predicted | 78 (67–88) |
| FVC, L | 2.79 (2.49–3.00) |
| FVC, % predicted | 86 (72–103) |
| Type of SEMS | |
| Covered SEMS | 19 (95) |
| Uncovered SEMS | 1 (5) |
| Length of SEMS, mm | 55 (45–78) |
| Duration of SEMS in place, months | 3 (2–8) |
| Reason for removal of SEMS | |
| Granulation tissue overgrowth | 20 (100) |
| Stent migration | 4 (20) |
| Stent fracture | 1 (5) |
Data are presented as n (%) or the median (interquartile range). ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists; FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in 1 sec; FVC = forced vital capacity; SEMS = self-expandable metallic stent. * Diagnostic lobectomy of left upper lobe for indeterminant nodule (n = 1), and therapeutic lobectomy of left lower lobe for bronchiectasis (n = 1). † Post-operative tracheal stenosis (n = 1), traumatic bronchial rupture (n = 1), and tracheomalacia (n = 1). ‡ Class 1, a normally healthy patient; Class 2, a patient with mild systemic disease; Class 3, a patient with severe systemic disease that is not incapacitating; Class 4, a patient with an incapacitating systemic disease that is a constant threat to life. § Categorization is based on the percentage of reduction in cross-sectional area. Grade I, ≤50% luminal stenosis; Grade II, 51–70% luminal stenosis; Grade III, 71–99% luminal stenosis; and Grade IV, no lumen.
Treatment modalities during follow-up.
| Variables | |
|---|---|
| Duration of follow-up after the first intervention at our hospital, months | 40 (19–88) |
| Number of interventional bronchoscopies | 7 (2–10) |
| Treatment modalities * | |
| Successful removal of SEMS | 19 (95) |
| Silicone stent insertion | 19 (95) |
| Dumon or Natural stent | 17/19 (89) |
| Y-stent | 6/19 (32) |
| Montgomery T-tube | 2/19 (11) |
| Ballooning | 9 (45) |
| Laser therapy | 5 (25) |
| Tracheostomy tube insertion | 5 (25) |
Data are presented as n (%) or the median (interquartile range). SEMS = self-expandable metallic stent. * Patients could undergo more than one procedure.
Figure 1Clinical course of patients with a self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) for benign tracheobronchial stenosis.
Clinical outcomes.
| Variables | |
|---|---|
| Immediate symptom relief | 20 (100) |
| Acute complications during the SEMS removal | 3 (15) |
| Mucosal tear and bleeding | 2 (10) * |
| Tracheo-esophageal fistula | 1 (5) † |
| Chronic complications during the follow-up | 20 (100) |
| Granulation tissue overgrowth | 16 (80) |
| Stent migration | 11/19 (58) ‡ |
| Mucostasis | 11 (55) |
| Malacia | 7 (35) |
| Tracheoesophageal fistula | 3 (15) |
| Restenosis after stent removal | 3/7 (43) § |
| Spirometry in the last state ( | |
| FEV1/FVC | 71 (65–84) |
| FEV1, L | 2.50 (1.89–2.86) |
| FEV1, % predicted | 88 (79–108) |
| FVC, L | 3.26 (2.61–3.85) |
| FVC, % predicted | 92 (77–104) |
| Final outcomes | |
| Persistent silicone stent placement | 15 (75) |
| Duration of stent placement, months | 65 (35–106) |
| Successful silicone stent removal | 4 (20) |
| Duration of stent placement, months | 12 (7–22) |
| Duration of follow-up after stent removal, months | 6 (4–26) |
| Successful removal of SEMS without additional stenting | 1 (5) ¶ |
| Permanent tracheostomy | 5 (25) |
| Surgical management | 0 (0) |
| Mortality | 1 (5) ǁ |
Data are presented as n (%) or the median (interquartile range). SEMS = self-expandable metallic stent; FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in 1 sec; FVC = forced vital capacity. * These cases needed admission to the intensive care unit. † The fistula spontaneously healed after two weeks of fasting. ‡ Excluded one patient who did not require additional stenting after SEMS removal. § Seven patients who underwent stent removal at least once are the denominator. ¶ This patient underwent rigid bronchoscopy with ballooning and laser treatment for bronchial stricture eight months after SEMS removal. ǁ This patient died after tracheostomy tube dislodgement 11 months after SEMS removal.
Figure 2A case in which the SEMS could not be completely removed. A 47-year-old female complained of progressive dyspnea. She was treated for endobronchial tuberculosis and underwent insertion of an uncovered SEMS in the left main bronchus 17 years prior. (A) Chest radiography showed a 45-mm SEMS in the left main bronchus. Her left upper lobe was already completely destroyed on chest computed tomography. (B,C) Her left main bronchus was almost totally obstructed by granulation tissue overgrowth. (D) We tried to remove the SEMS, but most of the stent was embedded (yellow arrows) in the deep layer of the bronchus. (E) After mechanical dilatation, a Natural stent (outer diameter = 10 mm, length = 45 mm) was inserted into the left main bronchus. (F) After the procedure, the remaining SEMS (length = 35 mm) was visible on chest radiography.
Figure 3A case in which the SEMS was successfully removed but a silicone stent was needed to maintain airway patency. A 35-year-old male who had undergone tracheostomy nine years prior due to a traffic accident suffered from progressive dyspnea after tracheostomy closure and subsequently underwent SEMS insertion. However, he experienced progressive respiratory distress again two months after stent insertion. The patient was referred to our institution with a tracheostomy. (A) Chest radiography showed a 75-mm SEMS in the trachea and a tracheostomy tube (red arrow). (B) There was no stenosis at the upper end of the SEMS. (C) However, there was Grade III stenosis at the lower end of the SEMS. (D) The SEMS was rolled up and pulled out using optical rigid forceps. Severe stenosis and granulation tissue remained in the trachea. (E) We inserted two Natural stents with an outer diameter of 12 mm and a length of 80 mm (sewn 50 mm and 30 mm stents using black silk (yellow arrows)). (F) Then, we inserted a tracheal stoma retainer through the tracheostomy site (green arrow).