| Literature DB >> 32706533 |
Robert Y Chen1, Vanderlene L Kung1, Subhasish Das1, M Shabab Hossain1, Matthew C Hibberd1, Janaki Guruge1, Mustafa Mahfuz1, S M Khodeza Nahar Begum1, M Masudur Rahman1, Shah Mohammad Fahim1, M Amran Gazi1, Rashidul Haque1, Shafiqul A Sarker1, Ramendra N Mazumder1, Blanda Di Luccia1, Kazi Ahsan1, Elizabeth Kennedy1, Jesus Santiago-Borges1, Dmitry A Rodionov1, Semen A Leyn1, Andrei L Osterman1, Michael J Barratt1, Tahmeed Ahmed1, Jeffrey I Gordon1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Environmental enteric dysfunction (EED) is an enigmatic disorder of the small intestine that is postulated to play a role in childhood undernutrition, a pressing global health problem. Defining the incidence of this disorder, its pathophysiological features, and its contribution to impaired linear and ponderal growth has been hampered by the difficulty in directly sampling the small intestinal mucosa and microbial community (microbiota).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32706533 PMCID: PMC7289524 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1916004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: N Engl J Med ISSN: 0028-4793 Impact factor: 91.245
Clinical characteristics of children whose stunting was not improved by nutritional intervention.
| Failed nutritional intervention (n=110) | Biopsy-confirmed EED with available plasma and duodenal biospecimens (n=80) | n=110 vs n=80 comparison p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (months) | 18.4 ± 2.1 | 18.3 ± 2.1 | 0.82 |
| Female - no. (%) | 64 (58%) | 48 (60%) | 0.92 |
| WAMI index | 0.58 ± 0.14 | 0.57 ± 0.13 | 0.64 |
| Improved sanitation | 79 (71.8%) | 58 (72.5%) | 0.92 |
| Improved source of drinking water | 110 (100%) | 80 (100%) | NA |
| Maternal education (years) | 5 [1, 8] | 5 [0, 7] | 0.50 |
| Income (USD/month) | 153.1 [124.1, 212.0] | 151.6 [124.1, 201.4] | 0.90 |
| Maternal height (cm) | 149.0 ± 5.1 | 148.8 ± 5.5 | 0.81 |
| Breastfeeding prior to intervention - no. (%) | 100 (91%) | 74 (93%) | 0.90 |
| Breastfeeding after intervention - no. (%) | 92 (84%) | 70 (88%) | 0.59 |
| ∆LAZ | 0.03 (-0.03, 0.08) | 0.04 (-0.03, 0.11) | 0.76 |
| ∆WAZ | 0.15 (0.08, 0.22) | 0.13 (0.04, 0.23) | 0.76 |
| ∆WLZ | 0.17 (0.07, 0.26) | 0.12 (0.00, 0.25) | 0.57 |
| LAZ at endoscopy | -2.19 ± 0.82 | -2.29 ± 0.86 | 0.49 |
| WAZ at endoscopy | -1.76 ± 0.87 | -1.85 ± 0.91 | 0.49 |
| WLZ at endoscopy | -0.96 ± 0.91 | -1.02 ± 0.93 | 0.64 |
| No evidence of EED | 6 (5.5%) | 0 (0.0%) | NA |
| Mild | 41 (37.3%) | 34 (42.5%) | 0.42 |
| Moderate | 13 (11.8%) | 10 (12.5%) | 0.53 |
| Severe | 50 (45.4%) | 36 (45.0%) | 0.13 |
| 𝛂1-antitrypsin (AAT, mg/g) | 0.33 [0.17, 0.50] | 0.33 [0.17, 0.50] | 0.57 |
| Myeloperoxidase (MPO, ng/mL) | 2325.5 [799.6, 4569.1] | 2006.0 [809.9, 4315.0] | 0.75 |
| Neopterin (NEO, nmol/L) | 1116.5 [495.5, 2552.5] | 1146 [506.3, 2575.3] | 0.93 |
| EE biomarker score | 2.60 [1.52, 4.25] | 2.77 [1.52, 4.24] | 0.92 |
Values represent: mean ± standard deviation; number (percentage); mean difference (95% CI); median [interquartile range]. WAMI index = Water-sanitation-hygiene, Asset status, Maternal education status, and monthly Income (17). Statistically significant differences in characteristics between all children who did not improve with nutritional intervention (n=110) and those who had histologic evidence of EED as well as matched plasma and duodenal biospecimens available (n=80) were performed using an unpaired t-test unless otherwise noted.
Statistically significant improvement in anthropometric measure as determined by paired t-test (p<0.05).
Statistical significance determined using a Chi-squared test.
Statistical significance determined using a Mann-Whitney U test.
See Supplementary Table S2 for additional comparisons between sub-cohorts.
Figure. 1Correlations between components of the duodenal proteome, the absolute abundances of duodenal bacterial taxa and stunting.
(A) The top 10 positive correlations between members of the 14 core taxa and duodenal proteins. The size and color of the circle represents the magnitude of the correlation (larger circle and darker color indicates stronger correlation). (B) Annotations of proteins shown in panels A and G. (C-F) Total duodenal bacterial load, and the abundances of the three organisms most positively correlated with duodenal inflammatory proteins are significantly negatively correlated with LAZ. The least-squares regression line is depicted in blue while shaded regions denote 95% confidence bands. (G) Star network of correlations between plasma REG3A and core taxa-associated duodenal proteins. As indicated by the color key, edge transparency/color corresponds to correlation strength (darker edges denote a stronger correlation). The duodenal protein with the strongest correlation, lipocalin-2 (LCN-2), is indicated by the tail of the arrowhead at 3 o’clock; duodenal proteins with progressively weaker correlations with REG3A are distributed in a counter-clockwise fashion from this position.
Figure. 2A defined consortium of cultured duodenal bacterial taxa from Bangladeshi children with EED transmits an enteropathy to gnotobiotic mice.
(A) Experimental design. The majority of mice gavaged with the EED strains (12/16), and all CONV-D mice (n=10) were euthanized seven days after the final gavage (four mice gavaged with the EED consortium became moribund five days following the second gavage and were euthanized; at this time point they had lost 20% of their starting body weight compared to -4.7% ± 7.7% for all other animals receiving the consortium and -4.9 ± 5.3% for the CONV-D group). (B) Twenty-three bacterial strains that colonized animals at a relative abundance >0.01% at one or more locations along the intestine. See Figure S6 for the biogeographical features of colonization along the length of the intestine. Strains belonging to the 14 core taxa detected in the duodenums of children with EED at the Genus level are highlighted in purple. (C-E) Hematoxylin- and eosin-stained sections showing representative histopathologic changes in the duodenal epithelium and lamina propria of mice colonized with the EED consortium (panels C and D) compared to CONV-D controls (panel E). See Supplementary Results and Supplementary Table S12 for flow cytometry of immune cell populations. Scale bars, 100 µm in panel C, 25 µm in panels D and E. (F) Quantification of crypt length in the proximal 3 cm of the small intestine. The 10 best oriented crypts were measured (n=5 mice/treatment group). Each dot represents one measurement. Horizontal lines denote mean values. ***, p<0.001 (ANOVA). (G) Differential expression of duodenal Reg3β and Reg3γ as determined by DESeq2 (FDR-corrected q<0.001). (H) MMP-8 protein levels in serum and small intestine. *, p=0.01 (serum, unpaired t-test); **, p=0.005 (duodenum), p=0.002 (jejunum), p=0.001 (ileum) (2-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons test). (I) Bacterial translocation from the gut is increased in mice colonized with the EED consortium. Each dot represents a splenic homogenate from one mouse (two independent experiments; n=5 mice/experiment; mean values are shown as horizontal lines; ***, p<0.001). All translocated bacteria recovered from mice gavaged with the EED consortium were identified as Escherichia coli and Enterococcus hirae (the former lacks virulence-associated markers of diarrheagenic strains of E. coli). Rare Enterococcus faecalis, Acinetobacter lwoffii, and Acinetobacter radioresistens were recovered from the spleens of CONV-D controls.
| Correlations between fecal biomarkers or histopathologic severity and LAZ (n=110 children) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pearson ρ | Coefficient (95% CI) | p-value | |
| Myeloperoxidase (MPO) | -0.19 | -0.19 (-0.31, 0.00) | 0.05 |
| Alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) | -0.15 | -0.13 (-0.29, 0.08) | 0.11 |
| Neopterin (NEO) | 0.11 | 0.09 (-0.07, 0.24) | 0.27 |
| EE biomarker score | -0.09 | -0.07 (-0.23, 0.08) | 0.36 |
| Histopathologic severity | -0.06 | -0.06 (-0.27, 0.15) | 0.57 |
| Correlations between features of the plasma proteome and LAZ (n=80 children) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pearson ρ | Coefficient (95% CI) | p-value | FDR-adjusted q-value | |
| Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) | 0.53 | 0.62 (0.40, 0.84) | < 0.001 | 0.001 |
| IGF acid-labile subunit (IGFALS) | 0.51 | 0.59 (0.37, 0.81) | < 0.001 | 0.006 |
| IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP3) | 0.48 | 0.56 (0.32, 0.80) | < 0.001 | 0.03 |
| Procollagen C-endopeptidase Enhancer 2 (PCOLCE2) | 0.40 | 0.46 (0.22, 0.70) | < 0.001 | 1 |
| IGF binding protein 2 (IGFBP2) | -0.39 | -0.46 (-0.70, -0.22) | < 0.001 | 1 |
| Correlations between features of the duodenal microbiota and LAZ (n=36 children) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pearson ρ | Coefficient (95% CI) | p-value | FDR-adjusted q-value | Mean relative abundance (95% CI) | |
| -0.40 | -0.31 (-0.54, -0.07) | 0.02 | 0.10 | 45.2% (38.3%, 52.2%) | |
| -0.38 | -0.33 (-0.61, -0.06) | 0.02 | 0.10 | 8.43% (5.82%, 11.04%) | |
| -0.41 | -0.20 (-0.35, -0.05) | 0.01 | 0.10 | 6.37% (4.04%, 8.71%) | |
| -0.39 | -0.20 (-0.37, -0.04) | 0.02 | 0.10 | 8.02% (4.28%, 11.76%) | |
| -0.47 | -0.38 (-0.62, -0.13) | 0.004 | 0.04 | 5.56% (4.29%, 6.82%) | |
| -0.44 | -0.32 (-0.54, -0.10) | 0.007 | 0.06 | 0.79% (0.57%, 1.00%) | |
| -0.45 | -0.31 (-0.53, -0.10) | 0.006 | 0.06 | 2.37% (1.30%, 3.43%) | |
| -0.37 | -0.29 (-0.53, -0.04) | 0.03 | 0.10 | 0.44% (0.33%, 0.54%) | |
| -0.49 | -0.28 (-0.46, -0.11) | 0.003 | 0.04 | 2.38% (1.45%, 3.32%) | |
| -0.48 | -0.28 (-0.45, -0.10) | 0.003 | 0.04 | 1.55% (0.73%, 2.36%) | |
| -0.48 | -0.27 (-0.44, -0.10) | 0.003 | 0.04 | 0.92% (0.55%, 1.29%) | |
| -0.50 | -0.35 (-0.56, -0.14) | 0.002 | 0.03 | 0.46% (0.14%, 0.78%) | |
| -0.32 | -0.22 (-0.45, 0.00) | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.18% (0.11%, 0.25%) | |
| -0.36 | -0.26 (-0.50, -0.03) | 0.03 | 0.10 | 0.24% (0.14%, 0.33%) | |
| Total bacterial load | -0.41 | -0.32 (-0.56, -0.08) | 0.01 | 0.10 | 33.0 (2.67, 63.3) |
| Total bacterial load of 'core group' taxa | -0.49 | -0.38 (-0.61, -0.15) | 0.003 | 0.04 | 38.9 (34.1, 43.8) |
CI denotes 95% confidence interval
Fecal biomarkers, plasma proteins, total bacterial load, and abundances of duodenal bacterial taxa were log-transformed and z-scored prior to determining their relationships with LAZ. Thus, coefficients represent the effect of a unit change in standard deviation of the independent variable on the dependent variable. Fecal biomarker concentrations are reported as their measured concentrations, prior to log-transformation or z-scoring.
Total bacterial load represents the inverse of the fractional abundance of the A. acidophilus spike-in.
Total bacterial load of core group taxa represents the summed absolute abundances of the 14 bacterial ASVs found in > 80% of duodenal aspirates at a relative abundance of >0.01%.