| Literature DB >> 32705976 |
Paulin M Kapepula1, Jimmy K Kabengele1, Micheline Kingombe2, Françoise Van Bambeke3, Paul M Tulkens3, Antoine Sadiki Kishabongo4, Eric Decloedt5, Adam Zumla6, Simon Tiberi6, Fatima Suleman7, Léon Tshilolo8,9,10, Jean-Jacques Muyembe-TamFum11,12, Alimuddin Zumla13,14, Jean B Nachega15,16,17,18,19.
Abstract
The world is currently facing a novel COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 that, as of July 12, 2020, has caused a reported 12,322,395 cases and 556,335 deaths. To date, only two treatments, remdesivir and dexamethasone, have demonstrated clinical efficacy through randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in seriously ill patients. The search for new or repurposed drugs for treatment of COVID-19 continues. We have witnessed anecdotal use of herbal medicines, including Artemisia spp. extracts, in low-income countries, and exaggerated claims of their efficacies that are not evidence based, with subsequent political controversy. These events highlight the urgent need for further research on herbal compounds to evaluate efficacy through RCTs, and, when efficacious compounds are identified, to establish the active ingredients, develop formulations and dosing, and define pharmacokinetics, toxicology, and safety to enable drug development. Derivatives from the herb Artemisia annua have been used as traditional medicine over centuries for the treatment of fevers, malaria, and respiratory tract infections. We review the bioactive compounds, pharmacological and immunological effects, and traditional uses for Artemisia spp. derivatives, and discuss the challenges and controversies surrounding current efforts and the scientific road map to advance them to prevent or treat COVID-19.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32705976 PMCID: PMC7470522 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0820
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg ISSN: 0002-9637 Impact factor: 2.345
Figure 1.Artemisia annua.
Figure 2.2D and 3D chemical structures of artemisinin and artesunate. In the 3D structure, carbon atoms appear as gray balls, hydrogen atoms as white balls, and oxygen atoms as red balls.
Comparison of in vivo concentrations with in vitro active concentrations for artemisinin and artesunate[8–10]
| Compound | Human doses | Human plasma concentrations (µg/L) | In vitro antiviral effects (IC50) | In vitro anti-inflammatory effects |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artemisinin | 500 mg/day (po) | 390–582 | Flaviviruses | 10–100 µM (2,820–28,200 µg/L) |
| 18.5 µM (5,217 µg/L) | ||||
| Artesunate | 1–8 mg/kg/day (iv) | 1,320–10,560 | Herpesviruses | 1–30 µM (384–11,520 µg/L) |
| 4–7 µM (1,536–2,688 µg/L) | ||||
| HBV | ||||
| 10 µM (3,840 µg/L) |
IC50, 50% maximal inhibitory concentration, a measure which indicates how much a drug is needed to inhibit, in vitro, a given biological process by 50%.