Literature DB >> 32705361

Strategies to overcome limitations in Otolaryngology residency training during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Francesco Bandi1, Apostolos Karligkiotis2, Jessica Mellia3, Stefania Gallo2, Mario Turri-Zanoni3,4, Paolo Battaglia3,4, Paolo Castelnuovo3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has produced an unequaled human crisis forcing a radical reorganization in the healthcare system. Otolaryngologists are at high risk of exposure, and changes in medical and surgical activities have reduced the learning opportunity for residents and fellows. We believe that even during COVID-19 crisis it is mandatory to guarantee an optimal training, and here, we propose some strategies, based on our experience, to further increase our trainees' learning curve.
METHODS: We asked our trainees to fill out an electronic survey about several aspect of their training: a first section focused on the reduction of clinical activities and the perceived impact of the pandemic on residents' skills; the second part outlined the type of attended training activity and the perceived benefit.
RESULTS: Surgical training has been reported by our residents as the activity perceived to be the most contracted during the pandemic. According to residents' opinion the most useful activities were dissection (n = 8, 53.4% residents) and online journal clubs/webinars (n = 7, 46.6% of residents). Residents' suggestions included actively participating to tracheostomy procedures on SARS-CoV-2 positive patients, attending lessons held by senior consultants on basic ENT topics and promoting collegial discussion of inpatient clinical cases.
CONCLUSION: Building on this dramatic experience, we must be ready for a global restructuring of the residency program to provide an adequate trainee education for the future surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cadaver dissection; Covid-19; Otolaryngology; Residency; Training

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32705361      PMCID: PMC7377304          DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06228-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is leading to a human, economic and social crisis attacking societies at their core. The World Health Organization (WHO) defined COVID-19 as a pandemic that infected 6.2 million people, causing 376,320 deaths as of June 02, 2020. Italy has been one of the most affected countries with more than 33,000 confirmed deaths [1]. Given that there is no specific treatment or vaccine for SARS-CoV-2, social distancing measures (SDM) appear to be those with the strongest scientific validity to prevent the spread of the disease [2]. Hence, there have been clear consequences in the planning of daily clinical activities. Based on the recommendations given by multiple scientific societies [3, 4], hospitals are admitting only urgent and emergent cases with 70% of chief surgeons reporting a 50–90% decrease of elective surgical cases [5, 6]. The reduction of outpatient and surgical activities occurred in all surgical fields but concerns about SARS-CoV-2 transmission during transnasal surgery [4, 7], and potentially any procedure involving the upper airways, contributed to a further slowing of activities in Otolaryngology departments. All measures to prevent the transmission of SARS-CoV-2, combined with the redistribution of human resources, have drastically reduced the learning opportunities for resident and fellows. The purpose of this article is to report our experience in a tertiary care center, in terms of strategies to overcome the educational constraints caused by COVID-19. Besides a description of the learning methods implemented during the pandemic, the study reports the perceived impact of COVID-19 on residents and the relevance of alternative training approaches.

Materials and methods

All ENT residents of the University of Insubria (Varese, Italy) were asked to fill out an electronic survey during the last week of the most restrictive measures of social distancing (May 11–15). General information such as age, gender, year of residency and hospitals of attendance in the period March–April 2020 were collected. The survey investigated several aspects: a first section focused on the reduction of clinical activities and the perceived impact of the pandemic on residents’ skills; the second part outlined the type of attended training activity and the perceived benefit. Each question was scored on a scale 0–5 to define the severity of a problem (0—Absent, 1—Very mild, 2—Mild, 3—Moderate, 4—Important, 5—Most important), the frequency of attendance (0—Less than 5%, 1—Between 5 and 25%, 2—Between 25 and 50%, 3—Between 50 and 75%, 4—Between 75 and 95%, 5—More than 95%) or the utility of the training method (0—No, 1—Very low, 2—Low, 3—Moderate, 4—High, 5—Very High). In addition, all residents reported (i) the most useful educational activity, (ii) the prevalent anatomical site studied during dissection training and (iii) proposals to improve training during pandemic.

Results

A cohort of 15 residents was examined. 6 were female and 9 were male (M:F = 1.5). The mean age was 29.4 ± 2.4 years. The group includes different years of residency: 7 (46.6%) were on the first year, 3 (20%) on the second year, 3 (20%) on the third year and 2 (13.4%) on the fourth year. Ten residents (66.6%) attended the main hub of the residency program (4 at first, 2 at the second, 3 at third, and 1 at fourth year of residency, respectively), being the hospital of Varese, during March–April 2020, while 5 residents attended 3 different affiliated hospitals, being part of the rotation program: 3 residents (20%) frequented the Hospital of Como (at first, second and fourth year of residency, respectively), 1 resident (6,6%) attended the Hospital of Busto Arsizio (at first year) and 1 resident (6,6%) attended the Hospital of Monza (at first year). Results of the survey are reported in Table 1. According to residents’ opinion, the most useful activities were dissection (n = 8, 53.4% residents) and online journal clubs/webinars (n = 7, 46.6% of residents). The prevalent anatomical sites studied during dissection sessions were the nasal and paranasal sinuses (70%), the oral cavity (20%) and neck (10%). Residents’ suggestions included actively participating to tracheostomy procedures on SARS-CoV-2-positive patients, attending lessons held by senior consultants on basic ENT topics and promoting collegial discussion of inpatient clinical cases.
Table 1

Self-reported questionnaire and results for each year of residency

Y 1n = 7Y 2n = 3Y3n = 3Y4n = 2Totaln = 15

Impact of COVID-19 in clinical activity

The higher the score, the more severe the problem

Mean ± Std. dev.
1. Properly informed about COVID-193.4 ± 0.93.3 ± 1.54 ± 13 ± 03.4 ± 0.9
2. Fear of contracting SARS-CoV23.2 ± 13 ± 13.6 ± 1.52.5 ± 0.73.2 ± 1
3. Inadequate protection against SARS-CoV2 exposure2.7 ± 1.43.3 ± 0.53.6 ± 0.52.5 ± 2.11 ± 1.2
4. Inadequate skills in relation of your year of residency2.4 ± 1.23 ± 03 ± 14 ± 02.8 ± 1
5. Reduction of global learning during pandemic4.4 ± 0.74.3 ± 1.15 ± 04 ± 04.4 ± 0.7
6. Reduction of learning activity in the inpatient clinic4.1 ± 14 ± 14.3 ± 0.53 ± 1.41 ± 1
7. Reduction of learning activity in the outpatient clinic4.1 ± 0.74.3 ± 1.14.3 ± 0.52 ± 1.43.9 ± 1
8. Reduction of surgical training during pandemic4.4 ± 14.3 ± 1.15 ± 05 ± 04.6 ± 0.8

Effects on training

The higher the score, the more severe the problem

9. Impact of COVID-19 on your global training3.2 ± 1.13 ± 15 ± 04 ± 03.7 ± 1
10. Impact of COVID-19 on your surgical skills3 ± 13 ± 14.3 ± 0.53.5 ± 0.73.3 ± 0.9

Alternative learning

The higher the score the higher the attendance or utility of training

11. Perceived utility of alternative learning methods3.5 ± 0.83 ± 13.3 ± 0.53.5 ± 0.73.4 ± 0.7
12. Frequency of activity in dissection lab4 ± 0.53.3 ± 0.53.6 ± 0.53.5 ± 0.73.7 ± 0.5
13. Utility of dissection lab training3.5 ± 1.74 ± 14.6 ± 0.54 ± 03.9 ± 1.2
14. Online Journal Club/lectures attendance2.8 ± 0.92.3 ± 0.54 ± 13 ± 01 ± 0.9
15. Utility of online learning3.5 ± 0.93.6 ± 0.54.3 ± 0.53.5 ± 0.73.7 ± 0.8
16. Participation to in-house tumor board2.7 ± 1.93 ± 2.64 ± 14.5 ± 0.73.2 ± 1.8
17. Utility of online tumor board3.3 ± 1.63 ± 23 ± 13.5 ± 0.73.2 ± 1.37
Self-reported questionnaire and results for each year of residency Impact of COVID-19 in clinical activity The higher the score, the more severe the problem Effects on training The higher the score, the more severe the problem Alternative learning The higher the score the higher the attendance or utility of training

Discussion

The COVID-19-induced limitations entail a substantial overhaul of the various facets of the training activity in Otolaryngology, with an even more complex task in a period where receiving correct information about the virus, facing the fear of infection and having adequate personal protective equipment (PPE) are crucial elements in the management of the pandemic (Table 1—Q1, Q2, Q3). As reported by the cohort of residents included in the study, there is a perceived reduction of all learning activities with a general concern that COVID-19 may have a negative impact on final skills, more evident among senior residents (Table 1—Q9, Q10).

Clinical activity

Inpatients and outpatients care during COVID-19 pandemic must respect two essential points: (i) the use of proper PPE with respect of SDM and (ii) the planning of dedicated shifts both to reduce exposure and to prevent the spread of the virus among healthcare workers. Wearing disposable FFP2/N95 masks, water-resistant gown, gloves, goggles, cap and full-face visor shield are now considered imperative, especially dealing with patients with unknown COVID-19 status [3, 4]. Moreover, clinical examination must be performed with as few as possible healthcare workers in the room. In our experience, the staff performing daily clinical examinations is composed by one supervisor (that can be either an attending or a senior resident), one resident (that can be either a senior or a junior resident), one nurse and the patient alone without any relatives or accompanying persons [8, 9]. However, a reduction of all clinical activities was reported (Table 1—Q5, Q6, Q7). An interesting proposal, also applied in other surgical divisions, is to organize independent teams of residents able to support inpatient, outpatient and surgical activities [10]. Therefore, we planned different resident groups rotating between different activities, so that not all residents are present at the same time in the same place [11]. This combination of strategies has proved successful because at the time of collection of the questionnaire none of our residents contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Surgical training

During COVID-19 breakout we have experienced a sharp decrease in elective surgery with a consequent notable limitation of the practice chances for residents and fellows [12]. Surgical training has been reported by our residents as the activity perceived to be the most contracted during the pandemic (Table 1—Q8). In this scenario, it is extremely important to find alternatives to ensure surgical skills implementations such as step-by-step video-surgery and online workshops that anyway help only partially the practical training of surgeons. Therefore, our dissection lab (DL) has gained a pivotal role in the training of surgical anatomy and techniques [13]. As reported by our residents, DL activities are the most useful learning methods to improve their skills during the pandemic (Table 1—Q13). In DL it is possible to mimic surgical procedures in complete security, respecting SDM [6]. DL setting allows senior consultants to supervise attending or senior residents performing step-by-step surgical procedures and to explain anatomy and technical notes to junior residents. It can also provide video material which can be edited and shared with other centers to be used for training. Moreover, DL allows in-depth anatomical and surgical knowledge in different subsites, and we were able to focus on nasal and paranasal sinuses (70%), oral cavity (20%) and neck (10%). Another option is live surgery, where residents and fellows can follow the operation being performed live via videoconferencing, without being physically present in the operating room.

Multidisciplinary management of oncological patient

The head and neck oncologic care is very complex and requires a multidisciplinary team approach that needs to be upheld. To date, supported by the technology, we were able to plan virtual multidisciplinary tumor boards with the same frequency as before, once a week. Each resident, supervised by an attending, prepares the clinical cases which are going to be discussed and sends the list to all the participants in order that everyone is informed. All participants connect to the intranet system, which allows consultation of data concerning the clinical case, and during the weekly online videoconference, draw-up the interdisciplinary report. Residents and fellows can participate in teleconferencing to the virtual tumor board and learn from it [14].

Didactic education

The last but not the least aspect of the training is the didactic. Frontal lectures, journal clubs, and case conferences are also important during residency and fellowship, but cannot be attended in person in respect of the SDM. Video lectures and grand rounds can be delivered through many electronic platforms where people are able to follow the lecturer and be actively involved in discussion. The different referral centers for specific otolaryngologic domains should offer lectures or surgical videos to be shared. Fellowship can be conducted in the same way: fellows can follow all the departmental activities through these instruments and by implementing surgical techniques discussion with the faculty members with video demonstrations [15].

Conclusions

We are facing unprecedented times right now which brought unexpected consequences hitherto. The changes in our daily practices are evolving, but it is necessary to reformulate a plan in order to guarantee the best management for the patients and guarantee the continuity of the residents’ training and education in ENT. Setting up independent teams of residents and limiting exposure opportunities resulted in a sound strategic combination of maintaining clinical practice while preserving trainees’ safety. The dissection activity is the best way to maintain the learning curve of surgical skills and therefore must be implemented when possible. As reported by our residents, on-line journal clubs/webinars were the second most important activity during pandemic; moreover, online lectures had the advantage of sharing knowledge among different centers, preventing the isolation of the single institution and maintaining an active encouragement in the production of didactic material.
  14 in total

1.  Insights on Otolaryngology Residency Training during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Dana L Crosby; Arun Sharma
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  How to Obtain a Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimen.

Authors:  Apostolos Karligkiotis; Alberto Arosio; Paolo Castelnuovo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Emergency Restructuring of a General Surgery Residency Program During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: The University of Washington Experience.

Authors:  Amer H Nassar; Nicole K Zern; Lisa K McIntyre; Dana Lynge; Caitlin A Smith; Rebecca P Petersen; Karen D Horvath; Douglas E Wood
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

4.  The utility of cadaver dissection in endoscopic sinus surgery training courses.

Authors:  Jodi D Zuckerman; Sarah K Wise; G Aaron Rogers; Brent A Senior; Rodney J Schlosser; John M DelGaudio
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.467

5.  Advanced head and neck surgery training during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Babak Givi; Michael G Moore; Arnaud F Bewley; Charles S Coffey; Marc A Cohen; Amy C Hessel; Scharukh Jalisi; Steven Kang; Jason G Newman; Liana Puscas; Maisie Shindo; Andrew Shuman; Punam Thakkar; Donald T Weed; Ara Chalian
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 3.147

6.  Transition to a virtual multidisciplinary tumor board during the COVID-19 pandemic: University of Pittsburgh experience.

Authors:  Harish Dharmarajan; Jennifer L Anderson; Seungwon Kim; Shaum Sridharan; Umamaheswar Duvvuri; Robert L Ferris; Mario G Solari; David A Clump; Heath D Skinner; James P Ohr; Dan P Zandberg; Barton Branstetter; Marion A Hughes; Katie S Traylor; Raja Seethala; Simion I Chiosea; Marci L Nilsen; Jonas T Johnson; Mark W Kubik
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 3.147

7.  How to Reorganize an Ear, Nose, and Throat Outpatient Service During the COVID-19 Outbreak: Report From Northern Italy.

Authors:  Francesca De Bernardi; Mario Turri-Zanoni; Paolo Battaglia; Paolo Castelnuovo
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  The impact of COVID-19 on Head and Neck surgery, education, and training.

Authors:  Jatin P Shah
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 3.147

9.  Managing care for patients with sinonasal and anterior skull base cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Mario Turri-Zanoni; Paolo Battaglia; Apostolos Karligkiotis; Davide Locatelli; Paolo Castelnuovo
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 3.147

10.  Letter: Precautions for Endoscopic Transnasal Skull Base Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Zara M Patel; Juan Fernandez-Miranda; Peter H Hwang; Jayakar V Nayak; Robert Dodd; Hamed Sajjadi; Robert K Jackler
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  7 in total

1.  Deterioration experienced by French otolaryngology residents in their training during the COVID-19 pandemic: A STROBE analysis.

Authors:  M Alexandru; V Favier; A Coste; F Carsuzaa; M Fieux; L Fath; S Bartier
Journal:  Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 2.665

2.  Is 2020 the golden year of Otolaryngology research? The impact of COVID-19 on the Italian academic production.

Authors:  Eleonora Trecca; Pier Gerardo Marano; Matteo Gelardi; Lazzaro Cassano; Giannandrea Francesco Verzicco; Aurelio D'Ecclesia; Michele Cassano; Francesco Longo
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2021-05-12

3.  Trainee perspectives of COVID-19 impact on medical genetics education.

Authors:  Amanda Barone Pritchard; Christina Sloan-Heggen; Catherine E Keegan; Shane C Quinonez
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 8.864

4.  [Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the training of otorhinolaryngology residents].

Authors:  Serafín Sánchez-Gómez; Juan Manuel Maza-Solano; Luz López Flórez; Pablo Parente Arias; David Lobo Duro; José María Palacios-García
Journal:  Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp       Date:  2021-10-09

5.  What is the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on residency training: a systematic review and analysis.

Authors:  Shou-Yen Chen; Hsiang-Yun Lo; Shang-Kai Hung
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Otolaryngology in the face of A pandemic.

Authors:  Nicole Ruszkay; Jacqueline Tucker; Karen Y Choi
Journal:  Oper Tech Otolayngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2022-04-28

7.  Intraoperative Ultrasonographic Assessment of Vocal Cord motion under sedation, following paediatric thyroidectomy in the Era of COVID-19: A double-blinded preliminary study.

Authors:  Ofir Zavdy; Michael Schwarz; Dror Gilony; Gideon Bachar; Hanna Gilat; Roy Hod
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 2.729

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.