| Literature DB >> 32704000 |
Gang Shu1, Fanli Kong2, Dan Xu1, Lizi Yin1, Changliang He1, Juchun Lin1, Hualin Fu1, Kaiyu Wang1, Yaofu Tian3, Xiaoling Zhao4.
Abstract
It has been shown that bamboo leaf flavone (BLF) displays biological and pharmacological activities in mammals. However, the effects of BLF on broiler gut microbiota and related immune function have not been investigated. The aim of this study was to test our hypothesis that BLF can improve the health status of broilers by modulating the gut microbiota. A total of 300 one-day-old Arbor Acres (AA) broilers were used to characterize their gut microbiota and immune status after feeding diet supplemented with BLF. The V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene from cecal bacteria was sequenced via the Illumina MiSeq platform. The Immune status and related parameters were assessed, including the immune organ index (the spleen, thymus, and bursa), serum concentrations of IL-2 and INF-γ, and spleen IL-2 and INF-γ gene expressions. The results showed the BLF diet had an Immune enhancement effect on broilers. In addition, BFL caused the changes of the gut microbial community structure, resulting in greater proportions of bacterial taxa belonging to Lactobacillus, Clostridiales, Ruminococcus, and Lachnospiraceae. These bacteria have been used as probiotics for producing short chain fatty acids in hosts. These results indicate that BLF supplement improves immune function in chicken via modulation of the gut microbiota.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32704000 PMCID: PMC7378082 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-69010-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Effect of bamboo leaf flavone supplementation on broiler immune organs index.
| Organs | Growth point (day) | Treatments | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | L | M | H | ||
| Spleen | 14 | 0.93 ± 0.14 | 0.97 ± 0.15 | 1.00 ± 0.07 | 1.07 ± 0.20 |
| 28 | 0.82 ± 0.06 | 0.91 ± 0.15 | 1.06 ± 0.22 | 1.05 ± 0.17 | |
| 42 | 1.09 ± 0.13b | 1.31 ± 0.20ab | 1.35 ± 0.06a | 1.22 ± 0.15ab | |
| Thymus | 14 | 2.48 ± 0.48b | 3.64 ± 1.96a | 3.10 ± 1.23ab | 3.98 ± 0.88a |
| 28 | 3.56 ± 0.49b | 5.20 ± 1.89ab | 5.35 ± 1.88ab | 5.63 ± 0.99a | |
| 42 | 5.53 ± 0.92 | 5.61 ± 0.63 | 5.90 ± 1.26 | 5.73 ± 0.99 | |
| Bursa of fabricius | 14 | 2.19 ± 0.61 | 2.02 ± 0.33 | 2.42 ± 0.27 | 2.38 ± 0.22 |
| 28 | 2.25 ± 0.36c | 2.36 ± 0.53bc | 3.23 ± 0.28b | 3.93 ± 0.54a | |
| 42 | 2.55 ± 0.20 | 2.71 ± 0.27 | 3.09 ± 0.49 | 2.88 ± 0.45 | |
Data were presented as mean ± SD.
a–cValues in the same row without the same uppercase differed significantly (P < 0.05).
Treatment effects on the serum concentrations of IL-2 and IFN-γ.
| Immune factors (ng/L) | Growth point (day) | Treatments | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | L | M | H | ||
| IL-2 | 14 | 42.13 ± 2.32 | 44.2 ± 3.15 | 45.5 ± 2.11 | 44.4 ± 2.12 |
| 28 | 45.43 ± 3.13b | 46.5 ± 4.21b | 55.4 ± 4.14a | 58.7 ± 3.11a | |
| 42 | 26.12 ± 3.14b | 32.2 ± 4.28a | 34.2 ± 1.50a | 31.1 ± 2.10a | |
| IFN-γ | 14 | 11.21 ± 0.88 | 11.56 ± 0.56 | 12.01 ± 0.72 | 11.44 ± 0.91 |
| 28 | 8.21 ± 0.65b | 9.82 ± 0.44a | 10.16 ± 0.57a | 9.72 ± 0.61a | |
| 42 | 5.63 ± 0.43c | 6.31 ± 0.45bc | 7.32 ± 0.41a | 6.84 ± 0.37ab | |
a–cValues in the same row without the same uppercase differed significantly (P < 0.05).
Treatment effects on the gene expression abundances of immune factors in the spleen.
| Immune factors | Growth point (day) | Treatments | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | L | M | H | ||
| IL-2 | 14 | 0.40 ± 0.14 | 0.45 ± 0.12 | 0.49 ± 0.11 | 0.46 ± 0.09 |
| 28 | 0.34 ± 0.08b | 0.32 ± 0.06b | 0.62 ± 0.18a | 0.58 ± 0.07a | |
| 42 | 0.48 ± 0.14b | 0.39 ± 0.13b | 0.71 ± 0.07a | 0.59 ± 0.08ab | |
| IFN-γ | 14 | 2.54 ± 0.42b | 2.64 ± 0.24b | 3.32 ± 0.67a | 3.23 ± 0.08a |
| 28 | 2.08 ± 0.06b | 2.22 ± 0.52ab | 3.14 ± 0.13a | 2.89 ± 0.28a | |
| 42 | 1.08 ± 0.23 | 1.19 ± 0.17 | 1.26 ± 0.33 | 1.16 ± 0.15 | |
a–cValues in the same row without the same uppercase differed significantly (P < 0.05).
Figure 1Differences in the gut bacterial community diversity (A) and richness (B) in chickens fed different levels of bamboo leaf flavone. Alpha diversities were measured by Shannon index and Observed OTUs. The top and bottom boundaries of each box plot indicate the 75th and 25th quartile values, respectively. The horizontal lines within each box represent the median values.
Figure 2Differences in the gut bacterial community membership and structure in chickens fed different levels of bamboo leaf flavone. Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) of bacterial community structures (A) and memberships (E) of the microbiota of three age groups with different concentrations of bamboo leaf flavone. PCoA indicated distinct bacterial communities on day 14 (B) and (F), 28 (C) and (G), and 42 (D). Each symbol represents each sample, red: day 14; green: day 28; and blue: day 42.
Figure 3Microbial composition affected by chicken age chicken and the levels of bamboo leaf flavone. The levels of phylum (A) and genus (B). Each bar represents the relative abundance of each bacterial taxon. The top 5 abundant phylum and 28 abundant genera are listed.
Figure 4Bacterial taxa affected by chicken age identified by linear discriminant analysis coupled with effect size (LEfSe). The changes of bacterial taxa at day 14 (A); day 28 (B); and day 42 (C).