| Literature DB >> 32703993 |
Pai-Jong Stacy Tsai1,2, Yasuhiro Yamauchi1, Jonathan M Riel2, Monika A Ward3.
Abstract
Maternal diabetes can lead to pregnancy complications and impaired fetal development. The goal of this study was to use a mouse model of reciprocal embryo transfer to distinguish between the preconception and gestational effects of diabetes. To induce diabetes female mice were injected with a single high dose of streptozotocin and 3 weeks thereafter used as oocyte donors for in vitro fertilization (IVF) and as recipients for embryo transfer. Following IVF embryos were cultured to the blastocyst stage in vitro or transferred to diabetic and non-diabetic recipients. Diabetic and non-diabetic females did not differ in regard to the number of oocytes obtained after ovarian stimulation, oocytes ability to become fertilized, and embryo development in vitro. However, diabetic females displayed impaired responsiveness to superovulation. Reciprocal embryo transfer resulted in similar incidence of live fetuses and abortions, and no changes in placental size. However, fetuses carried by diabetic recipients were smaller compared to those carried by non-diabetic recipients, regardless hyperglycemia status of oocyte donors. Congenital abnormalities were observed only among the fetuses carried by diabetic recipients. The findings support that the diabetic status during pregnancy, and not the preconception effect of diabetes on oogenesis, leads to fetal growth restriction and congenital deformities.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32703993 PMCID: PMC7378839 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-69247-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Effects of DM on in vitro fertilization and in vitro embryo development. Diabetic (DMO) and non-diabetic (CONO) females provided oocytes for in vitro fertilization. DMO females had higher blood glucose level (A) and decreased response to hormonal ovarian stimulation (B) when compared to CONO females. However, the average oocyte number per female (C), fertilization rate (D) and in developmental rate in vitro (E) were similar in both groups. In vitro produced embryos developed to healthy, good looking expanded blastocysts (F). Graphs are average ± SDev with n = 16 and n = 15 (A, B) and n = 10 and n = 15 (C–E) for DMO and CONO, respectively. Statistical significance (t-test): **P < 0.01; ****P < 0.0001. For statistical analyses all percentages were transformed to angles. Scale bar in (F), 50 µm. For the data in (B) females were considered individually: female that responded, 1/1, 100% and female that did not respond, 0/1, 0%. Raw data are shown in Table S1.
Figure 2Reciprocal embryo transfer. Embryos obtained after in vitro fertilization with oocytes from diabetic (DMO) or non-diabetic (CONO) females were transferred into the oviducts of diabetic (DMS) or non-diabetic (CONS) surrogates. At 18.5 days of pregnancy caesarian section was performed and live fetuses and abortions were obtained and scored. The four experimental groups (CONO-CONS, DMO-CONS, CONO-DMS, and DMO-DMS) were compared in regard to fetal developmental potential and provided fetal and placental tissues for banking.
Figure 3Effects of DM on post-implantation development. Embryos obtained after in vitro fertilization with oocytes from diabetic (DMO) or non-diabetic (CONO) females were transferred into the oviducts of diabetic (DMS) or non-diabetic (CONS) surrogates. At 18.5 days of pregnancy caesarian section was performed and number of live fetuses and resorption sites were scored. Fetuses and placentas were weighted and measured. Four experimental groups (CONO-CONS, DMO-CONS, CONO-DMS, and DMO-DMS) were compared in regard to proportion of fetuses (A) and resorption sites (B) from embryos transferred, fetal weight (C), fetal crown to rump length (CRL, D), placental weight (E), placental diameter (F), and incidences of fetuses with congenital defects (G). The data were analyzed with 1-way ANOVA analysis of variance with post-hoc Bonferroni test for multiple paired comparison. There were no differences between the groups in incidence of fetuses and abortions in ANOVA (P = 0.408 and P = 0.139, respectively) and post-hoc test. When the data shown in (A) and (B) were analyzed by t-test paired comparison, more sensitive than ANOVA, only one significant difference was noted (Abortions, DMO-DMS vs. DMO-CONS, P = 0.027). Fetal weight and CRL were significantly decreased with DMO surrogates as shown by ANOVA (P < 0.0001) and post-hoc test (A vs. B and C, P < 0.0001; B vs. B, P < 0.05). Placental diameter was also slightly decreased with DMO surrogates in ANOVA (P < 0.04), with no differences between groups in paired comparison. Congenital defects were only observed among fetuses from diabetic surrogates (ANOVA P = 0.0007, post-hoc A vs. B, P < 0.01). When the data shown in (G) were also analyzed by t-test paired comparison the difference was noted also between DMO-DMS vs. CONO-CONS and DMO-CONS (P = 0.012) and the difference between CONO-DMS vs. CONO-CONS and DMO-CONS increased (P = 0.005). In (H), the examples of early, midterm and late abortions and normal fetuses and placentas from DMS are shown. Scale in H, 1 cm (except for bottom most left panel which is not to scale). Graphs are average ± SDev with n = 5, 5, 4, and 5 (surrogates) in (A) and (B), and n = 54, 47, 37, and 44 (fetuses or placentas) in (C) to (G), for CONO-CONS, DMO-CONS, CONO-DMS, and DMO-DMS, respectively. For statistical analyses percentages were transformed to angles. Raw data for (A), (B) and (G) are shown in Table S3.
Figure 4Congenital malformations of fetuses from diabetic females. Fetuses derived from embryos produced with non-diabetic (CONO) and diabetic (DMO) oocyte donors transferred to diabetic surrogate mothers (DMO) displayed various congenital malformations. Distribution of congenital abnormality types is shown in (A). The examples of fetuses with malformations are shown in (B). Scale, 1 cm.