| Literature DB >> 32703749 |
Vidyut Rajhans1, Usman Memon2, Vidula Patil3, Aditya Goyal4.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Academia is experiencing massive reforms globally amid lockdown in COVID-19 outbreak. This study is aimed to apprehend the enabling and impeding factors of these reforms, with a focus on optometry education. It brings together how the Indian optometry educational system has responded to COVID-19 disruptions with findings of the 2020 survey, in light of similar survey done in 2018.Entities:
Keywords: ‘COVID-19 pandemic’; ‘Competency-based education’; ‘Educational technology’; ‘Online education’; ‘Optometry education’; “Aprendizaje electrónico”; “COVID-19”; “Crisis pandémica”; “Educación basada en la competencia”; “Educación en línea”; “Educación en optometría”; “Tecnología educativa”
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32703749 PMCID: PMC7293465 DOI: 10.1016/j.optom.2020.06.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Optom ISSN: 1989-1342
Summary of the methodology followed by the 2018 and 2020 surveys.
| Sr no | Description | 2018 survey | 2020 survey |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Survey development | Literature survey followed by a discussion between three optometry faculties to finalize items of the questionnaire | Reference of 2018 survey questionnaire and discussion between three optometry faculties to finalize items of the questionnaire |
| 2 | Number and nature of items in the questionnaire | 27, Mix of open and close-ended questions | 30, Mix of open and close-ended questions |
| 3 | Reliability (Cronbach Alpha) | 0.9252 (High) | 0.902 (High) |
| 4 | Mode of survey | Internet-based | Internet-based |
| 5 | Survey period | Jan-May 2018 | April 2020 |
| 6 | Sample frame | Purposive sampling, ensuring one representation from all Optometry colleges across India, conducting a four-year bachelor degree program | Open survey, Open for all educators in optometry colleges across India |
| 7 | Target population | Optometry educator, as representative of an optometry institute | Optometry educator, as a full time/part-time faculty in optometry institute |
| 8 | Recruitment process | Invitation by Email, with two reminders over the phone/messaging platform | Open invitation over the social messaging platform (WhatsApp) in a target group with one reminder message |
| 9 | Participation | Voluntary participation | Voluntary participation |
| 10 | Survey administration | Sequential questions administered using Google forms | Sequential questions administered using Google forms |
| 11 | Informed consent | E-consent | E-consent |
| 12 | Incentives | None | Sharing of survey results |
| 13 | Curriculum under consideration | Applied optics subjects such as visual optics, optometry optics, dispensing optics | Entire optometry UG/PG program, essentially taught by optometrist faculty |
| 14 | Use of adaptive questions | Yes | Yes |
| 15 | Number of screens | 3 | 6 |
| 16 | Review step | Review with back button; no alteration possible once a response is submitted | Review with back button; no alteration possible once the response is submitted |
| 17 | Preventing multiple entries from single respondent e.g. Cookies used | No such mechanism employed | No such mechanism employed |
| 18 | Data capturing | Automatic conversion into a spreadsheet | Automatic conversion into a spreadsheet |
| 19 | Data analysis | Descriptive statistics and qualitative thematic analysis of open-ended questions | Descriptive statistics and qualitative thematic analysis of open-ended questions |
| 20 | Software used for statistical analysis | EZR open source | EZR open source |
Demographic characteristics of respondents in both surveys.
| Sr no | Characteristics of respondents | Number of respondents | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 survey | 2020 survey | |||
| 1 | National representation of respondents | East region | 18.18% | 15.19% |
| North region | 15.91% | 15.19% | ||
| West region | 38.64% | 39.24% | ||
| South region | 27.27% | 30.38% | ||
| 2 | Category of institution | Private optometry college/department under university | 30 | 42 |
| Private optometry college under hospital/clinic | 10 | 28 | ||
| Public/government medical college | 4 | 5 | ||
| Other (with industry, Not for profit trusts & NGOs) | 0 | 4 | ||
Figure 1Graph showing the popularity of various online teaching tools for THEORY classes.
Figure 2Graph showing the popularity of various online teaching tools for SKILLS sessions.
Figure 3Graph showing techniques used to ensure active involvement of students in online sessions.
Collaborative efforts made to quickly adapt to the e-learning environment.
| Response to collaborative efforts | No of responses | % of total responses |
|---|---|---|
| I would like to collaborate with the purpose of sharing resources. | 22 | 28.21 |
| Individual to individual faculty collaboration | 32 | 41.03 |
| Institute to institute collaboration | 12 | 15.38 |
| Institute to individual faculty collaboration | 21 | 26.92 |
| No, I have no interest/belief in collaboration | 9 | 11.54 |
| Other | 8 | 10.26 |
Summary of key results in both surveys.
| Sr no | Results | 2018 survey | 2020 survey |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | System of education | Conventional classroom based system | E-learning system |
| 2 | Educator's attitude | Teacher centric: 30 out of 44 (82.5%) believed that most academic activities must be decided by teachers. | Student-centric: 62 out of 73 (84.93%) considered consulting students before switching to e-learning mode. |
| 3 | Educational model- attaining learning objectives | Tea steeping model- Pre-determined clock-hours to be completed for face to face teaching in each subject. E.g. Visual optics is taught for 40 h theory and 20 h skills. Learning is confirmed at end semester examinations. | Competency-based model- Learning objectives to be achieved regardless of actual online contact time spent in teaching- learning. Learning is confirmed by performance in immediate, small, online unit tests/assignments and not merely by attending/viewing online sessions. |
| 4 | Pre-determined learning outcomes for each session. | 77.27% of respondents paid attention to carefully draft and convey the ILOs. | 78.08% of respondents altered ILOs to suit new pedagogy techniques. |
| 5 | Top three methods used in teaching theory (knowledge component) | Didactic lectures, reading/writing assignments, and class presentations | Lectures using video conferencing apps, assignments using learning apps, use of pre-recorded presentations on social media platforms |
| 6 | Top three methods used in teaching clinical skills | Demonstrations, practice on peers, observation postings at clinics | Demonstration using video clips, case discussions, and role-play using video conferencing apps. |
| 7 | Provision of study material | 95.45% responded that teacher-designed notes, textbooks and reference books are most circulated study material during or after class. | 97.26% responded that presentations, other online resources, and recorded sessions are circulated during or after the session. |
| 8 | Nature of assessment | Prominently summative | Prominently formative |
| 9 | Conduct of examination | Theory written examination; practical skills demonstration | Online examination for theory in the form of assignments/presentations. Skills examination in the form of role-plays and oral examination. |