Cecilia Scholcoff1,2, Amy Farkas3,4, Julie L Machen5, Cynthia Kay3,4, Sarah Nickoloff3,4, Kathlyn E Fletcher3,4, Jeffrey L Jackson3,4. 1. Clement J. Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI, USA. cscholcoff@mcw.edu. 2. Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. cscholcoff@mcw.edu. 3. Clement J. Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI, USA. 4. Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. 5. Dell Medical School at the University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sexual harassment of women is a pervasive problem. Prior studies found that sexual harassment of female providers by patients is common, but guidance on addressing this problem is limited. OBJECTIVE: To understand the experiences of female providers with sexual harassment by patients with a focus on how practicing providers address these events. DESIGN: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty female, internal medicine providers, including resident physicians, staff physicians, and nurse practitioners at a large, urban, academic hospital in the USA. APPROACH: Interviews were analyzed for themes. KEY RESULTS: Two themes were explored: first, the experiences with sexual harassment and, second, the strategies to address sexual harassment. We coded four sub-themes regarding participant experiences: (1) their descriptions of the types of harassment, (2) the context of the event, (3) the impact of the harassment, and (4) their preparation to address the harassment. We coded seven sub-themes on strategies used by participants: (1) indirect strategies, (2) confrontation, (3) modifying the clinical encounter, (4) modifying self, (5) alerting others, (6) debrief, and (7) report. CONCLUSION: Our qualitative study found that sexual harassment of female providers by patients is an ongoing problem, disruptive to the patient-provider relationship, and a possible threat to the well-being of both provider and patient. Formal training on how to address this problem was lacking, but all providers had developed or adapted strategies based on personal experiences or role modeling. Educating providers on strategies is an important next step to addressing this problem.
BACKGROUND: Sexual harassment of women is a pervasive problem. Prior studies found that sexual harassment of female providers by patients is common, but guidance on addressing this problem is limited. OBJECTIVE: To understand the experiences of female providers with sexual harassment by patients with a focus on how practicing providers address these events. DESIGN: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty female, internal medicine providers, including resident physicians, staff physicians, and nurse practitioners at a large, urban, academic hospital in the USA. APPROACH: Interviews were analyzed for themes. KEY RESULTS: Two themes were explored: first, the experiences with sexual harassment and, second, the strategies to address sexual harassment. We coded four sub-themes regarding participant experiences: (1) their descriptions of the types of harassment, (2) the context of the event, (3) the impact of the harassment, and (4) their preparation to address the harassment. We coded seven sub-themes on strategies used by participants: (1) indirect strategies, (2) confrontation, (3) modifying the clinical encounter, (4) modifying self, (5) alerting others, (6) debrief, and (7) report. CONCLUSION: Our qualitative study found that sexual harassment of female providers by patients is an ongoing problem, disruptive to the patient-provider relationship, and a possible threat to the well-being of both provider and patient. Formal training on how to address this problem was lacking, but all providers had developed or adapted strategies based on personal experiences or role modeling. Educating providers on strategies is an important next step to addressing this problem.
Entities:
Keywords:
physician-patient relationship; sexual harassment; women in medicine
Authors: Heather Wolfe; Carleen Zebuhr; Alexis A Topjian; Akira Nishisaki; Dana E Niles; Peter A Meaney; Lori Boyle; Rita T Giordano; Daniela Davis; Margaret Priestley; Michael Apkon; Robert A Berg; Vinay M Nadkarni; Robert M Sutton Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Emily A Vargas; Sheila T Brassel; Lilia M Cortina; Isis H Settles; Timothy R B Johnson; Reshma Jagsi Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2019-09-12 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Reshma Jagsi; Kent A Griffith; Rochelle Jones; Chithra R Perumalswami; Peter Ubel; Abigail Stewart Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-05-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Naif Fnais; Charlene Soobiah; Maggie Hong Chen; Erin Lillie; Laure Perrier; Mariam Tashkhandi; Sharon E Straus; Muhammad Mamdani; Mohammed Al-Omran; Andrea C Tricco Journal: Acad Med Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Yue-Yung Hu; Ryan J Ellis; D Brock Hewitt; Anthony D Yang; Elaine Ooi Cheung; Judith T Moskowitz; John R Potts; Jo Buyske; David B Hoyt; Thomas J Nasca; Karl Y Bilimoria Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-10-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Karissa M Fenwick; Tana M Luger; Karen E Dyer; Joya G Chrystal; Alison B Hamilton; Elizabeth M Yano; Ruth Klap Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 6.473