Emily A Vargas1, Sheila T Brassel2, Lilia M Cortina2,3, Isis H Settles2,4, Timothy R B Johnson3,5,6, Reshma Jagsi5,7. 1. Department of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. 2. Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 3. Department of Women's Studies, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 4. Department of Afroamerican and African Studies, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 5. Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vot Voigtlander Women's Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 7. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Abstract
Background: A landmark National Academies report highlighted the need for rigorous evaluation of sexual harassment in medicine. We examined the prevalence and impact of sexual harassment using the Sexual Experiences Questionnaire, the standard for measurement of sexual harassment, but which has not been previously applied within academic medicine. Materials and Methods: A 20-minute online survey was administered to all faculty who had been working at University of Michigan Medical School for at least 1 year (n = 2723). We assessed sexual harassment within the past year from insiders (i.e., from staff, students, and faculty) and from patients and patients' families. We also evaluated mental health, job satisfaction, sense of safety at work, and turnover intentions. Results: In the final sample (n = 705; which included 25.9% of the originally targeted population), most respondents, 82.5% of women and 65.1% of men, reported at least one incident of sexual harassment from insiders in the past year; 64.4% of women and 44.1% of men reported harassment from patients and patients' families. The most frequently experienced dimension of sexual harassment for women and men was sexist gender harassment. Increased experiences of harassment were independently associated with lower mental health, job satisfaction, and sense of safety at work, as well as increased turnover intentions, with no significant interactions by gender. Conclusions: Sexual harassment against medical faculty is alarmingly common at an institution that is not expected to be atypical. Interventions must address sexual harassment, which affects mental health and career outcomes of male and female physicians.
Background: A landmark National Academies report highlighted the need for rigorous evaluation of sexual harassment in medicine. We examined the prevalence and impact of sexual harassment using the Sexual Experiences Questionnaire, the standard for measurement of sexual harassment, but which has not been previously applied within academic medicine. Materials and Methods: A 20-minute online survey was administered to all faculty who had been working at University of Michigan Medical School for at least 1 year (n = 2723). We assessed sexual harassment within the past year from insiders (i.e., from staff, students, and faculty) and from patients and patients' families. We also evaluated mental health, job satisfaction, sense of safety at work, and turnover intentions. Results: In the final sample (n = 705; which included 25.9% of the originally targeted population), most respondents, 82.5% of women and 65.1% of men, reported at least one incident of sexual harassment from insiders in the past year; 64.4% of women and 44.1% of men reported harassment from patients and patients' families. The most frequently experienced dimension of sexual harassment for women and men was sexist gender harassment. Increased experiences of harassment were independently associated with lower mental health, job satisfaction, and sense of safety at work, as well as increased turnover intentions, with no significant interactions by gender. Conclusions: Sexual harassment against medical faculty is alarmingly common at an institution that is not expected to be atypical. Interventions must address sexual harassment, which affects mental health and career outcomes of male and female physicians.
Entities:
Keywords:
academic medical faculty; career outcomes; mental health; sexual harassment
Authors: Amy H Farkas; Cecilia Scholcoff; Julie L Machen; Cynthia Kay; Sarah Nickoloff; Kathlyn E Fletcher; Jeffrey L Jackson Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Cecilia Scholcoff; Amy Farkas; Julie L Machen; Cynthia Kay; Sarah Nickoloff; Kathlyn E Fletcher; Jeffrey L Jackson Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-07-22 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Karissa M Fenwick; Karen E Dyer; Ruth Klap; Kristina Oishi; Jessica L Moreau; Elizabeth M Yano; Bevanne Bean-Mayberry; Anne G Sadler; Alison B Hamilton Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-03-09 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Karissa M Fenwick; Tana M Luger; Karen E Dyer; Joya G Chrystal; Alison B Hamilton; Elizabeth M Yano; Ruth Klap Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Mareike Adler; Sylvie Vincent-Höper; Claudia Vaupel; Sabine Gregersen; Anja Schablon; Albert Nienhaus Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Eliza Notaro; Vanessa L Pascoe; Daniel S Hippe; Kristina Lachance; Michi M Shinohara; Katherine L DeNiro Journal: Int J Womens Dermatol Date: 2020-11-05