Literature DB >> 32699752

Posterior Spinal Fusion With Multilevel Posterolateral Convex Disc Releases for the Treatment of Severe Thoracolumbar Scoliosis.

Christopher Mikhail1, Robert Brochin1, Lily Eaker1, Baron S Lonner1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Severe, rigid thoracolumbar scoliosis presents a surgical challenge to achieve 3-dimensional correction, maximize distal motion segments, and avoid operative morbidity conferred by combined anterior-posterior approaches or 3-column osteotomies. We present a new approach for releasing these curves, using multilevel posterolateral convex disc release (PCDR) and posterior instrumented fusion.
METHODS: There were 3 adults and 1 adolescent (mean age, 31.8 years; 2 females) with severe progressive thoracic and transforaminal lumbar (major) idiopathic scoliosis (IS) who were treated with 3-level PCDR, multiple posterior column osteotomies, and posterior instrumented thoracolumbar fusion with all-pedicle screw constructs.
RESULTS: Restoration of global coronal and sagittal alignment was achieved for all patients (minimum 2-year follow-up). Lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) was L4 in 2 patients and L3 in the remaining 2. All except 1 were fused to the lower end vertebra. Postoperatively, mean thoracolumbar curve was reduced from 77.3° (range, 69°-91°) to 21.8° (72%Δ), LIV tilt decreased from 26.8° to 8.3°, and LIV translation improved (2.5-1.2 cm; 58%Δ), whereas lumbar lordosis remained unchanged. Average central sacral vertical line shift measured via C7 sagittal vertical axis changed from 1.4 to -0.7 cm. There were no complications except for dysesthesias in the lower extremity on the side of the PCDR in 1 patient, which resolved after 3 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Severe thoracolumbar IS presents a surgical challenge to achieve 3-dimensional correction, minimize fusion levels, and avoid procedural morbidity. PCDR is a novel technique that may facilitate this correction with minimal procedure-related morbidity. ©International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  feasibility study; new technique; posterolateral convex disc release; thoracolumbar scoliosis

Year:  2020        PMID: 32699752      PMCID: PMC7343274          DOI: 10.14444/7041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  38 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of lumbar disc changes below scoliosis fusions. A prospective study.

Authors:  R A Balderston; T J Albert; T McIntosh; L Wong; C Dolinskas
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Biomechanical comparison of ponte osteotomy and discectomy.

Authors:  Cheng Wang; Kevin Bell; Michael McClincy; Lloydine Jacobs; Ozgur Dede; James Roach; Patrick Bosch
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  The effect of different surgical releases on thoracic spinal motion. A cadaveric study.

Authors:  M A Feiertag; W C Horton; J T Norman; F C Proctor; W C Hutton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Anterior spinal fusion for thoracolumbar scoliosis: comprehensive assessment of radiographic, clinical, and pulmonary outcomes on 2-years follow-up.

Authors:  Kushagra Verma; Joshua D Auerbach; Kristin E Kean; Firas Chamas; Matthew Vorsanger; Baron S Lonner
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2010 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.324

5.  Is anterior release effective to increase flexibility in idiopathic thoracic scoliosis? Assessment by traction films.

Authors:  A Hempfing; L Ferraris; H Koller; J Rump; P Metz-Stavenhagen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  A biomechanical comparison of open and thoracoscopic anterior spinal release in a goat model.

Authors:  P O Newton; J M Cardelia; C L Farnsworth; K J Baker; D G Bronson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  R R Betz; J Harms; D H Clements; L G Lenke; T G Lowe; H L Shufflebarger; D Jeszenszky; B Beele
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Comparison of selective anterior versus posterior screw instrumentation in Lenke5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Ming Li; Jianqiang Ni; Xiutong Fang; Hongtao Liu; Xiaodong Zhu; Shisheng He; Suxi Gu; Xin Wang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The prevalence of disc aging and back pain after fusion extending into the lower lumbar spine. A matched MR study twenty-five years after surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  A J Danielsson; C G Cederlund; S Ekholm; A L Nachemson
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.701

10.  Criteria for Ending the Distal Fusion at the L3 Vertebra vs. L4 in Surgical Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients with Lenke Type 3C, 5C, and 6C Curves: Results After Ten Years of Follow-up.

Authors:  Mehmet N Erdem; Sinan Karaca; Mehmet F Korkmaz; Meric Enercan; Mehmet Tezer; Ayhan N Kara; Azmi Hamzaoglu
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.