Cheng Wang1, Kevin Bell, Michael McClincy, Lloydine Jacobs, Ozgur Dede, James Roach, Patrick Bosch. 1. *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ferguson Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA †Department of Spinal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China, Hengyang City, Hunan Province, China ‡Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; and §Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical cadaver study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relative effectiveness of Ponte osteotomies for spinal release in deformity correction. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Controversy exists as to the role of Ponte osteotomy in deformity correction surgery. Very little has been written about the biomechanical effects of Ponte osteotomy. Past biomechanical studies have been limited to application of forces through endplates, single functional units, or lack of comparison with anterior release. METHODS: Twelve fresh-frozen human full thoracic spinal units were tested for motion in axial rotation, flexion/extension, and lateral bending in a custom-designed robotic environment. Testing was repeated after sequential facetectomy and Ponte osteotomy (6 specimens) and compared with partial and full discectomy (6 specimens). RESULTS: Motion in axial rotation is increased 21% by Ponte osteotomy compared with 35% for full discectomy. Anterior displacement of the spinal column, creating lordosis, was increased 15% by Ponte osteotomy and 40% by full discectomy. Posterior displacement of the spinal column, creating kyphosis, was increased 23% by Ponte osteotomy and 89% by full discectomy. Finally, in coronal force application the Ponte osteotomy had virtually no effect (2%) compared with 40% increased motion by full discectomy. CONCLUSION: Posterior Ponte osteotomy releases produced more motion than facetectomy alone in axial rotation and sagittal correction maneuvers, but had no effect on coronal correction. Anterior discectomy release destabilized spinal column significantly more than posterior releases in all force applications. Despite ample clinical experience demonstrating the effectiveness of posterior-only surgery, the biomechanical effect of Ponte osteotomies is modest. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.
STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical cadaver study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relative effectiveness of Ponte osteotomies for spinal release in deformity correction. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Controversy exists as to the role of Ponte osteotomy in deformity correction surgery. Very little has been written about the biomechanical effects of Ponte osteotomy. Past biomechanical studies have been limited to application of forces through endplates, single functional units, or lack of comparison with anterior release. METHODS: Twelve fresh-frozen human full thoracic spinal units were tested for motion in axial rotation, flexion/extension, and lateral bending in a custom-designed robotic environment. Testing was repeated after sequential facetectomy and Ponte osteotomy (6 specimens) and compared with partial and full discectomy (6 specimens). RESULTS: Motion in axial rotation is increased 21% by Ponte osteotomy compared with 35% for full discectomy. Anterior displacement of the spinal column, creating lordosis, was increased 15% by Ponte osteotomy and 40% by full discectomy. Posterior displacement of the spinal column, creating kyphosis, was increased 23% by Ponte osteotomy and 89% by full discectomy. Finally, in coronal force application the Ponte osteotomy had virtually no effect (2%) compared with 40% increased motion by full discectomy. CONCLUSION: Posterior Ponte osteotomy releases produced more motion than facetectomy alone in axial rotation and sagittal correction maneuvers, but had no effect on coronal correction. Anterior discectomy release destabilized spinal column significantly more than posterior releases in all force applications. Despite ample clinical experience demonstrating the effectiveness of posterior-only surgery, the biomechanical effect of Ponte osteotomies is modest. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.
Authors: Xiaoyu Wang; A Noelle Larson; Dennis G Crandall; Stefan Parent; Hubert Labelle; Charles G T Ledonio; Carl-Eric Aubin Journal: Scoliosis Spinal Disord Date: 2017-04-17