Suela Sulo1, David Lanctin2, Josh Feldstein3, Bjoern Schwander4, Jamie Partridge5, Wendy Landow6, York F Zöllner7. 1. Director, Health Economics & Outcomes Research (HEOR), Abbott Nutrition, Columbus, OH. 2. Senior Analyst, HEOR, Abbott Nutrition, Columbus. 3. President and Chief Executive Officer, CAVA, LLC, Northampton, MA. 4. General Manager, AHEAD GmbH-Agency for Health Economic Assessment and Dissemination, Loerrach, Germany. 5. Director, Global HEOR & Health Policy, Abbott Nutrition, Columbus. 6. Director, Operations, Advocate Health Care, Downers Grove, IL. 7. Professor, Health Economics, Medical School Hamburg, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hospital-based, nutrition-focused interventions have significantly lowered the cost-associated burden of poor nutrition through a reduction in healthcare resource utilization (HCRU). However, for patients at risk for poor nutrition who receive nutritional care at home, limited evidence exists on the economic impact of nutrition-focused interventions. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the 30-day cost-savings associated with an at-home nutrition-focused quality improvement program in the postacute care setting for patients at risk for poor nutrition from the perspective of a hospital system. METHODS: We compared the HCRU of 1546 patients enrolled in a quality improvement program during 1 year versus 7413 patients in a pre-program historical cohort who received care during the 1 year before the quality improvement program implementation. The analysis included the number of 30-day hospitalizations, emergency department and outpatient visits for both cohorts, and the associated costs. The main analysis included the fixed and variable costs for the program, and the costs of oral nutritional supplement and delivery. The costs for hospitalization, emergency department, and outpatient visit costs were based on the 2013 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project and Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. RESULTS: Based on the 2013 survey, the baseline costs for hospitalization, emergency department, and outpatient visit costs were $18,296, $1312, and $535, respectively. Our health economic analysis about the 30-day overall HCRU has shown that the quality improvement program group resulted in a total cost-savings of $2,408,668 for the 1546 patients in the program and a net savings of $1558 per patient compared with the costs for the pre-quality improvement program historical cohort. CONCLUSION: The use of a nutrition-focused quality improvement program led to significant 30-day cost-savings, by reducing HCRU for adults who received nutritional-based care at home. The improvements in HCRU highlight the importance of implementing nutrition-focused quality improvement programs for hospital systems that provide care for patients who are at risk for poor nutrition across a variety of care settings.
BACKGROUND: Hospital-based, nutrition-focused interventions have significantly lowered the cost-associated burden of poor nutrition through a reduction in healthcare resource utilization (HCRU). However, for patients at risk for poor nutrition who receive nutritional care at home, limited evidence exists on the economic impact of nutrition-focused interventions. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the 30-day cost-savings associated with an at-home nutrition-focused quality improvement program in the postacute care setting for patients at risk for poor nutrition from the perspective of a hospital system. METHODS: We compared the HCRU of 1546 patients enrolled in a quality improvement program during 1 year versus 7413 patients in a pre-program historical cohort who received care during the 1 year before the quality improvement program implementation. The analysis included the number of 30-day hospitalizations, emergency department and outpatient visits for both cohorts, and the associated costs. The main analysis included the fixed and variable costs for the program, and the costs of oral nutritional supplement and delivery. The costs for hospitalization, emergency department, and outpatient visit costs were based on the 2013 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project and Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. RESULTS: Based on the 2013 survey, the baseline costs for hospitalization, emergency department, and outpatient visit costs were $18,296, $1312, and $535, respectively. Our health economic analysis about the 30-day overall HCRU has shown that the quality improvement program group resulted in a total cost-savings of $2,408,668 for the 1546 patients in the program and a net savings of $1558 per patient compared with the costs for the pre-quality improvement program historical cohort. CONCLUSION: The use of a nutrition-focused quality improvement program led to significant 30-day cost-savings, by reducing HCRU for adults who received nutritional-based care at home. The improvements in HCRU highlight the importance of implementing nutrition-focused quality improvement programs for hospital systems that provide care for patients who are at risk for poor nutrition across a variety of care settings.
Authors: Julia Thornton Snider; Anupam B Jena; Mark T Linthicum; Refaat A Hegazi; Jamie S Partridge; Chris LaVallee; Darius N Lakdawalla; Paul E Wischmeyer Journal: Chest Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Anup Das; Edward C Norton; David C Miller; Andrew M Ryan; John D Birkmeyer; Lena M Chen Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2016-05-01 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Patricia Sheean; Isabel C Farrar; Suela Sulo; Jamie Partridge; Linda Schiffer; Marian Fitzgibbon Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2018-11-06 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Kurt Hong; Suela Sulo; William Wang; Susan Kim; Laura Huettner; Rose Taroyan; Kirk W Kerr; Carolyn Kaloostian Journal: J Prim Care Community Health Date: 2021 Jan-Dec