Giuseppe Novelli1,2,3, Antonio Novelli4, Paola Borgiani5, Dario Cocciadiferro4, Michela Biancolella6, Emanuele Agolini4, Marco Pietrosanto6, Rosario Casalone7, Manuela Helmer-Citterich6, Emiliano Giardina5,8, Suresh K Jain9, Wenyi Wei10,11, Charis Eng12,13,14,15, Pier Paolo Pandolfi16,17. 1. Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Tor Vergata University of Rome, 00133, Rome, Italy. novelli@med.uniroma2.it. 2. IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli (IS), Italy. novelli@med.uniroma2.it. 3. Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, 89557, USA. novelli@med.uniroma2.it. 4. Laboratory of Medical Genetics, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy. 5. Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Tor Vergata University of Rome, 00133, Rome, Italy. 6. Department of Biology, Tor Vergata University of Rome, 00133, Rome, Italy. 7. Cytogenetics and Medical Genetics Laboratory, Ospedale di Circolo, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy. 8. Molecular Genetics Laboratory UILDM, Santa Lucia Foundation, 00142, Rome, Italy. 9. Intonation Research Laboratories Pvt. Ltd, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500076, India. 10. Cancer Research Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. 11. Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. 12. Genomic Medicine Institute, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. 13. Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. 14. Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. 15. Germline High Risk Cancer Focus Group, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. 16. MBC, Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, TO, 10126, Italy. pierpaolo.pandolfiderinaldis@unito.it. 17. DRI, Renown Health, Nevada System of Higher Education, Reno, NV, 89512, USA. pierpaolo.pandolfiderinaldis@unito.it.
Dear Editor,Autism spectrum disorder (ASD, MIM: 209850) is a group of common but heterogeneous neurodevelopmental disorders with a prevalence of 4–10 per 10,000 individuals[1,2]. About 5% of ASD cases are caused by single-gene variants in FMR1 (MIM: 309550), MECP2 (MIM: 300005), or SHANK3 (MIM: 606230); 10% by copy number variants (CNVs)[2], while the majority is attributed to polygenic inheritance of common variants[3]. In addition, germline PTEN mutations have been identified in 2–5% of all ASDpatients and ~10% of macrocephalic ASD[4]. Recently, Lee et al.[5] identified germline variants within the E3 ubiquitin ligase WWP1 (MIM: 602307) gene in PTEN mutation negative individuals with neoplastic phenotypes found in PHTS (MIM: 158350).To establish whether WWP1 could play a role in ASD and neurodevelopment disorders, we analyzed 198 unrelated individuals mainly referred for syndromic or non-syndromic developmental delay and/or ASD of unknown genetic etiology. All individuals were clinically diagnosed with ASD on the basis of the fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). Whole-exome sequencing, validated by Sanger sequencing, identified eight different heterozygous germline mutations (one recurrent in three unrelated patients) of the WWP1 gene in 10 of 198 unrelated probands via WES (Table 1). None of the variant positive probands had macrocephaly. In two cases, parental origin could not be investigated, therefore, a de novo origin of the mutation, cannot be ruled out. For each patient (6 males and 4 females; ages 3–26), the clinical data have been reassessed. None of the probands had germline PTEN mutations or other mutations in genes (FMR1, SHANK3, MECP2, CDK19) associated with ASD/intellectual disability (ID). We independently confirmed that WWP1 variation does not act as a modifier for ASD phenotypes in PHTS with none of ~600 mainly American PTEN mutation positive research associated with the WWP1 locus. Similarly, routine chromosome studies and FRAXA locus were normal. GnomAD database analysis revealed that the identified WWP1 variants with the exception of R389S, R893H, and M728L (never detected), existed with a cumulative frequency of 0.00085 in ethnically matched populations (EUR), indicating that they are very rare variants. Specifically, WWP1 germline variants occurred in 10/396 alleles (allelic freq. = 0.0252) from the 198 unrelated individuals with ASD/ID (Table 1) which is a highly significant difference from European population frequencies from GnomAD (p < 0.00001; OR = 30.6 with 95% CI 16.27 and 57.59). We therefore extended the study to a cohort of 1158 individuals from the Italian general population to establish the frequency of WWP1 variants in this Italian cohort. We detected three WWP1 rare variants (c.1118G>A, p-Arg373Gln; c.1486G>C, p.Glu496Gln; c.2234A>G, p.Asn745S) (3/2316 alleles: allelic freq. = 0.00129). Notably, WWP1 variants were again shown to be over-represented in the ASD/ID series, even when compared with the Italian cohort examined (p < 0.00001; OR = 19.93 with 95% CI 5.47 and 72.90). The variants are found in all functional domains of the protein (the catalytic C-terminal HECT domain; the N-terminal C2 domain and WW domains) with an over-representation in the HECT domain (4/8). To predict the potential impact of the identified variants on the protein we used different tools (PolyPhen2, Mutation Taster, SIFT, MetaLR_pred, and MetaSVM_pred). The recurrent N745S variant has been previously reported by Lee et al.[5]: it is in the HECT domain and is expected to decrease its binding to the N-terminal domain. Analogously, R86H (C2 domain) was also described by Lee et al.[5]. This variant is functionally relevant since it induces a gain-of-function effect in triggering PTEN polyubiquitination[5]. With regards to the other five coding variants observed in our ASD cases, one is predicted by in silico analysis to be deleterious (R528H), while the others gave conflicting results.
Table 1
Summary of variations in ASD patients carrying WWP1 mutations.
Patient ID
Sex
Exon
Position (Hg19)
Nucleotide
Amino acid
Domain
GnomAda
dbSNP
Transmission
GM4277
F
Int 7
87414243
c.540-5T>C
NA
0.0027
rs187132881
Mother
GM3474
M
11
87439881
c.1167A>C
p.Arg389Ser
WW1
0
NA
NA
A020
M
14
87443954
c.1583G>A
p.Arg528His
WW4
0.000008
rs554041348
Father
GM6802
F
20
87460703
c.2234A>G
p.Asn745Ser
HECT
0.00003
rs148651938
Mother
GM8105
M
20
87460703
c.2234A>G
p.Asn745Ser
HECT
0.00003
rs148651938
Father
GM-1HSL
M
20
87460703
c.2234A>G
p.Asn745Ser
HECT
0.00003
rs148651938
NA
GM4098
F
20
87460645
c.2176G>A
p.Val726Ile
HECT
0.000023
rs144129917
Mother
GM8302
F
25
87479031
c.2678G>A
p.Arg893His
HECT
0
rs755897749
Father
A036
M
20
87460651
c.2182A>T
p.Met728Leu
HECT
0
NA
Father
A069
M
5
87393781
c.257G>A
p.Arg86His
C2
0.000023
rs371650373
Mother
aEUR.
Summary of variations in ASDpatients carrying WWP1 mutations.aEUR.Our results suggest that germline WWP1 variants identified in ASD/ID/NDDs may contribute to the pathogenesis of ASD/ID/NDDs. In addition, since the enzymatic activity of WWP1 can be inhibited by the natural compound, indole-3-carbinol[6], our study identifies a possible therapeutic target for individuals with ASD/ID/NDDS.