Literature DB >> 32699167

Artificial intelligence mobile health platform for early detection of COVID-19 in quarantine subjects using a wearable biosensor: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Chun Ka Wong1, Deborah Tip Yin Ho2, Anthony Raymond Tam2, Mi Zhou1, Yuk Ming Lau1, Milky Oi Yan Tang2, Raymond Cheuk Fung Tong3, Kuldeep Singh Rajput4, Gengbo Chen5, Soon Chee Chan5, Chung Wah Siu6, Ivan Fan Ngai Hung2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There is an outbreak of COVID-19 worldwide. As there is no effective therapy or vaccine yet, rigorous implementation of traditional public health measures such as isolation and quarantine remains the most effective tool to control the outbreak. When an asymptomatic individual with COVID-19 exposure is being quarantined, it is necessary to perform temperature and symptom surveillance. As such surveillance is intermittent in nature and highly dependent on self-discipline, it has limited effectiveness. Advances in biosensor technologies made it possible to continuously monitor physiological parameters using wearable biosensors with a variety of form factors.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the potential of using wearable biosensors to continuously monitor multidimensional physiological parameters for early detection of COVID-19 clinical progression.
METHOD: This randomised controlled open-labelled trial will involve 200-1000 asymptomatic subjects with close COVID-19 contact under mandatory quarantine at designated facilities in Hong Kong. Subjects will be randomised to receive a remote monitoring strategy (intervention group) or standard strategy (control group) in a 1:1 ratio during the 14 day-quarantine period. In addition to fever and symptom surveillance in the control group, subjects in the intervention group will wear wearable biosensors on their arms to continuously monitor skin temperature, respiratory rate, blood pressure, pulse rate, blood oxygen saturation and daily activities. These physiological parameters will be transferred in real time to a smartphone application called Biovitals Sentinel. These data will then be processed using a cloud-based multivariate physiology analytics engine called Biovitals to detect subtle physiological changes. The results will be displayed on a web-based dashboard for clinicians' review. The primary outcome is the time to diagnosis of COVID-19. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from institutional review boards at the study sites. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  infection control; telemedicine; virology

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32699167      PMCID: PMC7380847          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


Automatic physiological data collection by wearable biosensors that do not rely on self-discipline of quarantined subjects. Large number of physiological parameters monitored, including skin temperature, respiratory rate, blood pressure, pulse rate, blood oxygen saturation and daily activities, instead of relying solely on temperature measurement. Continuous data collection and analysis throughout the day. Limited by being single-centre based and exploratory in nature.

Introduction

COVID-19 emerged in December 2019,1–4 and in a mere few months has spread to more than 104 countries, resulting in an outbreak of viral pneumonia worldwide. As of 12 March 2020, the virus has reportedly caused 127 863 infections and 4718 deaths globally.5 The WHO declared COVID-19 a public health emergency of international concern on 30 January 2020 and further characterised it as a pandemic on 11 March 2020. As there is no effective therapeutic or vaccine for the condition yet, rigorous implementation of traditional public health measures such as isolation, quarantine, social distancing and community containment is the principle strategy used to control the COVID-19 epidemic.6 In addition to isolating patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection from the non-infected population, it is equally if not more important to quarantine asymptomatic individuals with COVID-19 exposure in order to reduce viral spread in the community. Indeed, quarantine measures have been initiated in many countries and regions to restrict movement of asymptomatic individuals with COVID-19 exposure in the community. These individuals are required to stay at home or at designated quarantine facilities. In addition, they are also asked to perform fever and symptom surveillance during the presumed incubation period (14 days). However, as such surveillance is intermittent in nature and highly dependent on self-discipline, it has limited effectiveness Furthermore, it has been reported that as many as 50% of COVID-19 infected patients had no fever until developing full-blown disease,3 7 thereby body temperature surveillance per se may not be sufficient to detect early disease progression. In the past few decades, advances in technology has allowed progressive miniaturisation of electronic biosensors such that they can be incorporated into wearable devices to allow continuous monitoring of physiological parameters such as skin temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, perspiration and activity of ambulatory subjects in a 24/7 basis.8 9 Together with state-of-the-art telecommunication technologies that allow instantaneous and multidirectional massive data transfer, it is now possible to remotely monitor physiological parameters of a large number of subjects in real time. These data can subsequently be relayed to physicians to allow timely intervention. Nonetheless, the potentials of using wearable biosensors to improve disease management have not been fully explored in real world settings. The current study aims to assess the impact of performing continuous remote monitoring of asymptomatic subjects with COVID-19 exposure under mandatory quarantine at designated facilities in Hong Kong using the Biovitals Sentinel platform. The platform consists of a clinical-grade wearable biosensor worn on the upper arm called Everion (Biofourmis, Singapore) which allows continuous multidimensional physiological parameters monitoring and an artificial intelligence-powered physiology analytical platform Biovitals (Biofourmis, Singapore) for detecting disease progression. The research hypothesis is that by collecting continuous physiological data using Biovitals Sentinel and patient-reported outcomes, and processing them with a cloud-based analytics platform, Biovitals, it will be possible to identify physiology changes and detect other clinically meaningful alerts that will indicate early clinical progression in quarantined subjects with COVID-19 exposure.

Methods and analysis

This clinical trial protocol follows Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials.10 11 The underlying protocol follows Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials.12 13 The clinical trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04343794).

Study design and participants

This is a prospective, randomised-controlled, open-labelled study. Asymptomatic subjects with COVID-19 exposure at designated facilities under the compulsory quarantine measure introduced on 8 February 2020 in Hong Kong, fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study will be invited to participate in this study. Box 1 summarises the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Age ≥18 years. Asymptomatic for COVID-19 pneumonia. With close COVID-19 contact under mandatory quarantine at designated facilities in Hong Kong. Voluntarily agrees to participate by providing written informed consent. Symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 infection including fever, upper respiratory symptoms and/or gastrointestinal symptoms at recruitment. Confirmed COVID-19 infection. Planned laboratory test for COVID-19. Inability or refusal to provide informed consent. Lack of skills in operating simple electronic devices. There will be two phases of subject recruitment. The initial run-in phase is a single-arm, open-label study design confirmation phase with approximately 100 subjects. All subjects will undergo remote physiological monitoring using the Biovitals Sentinel platform. The data collected from the platform and clinical data from the health system will be used to validate the solution and the study design for the randomised phase. In the subsequent randomised phase, subjects will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to1 continuous remote physiological monitoring using the Biovitals Sentinel platform (intervention group) or2 usual care (control group) during the 14-day quarantine period (figure 1).
Figure 1

Study flow.

Study flow. In addition to daily body temperature monitoring and symptom surveillance in the control group, subjects randomised to the intervention group will wear a multisensor-based wearable armband biosensor, Everion, during the quarantine period. Everion is a wearable vital sign monitor capable of tracking heart rate, heart rate variability, blood oxygen saturation, blood pulse wave, respiration rate at rest, skin blood perfusion, activity, steps, skin temperature, barometric pressure and electrodermal activity. The wearable biosensors will be worn for 22–23 hours per day and be recharged while bathing or showering. In addition, patients will be instructed to report their symptoms and record their cough sounds using the specially designed smartphone application daily. The physiological parameters obtained will be automatically transferred in real time through a specially designed smartphone application to a secured cloud storage for processing using the Biovitals Analytics Engine. The results will be displayed on a web-based clinician’s dashboard for review (figures 2–5). The Biovitals Analytics Engine will process these multidimensional physiology parameters to detect subtle physiological changes preceding critical events, thereby enabling clinicians to promptly review and intervene. As an additional safety measure, specific alert thresholds for individual physiological parameters have also been set. Study investigators will remotely review the individual subject’s physiological parameters every 4 hours, and order diagnostic tests for COVID-19 infection through instant communication (electronic communication and/or phone). In addition, after the initial run-in phase and having recruited an adequate number of subjects with subsequently confirmed COVID-19, the collected physiological data will be used to enhance the Biovitals prediction model for COVID-19 infection using machine learning technology. Wearable device and home screen of the dedicated smartphone application. Smartphone application screen for symptom surveillance. Smartphone application screen for cough sound recording. Web-based dashboard for clinicians.

Outcomes

The primary outcome measure is the time to detection of COVID-19 infection using nasopharyngeal sampling for COVID-19 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The secondary outcomes include wearable device adherence, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of Biovitals Sentinel in identifying COVID-19 subjects, viral load of COVID-19 using nasopharyngeal sampling for RT-PCR at diagnosis, cross-infection rate within family cluster, length of hospital stay, length of intensive care unit stay, non-invasive and invasive ventilation use, National Early Warning Score 2, worsening of comorbidities and mortality.

Sample size and statistical analysis

The sample size for the randomisation phase will be determined based on the result from the phase I run-in period involving approximately 100 subjects. The sample size of the run-in period was determined by convenience sampling because there were no previous research-themed studies. To explore and estimate the effect of longitudinally measured clinical and physiological data on the time-to-event of primary and secondary outcomes, joint modelling of longitudinal and time-to-event data analysis, and other statistical and/or machine learning-based methods will be used. Data normality of continuous variables will be assessed using skewness statistics. Baseline characteristics of the two study groups will be compared using analysis of variance, χ2 or Fisher’s exact tests, as appropriate. Analysis of the primary and secondary outcomes will conform to the intention-to-treat principle. Cox regression analysis will be performed to compare the time to diagnosis of COVID-19 infection between the study groups with adjustment for potential confounders. For other secondary outcomes, the generalised estimating equations model will be used to compare the differential changes in each of the outcomes across the 14-day time points between the two study arms, with adjustment for potential confounders.

Randomisation

Patients will be randomised either to the Intervention group or Control group using a computer-generated random number to derive allocation sequence prior to enrolment in the study. Study staff responsible for enrolment will be informed of the randomisation assignment after entering the information of the subjects to a designated computer system. If a subject is found to be ineligible for the study after randomisation, the original assignment will be reassigned to the next eligible subject. Subjects and clinicians will not be blinded to the randomisation assignment. Data staff responsible for data entry will be blinded from randomisation assignment.

Data collection and management

After enrolment, each subject will be assigned a unique identifier to be used in the database. Data will be entered by study staff and data accuracy will be verified by the principal investigator of the study. Data quality control measures include queries to identify missing data, outliers and discrepancies. The database will be password protected and encrypted. Only study staff will have access to the database. Subjects who withdraw from the study will have continuous monitoring stopped, usual care continued and final outcome collected for analysis.

Data monitoring

Due to the minimal risk nature of the study, there is no external data and safety monitoring board. The principal investigator and study staff will monitor data internally and meet weekly in person or by phone to ensure the study is proceeding as intended.

Patient and public involvement

We received inputs from quarantined individuals and healthcare providers which guided the design of the current study and the choice of research questions. No quarantined individuals or the public were directly involved in the design of the study and choice of outcome measures. No quarantined individuals or the public will be involved in recruitment or conduct of the study. Results of the study will be disseminated to subjects, the public and the scientific community.

Ethics and dissemination

The investigation conforms to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of The University of Hong Kong, and Hong Kong West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong. Written informed consent will be obtained from all study participants by the study staff responsible for recruitment (online supplementary files 1 and 2). Important protocol modifications will be conveyed to investigators, the institutional review board, trial registries, regulators, journals and trial participants. After enrolment, each subject will be assigned a unique identifier to be used in the database. The personal identity of the subjects will not be used for any public purpose or for publication, nor will it be transmitted outside of the study team. The data set used during the study will be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Collaboration with other investigators interested in optimising quarantine strategies for COVID-19 will be welcomed. The results of the trial will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented in conferences.

Discussion

Emerging in December 2019, COVID-19 has spread at a rate far outstripping the capacity of many medical systems.14 Traditionally, public health measures including isolation and quarantine are the cornerstone to curb the spread of infectious diseases by interrupting person-to-person transmission, and are particularly important when no specific therapeutics or vaccines are available.6 Indeed, early detection of infected individuals among those with viral exposure followed by isolation would effectively reduce overt viral shedding in the community; nonetheless, early detection can be challenging. Symptom and fever surveillance among individuals with COVID-19 exposure is a commonly used method to detect infected individuals in the absence of medical testing. However, symptom declaration and intermittent body temperature measurement per se may not be sufficient to detect early disease progression. Indeed, up to 50% COVID-19 infected patients were so-called ‘asymptomatic’ and did not have fever until the full-blown disease.7 Conceivably, while fever is one of the cardinal symptoms specific for active infection, many other physiological alterations such as heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, perspiration and so on may likewise indicate active infection. However, practically speaking, they are more difficult to accurately measure without medical training. The intervention arm of the current study differs from the existing symptom and fever surveillance-based quarantine programme in several important aspects. By incorporating a wide range of continuously collected physiological parameters instead of solely relying on intermittent body temperature, it is possible to more accurately assess an individual’s physiological changes for detecting early disease progression.9 At the same time, the use of contemporary mobile communication technology facilitates automatic collection and transfer of physiological data. These measures can enhance patient compliance with the monitoring system as well as greatly shorten the time between detection of an abnormality and subsequent intervention. In the past decades, wearable technology has been increasingly used for medical diagnosis, most notably in arrhythmia detection.15–21 Indeed, by continuously collecting multidimensional physiological parameters and analysing them with machine learning techniques, it is possible to acquire a much more in-depth understanding of different disease processes, which potentially allows us to improve clinical management. Nonetheless, such potentials have not been fully explored in real world disease management. In the short term, the results of the current study may provide insights into detecting disease progression of COVID-19 through physiological data monitoring and possible ways to reduce the spread of the disease. In the long term, the study may demonstrate an important example of how wearable technologies and machine learning techniques can be incorporated into existing medical services. The clinical trial is limited by its single-centred characteristic and being exploratory in nature.
  19 in total

1.  Head-to-Head Comparison of the AliveCor Heart Monitor and Microlife WatchBP Office AFIB for Atrial Fibrillation Screening in a Primary Care Setting.

Authors:  Pak-Hei Chan; Chun-Ka Wong; Louise Pun; Yu-Fai Wong; Michelle Man-Ying Wong; Daniel Wai-Sing Chu; Chung-Wah Siu
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials.

Authors:  An-Wen Chan; Jennifer M Tetzlaff; Peter C Gøtzsche; Douglas G Altman; Howard Mann; Jesse A Berlin; Kay Dickersin; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Kenneth F Schulz; Wendy R Parulekar; Karmela Krleza-Jeric; Andreas Laupacis; David Moher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-01-08

3.  Convulsive seizure detection using a wrist-worn electrodermal activity and accelerometry biosensor.

Authors:  Ming-Zher Poh; Tobias Loddenkemper; Claus Reinsberger; Nicholas C Swenson; Shubhi Goyal; Mangwe C Sabtala; Joseph R Madsen; Rosalind W Picard
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 5.864

4.  Large-Scale Assessment of a Smartwatch to Identify Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Marco V Perez; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Haley Hedlin; John S Rumsfeld; Ariadna Garcia; Todd Ferris; Vidhya Balasubramanian; Andrea M Russo; Amol Rajmane; Lauren Cheung; Grace Hung; Justin Lee; Peter Kowey; Nisha Talati; Divya Nag; Santosh E Gummidipundi; Alexis Beatty; Mellanie True Hills; Sumbul Desai; Christopher B Granger; Manisha Desai; Mintu P Turakhia
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 176.079

5.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials.

Authors:  D Moher; K F Schulz; D G Altman
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2001-04-20       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Diagnostic performance of an automatic blood pressure measurement device, Microlife WatchBP Home A, for atrial fibrillation screening in a real-world primary care setting.

Authors:  Pak-Hei Chan; Chun-Ka Wong; Louise Pun; Yu-Fai Wong; Michelle Man-Ying Wong; Daniel Wai-Sing Chu; Chung-Wah Siu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia.

Authors:  Qun Li; Xuhua Guan; Peng Wu; Xiaoye Wang; Lei Zhou; Yeqing Tong; Ruiqi Ren; Kathy S M Leung; Eric H Y Lau; Jessica Y Wong; Xuesen Xing; Nijuan Xiang; Yang Wu; Chao Li; Qi Chen; Dan Li; Tian Liu; Jing Zhao; Man Liu; Wenxiao Tu; Chuding Chen; Lianmei Jin; Rui Yang; Qi Wang; Suhua Zhou; Rui Wang; Hui Liu; Yinbo Luo; Yuan Liu; Ge Shao; Huan Li; Zhongfa Tao; Yang Yang; Zhiqiang Deng; Boxi Liu; Zhitao Ma; Yanping Zhang; Guoqing Shi; Tommy T Y Lam; Joseph T Wu; George F Gao; Benjamin J Cowling; Bo Yang; Gabriel M Leung; Zijian Feng
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 176.079

8.  A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster.

Authors:  Jasper Fuk-Woo Chan; Shuofeng Yuan; Kin-Hang Kok; Kelvin Kai-Wang To; Hin Chu; Jin Yang; Fanfan Xing; Jieling Liu; Cyril Chik-Yan Yip; Rosana Wing-Shan Poon; Hoi-Wah Tsoi; Simon Kam-Fai Lo; Kwok-Hung Chan; Vincent Kwok-Man Poon; Wan-Mui Chan; Jonathan Daniel Ip; Jian-Piao Cai; Vincent Chi-Chung Cheng; Honglin Chen; Christopher Kim-Ming Hui; Kwok-Yung Yuen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Nowcasting and forecasting the potential domestic and international spread of the 2019-nCoV outbreak originating in Wuhan, China: a modelling study.

Authors:  Joseph T Wu; Kathy Leung; Gabriel M Leung
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Feasibility of controlling COVID-19 outbreaks by isolation of cases and contacts.

Authors:  Joel Hellewell; Sam Abbott; Amy Gimma; Nikos I Bosse; Christopher I Jarvis; Timothy W Russell; James D Munday; Adam J Kucharski; W John Edmunds; Sebastian Funk; Rosalind M Eggo
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 26.763

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Advancing Artificial Intelligence in Health Settings Outside the Hospital and Clinic.

Authors:  Nakul Aggarwal; Mahnoor Ahmed; Sanjay Basu; John J Curtin; Barbara J Evans; Michael E Matheny; Shantanu Nundy; Mark P Sendak; Carmel Shachar; Rashmee U Shah; Sonoo Thadaney-Israni
Journal:  NAM Perspect       Date:  2020-11-30

2.  Wearable, wireless, multi-sensor device for monitoring tissue circulation after free-tissue transplantation: a multicentre clinical trial.

Authors:  Yoko Tomioka; Masaki Sekino; Jian Gu; Masakazu Kurita; Shuji Yamashita; Shimpei Miyamoto; Takuya Iida; Koji Kanayama; Kotaro Yoshimura; Masahiro Nakagawa; Satoshi Akazawa; Yu Kagaya; Kentaro Tanaka; Yuki Sunaga; Keiko Ueda; Takuya Kawahara; Yukiko Tahara; Mutsumi Okazaki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 3.  Pedagogy and innovative care tenets in COVID-19 pandemic: An enhancive way through Dentistry 4.0.

Authors:  Mohd Javaid; Abid Haleem; Ravi Pratap Singh; Rajiv Suman
Journal:  Sens Int       Date:  2021-07-24

4.  Comparing COVID-19 and Influenza Presentation and Trajectory.

Authors:  Anat Reiner Benaim; Jonathan A Sobel; Ronit Almog; Snir Lugassy; Tsviel Ben Shabbat; Alistair Johnson; Danny Eytan; Joachim A Behar
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-05-14

Review 5.  The performance of wearable sensors in the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marianna Mitratza; Brianna Mae Goodale; Aizhan Shagadatova; Vladimir Kovacevic; Janneke van de Wijgert; Timo B Brakenhoff; Richard Dobson; Billy Franks; Duco Veen; Amos A Folarin; Pieter Stolk; Diederick E Grobbee; Maureen Cronin; George S Downward
Journal:  Lancet Digit Health       Date:  2022-05

Review 6.  Understanding the Co-Epidemic of Obesity and COVID-19: Current Evidence, Comparison with Previous Epidemics, Mechanisms, and Preventive and Therapeutic Perspectives.

Authors:  Maria Dalamaga; Gerasimos Socrates Christodoulatos; Irene Karampela; Natalia Vallianou; Caroline M Apovian
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2021-04-28

7.  Breaking out of the Box: Wearable Technology Applications for Detecting the Spread of COVID-19.

Authors:  Mostafa Al-Emran; Jesse M Ehrenfeld
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.920

8.  Development and validation pathways of artificial intelligence tools evaluated in randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  George C M Siontis; Romy Sweda; Peter A Noseworthy; Paul A Friedman; Konstantinos C Siontis; Chirag J Patel
Journal:  BMJ Health Care Inform       Date:  2021-12

Review 9.  Translational precision medicine: an industry perspective.

Authors:  Dominik Hartl; Valeria de Luca; Anna Kostikova; Jason Laramie; Scott Kennedy; Enrico Ferrero; Richard Siegel; Martin Fink; Sohail Ahmed; John Millholland; Alexander Schuhmacher; Markus Hinder; Luca Piali; Adrian Roth
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 10.  Early detection of SARS-CoV-2 and other infections in solid organ transplant recipients and household members using wearable devices.

Authors:  Brendan J Keating; Eyas H Mukhtar; Eric D Elftmann; Feyisope R Eweje; Hui Gao; Lina I Ibrahim; Ranganath G Kathawate; Alexander C Lee; Eric H Li; Krista A Moore; Nikhil Nair; Venkata Chaluvadi; Janaiya Reason; Francesca Zanoni; Alexander T Honkala; Amein K Al-Ali; Fatima Abdullah Alrubaish; Maha Ahmad Al-Mozaini; Fahad A Al-Muhanna; Khaldoun Al-Romaih; Samuel B Goldfarb; Ryan Kellogg; Krzysztof Kiryluk; Sarah J Kizilbash; Taisa J Kohut; Juhi Kumar; Matthew J O'Connor; Elizabeth B Rand; Robert R Redfield; Benjamin Rolnik; Joseph Rossano; Pablo G Sanchez; Arash Alavi; Amir Bahmani; Gireesh K Bogu; Andrew W Brooks; Ahmed A Metwally; Tejas Mishra; Stephen D Marks; Robert A Montgomery; Jay A Fishman; Sandra Amaral; Pamala A Jacobson; Meng Wang; Michael P Snyder
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.782

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.