Literature DB >> 32697604

Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome-Based Interventions for Palliative Cancer Care: A Systematic and Mapping Review.

Christina Karamanidou1, Pantelis Natsiavas1, Lefteris Koumakis2, Kostas Marias2, Fatima Schera3, Michael Schäfer3, Sheila Payne4, Christos Maramis1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Capitalizing on the promise of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), electronic implementations of PROs (ePROs) are expected to play an important role in the development of novel digital health interventions targeting palliative cancer care. We performed a systematic and mapping review of the scientific literature on the current ePRO-based approaches used for palliative cancer care.
METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement guidelines, the conducted review answered the research questions: "What are the current ePRO-based approaches for palliative cancer care; what is their contribution/value in the domain of palliative cancer care; and what are the potential gaps, challenges, and opportunities for further research?" After a screening step, the corpus of included articles indexed in PubMed or the Web of Science underwent full text review, which mapped the articles across 15 predefined axes.
RESULTS: The corpus of 24 mapped studies includes 9 study protocols, 7 technical tools/solutions, 7 pilot/feasibility/acceptability studies, and 1 evaluation study. The review of the corpus revealed (1) an archetype of ePRO-enabled interventions for palliative cancer care, which most commonly use ePROs as study end point assessment instruments rather than integral intervention components; (2) the fact that the literature has not fully embraced the modern definitions that expand the scope of palliative care; (3) the striking shortage of promising ubiquitous computing devices (eg, smart activity trackers); and (4) emerging evidence about the benefits of narrowing down the target cancer population, especially when combined with modern patient-centered intervention design methodologies.
CONCLUSION: Although research on exploiting ePROs for the development of digital palliative cancer care interventions is considerably active and demonstrates several successful cases, there is considerable room for improvement along the directions of the aforementioned findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32697604      PMCID: PMC7397776          DOI: 10.1200/CCI.20.00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform        ISSN: 2473-4276


  35 in total

Review 1.  A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies.

Authors:  Maria J Grant; Andrew Booth
Journal:  Health Info Libr J       Date:  2009-06

2.  Feasibility of Conducting a Palliative Care Randomized Controlled Trial in Children With Advanced Cancer: Assessment of the PediQUEST Study.

Authors:  Veronica Dussel; Liliana Orellana; Natalie Soto; Kun Chen; Christina Ullrich; Tammy I Kang; Jeffrey R Geyer; Chris Feudtner; Joanne Wolfe
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 5.  EAPC White Paper on outcome measurement in palliative care: Improving practice, attaining outcomes and delivering quality services - Recommendations from the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) Task Force on Outcome Measurement.

Authors:  Claudia Bausewein; Barbara A Daveson; David C Currow; Julia Downing; Luc Deliens; Lukas Radbruch; Kath Defilippi; Pedro Lopes Ferreira; Massimo Costantini; Richard Harding; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 4.762

6.  Implementation and preliminary effectiveness of a real-time pain management smartphone app for adolescents with cancer: A multicenter pilot clinical study.

Authors:  Lindsay A Jibb; Bonnie J Stevens; Paul C Nathan; Emily Seto; Joseph A Cafazzo; Donna L Johnston; Vanessa Hum; Jennifer N Stinson
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 7.  Alleviating the access abyss in palliative care and pain relief-an imperative of universal health coverage: the Lancet Commission report.

Authors:  Felicia Marie Knaul; Paul E Farmer; Eric L Krakauer; Liliana De Lima; Afsan Bhadelia; Xiaoxiao Jiang Kwete; Héctor Arreola-Ornelas; Octavio Gómez-Dantés; Natalia M Rodriguez; George A O Alleyne; Stephen R Connor; David J Hunter; Diederik Lohman; Lukas Radbruch; María Del Rocío Sáenz Madrigal; Rifat Atun; Kathleen M Foley; Julio Frenk; Dean T Jamison; M R Rajagopal
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Bringing PROMIS to practice: brief and precise symptom screening in ambulatory cancer care.

Authors:  Lynne I Wagner; Julian Schink; Michael Bass; Shalini Patel; Maria Varela Diaz; Nan Rothrock; Timothy Pearman; Richard Gershon; Frank J Penedo; Steven Rosen; David Cella
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  'Oncokompas', a web-based self-management application to support patient activation and optimal supportive care: a feasibility study among breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Heleen C Melissant; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; Birgit I Lissenberg-Witte; Inge R Konings; Pim Cuijpers; Cornelia F Van Uden-Kraan
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.089

10.  An eHealth Application in Head and Neck Cancer Survivorship Care: Health Care Professionals' Perspectives.

Authors:  Sanne Duman-Lubberding; Cornelia F van Uden-Kraan; Niels Peek; Pim Cuijpers; C René Leemans; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Patient reported outcomes in oncology: changing perspectives-a systematic review.

Authors:  Augusta Silveira; Teresa Sequeira; Joaquim Gonçalves; Pedro Lopes Ferreira
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 3.077

2.  Fostering Palliative Care Through Digital Intervention: A Platform for Adult Patients With Hematologic Malignancies.

Authors:  Lefteris Koumakis; Fatima Schera; Heather Parker; Panos Bonotis; Maria Chatzimina; Panagiotis Argyropaidas; Giorgos Zacharioudakis; Michael Schäfer; Christine Kakalou; Christina Karamanidou; Jana Didi; Eleni Kazantzaki; Lydia Scarfo; Kostas Marias; Pantelis Natsiavas
Journal:  Front Digit Health       Date:  2021-12-17

Review 3.  Ethical Principles in Digital Palliative Care for Children: The MyPal Project and Experiences Made in Designing a Trustworthy Approach.

Authors:  Tina Garani-Papadatos; Pantelis Natsiavas; Marcel Meyerheim; Stefan Hoffmann; Christina Karamanidou; Sheila A Payne
Journal:  Front Digit Health       Date:  2022-03-18

Review 4.  Electronic patient-reported outcomes (e-PROMs) in palliative cancer care: a scoping review.

Authors:  Letteria Consolo; Greta Castellini; Silvia Cilluffo; Ilaria Basile; Maura Lusignani
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2022-09-23

5.  AquaScouts: ePROs Implemented as a Serious Game for Children With Cancer to Support Palliative Care.

Authors:  Stefan Hoffmann; Robert Schraut; Thomas Kröll; Wiebke Scholz; Tatiana Belova; Johann Erhardt; Daniel Gollmer; Christian Mauck; Giorgos Zacharioudakis; Marcel Meyerheim; Panos Bonotis; Christine Kakalou; Maria Chatzimina; Christina Karamanidou; Annette Sander; Jana Didi; Norbert Graf; Pantelis Natsiavas
Journal:  Front Digit Health       Date:  2021-12-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.