Literature DB >> 32697344

COVID-19 and olfactory dysfunction: A possible associative approach towards neurodegenerative diseases.

Iyer Mahalaxmi1, Jayaramayya Kaavya1, Subramaniam Mohana Devi2, Vellingiri Balachandar3.   

Abstract

The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the agent of novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19), has kept the globe in disquiets due to its severe life-threatening conditions. The most common symptoms of COVID-19 are fever, sore throat, and shortness of breath. According to the anecdotal reports from the health care workers, it has been suggested that the virus could reach the brain and can cause anosmia, hyposmia, hypogeusia, and hypopsia. Once the SARS-CoV-2 has entered the central nervous system (CNS), it can either exit in an inactive form in the tissues or may lead to neuroinflammation. Here, we aim to discuss the chronic infection of the olfactory bulb region of the brain by SARS-CoV-2 and how this could affect the nearby residing neurons in the host. We further review the probable cellular mechanism and activation of the microglia 1 phenotype possibly leading to various neurodegenerative disorders. In conclusion, SARS-CoV-2 might probably infect the olfactory bulb neuron enervating the nasal epithelium accessing the CNS and might cause neurodegenerative diseases in the future.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2 neuroinvasion; neurodegenerative disorders; neuroinflammation; olfactory bulb dysfunction

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32697344      PMCID: PMC7405062          DOI: 10.1002/jcp.29937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Physiol        ISSN: 0021-9541            Impact factor:   6.513


Alzheimer's disease central nervous system microglia 1 Parkinson's disease severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 tumour necrosis factor‐α

INTRODUCTION

The novel pandemic coronavirus 2019 (COVID‐19) has expanded at an unprecedented rate around the globe where the researchers are striving to find a cure for this pandemic. This shattering viral infection has infected around 10.5 million people with a death toll of over five hundred thousand as of July, 2020. At this time, it is imperative to understand the possible connections between COVID‐19 and other detrimental illnesses (Balachandar et al., 2020). The COVID‐19 is highly prevalent in human and has the prospect to reach the brain without evident clinical symptoms. The central nervous system (CNS), a prodigy of convoluted cellular and molecular interactions, maintains life and orchestrates homoeostasis. Unfortunately, if there is any acute, tenacious or dormant form of viral infection inside the CNS, its immune system does not react subsequently, which results in neurological disorders. The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection has created chaos due to its possible ability of neuronal invasion, which might have a long‐term effect on the affected patients in their future. Also, the study highlights that the mechanism or route of transmissions of the neuroinvasive property of SARS‐CoV‐2 remains scarce (Koralnik & Tyler, 2020; Li, Bai, & Hashikawa, 2020). Such type of neuroinvasive propensity of coronaviruses has been documented in most of its beta‐coronavirus form, including SARS‐CoV, MERS‐CoV, HCoV‐229E, and SARS‐CoV‐2 (Vellingiri et al., 2020). A study has indicated that, through this viral neuroinvasion, the SARS‐CoV‐N protein can invade various other organs such as the stomach, small intestine, kidney, sweat glands, parathyroid, pituitary gland and liver, resulting into multiorgan failure in human beings (Ding et al., 2004). While dealing with the aftermath of this pandemic, it is important to carefully consider the potential effects of SARS‐CoV‐2 and its diagnostics and treatment options in human body (Iyer et al., 2020). The blood–brain and blood–cerebrospinal fluid barrier play a decisive role in maintaining homeostasis as well as protecting the brain from free passages of pathogens like viruses (human coronavirus), where the entry often occurs via peripheral nerves especially the olfactory sensory neurons (Dahm et al., 2016; McGavern & Kang, 2011). Recently, it was observed that loss of smell (hyposmia) was manifested among the COVID‐19 patients who were admitted in the hospitals (Ling et al., 2020). We propose a hypothetical mechanism for the entry of SARS‐CoV‐2 inside the CNS via olfactory bulb, where viral lesions have the possibility to trigger the microglia 1 (M1) phenotype which in response could activate the proinflammatory cytokines. This may result in the secretion of cytokines which may induce demyelination in the nervous system. Our hypothetical mechanism was also supported by Das, Mukherjee, and Ghosh (2020) where the authors have observed that SARS‐CoV‐2 might exhibit an intrinsic capability to infect the neural cells and could spread from CNS to the periphery via transneuronal routes. Also Xydakis et al. (2020) and Gómez‐Iglesias et al. (2020) have stated that the virus has neuroinvasive potential and has the possibility to enter the brain through the olfactory bulb. Similar various recent studies related to COVID‐19 and neurological manifestations have been reported in Table 1. It has been reported that the SARS‐CoV‐2 enters the CNS via viral interaction with membrane‐bound ACE‐2 receptors which are expressed not only in nasal and oral mucosa but also in the nervous system (Dinkin et al., 2020; Li et al., 2020; Marinosci et al., 2020). In addition, the ACE2 receptors present in endothelial cells of the brain could be a possible reason for SARS‐CoV‐2 infection induced stroke as well as encephalitis (Nath, 2020). When the cells of the neuroepithelium are damaged by virus, they may recruit inflammatory cells to the site and trigger cytokine storm, causing subsequent damage to neurons and neurogenesis (Whitcroft et al., 2020). Armocida et al. (2020) have reported that COVID‐19 patients presenting with smell‐related symptoms should be provided with appropriate precautions as they might have an impact on neurological conditions as well as immunosuppression. De Santis (2020) has reported that SARS‐CoV‐2 could enter the CNS via olfactory bulb which might trigger cytokine storm, causing dysfunction in the brainstem and further leading to neuronal death. This mechanism of SARS‐CoV‐2 inside CNS raises questions on the possible common link between COVID‐19 and smell dysfunctions that might play a possible role in causing various neurodegenerative disorders. Reports have suggested that smell or olfactory dysfunction is a sensitive indicator for various neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's diseases (PD), alzheimer's diseases (AD), and dementia (Ponsen et al., 2004; Richard, 2013; Velayudhan & Lovestone, 2009). The major player in smell dysfunction is the basal forebrain cholinergic system which regulates various neurotransmitters in the brain. The cholinergic neurons project into the olfactory bulb and modulate various neurological activities which stimulate immune response when a foreign agent invades the CNS. When there is a damage or defect in the cholinergic neurons, this might result into the activation of M1 phenotype and excite inflammatory mediators including IL‐6, IL‐12p40, IL‐15, and tumour necrosis factor‐α (TNF‐α) at a high level which has the possibility of neuroinflammation and cell death (Doursout et al., 2013; Richard, 2013; Wang, Zhou, Brand, & Huang, 2009). This detailed hypothetical mechanism has been depicted in Figure 1.
Table 1

Studies related to COVID‐19 and neurological manifestations

S. noType of studyCountry where the study conductedConcluding remarksManifestationReferences
1.Letter to the editorItalyThe cause behind olfactory alterations in COVID‐29 could be due to infection in CNS rather than peripheral damage in nasal neuroepithelium. And gustatory alterations will be followed after olfactory disorderAlterations in olfactory/gustatory functionsRalli et al. (2020)
2.Letter to the editorSwitzerlandIt is reported that anosmia could be used as an early prediction marker to detect this viral infection. Hence, scientific community has to focus on these symptoms and should make mandatory to test olfaction signs in COVID‐9 patientsLoss of smell or tasteMarinosci, Landis, and Calmy (2020)
3.Clinical updateLondonThe COVID‐19 patients are mainly associated with olfactory symptoms. This symptom should be used as a sign for self‐isolation and testing of COVID‐19. The authors suggest conducting psychophysical assessment will be more reliable in COVID‐19 patientsLoss of smell or tasteWhitcroft et al. (2020)
4.Research articleBelgium, Italy, Spain, FranceThe olfactory and gustatory are most common symptoms observed in Europeans affected with COVID‐19. The authors suggest that the international scientific community should recognise sudden olfactory or gustatory dysfunction as important sign of COVID‐19Olfactory and gustatory dysfunctionLechien et al. (2020)
5.CorrespondenceUnited States of AmericaIt is evident that COVID‐19 does not manifest upper respiratory form of infections such as red, runny, stuffy or itchy nose. Hence, the authors comment that based on these observations, this virus could also be a neurotropic virus which is site‐specific for olfactory systemAnosmia with or without dysgeusiaXydakis et al. (2020)
6.CorrespondenceItalyThe authors have reported that COVID‐19 patient presenting with smell‐related symptoms should be provided with appropriate precautions as they might have an impact on neurological conditions as well as immunosuppressionLoss of smell or tasteArmocida et al. (2020)
7.Review articleIndiaThe authors have stated that patients with altered mental health or with smell and taste dysfunction must be tested for COVID‐19. Also more autopsies of brain from COVID‐19 affected patients should be conducted to track down the neurological manifestation of this viral infectionMild (anosmia and ageusia) to severe (encephalopathy)Das et al. (2020)
8.Short reportUnited States of AmericaThe authors reported two cases who were infected with COVID‐19. The first case showed symptoms for Hunt and Hess (H&H) grade 3 aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). The second case was symptoms of Ischaemic stroke with massive haemorrhagic conversion. But virus was not present in CSFHunt and Hess (H&H) grade 3 aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). Ischaemic strokeAl Saiegh et al. (2020)
9.Case reportNew YorkThe authors reported a case who had Parkinson's disease was positive for COVID‐19; it was observed that the post‐mortem reports of COVID‐19 patient revealed that the virus was present in the neural and capillary endothelial cells in frontal lobe tissueNormal symptoms of COVID‐19Paniz‐Mondolfi et al. (2020)
10.Letter to the editorChinaThe authors report a rare case of a patient diagnosed with COVID‐19 who manifested with concomitant neurological symptoms such as altered consciousness and psychiatric symptomsAltered consciousness and psychiatric symptomsYin et al. (2020)
11.Review articleIranThrough this review article the authors have suggested that COVID‐19 patients do have mild to severe neurological manifestation such as headache, anosmia, Febrile seizures, convulsions, change in mental status, and encephalitisFebrile seizures, convulsions, change in mental status, and encephalitisAsadi‐Pooya and Simani (2020)
12.Case reportUnited States of AmericaThe authors have reported a case of 74 year old patients who had history of Parkinson's disease was positive for COVID‐19. Further examination revealed that the patient has encephalopathy, nonverbal and unable to follow any commandsEncephalitisFilatov, Sharma, Hindi, and Espinosa (2020)
13.Special editorialBethesdaThe author have stated that ACE2 is also found in the endothelial cells of brain which could increase the possibility of stroke due to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and also encephalitis as a potential complication.Stroke, encephalitisNath (2020)
14.Case reportUnited States of AmericaThe authors report a case of 72‐year‐old man who had history of hypertension, coronary heart disease, diabetes and kidney issues. The patient was also positive for COVID‐19. The authors observed that the patients had symptoms of seizures, which could be possible due to virus invading the CNSSeizuresSohal and Mossammat (2020)
15.Letter to the editorItalyThe author have reported that SARS‐CoV‐2 could enter the CNS via olfactory bulb and may reach brainstem causing dysfunction and neuronal death. The author also suggest that this might trigger immune responseDe Santis (2020)
16.PerspectiveChinaThe authors have reported that COVID‐19 patients are mainly known to have respiratory symptoms but the initial symptoms they have are kind of neurological one'sLoss of smell, mild cognitive impairment, altered taste, nerve pain, ataxia, etcZhou et al. (2020)
17.Retrospective studyChicagoThrough this study, the authors have reported that neurological manifestations of COVID‐19 could be highly variable and may be a serious complication of this infectionEncephalopathy, cognitive impairment, seizures, dysgeusia, etcPinna et al. (2020)
18.Review articlePhiladelphiaThe author has suggested that as COVID‐19 disease triggers the cytokine storm; hence, it may also trigger various auto‐immune diseases such as acute paralytic disease like Guillain‐Barre SyndromeGuillain‐Barré SyndromeDalakas (2020)
19.Review articlePakistanThe authors have suggested that the COVID‐19 patients with neurological manifestations must be given utmost care and high priority index as it may also cause severe complicationsHeadache, dizziness, encephalopathy, and deliriumAhmad and Rathore (2020)
20.Systematic reviewUnited States of AmericaIn this review article, the authors have also suggested that the SARS‐CoV‐2 infection mainly spreads through cribriform plate or olfactory bulb and could disseminate viz trans‐synaptic transferHyposmia, headaches, encephalitis, demyelination, neuropathy, and strokeMontalvan, Lee, Bueso, De Toledo, and Rivas (2020)

Abbreviations: COVID‐19, coronavirus 2019; CNS, central nervous system; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; SARS‐CoV‐2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Figure 1

Mechanism of action for COVID‐19 neuroinvasion. Figure 1 depicts the hypothetical mechanism of entry of SARS‐CoV‐2 inside the CNS via olfactory bulb along with the mechanism involved in olfactory bulb dysfunction. This image is evident that both the pathways of mechanism are similar where the M1 phenotype of microglia gets activated which may further stimulate the pro‐inflammatory cytokines that have the possibility of resulting in neuroinflammation. COVID‐19, coronavirus 2019; CNS, central nervous system; M1, microglia 1; SARS‐CoV‐2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

Studies related to COVID‐19 and neurological manifestations Abbreviations: COVID‐19, coronavirus 2019; CNS, central nervous system; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; SARS‐CoV‐2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Mechanism of action for COVID‐19 neuroinvasion. Figure 1 depicts the hypothetical mechanism of entry of SARS‐CoV‐2 inside the CNS via olfactory bulb along with the mechanism involved in olfactory bulb dysfunction. This image is evident that both the pathways of mechanism are similar where the M1 phenotype of microglia gets activated which may further stimulate the pro‐inflammatory cytokines that have the possibility of resulting in neuroinflammation. COVID‐19, coronavirus 2019; CNS, central nervous system; M1, microglia 1; SARS‐CoV‐2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 When this M1 phenotypes are activated, it might produce the proinflammatory cytokines or enhance phagocytosis or apoptosis which might contribute to the development of various neurodegenerative disorders (Seo, Kim, & Kang, 2018). After the entry of SARS‐CoV‐2 into the olfactory bulb, it possibly results in viral replication forming the ORF3a, ORF8b, E and other viral proteins. These proteins may also activate the (nuclear factor kappa‐light‐chain‐enhancer of activated B cells) NF‐Kb pathway followed by other proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF‐α, interleukin ‐1b (IL‐1b), and interleukin‐6 (IL‐6; Figure 2). This will bring to light the prominent proteins such as α‐synuclein and amyloid fibres which could get aggregated in neurodegenerative disorders. This inflammatory environment in the brain could also trigger oxidative stress mediators such as reactive oxygen species and nitrogen species, finally resulting in loss of dopamine (DA) neurons or the aggregation of amyloid fibrils forms, soluble proteins which assemble to form insoluble fibres that are resistant to degradation, which is the major pathogenesis of PD and AD (Hassanzadeh & Rahimmi, 2019; Kaavya et al., 2020; Rambaran & Serpell, 2008; Venugopal, Mahalaxmi, Venkatesh, & Balachandar, 2019).
Figure 2

Depiction of the possible role of SARS‐CoV‐2 to cause neurodegenerative diseases. The entry of SARS‐CoV‐2 in the CNS through olfactory bulb upon nasal infection may possibly cause inflammation and demyelination. Upon binding with the olfactory bulb, the viral replication is initiated. ORF3a, ORF8b, E proteins, and the NF‐KB pathway activate the inflammasome pathway through various means, leading to the activation of cytokine. This results in a cytokine storm, which further results into various neuronal inflammations and may result into neurodegenerative disorders. CNS, central nervous system; SARS‐CoV‐2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

Depiction of the possible role of SARS‐CoV‐2 to cause neurodegenerative diseases. The entry of SARS‐CoV‐2 in the CNS through olfactory bulb upon nasal infection may possibly cause inflammation and demyelination. Upon binding with the olfactory bulb, the viral replication is initiated. ORF3a, ORF8b, E proteins, and the NF‐KB pathway activate the inflammasome pathway through various means, leading to the activation of cytokine. This results in a cytokine storm, which further results into various neuronal inflammations and may result into neurodegenerative disorders. CNS, central nervous system; SARS‐CoV‐2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

CONCLUSION

While most studies related to COVID‐19 are in its nascent stages, a more in‐depth research is required in this domain to enhance the knowledge about this virus on neuroinvasion. As described so far, COVID‐19 is an acute respiratory infection which demonstrates neurotropic capacities, thus allowing the virus to gain dormancy and might inhibit immunological reactions in the host cell. It has been hypothesised that SARS‐CoV‐2 enters the neuroepithelium by binding to the olfactory receptors. Further, the virus subsequently enters the brain stem and the medulla oblongata, causing respiratory problems (De Santis, 2020; Ralli, Di Stadio, Greco, de Vincentiis, & Polimeni, 2020). Based on the experimental studies in mice, SARS‐CoV and MERS‐CoV had revealed that the virus could enter the brain possibly via the olfactory bulb, following its spread to some specific brain parts such as thalamus and brainstem (Li et al., 2020). In a recent study, it was observed that the postmortem reports of COVID‐19 revealed that the virus was present in the neural and capillary endothelial cells in frontal lobe tissue (Paniz‐Mondolfi et al., 2020). Interestingly, the olfactory dysfunctions were also found in patients without other symptoms, indicating that these abnormalities can be beneficial in early identification of disease (Lechien et al., 2020). Considering the high similarity between SARS‐CoV and SARS‐CoV‐2, the patients affected with COVID‐19 or recovered patients have probable chances to infect various organs including lungs, heart, kidney, brain and gastrointestinal tracts (Baig, Khaleeq, Ali, & Syeda, 2020). Hence, this review suggests that through olfactory bulb the SARS‐CoV‐2 might infect the brain which was also evaluated by Matthew (2020) and Ling et al. (2020) for which further investigation are required. The possible link between COVID‐19 and neurological conditions could help us to understand the neuroinvasion properties of the virus and develop precautionary measures to prevent it. In conclusion, this review warrants more research in this area to uncover the mechanism of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection via olfactory bulb and its implications in neurodegenerative diseases.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.
  41 in total

Review 1.  Unraveling correlative roles of dopamine transporter (DAT) and Parkin in Parkinson's disease (PD) - A road to discovery?

Authors:  Kaavya Jayaramayya; Mahalaxmi Iyer; Dhivya Venkatesan; Venkatesh Balasubramanian; Arul Narayanasamy; Mohana Devi Subramaniam; Ssang Goo Cho; Balachandar Vellingiri
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 2.  Illuminating viral infections in the nervous system.

Authors:  Dorian B McGavern; Silvia S Kang
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 53.106

3.  Inflammation and taste disorders: mechanisms in taste buds.

Authors:  Hong Wang; Minliang Zhou; Joseph Brand; Liquan Huang
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 4.  Clinical time course of COVID-19, its neurological manifestation and some thoughts on its management.

Authors:  Yifan Zhou; Wei Li; David Wang; Ling Mao; Huijuan Jin; Yanan Li; Candong Hong; Shengcai Chen; Jiang Chang; Quanwei He; Mengdie Wang; Bo Hu
Journal:  Stroke Vasc Neurol       Date:  2020-05-04

Review 5.  Neurological manifestations and complications of COVID-19: A literature review.

Authors:  Imran Ahmad; Farooq Azam Rathore
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 1.961

6.  Neurological manifestations and COVID-19: Experiences from a tertiary care center at the Frontline.

Authors:  Pranusha Pinna; Parneet Grewal; Julianne P Hall; Tachira Tavarez; Rima M Dafer; Rajeev Garg; Nicholas D Osteraas; Danielle R Pellack; Anjali Asthana; Kelsey Fegan; Vikram Patel; James J Conners; Sayona John; Ivan Da Silva
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 3.181

Review 7.  Guillain-Barré syndrome: The first documented COVID-19-triggered autoimmune neurologic disease: More to come with myositis in the offing.

Authors:  Marinos C Dalakas
Journal:  Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm       Date:  2020-06-09

Review 8.  COVID-19: A Global Threat to the Nervous System.

Authors:  Igor J Koralnik; Kenneth L Tyler
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 11.274

9.  COVID-19: an update on diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

Authors:  Mahalaxmi Iyer; Kaavya Jayaramayya; Mohana Devi Subramaniam; Soo Bin Lee; Ahmed Abdal Dayem; Ssang-Goo Cho; Balachandar Vellingiri
Journal:  BMB Rep       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.778

10.  Concomitant neurological symptoms observed in a patient diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019.

Authors:  Rong Yin; Wei Feng; Tonghui Wang; Gang Chen; Tao Wu; Dongrui Chen; Tangfeng Lv; Dawei Xiang
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 20.693

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Experimental Models of SARS-COV-2 Infection in the Central Nervous System.

Authors:  Anna Maria Paoletti; Maria Grazia Melilli; Immacolata Vecchio
Journal:  J Cent Nerv Syst Dis       Date:  2022-06-28

Review 2.  COVID-19 and Parkinson's disease: Defects in neurogenesis as the potential cause of olfactory system impairments and anosmia.

Authors:  Harini Sri Rethinavel; Sowbarnika Ravichandran; Risna Kanjirassery Radhakrishnan; Mahesh Kandasamy
Journal:  J Chem Neuroanat       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.052

Review 3.  Immunological Interfaces: The COVID-19 Pandemic and Depression.

Authors:  Austin Perlmutter
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Is SARS-CoV-2 vaccination safe and effective for elderly individuals with neurodegenerative diseases?

Authors:  Yan Shi; Minna Guo; Wenjing Yang; Shijiang Liu; Bin Zhu; Ling Yang; Chun Yang; Cunming Liu
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 5.217

5.  Epidemiological Mucormycosis treatment and diagnosis challenges using the adaptive properties of computer vision techniques based approach: a review.

Authors:  Harekrishna Kumar
Journal:  Multimed Tools Appl       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 2.577

Review 6.  COVID-19-Related Brain Injury: The Potential Role of Ferroptosis.

Authors:  Ruoyu Zhang; Chen Sun; Xuemei Chen; Yunze Han; Weidong Zang; Chao Jiang; Junmin Wang; Jian Wang
Journal:  J Inflamm Res       Date:  2022-04-05

7.  Mucormycosis: An opportunistic pathogen during COVID-19.

Authors:  Iyer Mahalaxmi; Kaavya Jayaramayya; Dhivya Venkatesan; Mohana Devi Subramaniam; Kaviyarasi Renu; Padmavathi Vijayakumar; Arul Narayanasamy; Abilash Valsala Gopalakrishnan; Nachimuthu Senthil Kumar; Palanisamy Sivaprakash; Krothapalli R S Sambasiva Rao; Balachandar Vellingiri
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 6.498

Review 8.  Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Impact on the Central Nervous System: Are Astrocytes and Microglia Main Players or Merely Bystanders?

Authors:  Veronica Murta; Alejandro Villarreal; Alberto J Ramos
Journal:  ASN Neuro       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.146

9.  Can Covid-19 attack our nervous system?

Authors:  Sara Mohamed Naguib Abdel Hafez
Journal:  J Chem Neuroanat       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 3.052

Review 10.  COVID-19 and olfactory dysfunction: A possible associative approach towards neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Iyer Mahalaxmi; Jayaramayya Kaavya; Subramaniam Mohana Devi; Vellingiri Balachandar
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 6.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.