OBJECTIVE: To describe metastasis-free survival (MFS) in men with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence following radical prostatectomy, and to define clinical prognostic factors modifying metastatic risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 450 men treated with prostatectomy at a tertiary hospital between July 1981 and July 2010 who developed PSA recurrence (≥0.2 ng/mL) and never received adjuvant or salvage therapy before the development of metastatic disease. We estimated MFS using the Kaplan-Meier method, and investigated factors influencing the risk of metastasis using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Median follow-up after prostatectomy was 8.0 years, and after biochemical recurrence was 4.0 years. At last follow-up, 134 of 450 patients (29.8%) had developed metastases, while median MFS was 10.0 years. Using multivariable regressions, two variables emerged as independently predictive of MFS: PSA doubling time (<3.0 vs 3.0-8.9 vs 9.0-14.9 vs ≥15.0 months) and Gleason score (≤6 vs 7 vs 8-10). Using these stratifications of Gleason score and PSA doubling time, tables were constructed to predict median, 5- and 10-year MFS after PSA recurrence. In different patient subsets, median MFS ranged from 1 to 15 years. CONCLUSIONS: In men undergoing prostatectomy, MFS after PSA recurrence is variable and is most strongly influenced by PSA doubling time and Gleason score. These parameters serve to stratify men into different risk groups with respect to metastatic progression. Our findings may provide the background for appropriate selection of patients, treatments and endpoints for clinical trials.
OBJECTIVE: To describe metastasis-free survival (MFS) in men with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence following radical prostatectomy, and to define clinical prognostic factors modifying metastatic risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 450 men treated with prostatectomy at a tertiary hospital between July 1981 and July 2010 who developed PSA recurrence (≥0.2 ng/mL) and never received adjuvant or salvage therapy before the development of metastatic disease. We estimated MFS using the Kaplan-Meier method, and investigated factors influencing the risk of metastasis using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Median follow-up after prostatectomy was 8.0 years, and after biochemical recurrence was 4.0 years. At last follow-up, 134 of 450 patients (29.8%) had developed metastases, while median MFS was 10.0 years. Using multivariable regressions, two variables emerged as independently predictive of MFS: PSA doubling time (<3.0 vs 3.0-8.9 vs 9.0-14.9 vs ≥15.0 months) and Gleason score (≤6 vs 7 vs 8-10). Using these stratifications of Gleason score and PSA doubling time, tables were constructed to predict median, 5- and 10-year MFS after PSA recurrence. In different patient subsets, median MFS ranged from 1 to 15 years. CONCLUSIONS: In men undergoing prostatectomy, MFS after PSA recurrence is variable and is most strongly influenced by PSA doubling time and Gleason score. These parameters serve to stratify men into different risk groups with respect to metastatic progression. Our findings may provide the background for appropriate selection of patients, treatments and endpoints for clinical trials.
Authors: Evan Y Yu; Roman Gulati; Donatello Telesca; Peter Jiang; Stephen Tam; Kenneth J Russell; Peter S Nelson; Ruth D Etzioni; Celestia S Higano Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-04-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Bruce J Trock; Misop Han; Stephen J Freedland; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Theodore L DeWeese; Alan W Partin; Patrick C Walsh Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-06-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Danil V Makarov; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Leslie A Mangold; Michael A Carducci; Alan W Partin; Mario A Eisenberger; Patrick C Walsh; Bruce J Trock Journal: J Urol Date: 2007-11-14 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Mark K Buyyounouski; Alexandra L Hanlon; Eric M Horwitz; Alan Pollack Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-10-04 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Steven L Chang; Stephen J Freedland; Martha K Terris; William J Aronson; Christopher J Kane; Christopher L Amling; Joseph C Presti Journal: Urology Date: 2009-10-12 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: M D Galsky; W Xie; M Nakabayashi; R W Ross; F M Fennessy; C M Tempany; T K Choueiri; K Khine; P W Kantoff; M-E Taplin; W K Oh Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2013-05-28 Impact factor: 5.554
Authors: Elena Elimova; Xuemei Wang; Wei Qiao; Kazuki Sudo; Roopma Wadhwa; Hironori Shiozaki; Yusuke Shimodaira; Venkatram Planjery; Nikolaos Charalampakis; Jeffrey H Lee; Brian R Weston; Manoop S Bhutani; Ritsuko Komaki; David C Rice; Stephen G Swisher; Mariela A Blum; Jane E Rogers; Heath D Skinner; Dipen M Maru; Wayne L Hofstetter; Jaffer A Ajani Journal: Oncology Date: 2018-04-27 Impact factor: 2.935
Authors: Rana R McKay; Kathryn P Gray; Julia H Hayes; Glenn J Bubley; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Arif Hussain; Philip W Kantoff; Mary-Ellen Taplin Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-04-22 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: J N Nyarangi-Dix; J Steimer; T Bruckner; H Jakobi; S A Koerber; B Hadaschik; J Debus; M Hohenfellner Journal: World J Urol Date: 2017-08-31 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Jason P Izard; Lawrence D True; Philip May; William J Ellis; Paul H Lange; Bruce Dalkin; Daniel W Lin; Rodney A Schmidt; Jonathan L Wright Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 6.394