Michèle Hubli1, Roland Zemp2, Urs Albisser3, Franziska Camenzind2, Olena Leonova2, Armin Curt3, William R Taylor2. 1. Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. michele.hubli@balgrist.ch. 2. Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Institute for Biomechanics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich (ETHZ), Zurich, Switzerland. 3. Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional pre-post pilot study. OBJECTIVES: This pilot study aimed to evaluate the potential for improving pressure relief behaviour in wheelchair users with spinal cord injury (SCI) using a novel feedback system based on textile pressure sensor technology. SETTING: In- and out-patient clinic of the Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland. METHODS: Nine wheelchair users with SCI (3 females, 50 ± 12 years of age, 2 tetra- and 7 paraplegics) were equipped with a feedback system (sensomativewheelchair) for three continuous weeks. The system consists of a textile pressure mat and a mobile smartphone application that reminds participants to perform missing pressure reliefs during regular and unobserved wheelchair usage in a customized manner. Pressure reliefs were detected using a subject-specific random forest classifier. Improvements of relief quality, duration and frequency were analysed by comparing week 1 (baseline) with no feedback, i.e., only pressure data recorded, against week 2 (with feedback). Carry-over effects of improved relief behaviour were studied in week 3 (no feedback, pressure data only recorded). RESULTS: All participants increased their relief frequency and performed in median 82% (IQRs: 55%-99%) of the required reliefs while using the feedback system, whereas the median relief frequency was only 11% (IQRs: 10%-31%) during the baseline condition. Every participant who did not perform reliefs of sufficient duration (based on the recommendations of the therapist) during week 1 showed a significant improvement while using the feedback system. CONCLUSION: Subject-specific feedback using the novel feedback system may have the potential for improving the regularity of an individual's relief activities, and may ultimately be an instrument for reducing the risk of developing pressure ulcers.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional pre-post pilot study. OBJECTIVES: This pilot study aimed to evaluate the potential for improving pressure relief behaviour in wheelchair users with spinal cord injury (SCI) using a novel feedback system based on textile pressure sensor technology. SETTING: In- and out-patient clinic of the Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland. METHODS: Nine wheelchair users with SCI (3 females, 50 ± 12 years of age, 2 tetra- and 7 paraplegics) were equipped with a feedback system (sensomativewheelchair) for three continuous weeks. The system consists of a textile pressure mat and a mobile smartphone application that reminds participants to perform missing pressure reliefs during regular and unobserved wheelchair usage in a customized manner. Pressure reliefs were detected using a subject-specific random forest classifier. Improvements of relief quality, duration and frequency were analysed by comparing week 1 (baseline) with no feedback, i.e., only pressure data recorded, against week 2 (with feedback). Carry-over effects of improved relief behaviour were studied in week 3 (no feedback, pressure data only recorded). RESULTS: All participants increased their relief frequency and performed in median 82% (IQRs: 55%-99%) of the required reliefs while using the feedback system, whereas the median relief frequency was only 11% (IQRs: 10%-31%) during the baseline condition. Every participant who did not perform reliefs of sufficient duration (based on the recommendations of the therapist) during week 1 showed a significant improvement while using the feedback system. CONCLUSION: Subject-specific feedback using the novel feedback system may have the potential for improving the regularity of an individual's relief activities, and may ultimately be an instrument for reducing the risk of developing pressure ulcers.
Authors: Carolin Bontrup; William R Taylor; Michael Fliesser; Rosa Visscher; Tamara Green; Pia-Maria Wippert; Roland Zemp Journal: Appl Ergon Date: 2019-07-15 Impact factor: 3.661
Authors: Gerben DeJong; Wenqiang Tian; Ching-Hui Hsieh; Cherry Junn; Christopher Karam; Pamela H Ballard; Randall J Smout; Susan D Horn; Jeanne M Zanca; Allen W Heinemann; Flora M Hammond; Deborah Backus Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Roland Zemp; Matteo Tanadini; Stefan Plüss; Karin Schnüriger; Navrag B Singh; William R Taylor; Silvio Lorenzetti Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2016-10-27 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Reto Togni; Andrea Kilchenmann; Alba Proffe; Joel Mullarkey; László Demkó; William R Taylor; Roland Zemp Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol Date: 2022-02-17