OBJECTIVE: To determine effectiveness of an intervention using monetary rewards as a consequence for preventing or reducing severity of pressure ulcers in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients with a history of chronic, recurrent ulcers. DESIGN: Multiple baseline analysis across subjects (time-lagged control), comparing severity of pressure ulcers and treatment costs during baseline and intervention. SETTING: Outpatient wound-care clinic of private, nonprofit specialty hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Nine adults (all with paraplegia) with a history of hospitalizations for treatment of pressure ulcers. INTERVENTIONS: In study 1, participants (n=6) undertook (1) a comprehensive self-care plan, (2) had a graduated schedule of visits with an advanced practice nurse, and (3) received monetary rewards for successfully preventing serious ulcers. In study 2, participants (n=3) undertook interventions 1 and 2, but monetary rewards were in staged phases so a component analysis could compare the effectiveness of visits alone to visits plus monetary rewards. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Severity of pressure ulcers measured with the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH Tool 3.0); and direct costs of treatment and preventive care for pressure ulcers. RESULTS: In study 1, severity of pressure ulcers-and their related treatment costs-decreased for the 6 participants. Maintenance of effects postintervention was highly variable, with only 3 participants showing long-term improvements. In study 2, for 2 participants, visits alone did not reduce pressure ulcer severity, but visits plus payments did effectively reduce ulcer severity, indicating improved prevention behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the assumption that pressure ulcers may recur among some individuals because there are insufficient positive consequences for effective prevention.
OBJECTIVE: To determine effectiveness of an intervention using monetary rewards as a consequence for preventing or reducing severity of pressure ulcers in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients with a history of chronic, recurrent ulcers. DESIGN: Multiple baseline analysis across subjects (time-lagged control), comparing severity of pressure ulcers and treatment costs during baseline and intervention. SETTING:Outpatient wound-care clinic of private, nonprofit specialty hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Nine adults (all with paraplegia) with a history of hospitalizations for treatment of pressure ulcers. INTERVENTIONS: In study 1, participants (n=6) undertook (1) a comprehensive self-care plan, (2) had a graduated schedule of visits with an advanced practice nurse, and (3) received monetary rewards for successfully preventing serious ulcers. In study 2, participants (n=3) undertook interventions 1 and 2, but monetary rewards were in staged phases so a component analysis could compare the effectiveness of visits alone to visits plus monetary rewards. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Severity of pressure ulcers measured with the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH Tool 3.0); and direct costs of treatment and preventive care for pressure ulcers. RESULTS: In study 1, severity of pressure ulcers-and their related treatment costs-decreased for the 6 participants. Maintenance of effects postintervention was highly variable, with only 3 participants showing long-term improvements. In study 2, for 2 participants, visits alone did not reduce pressure ulcer severity, but visits plus payments did effectively reduce ulcer severity, indicating improved prevention behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the assumption that pressure ulcers may recur among some individuals because there are insufficient positive consequences for effective prevention.
Authors: Mike Carlson; Cheryl L P Vigen; Salah Rubayi; Erna Imperatore Blanche; Jeanine Blanchard; Michal Atkins; Barbara Bates-Jensen; Susan L Garber; Elizabeth A Pyatak; Jesus Diaz; Lucia I Florindez; Joel W Hay; Trudy Mallinson; Jennifer B Unger; Stanley Paul Azen; Michael Scott; Alison Cogan; Florence Clark Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2017-04-17 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Mary Ann Regan; Robert W Teasell; Dalton L Wolfe; David Keast; William B Mortenson; Jo-Anne L Aubut Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Milagros Evardone; Catherine S Wilson; Diana Weinel; Jason R Soble; Younghee Kang Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2016-05-05 Impact factor: 1.985