Krissie Tellez1, Yan Hang1,2, Xueying Gu1, Charles A Chang1, Roland W Stein3,4, Seung K Kim5,6,7. 1. Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. 2. Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. 3. Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. 4. Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. 5. Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. seungkim@stanford.edu. 6. Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. seungkim@stanford.edu. 7. Department of Medicine (Endocrinology Division), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. seungkim@stanford.edu.
Abstract
Little is known about regulated glucagon secretion by human islet α-cells compared to insulin secretion from β-cells, despite conclusive evidence of dysfunction in both cell types in diabetes mellitus. Distinct insulins in humans and mice permit in vivo studies of human β-cell regulation after human islet transplantation in immunocompromised mice, whereas identical glucagon sequences prevent analogous in vivo measures of glucagon output from human α-cells. Here, we use CRISPR-Cas9 editing to remove glucagon codons 2-29 in immunocompromised NSG mice, preserving the production of other proglucagon-derived hormones. Glucagon knockout NSG (GKO-NSG) mice have metabolic, liver and pancreatic phenotypes associated with glucagon-signalling deficits that revert after transplantation of human islets from non-diabetic donors. Glucagon hypersecretion by transplanted islets from donors with type 2 diabetes revealed islet-intrinsic defects. We suggest that GKO-NSG mice provide an unprecedented resource to investigate human α-cell regulation in vivo.
Little is known about regulated glucagon secretion by human islet α-cells compared to insulin secretion from β-cells, despite conclusive evidence of dysfunction in both cell types in diabetes mellitus. Distinct insulins in humans and mice permit in vivo studies of human β-cell regulation after human islet transplantation in immunocompromised mice, whereas identical glucagon sequences prevent analogous in vivo measures of glucagon output from human α-cells. Here, we use CRISPR-Cas9 editing to remove glucagon codons 2-29 in immunocompromised NSG mice, preserving the production of other proglucagon-derived hormones. Glucagon knockout NSG (GKO-NSG) mice have metabolic, liver and pancreatic phenotypes associated with glucagon-signalling deficits that revert after transplantation of human islets from non-diabetic donors. Glucagon hypersecretion by transplanted islets from donors with type 2 diabetes revealed islet-intrinsic defects. We suggest that GKO-NSG mice provide an unprecedented resource to investigate human α-cell regulation in vivo.
Pancreatic islet α and β cells play an important role in
maintaining euglycemia by secreting peptide hormones in response to glucose and other
blood metabolites. In healthy β cells, an increase in blood glucose triggers
insulin secretion, which promotes glucose uptake and glycogenesis or adipogenesis in
‘insulin-target’ organs. In contrast, α cell glucagon secretion,
stimulated by hypoglycemia, amino acids, adrenal and neuronal inputs, leads to glucose
mobilization by promoting glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis in
‘glucagon-target’ organs, like liver[1]. Impaired regulation or output of insulin and glucagon by human
β cells and α cells underlies development and progression of diabetes
mellitus. Thus, intensive efforts are focused on determining the physiological and
pathological mechanisms governing human islet α cell and β cell
function.Recent studies reveal that human and mouse islet cells have differences in
cellular composition, molecular regulation, physiological control, intra-islet cell
interactions and other crucial properties[2-5], motivating
increased research focus and resource generation in human islet biology. Transplantation
of human islets in immunocompromised mice, like the
NOD.Cg-PrkdcIl2rgSz
mice (NSG) strain[6,7], has emerged as an important strategy
for assessing human islet β cell function in vivo[8-10]. Unlike distinct human and mouse insulins, the mature glucagon
sequence in these species is identical, precluding accurate quantification of
circulating human islet-derived glucagon secretion in mice and limiting studies of human
α cells in transplantation-based models. Thus, development of immunocompromised
mouse strains that permit detection of humanglucagon in mice and in
vivo studies of transplanted human islet α cell function could be
transformative by enabling mechanistic analysis in physiological and pathophysiological
conditions.Genetic targeting to eliminate endogenous glucagon production in mice could
permit in vivo quantification of glucagon output by transplanted human
islets. The Gcg gene encodes proglucagon, a prohormone expressed and
differentially processed in islet α cells, gut enteroendocrine cells, and the
central nervous system to produce multiple distinct peptide hormone products, including
glucagon, oxyntomodulin, glicentin, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucagon-like
peptide 2 (GLP-2)[11]. Differential
proglucagon processing depends on co-expression of the prohormone convertase (PC)
enzymes. In pancreatic islet α cells, PC2 enables cleavage of proglucagon into
the 29 amino acid mature glucagon protein, which is entirely encoded[12] by Gcg exon 3. PC1/3 expression
in enteroendocrine cells permits cleavage of proglucagon into other products, including
GLP-1, a secreted incretin hormone that enhances postprandial insulin output by islet
β cells[13-17].Glucagon production in mice has been eliminated by targeted mutation of the
Gcg gene to generate the Gcggfp allele;
adult homozygous Gcggfp/gfp mice were normoglycemic and
exhibited α cell hyperplasia and hypoinsulinemia[18]. Earlier studies in mice of glucagon signaling
loss from glucagon receptor (Gcgr) deletion, Gcgr antibody
inactivation[19-22], or elimination of PC2[23, 24] reported extensive metabolic phenotypes reflecting impaired
gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis, including elevated circulating amino acid levels and
basal hypoglycemia. Despite this progress, none of the mice from these prior studies
afforded the possibility of investigating glucagon regulation by transplanted human
islet α cells. Here we generated immunocompromised mice lacking mature glucagon
coding sequences (GKO-NSG) that enable investigations of glucagon
regulation in transplanted human islets. We demonstrate the utility of
GKO-NSG mice for analyzing in vivo α cell
function in human islets from non-diabetic and diabetic donors.
Results
Generation of GKO-NSG mice
To develop mice that permit transplantation of human islets and detection
of humanglucagon, we used CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in
NSG-derived oocytes to create an in-frame deletion of
nucleotides from Gcg exon 3, which encode mature glucagon
(Figure 1a
and
Extended Data 1a). This strategy should
preserve production of metabolic regulators derived from the proglucagon
carboxy-terminus, including GLP-1. After generating candidate founder mice,
genotype screening identified one NSG founder harboring an
in-frame 93 base pair (bp) deletion of the 3’ end of Gcg
exon 3. This in-frame deletion includes the elimination of 84 nucleotides
encoding amino acids 2–29 of mature glucagon (Figures 1a-b
and
Extended Data 1a). Subsequent breeding of
heterozygous F1 mice produced viable, fertile homozygous
GKO-NSG mice that were born at a rate of 22.1% (compared to
32.8% wild type, and 45.1% heterozygous; n= 122 mice). Three-week-old male and
female GKO-NSG mice weighed significantly less than
NSG control littermates (Extended Data 1c). However, by eight weeks of age, no difference in
body weight was detected in adult NSG and
GKO-NSG mice (Extended Data
1c). This transient reduction of body mass in
GKO-NSG mice likely reflects a combination of reduced
circulating insulin levels in GKO-NSG mice (see below), and
possibly unrecognized roles for glucagon in development[25-28]. Thus, beginning at eight weeks of age,
GKO-NSG mice of both sexes were characterized for
phenotypes associated with glucagon signaling loss.
Figure 1.
Generation of GKO-NSG mice.
(a) Schematic showing Glucagon
(Gcg) gene structure, guide RNA (gRNA) targeting sites
(green arrows), and genotyping primers (blue arrows). Exon 3 is highlighted in
red with the portion encoding mature glucagon marked by hatch lines.
(b) Representative genotyping PCR of GKO-NSG
mice following a heterozygous GKO-NSG cross; similar results
were seen from 30 crosses of heterozygous GKO-NSG mice. DNA
ladder on right side of genotyping gel image is marked at the size indicators
for 850 and 650 base pairs (bp). (c) Plasma glucagon levels in
2–3 month old GKO-NSG and NSG mice
during ad libitum feeding or after a 3-hour fast. Due to
distribution of data from GKO-NSG mice, these data were not
analyzed with statistical tests. (NSG mice, n= 6 males and 4
females; GKO-NSG mice, n= 4 males and 8 females).
(d) Plasma active GLP-1 levels from 2.5–3 month old
GKO-NSG and NSG controls following oral
glucose challenge (30’: P= 0.027573 by Repeated Measures
ANOVA, with Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test) (NSG
mice, n= 5 males and 3 females; GKO-NSG mice, n= 8 males and 2
females). Dashed lines indicate limit of detection. Data are represented as mean
of biological replicates with individual data points overlaid and error bars
indicate ± SEM. * P ≤ 0.05, ** P
≤ 0.01, *** P ≤ 0.001. N.D.= not detected. See
also Extended Data 1.
Extended Data Fig. 1
Design and characterization of GKO-NSG mice.
Related to figure 1.
(a) Sequence from GKO-NSG founder
(18–1) showing an in-frame deletion of 93 base pairs within exon 3 of
the Gcg gene compared to the wild type NSG sequence (WT).
Pink bar on top depicts exon 3 of Gcg. Blue bar represents
nucleotide sequences encoding mature glucagon peptide. Red-highlighted
dashes indicate deleted nucleotides in founder 18–1. (b)
Representative immunostaining of GKO-NSG pancreatic islets
with antibodies raised against mature glucagon (GCG, green) and proglucagon
(Pro-GCG, red) - peptide sequences of GLP-1 (7–17). Similar results
were seen across n= 3 NSG littermate control, n= 3
GKO-NSG, and n= 2 GKO-NSG Tx mice.
(c) Body weight of male and female GKO-NSG
and NSG control littermates at 3 and 8-weeks of age (3-week
old female mice P= 0.025667 and 3-week old male mice
P= 0.000454 by Repeated Measures ANOVA, with
Tukey’s multiple comparisons test) (NSG mice, n= 7
males and 5 females; GKO-NSG mice, n= 11 males and 6
females). (d) Blood glucose measures of 2–3 month old
GKO-NSG and NSG control mice during
ad libitum feeding or after a 3-hour fast (fed:
P= 0.000223; fasted: P= 0.003003 by
Repeated Measures ANOVA, with Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test)
(NSG mice, n= 6 males and 4 females;
GKO-NSG mice, n= 4 males and 8 females).
(e) GKO-NSG and NSG
control blood glucose measures over 180 minutes post oral glucose gavage
(60’: P= 0.001383; 90’: P=
0.002618; 120’: P= 0.040657 by Repeated Measures
ANOVA, with Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test) (6g/kg body
weight) (NSG mice, n= 5 males and 3 females;
GKO-NSG mice, n= 8 males and 2 females) and
(f) plasma total GLP-1 levels from 2.5–3 month old
GKO-NSG and NSG controls following
oral glucose challenge (15’: P= 0.000194, and
30’: P= 0.000034 by Repeated Measures ANOVA, with
Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test) (NSG mice,
n= 4 males; GKO-NSG mice, n= 5 males). (g)
Quantification of active GLP-1 present in islet lysates from 5–7
month old NSG (n= 3 males) and GKO-NSG (n=
3 males) mice (P= 0.035323 by two-tailed Student’s
t-test). Dashed lines indicate limit of detection. Scale bars, 50 μm.
Data are represented as mean of biological replicates with individual data
points overlaid and error bars indicate ± SEM. * P
≤ 0.05, ** P ≤ 0.01, *** P
≤ 0.001.
To verify elimination of mature glucagon production in
GKO-NSG mice, plasma glucagon levels were measured from
ad libitum fed and fasted GKO-NSG and
NSG control mice. Unlike control NSG mice,
plasma glucagon was undetectable in GKO-NSG mice in both fed
and fasted states (Figure 1c). Consistent
with this, immunostaining with antibodies that detect mature glucagon (GCG
1–29) did not label islet α cells in GKO-NSG
pancreata, whereas these α cells were readily identified with an antibody
that detects proglucagon (Extended Data
1b). By contrast, plasma total and active GLP-1 levels following an oral
glucose tolerance test were higher in GKO-NSG mice compared to
NSG control littermates (Figure 1d
and
Extended Data 1f). Similar to previous
studies using glucagon-signaling deficient mice[19, 29], extracts of isolated islets from GKO-NSG
mice had increased active GLP-1 levels that may account for increased
circulating GLP-1 (Extended Data 1g). This
increase in circulating GLP-1 was accompanied by lower glycemic levels in both
fasting and feeding (Extended Data 1d), as
well as improved glucose tolerance (Extended Data
1e) in GKO-NSG mice. Thus, our CRISPR-based strategy
successfully eliminated glucagon while sparing GLP-1 production in
GKO-NSG mice.
Transplanted human islets retain regulated glucagon secretion in GKO-NSG
mice
To assess the possibility of measuring circulating glucagon from human
islets in GKO-NSG mice, we transplanted human islets from
previously-healthy donors under the renal capsule of GKO-NSG
mice (GKO-NSG Tx mice; Figure
2a). Plasma glucagon was detectable in GKO-NSG Tx
mice two weeks after transplantation and thereafter for at least fourteen weeks,
at which point GKO-NSG Tx mice were sacrificed for tissue
analysis. Four weeks after human islet transplantation, plasma glucagon levels
in fasted GKO-NSG Tx and control NSG mice were
remarkably similar, but circulating glucagon remained undetectable in
sham-transplanted GKO-NSG mice (Figure 2b).
Figure 2.
Transplanted human islets retain regulated glucagon secretion in
GKO-NSG mice.
Human islets were transplanted under the renal capsule of
GKO-NSG mice. Mice were then examined for presence of
glucagon in the circulation and regulation of glucagon secretion from
transplanted islets. Data are from NSG control,
GKO-NSG, and GKO-NSG mice
post-transplantation (GKO-NSG Tx). (a) Schematic
of islet transplantation and phenotyping schedule. (b) Plasma
glucagon levels from 4–6 month old mice after a 6-hour fast. Due to the
distribution of data from GKO-NSG mice, these data points were
omitted from one-way ANOVA, with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test.
(NSG mice, n= 10 males and 3 females;
GKO-NSG mice, n= 11 males and 2 females;
GKO-NSG Tx mice, n= 6 males). (c)
4.5–6.5 month old mice were challenged with human insulin; glucagon
response to acute hypoglycemia was measured from plasma at 0 and 30-minutes
post-insulin injection (0’ vs 30’: NSG: P=
0.033030; GKO-NSG Tx: P= 0.002262 by paired
two-tailed Student’s t-test, with Bonferroni correction). Due to the
distribution of data from GKO-NSG mice, these data points were
omitted from statistical analysis. (NSG mice, n= 5 males;
GKO-NSG mice, n= 2 males and 1 female;
GKO-NSG Tx mice, n= 5 males). Dashed lines indicate limit
of detection. Data are represented as mean of biological replicates with
individual data points overlaid and error bars indicate ± SEM. N.D.= not
detected. N.S.= not significant. * P ≤ 0.05, **
P ≤ 0.01, *** P ≤ 0.001. See
also Extended Data 2.
To assess dynamic regulation of glucagon secretion from human α
cells in GKO-NSG Tx mice, we measured glucagon secretion
in vivo after an intraperitoneal insulin challenge, which
elicits transient hypoglycemia. Reduced blood glucose levels stimulate α
cell glucagon secretion[1, 30], and, as expected, acute
hypoglycemia was accompanied by increased circulating glucagon levels in
NSG controls (Figures
2c
and
Extended Data 2). By contrast, insulin
challenge and hypoglycemia elicited no glucagon output in sham-transplanted
GKO-NSG mice (Figure
2c
and
Extended Data 2). Like in
NSG controls, circulating human islet-derived glucagon
levels increased upon induction of hypoglycemia in GKO-NSG Tx
mice (Figure 2c
and
Extended Data 2). As transplanted human
islets are the sole source of circulating glucagon in GKO-NSG
Tx mice, we conclude that insulin challenge and ensuing transient hypoglycemia
evoked glucagon secretion by human α cells in these mice, an in
vivo response not previously reported for human islets transplanted
in mice. These results suggest human α cell mechanisms governing
regulated glucagon secretion remained intact after transplantation.
Extended Data Fig. 2
Blood glucose reduction following insulin challenge.
Related to Figure 2. Percent of
basal blood glucose 30-minutes post insulin injection (1U/kg body weight)
from 4.5–6.5 month old NSG, GKO-NSG, and GKO-NSG Tx
mice (P= 0.017712 by one-way ANOVA, with Tukey’s multiple comparison
test) (NSG mice, n= 5 males; GKO-NSG mice,
n= 2 males and 1 female; GKO-NSG Tx mice, n= 5 males). Data
are represented as mean of biological replicates with individual data points
overlaid and error bars indicate ± SEM. * P ≤
0.05.
Human islets establish a glucagon-signaling axis that corrects liver
phenotypes in GKO-NSG mice
Glucagon signaling is an essential regulator of hepatic amino acid
metabolism, gluconeogenesis, and glycogenolysis[20, 31,
32]. Consistent with prior
mouse models of impaired glucagon signaling from glucagon or glucagon receptor
deficiency[20-22], we observed increased total
plasma amino acid levels in GKO-NSG mice compared to
NSG control littermates (Figure 3a). Moreover, measures of individual amino acids from plasma
revealed that 23 of 28 amino acids profiled were significantly increased in
GKO-NSG mice (Figure
3b
and
Extended Data 3). To examine if these
changes could result from altered hepatic metabolism, expression of genes
encoding enzymes involved in gluconeogenesis (G6pc and Pepck)
and amino acid metabolism (Tat, Oat, Nnmt, and
Gls2) were measured by qPCR. G6pc,
Tat, Oat and Gls2 were
significantly decreased in GKO-NSG mice compared to
NSG controls (Figure
3d). To assess differences in glycogenolysis, liver glycogen levels
were measured from fasted GKO-NSG and NSG
control mice. We observed a trend of increased average hepatic glycogen levels
in GKO-NSG mice compared to NSG controls
(Figure 3c). Together, these data
suggest that, like in previous studies of glucagon signaling loss[20–22, 24,
33], gluconeogenesis and
amino acid metabolism are impaired in GKO-NSG mice.
Figure 3.
Human islet transplantation establishes a glucagon-signaling axis that
corrects liver phenotypes in GKO-NSG mice.
Mice were examined for liver phenotypes associated with glucagon loss
following transplantation of human islets. Data are from NSG
control, GKO-NSG, and GKO-NSG mice
post-transplantation (GKO-NSG Tx). (a) Total
plasma amino acids from 5–7 month old mice (NSG vs.
GKO-NSG P= 0.000198; GKO-NSG vs.
GKO-NSG Tx P= 0.044206 by one-way ANOVA,
with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test) (NSG mice, n= 8
males and 2 females; GKO-NSG mice, n= 4 males and 3 females;
GKO-NSG Tx mice, n= 6 males). (b)
Concentration of individual plasma amino acids that showed significant change in
GKO-NSG mice by one-way ANOVA, with Tukey’s multiple
comparisons test (P values listed in Supplementary Table 2)
(NSG mice, n= 10 males and 2 females;
GKO-NSG mice, n= 5 males and 3 females;
GKO-NSG Tx mice, n= 6 males). (c) Liver
glycogen quantification from the left lobe of 6–8 month old mice
(GKO-NSG vs. GKO-NSG Tx:
P= 0.015738 by one-way ANOVA, with Tukey’s multiple
comparisons test) (NSG mice, n= 9 males and 1 female;
GKO-NSG mice, n= 6 males and 2 females;
GKO-NSG Tx mice, n= 6 males). (d) Gene
expression in the left liver lobe of indicated genes from 6–8 month old
mice (significant P values generated by one-way ANOVA, with
Tukey’s multiple comparisons test are listed in Supplementary Table 2)
(NSG mice, n= 9 males; GKO-NSG mice, n= 6
males; GKO-NSG Tx mice, n= 6 males). Dashed lines indicate
limit of detection. Data are represented as mean of biological replicates with
individual data points overlaid and error bars indicate ± SEM. N.S.= not
significant. * NSG vs. GKO-NSG mice and
+
GKO-NSG vs. GKO-NSG Tx mice (b
and d). + or * P ≤ 0.05,
++or ** P ≤ 0.01, +++ or
***P ≤ 0.001. See also Supplementary Table 2 and Extended Data 3.
Extended Data Fig. 3
Concentrations of individual plasma amino acids showing no change in
GKO-NSG mice.
Related to Figure 3.
Concentration of individual plasma amino acids that showed no significant
changes in 6–7 month old GKO-NSG mice
(NSG mice, n= 10 males and 2 females;
GKO-NSG mice, n= 5 males and 3 females;
GKO-NSG Tx mice, n= 6 males). Data are represented as
mean of biological replicates with individual data points overlaid and error
bars indicate ± SEM.
To determine if human islet-derived glucagon was able to rescue the
phenotypes found in GKO-NSG host tissues, we examined
GKO-NSG Tx mice fourteen weeks after human islet
transplantation. The liver defects were corrected, including reduction of total
and individual plasma amino acids (Figures
3a-b
and
Extended Data 3), decreased liver glycogen
levels (Figure 3c), and normalization of
hepatic G6pc, Tat, Oat, and Gls2 expression
(Figure 3d). Together, these findings
suggest that glucagon secretion by human islet grafts durably reconstituted a
physiological islet-liver signaling axis in GKO-NSG mice.
Glucagon secreted by human islet grafts corrects α cell hyperplasia in
GKO-NSG mice
Impaired glucagon signaling in mice can evoke compensatory α cell
proliferation and hyperplasia[19,
23, 24, 34]. Elevated circulating amino acids in mice lacking glucagon
signaling were previously demonstrated to induce α cell proliferation and
hyperplasia[20-22] through a mechanism involving
an amino acid transporter, Slc38a5 [20, 21]. As
GKO-NSG mice exhibited hyperaminoacidemia, we assessed
islet α cell and β cell hyperplasia and proliferation in
GKO-NSG islets. For α cell morphometry in
GKO-NSG islets, we used a proglucagon-specific antibody
that detected both wild type and internally-deleted GKO proglucagon
(proglucagonΔ). Antibodies to MafB, an adult α cell-specific islet
transcription factor in mice[35]
(Figures 4a-c), were also used to identify changes in islet
α cell mass. Islet morphometry in adult GKO-NSG mice
revealed an increased percentage of α cells expressing the proliferation
marker Ki67 (Figures 4e-h) and increased α cell mass (Figures 4a-d). No
differences were observed in β cell mass or proliferation in islets of
GKO-NSG and NSG control mice (Figures 4a-h). To examine if α cell hyperplasia might be driven by a
previously described mechanism involving Slc38a5
[20, 21], islets from GKO-NSG and
NSG control mice were surveyed for Slc38a5 protein
production. As expected, GKO-NSG mice showed increased α
cell production of Slc38a5 compared to islets from NSG control
mice and, as previously reported[36], we also detected Slc38a5 in acinar cells (Figures 4i-n).
Thus, like in prior models of glucagon deficiency, we observed adaptive α
cell expansion, stimulated by hyperaminoacidemia and accompanied by increased
α cell Slc38a5 production.
Figure 4.
Human islet-derived glucagon corrects GKO-NSG α cell
hyperplasia.
(a-c) Representative immunostaining for quantification of
α and β cell mass (d) from 4–8 month old
NSG control, GKO-NSG, and
GKO-NSG Tx mice with antibodies detecting Proglucagon
(green), Insulin (white), and MafB (red) (NSG vs.
GKO-NSG P= 0.000958; GKO-NSG vs.
GKO-NSG Tx P= 0.001530 by one-way ANOVA,
with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test) (NSG mice, n= 3
males and 1 female; GKO-NSG mice, n= 3 males and 1 female;
GKO-NSG Tx mice, n= 5 males). (e-g)
Representative immunostaining for quantification of α and β cell
proliferation (h) in 4–8 month old NSG
control, GKO-NSG, and GKO-NSG Tx mouse
pancreata using antibodies detecting Proglucagon (green), Insulin (white), and
Ki67 (red). (P= 0.022675 by two-tailed Student’s t-test)
(NSG mice, n= 3 males and 1 female;
GKO-NSG mice, n= 3 males and n= 1 female;
GKO-NSG Tx mice, n= 3 males). For (a-h):
images for morphometric quantifications are acquired from 10 pancreatic sections
per individual mouse (see methods).
(i-q) Representative immunostaining of Slc38a5 expression in
NSG control, GKO-NSG, and
GKO-NSG Tx mouse pancreata using antibodies detecting
Proglucagon (green), Insulin (white), and Slc38a5 (red). Similar results for
Slc38a5 staining were seen across n= 3 NSG control, n= 5
GKO-NSG, and n= 3 GKO-NSG Tx mice. All
images are shown at the same resolution; scale bars, 50 μm.
Data are represented as mean of biological replicates with individual data
points overlaid and error bars indicate ± SEM. N.S.= not significant. *
P ≤ 0.05, ** P ≤ 0.01, ***
P ≤ 0.001.
Since humanglucagon from islet grafts restored circulating amino acid
levels in GKO-NSG mice (Figures
3a-b), we next assessed the
impact on host islet α cells in GKO-NSG Tx mice and
controls. Morphometry analysis revealed that host α cell mass
‘normalized’ in GKO-NSG Tx mice compared to
NSG control mouse islets (Figures 4c-d), and was
accompanied by a reduction in the number of proglucagonΔ+
Ki67+ cells (Figures
4g-h), and loss of Slc38a5 in
mouse α cells (Figures 4o-q). Thus, restoration of glucagon signaling
by human islet grafts in GKO-NSG mice corrected adaptive
pancreatic islet α cell expansion observed in GKO-NSG
mice. However, further studies are needed to assess the basis of this
correction, including the possibility of α cell apoptosis[24].
Restoration of glucose and insulin regulation in transplanted GKO-NSG
mice
Glucagon increases blood glucose levels by promoting hepatic glucose
output, and is also implicated in regulating normal insulin secretion[37-39]. Hence, mice lacking glucagon signaling
are hypoinsulinemic[18] and
hypoglycemic[19, 23, 33]. Consistent with these extant glucagon signaling mutant
mouse models, GKO-NSG mice had chronically reduced blood
glucose levels and lower ad libitum fed plasma insulin levels
compared to NSG control mice (Figures 5a-b, Extended Data 1d, and
Extended Data 4b-c). Four weeks after human islet transplantation,
ad libitum fed blood glucose and total plasma insulin
levels in GKO-NSG Tx mice were increased and indistinguishable
from NSG controls (Figures
5a-b
and
Extended Data 4b-c). In GKO-NSG Tx mice, total plasma
insulin levels reflected contributions from both host mouse β cells and
transplanted human islets (Figure 5b
and
Extended Data 4d). While circulating
glucagon levels differed in ad libitum fed NSG
and GKO-NSG Tx mice, humanglucagon in GKO-NSG
Tx mice was sufficient to maintain normoglycemia (Figures 2b, 5a,
and
Extended Data 4a-b). Thus, transplanted human islets improved glycemic
and insulin control in GKO-NSG Tx mice.
Figure 5.
Improved glucose and insulin regulation in transplanted
GKO-NSG mice.
4–6 month old GKO-NSG mice post-transplantation
(GKO-NSG Tx), GKO-NSG mice, and
NSG control mice were assessed for ad
libitum fed blood glucose (a) (NSG
vs. GKO-NSG P= 0.000086;
GKO-NSG vs. GKO-NSG Tx
P= 0.004522 by one-way ANOVA, with Tukey’s multiple
comparisons test) (NSG mice, n= 10 males and 3 females;
GKO-NSG mice, n= 12 males and 2 females;
GKO-NSG Tx mice, n= 6 males) and plasma insulin levels
(b) (NSG vs. GKO-NSG P=
0.000047; GKO-NSG vs. GKO-NSG
Tx P= 0.000066 by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple
comparisons test) (NSG mice, n= 9 males and 3 females;
GKO-NSG mice, n= 11 males and 2 females;
GKO-NSG Tx mice, n= 6 males). 5–7 month old mice
were given an intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test and monitored for blood
glucose measures (c) and plasma mouse (d) and human
(e) insulin levels (P values generated by
Repeated Measures ANOVA, with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test are
listed in Supplementary Table
3). For (c-e): NSG mice, n= 3 males;
GKO-NSG mice, n= 3 males; GKO-NSG Tx mice,
n= 4 males. Human insulin excursion is measured by human insulin-specific ELISA
in the same IPGTT test as in panels (c) and (d).
Dashed lines indicate limit of detection. Data are represented as mean of
biological replicates with individual data points overlaid and error bars
indicate ± SEM. N.S.= not significant. * NSG vs.
GKO-NSG mice and +
GKO-NSG vs. GKO-NSG Tx mice
(c-d). + or * P ≤ 0.05,
++ or ** P ≤ 0.01, +++ or ***
P ≤ 0.001. See also Supplementary Table 3 and Extended Data 4.
Extended Data Fig. 4
Further assessment of blood glucose, plasma insulin, and glucagon
phenotypes in GKO-NSG mice after human islet
transplantation.
Related to Figure 5. Data are
from 4–6 month old NSG control,
GKO-NSG, and GKO-NSG mice
post-transplantation (GKO-NSG Tx). (a) Plasma
glucagon levels in ad libitum fed mice
(NSG vs. GKO-NSG Tx:
P= 0.005112 by two-tailed Student’s t-test). Due
to the distribution of data from GKO-NSG mice, these data
points were omitted from statistical analysis. (NSG mice,
n= 10 males and 3 females; GKO-NSG mice, n= 12 males and 1
female; GKO-NSG Tx mice, n= 6 males). Blood glucose
(b) (P= 0.013846 by one-way ANOVA, with
Tukey’s multiple comparison test) (NSG mice, n= 10
males and 3 females; GKO-NSG mice, n= 8 males and 2
females; GKO-NSG Tx mice, n= 6 males) and plasma insulin
levels (c) (NSG mice, n= 10 males and 3
females; GKO-NSG mice, n= 7 males and 2 females;
GKO-NSG Tx mice, n= 6 males) in fasted mice.
(d) Mouse and human plasma insulin levels in ad
libitum fed GKO-NSG Tx mice (n=6 males).
Dashed lines indicate limit of detection (d: black dashed line
indicates limit of detection of mouse insulin and red dashed line indicates
limit of detection of human insulin). Data are represented as mean of
biological replicates with individual data points overlaid and error bars
indicate ± SEM. * P ≤ 0.05, **
P ≤ 0.01, *** P ≤
0.001.
To examine insulin and glucose regulation further in
GKO-NSG mice after human islet transplantation, we
performed an intraperitoneal glucose challenge. Compared to NSG
controls, glucose clearance by GKO-NSG mice was faster (Figure 5c) and accompanied by an exaggerated
(mouse) insulin excursion (Figure 5d).
Glucose and insulin excursions in GKO-NSG Tx mice more closely
resembled that of NSG controls (Figures 5c-d). Dynamic total
circulating insulin levels in GKO-NSG Tx mice reflected a
combination of mouse and human insulins (Figures
5d-e). Notably, it appeared that
humaninsulin release from transplanted islets was well-regulated during glucose
challenge, including an acute hormone rise followed by clearance from the
circulation (Figure 5e). These data suggest
that human islet-derived glucagon improved glycemic and insulin regulation in
GKO-NSG Tx mice, and thus highlight the role of glucagon in
maintaining euglycemia and normal insulin secretion.
Excessive glucagon secretion by transplanted T2D islets in GKO-NSG
mice
Type 2 diabetes mellitus is often associated with increased circulating
glucagon levels, which appear less responsive to inhibitory elevations in blood
glucose[40, 41]. However, it remains unclear if
hyperglucagonemia in T2D reflects increased glucagon secretion by islets. We
used in vitro assays and human islet transplantation into
GKO-NSG mice to examine glucagon secretion by islets from
subjects with T2D (Extended Data 5 and
Figure 6). Compared to control islets
from non-diabetic donors, islets from T2D donors had similar increases of
glucagon secretion in response to glucose reduction in vitro:
however, in 2 out of 3 T2D donor islets, the response to the secretagogue
L-arginine was exaggerated (Extended Data
5a). Transplantation of T2D islets into GKO-NSG mice
(hereafter, GKO-NSG Tx T2D) led to elevated plasma glucagon
levels (Figure 6b
and
Extended Data 5c). However, there was no
detectable difference in islet glucagon content between non-diabetic and T2D
donors (Extended Data 5b).
Hyperglucagonemia was accompanied by an average glycemic increase of 32 mg/dL in
fasted GKO-NSG Tx T2D mice, (96± 8 vs. 128 ± 8
mg/dL; P= 0.042886; Extended
Data 5d), and a trend toward increased glycemia during ad
libitum feeding (P= 0.071059; Figure 6a).
Extended Data Fig. 5
In vitro characterization of donor human islets and more
physiological assessment of GKO-NSG mice transplanted with
islets either non-diabetic or T2D diabetic donors.
Related to Figure 6.
(a) In vitro glucagon secretion assay on
islets from non-diabetic (n= 4 donors) and type 2 diabetic donors (n= 3
donors), shown as technical replicates from individual donors.
(b) Glucagon content of donor islets transplanted into
GKO-NSG mice (P=0.558605 by two-tailed Student’s
t-test; non-diabetic donor n= 5, type 2 diabetic donor n= 3). Data in
(c-e) are from 4–6 month old
GKO-NSG mice post-transplantation with islets from
non-diabetic (GKO-NSG Tx) or type 2 diabetic donors
(GKO-NSG Tx T2D). For data presented in
(c-e): GKO-NSG Tx mice, n= 6 males;
GKO-NSG Tx T2D mice n= 1 male and 2 females.
(c) Plasma glucagon levels in ad libitum
fed mice (P= 0.034687 by two-tailed Student’s
t-test). Blood glucose (d) (P= 0.042886 by
two-tailed Student’s t-test) and plasma insulin levels
(e) in 6-hour fasted mice. (f) Percent of
basal blood glucose 30-minutes post insulin injection (1U/kg body weight)
from 4.5–6.5 month old GKO-NSG Tx and GKO-NSG Tx T2D
mice (GKO-NSG Tx mice, n= 5 males; GKO-NSG
Tx T2D n= 1 male and 1 female). Dashed lines indicate limit of detection.
Data are represented as mean of biological replicates with individual data
points overlaid, except in a, where individual data points
represent technical replicates from single donors. Error bars indicate
± SEM. * P ≤ 0.05, ** P
≤ 0.01, *** P ≤ 0.001.
Figure 6.
Excessive glucagon secretion by transplanted T2D islets in
GKO-NSG mice.
4–6 month old GKO-NSG mice transplanted with
islets from non-diabetic (GKO-NSG Tx) or T2D diabetic
(GKO-NSG Tx T2D) donors were assessed for ad
libitum fed blood glucose levels (a), 6-hour fasted
plasma glucagon levels (b) (P= 0.015626 by
two-tailed Student’s t-test), and ad libitum fed plasma
insulin levels (d). In (d), black dashed line
indicates limit of detection for mouse insulin and red dashed line indicates
limit of detection for human insulin. (e) 4.5–6.5 month old
mice were challenged with human insulin; glucagon response to acute hypoglycemia
was measured from plasma at 0 and 30-minutes post-insulin injection (0’
vs 30’: GKO-NSG Tx P= 0.002262 by
paired two-tailed t-test, with Bonferroni correction) (GKO-NSG
Tx vs. GKO-NSG Tx T2D 0’: P= 0.013266;
30’: P= 0.000985 by Mixed-effects analysis, with
Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test). For all data in
(a-e), GKO-NSG Tx mice, n= 6 males;
GKO-NSG Tx T2D n= 1 male and 2 females. Dashed lines
indicate limit of detection. Data are represented as mean of biological
replicates with individual data points overlaid and error bars indicate ±
SEM. * P ≤ 0.05, ** P ≤ 0.01,
*** P ≤ 0.001. See also Extended Data 5.
Despite relative hyperglycemia and hyperglucagonemia in
GKO-NSG Tx T2D mice, circulating total and human
islet-derived insulin levels in these mice were comparable to those in
GKO-NSG mice transplanted with islets from non-diabetic
donors (Figures 6c-d
and
Extended Data 5e). When challenged with
insulin and subsequent transient hypoglycemia, GKO-NSG Tx T2D
mice had elevated plasma glucagon levels compared to GKO-NSG
mice transplanted with non-diabetichuman islets (Figure 6e and Extended Data
5f). Collectively, these results demonstrate that hyperglucagonemia in
T2D reflects intrinsic islet defects in regulated glucagon secretion. Moreover,
compared to in vitro secretion studies, defective T2D islet
secretion was more robustly detected after transplantation in
GKO-NSG mice, highlighting the need for in
vivo systems to assess glucagon secretion.
Discussion
To address the absence of animal models to study regulated glucagon
secretion from human islet α cells in vivo, here we used
CRISPR/Cas9 to develop the GKO-NSG mouse. Human islets engrafted
durably in GKO-NSG mice and retained regulated glucagon and insulin
secretion. Reconstituting glucagon signaling to ‘glucagon-target’
organs like the pancreas and liver rescued multiple phenotypes associated with
glucagon deficiency, including deviations in circulating glucose, amino acid, and
insulin levels. Additionally, we provide index evidence that transplanted islets
from human donors with T2D display chronically elevated glucagon output, accompanied
by significantly increased blood glucose levels. Prior reports of mice that lack
glucagon signaling[18–23, 29, 42] revealed many
phenotypes associated with loss of glucagon signaling in pancreatic islets and other
organs - phenotypes that we observed in GKO-NSG mice. However,
GKO-NSG mice also have distinct properties not previously
reported[18, 23, 29],
likely reflecting preserved production of ‘nested’ proglucagon-derived
peptides like GRPP, GLP-1, and GLP-2, in addition to the superior receptivity of the
NSG strain background to xenotransplantation[6, 7].
While our approach led to the unavoidable loss of the oxyntomodulin and glicentin
peptide hormones (which incorporate amino acids 1–29 of GCG), this also
creates opportunities to study the in vivo functions of these
hormones in GKO-NSG mice.Glucagon is a crucial intercellular and inter-organ regulator of pancreatic
islet cells, liver, and other organs[43]. Our results suggest that the GKO-NSG model
should be useful for investigating these signaling interactions. Here, we observed
that hyperaminoacidemia, hypoglycemia, α cell hyperplasia, and islet Slc38a5
production in GKO-NSG mice are reversed after human islet
transplantation, indicating (re)-establishment of at least two homeostatic
in vivo signaling axes mediated by humanglucagon and
circulating amino acids. The first signaling axis links transplanted human islets to
the host liver and the second links the liver to native pancreatic islets cells.
Reversion of hyperaminoacidemia and hypoglycemia reflect signaling of humanglucagon
to the host GKO-NSG liver, which then appropriately triggers
glycogenolysis, gluconeogenesis, and amino acid metabolism to correct hypoglycemia
(Figures 3
and
5a). Thus, GKO-NSG mice should
be useful in future studies to determine how α cells regulate glycemic
levels, a phenotype that likely reflects multiple signals between the host liver and
islets. For example, systematic modulation of variables like the number of
transplanted human islets[44] in
GKO-NSG mice could be used to clarify the basis of
distinct[44, 45] mouse and human glycemic
‘set-points’. While reversion of liver phenotypes is largely driven by
human islet-derived glucagon signaling, reversion of α cell hyperplasia in
GKO-NSG Tx mice likely reflects corrected liver to native
pancreas signaling. However, further studies are needed to assess the basis for this
observation, including the possibility of host α cell apoptosis with glucagon
repletion [24].Studies here also demonstrate powerful ways the GKO-NSG
mouse can be used to investigate human islets from subjects with diseases like
diabetes. For example, our work compared in vivo glucagon output by
transplanted islets from non-diabetic and T2D donors, and revealed that T2D islets
maintained significantly increased glucagon output, providing index in
vivo evidence that islet-intrinsic or α cell-intrinsic defects
lead to excessive glucagon secretion in T2D. Moreover, relative hyperglucagonemia in
GKO-NSG mice transplanted with T2D human islets was accompanied
by a significant increase in fasted blood glucose levels, compared to mice
transplanted with islets from non-diabetic donors. These data suggest that glucagon
hypersecretion by islets in T2D may contribute to hyperglycemia. Notably, humaninsulin output in GKO-NSG Tx T2D mice did not increase in response
to the elevated glycemic levels, indicating that β cell dysfunction is also
maintained after T2D islet transplantation in GKO-NSG mice.To evaluate the function of candidate T2D risk genes identified by GWAS and
discover human islet β cell regulators, we previously used loss-, and
gain-of-function genetics in human pseudo-islets transplanted in
NSG mice[4, 10]. This experimental logic, using
GKO-NSG mice, can be expanded to human α cells in islets
from previously-healthy, pre-diabetic, or diabetic donors. Thus, we can now examine
how α cell enriched genes[3, 46] and genetic changes in diabetes
mellitus[3, 47, 48]
impact human α cell identity and function. Aside from intrinsic genetic
mechanisms governing hormone secretion from islet cells, intra-islet signaling
between α cells, β cells, δ cells, and other islet cells is
also known to regulate islet hormone secretion[1, 37, 38, 49–55]. To the
extent that regulated interactions between human α cells, β cells, and
δ cells are reconstituted and measurable in GKO-NSG mice,
these mice could be useful for in vivo studies of these and other
intra-islet signaling interactions. Moreover, we envision that
GKO-NSG mice transplanted with islets from human donors (or
other species) will be useful for examining how pharmacological agents, or acquired
environmental stressors, like starvation or diet-induced obesity, impact human
α cells. Using NSG mice, we recently reported that responses
of transplanted human islet β cells to high fat diet challenge were distinct
from those observed in (host) mouse β cells[9]. Additionally, GKO-NSG mice
should be useful for assessing the function of transplanted islet-like cells
produced from renewable sources like human stem cell lines[56-60]. Thus, GKO-NSG mice should be a valuable
resource for in vivo studies of human islets, islet replacement
cells using genetics, small molecules, or modeling of acquired in
vivo physiological or pathological risk states in diabetes
mellitus.
Methods
Glucagon gene targeting in NSG mice
GKO-NSG mice were generated through the NIDDK Type 1
Diabetes Resource (TIDR) and the Jackson Laboratory. Two mouseGcg Exon 3 guide RNAs (sgRNA 3569: GAAGACAAACGCCACTCACA and
sgRNA 3572: CAGACTCTTACCGGTTCCTCT) and the CRISPR/Cas9 plasmid were injected
into NSG (NOD.Cg-Prkdc
Il2rg/SzJ,
The Jackson Laboratory, stock 005557) oocytes to generate founders. Out of 33
progeny, one male (termed 18–1) was confirmed by TOPO cloning and DNA
sequencing to carry the desired in-frame deletion and bred to
NSG females for germ line transmission. Verified F1
heterozygous offspring were used for further breeding to homozygosity.
Subsequent genotyping were performed using PCR amplification with 3573_F1
(TGAGAACCACTGCAAGGCAAC) and 3575_R1 (AACGATCAATACAGCTAAGGTCTC) primers, which
produce a 715 bp wildtype product or a 622 bp Gcg exon 3
deletion product (Figure 1b). Homozygous
glucagon knockout mice were born at near Mendelian ratios, however some
lethality was observed around weaning. To promote survival of
GKO-NSG mice, mice were provided with DietGel 76A (Clear
H2O) mixed with wet chow one week before weaning and for two
weeks after weaning. Additionally, mice were provided with water supplemented
with 0.045% D-glucose (Sigma-Aldrich) for two weeks after weaning. All mice,
including littermate controls, were given this supplemental care. Mice were
housed in a pathogen-free barrier facility at Stanford University Medical
School, and were exposed to a normal 12-hour light cycle. Male and female mice
(2–8 months old) were used for experiments along with age- and sex-
matched control littermate NSG mice. GKO-NSG
mice, i.e. NOD.Cg-Gcg
Prkdc
Il2rg/DvsJ (Strain 029819),
are available through The Jackson Laboratory.
Human islet procurement and transplantation
Deidentified humanpancreatic islets were procured through the
Integrated Islet Distribution Program, Alberta Diabetes Institute IsletCore, and
International Institute for the Advancement of Medicine. Five hundred human
islet equivalents (IEQ) from previously healthy, nondiabetic organ donors (n=6)
or type 2 diabetic donors (n=3) with less than 15-hour cold ischemia time (Table 1) were used for transplantation
under the kidney capsule of GKO-NSG mice as previously
described[8,10]. In brief, 2–5 month-old male and
female GKO-NSG mice were used as transplantation recipients.
Animals were anesthetized using ketamine/xylazine. Upon confirmation of
appropriate depth of anesthesia, human islets resuspended in cold Matrigel
(Corning) were transferred into the left renal capsular space of recipient mice
through a 10ul PCR micro-pipet (Drummond).
Table 1.
Donor information of human islets used for transplantation studies
Sample ID
Source ID
Age
Sex
BMI
Purity
HbA1c
1
SAMN08773444
40
M
25.5
95%
5.3
2
R278
57
M
27.6
80%
5.7
3
SAMN09862214
31
M
31.8
80%
5.3
4
R292
47
M
27.6
90%
5.6
5
SAMN10574375
60
F
30.6
80%
6
6
R338
30
M
25.5
90%
5.3
7
SAMN11157311
34
F
31.7
92%
7.3
8
AGJU173
53
F
29.2
75%
9.8
9
R347
57
M
27.9
75%
6.3
Glucose tolerance testing
After a 5-hour fast (starting from 9–10 AM), mice were
administered an intraperitoneal (IP) injection of D-glucose (3 g/kg body
weight). Blood glucose levels were measured with a Contour glucometer (Bayer) at
0, 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 minutes post injection and EDTA-treated plasma
samples were collected for insulin hormone assays at the same time intervals.
5–7 month-old male GKO-NSG, GKO-NSG Tx, and
NSG littermate control mice were used. For circulating
GLP-1 assessment, mice were fasted for 6 hours (starting at 9AM), then D-glucose
(6 g/ kg body weight) was given by oral gavage. Blood glucose was measured with
a Contour glucometer (Bayer) at 0, 5, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 180 minutes
post-gavage and EDTA-, DPP4-inibitor- (Millipore), and HALT protease inhibitor-
(Thermo Scientific) treated plasma samples were collected at 0, 15, and 30
minutes post-gavage. 2.5–3 month-old male and female
GKO-NSG and NSG littermate control mice
were used.
Insulin tolerance test (ITT)
After a 5-hour fast (starting from 9–10 AM), mice were
administered an intraperitoneal injection of Novolin R U-100 (1U/kg body
weight). Blood glucose levels were measured with a Contour glucometer (Bayer) at
0, 15, and 30 minutes post insulin injection. EDTA- and protease
cocktail-treated (Bimake) plasma samples were collected at 0 and 30 minutes
post-insulin injection for circulating glucagon measurement. 4.5–6.5
month-old male and female GKO-NSG, GKO-NSG Tx,
GKO-NSG Tx T2D, and NSG littermate control
mice were used.
Plasma hormones and amino acids assays
Plasma insulin and glucagon levels were assessed using an ultrasensitive
mouseinsulin ELISA (Mercodia) and glucagon ELISA (Mercodia), respectively.
Circulating humaninsulin levels in transplanted GKO-NSG
recipients were measured with a humaninsulin ELISA (Mercodia). Due to
ultrasensitive mouseinsulin ELISA cross-reactivity with humaninsulin, mouseinsulin from GKO-NSG Tx and GKO-NSG Tx T2D
plasma was determined by subtracting values obtained from humaninsulin ELISA.
2–7 month-old male and female GKO-NSG, GKO-NSG Tx,
GKO-NSG Tx T2D, and NSG littermate control
mice were used. Plasma GLP-1 levels were quantified with an active GLP-1 ELISA
(Eagle Biosciences) and a total GLP-1 NL-ELISA (Mercodia). 2.5–3
month-old male and female GKO-NSG, GKO-NSG Tx, and
NSG littermate control mice were used. Mice were fasted for
4-hours (starting from 9:30–10:30 AM) prior to blood collection for amino
acid quantification. Plasma amino acid levels were determined using a L-Amino
Acid Quantitation Kit (Sigma Aldrich) following manufacture’s
instruction, and individual amino acids by the Vanderbilt University Hormone
Assay and Analytical Services Core using a Biochrom 30 amino acid analyzer.
5–7 month-old male and female GKO-NSG, GKO-NSG Tx, and
NSG littermate control mice were used.
Immunostaining and morphometry
Pancreata were weighed (wet weight), fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde
overnight at 4°C, and 10 μm thick cryosections were prepared. At
least 10 sections per pancreas spaced at least 100 μm apart were stained
with the following primary antibodies: Guinea pig anti-insulin (Dako, 1:500),
Rabbit anti-proglucagon (Cell Signaling Technologies, 1:400), Mouse
anti-proglucagon (Novus Biologicals, 1:300), Guinea pig anti-glucagon (Takara,
1:2000), Rabbit anti-Mafb (Bethyl, 1:250), Rat anti-Ki67 (Biolegend, 1:100),
Rabbit anti-Slc38a5 (Abcam 1:200). Hoechst 33342 (Thermo Fisher Scientific,
1:2000) was used to detect nuclei. For fluorescent detection of primary
antibodies, sections were subsequently stained with Alexa Flour-conjugated (488,
555, or 647) secondary antibodies (1:500, donkey-anti-primary-host, Jackson
ImmunoResearch). Detailed product information and validation methods are
provided in Reporting
Summary.Fluorescent micrographs were captured using a Zeiss AxioM1 microscope
and a Leica SP2 confocal microscope. Images were processed in Image J for islet
cell mass quantification and Image-Pro Plus for islet cell proliferation using
previously described methods[61,
62]. For islet mass
analysis, fluorescent micrographs were captured with a 10X objective lens on a
Zeiss AxioM1 microscope and individual 10X images were captured as tiled images
of entire pancreatic sections using the tiling feature in Zeiss AxioVision
software (version 4.8). Pancreata were imaged using fluorescent detectors for
secondary antibodies, Hoechst, and an autoflourescent ‘background’
channel used to capture the entire pancreatic tissue section area. Merged
Hoechst and ‘background’ tiled images were used to measure total
pancreatic area, where tissue was manually traced in Image J using the freehand
selection tool and areas of traces were measured using the measure function. To
measure hormone positive areas, tiled images of individual channels were
thresholded and positive areas were measured using the analyze particles
function. To calculate islet cell mass, total hormone positive area was divided
by the total pancreatic area and then subsequently multiplied by pancreatic
weight. For islet proliferation analysis and representative images presented in
this manuscript, fluorescent micrographs were captured with a 40x objective
lens. 200 islets per pancreata were randomly selected for islet proliferation
imaging and analysis. Total α and β cell number were measured
using individual channel images and were determined by performing an initial
manual count (for each animal) to estimate an average cell number/fluorescent
area; once initial counts were performed, subsequent counting was performed
using the automatic bright object count function in Image-Pro Plus software
(version 5). Islet cell co-expression of Ki67 and hormones was analyzed using
merged channel images; Ki67+ hormone+ cells were manually
counted in Image-Pro Plus software (version 5) using the manual count function.
4–8 month-old male and female GKO-NSG, GKO-NSG Tx, and
NSG littermate control mice were used.
Liver glycogen content assessment
60 mg of tissue from the liver (left lateral lobe) was collected from
mice fasted for 5 hours (starting from 9–10 AM), and flash frozen in
liquid nitrogen. Liver samples were homogenized on ice in buffer containing
protease cocktail inhibitor (Bimake) and quantified using a fluorometric
glycogen assay kit according to manufacturer’s instructions (Cayman
Chemicals). 6–8 month-old male and female GKO-NSG,
GKO-NSG Tx, and NSG littermate control mice were
used.
RNA extraction and quantitative PCR
90 mg of tissue from the liver (left lateral lobe) was collected from
mice fasted for 5 hours. Then, total RNA was extracted using RNeasy Mini kit
(Qiagen) and complementary DNA was synthesized using Maxima First Strand cDNA
Synthesis kit (Thermo Fischer Scientific) following manufacturer’s
instructions. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed using TaqMan assays (Supplementary Table 1)
and reagents from Applied Biosystems with Actb used as an
endogenous control. 6–8 month-old male GKO-NSG, GKO-NSG
Tx, and NSG littermate control mice were used.
In vitro glucagon secretion assay
Technical replicates (2–3) containing 25–30 human islets
were used for in vitro glucagon secretion assays. Secretion assay media was
composed of RPMI 1640 (Gibco) supplemented with 2% fetal bovine serum (HyClone)
and the glucose (Sigma-Aldrich) concentrations detailed below. In an initial
equilibration step, islets were incubated twice in media containing 7 mM glucose
for 45 minutes (90 minutes total). After pre-incubation steps, islets were
incubated in media containing 7 mM glucose, 1 mM glucose and, 1 mM glucose +
L-Arginine (Sigma-Aldrich) for 60 minutes each and supernatant was collected. At
the end of the assay, islets were lysed by sonication in a TE/BSA buffer (10 mM
Tris-HCl (Calbiochem), 1 mM EDTA (Calbiochem), and 0.1% BSA (Fisher)) that was
subsequently mixed with equal parts of an acid-ethanol solution to extract the
total islet glucagon content. Secreted glucagon (from islet supernatant) and
total glucagon (islet lysate) were quantified using a glucagon ELISA kit
(Mercodia). Measures of secreted glucagon were normalized to total glucagon
content (presented as a percentage of total glucagon content). Donor information
is listed in Table 1.
Study approvals
All studies involving human islets were conducted in accordance with
Stanford University Institutional Review Board guidelines. All animal
experiments and methods were approved by and performed in accordance with the
guidelines provided by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of
Stanford University.
Statistics
Data are presented as the mean of biological replicates ± SEM
with individual data points overlaid. All data are the result of one experiment
per biological replicate, where each data point is a distinct biological
replicate (n values listed in figure legends), except where noted in Extended Data 5a (figure legend). GraphPad
Prism v. 7 and Microsoft Excel 2016 were used to perform Student’s t-test
(two-tailed), repeated measures ANOVA (with Bonferroni’s multiple
comparisons test), Mixed-effects analysis (with Bonferroni’s multiple
comparisons test), and one-way ANOVA (with Tukey’s multiple comparisons
test) for statistical comparisons between data. For data point values falling
below detection limits, statistical tests were run with these data points as 0.
As noted in figure legends, data that did not show a normal distribution (plasma
glucagon measures from GKO-NSG mice) were omitted from
statistical tests. P values ≤0.05 were considered
significant. Exact P values for data with significant
differences are listed in figure legends or in supplementary tables.
Design and characterization of GKO-NSG mice.
Related to figure 1.
(a) Sequence from GKO-NSG founder
(18–1) showing an in-frame deletion of 93 base pairs within exon 3 of
the Gcg gene compared to the wild type NSG sequence (WT).
Pink bar on top depicts exon 3 of Gcg. Blue bar represents
nucleotide sequences encoding mature glucagon peptide. Red-highlighted
dashes indicate deleted nucleotides in founder 18–1. (b)
Representative immunostaining of GKO-NSG pancreatic islets
with antibodies raised against mature glucagon (GCG, green) and proglucagon
(Pro-GCG, red) - peptide sequences of GLP-1 (7–17). Similar results
were seen across n= 3 NSG littermate control, n= 3
GKO-NSG, and n= 2 GKO-NSG Tx mice.
(c) Body weight of male and female GKO-NSG
and NSG control littermates at 3 and 8-weeks of age (3-week
old female mice P= 0.025667 and 3-week old male mice
P= 0.000454 by Repeated Measures ANOVA, with
Tukey’s multiple comparisons test) (NSG mice, n= 7
males and 5 females; GKO-NSG mice, n= 11 males and 6
females). (d) Blood glucose measures of 2–3 month old
GKO-NSG and NSG control mice during
ad libitum feeding or after a 3-hour fast (fed:
P= 0.000223; fasted: P= 0.003003 by
Repeated Measures ANOVA, with Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test)
(NSG mice, n= 6 males and 4 females;
GKO-NSG mice, n= 4 males and 8 females).
(e) GKO-NSG and NSG
control blood glucose measures over 180 minutes post oral glucose gavage
(60’: P= 0.001383; 90’: P=
0.002618; 120’: P= 0.040657 by Repeated Measures
ANOVA, with Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test) (6g/kg body
weight) (NSG mice, n= 5 males and 3 females;
GKO-NSG mice, n= 8 males and 2 females) and
(f) plasma total GLP-1 levels from 2.5–3 month old
GKO-NSG and NSG controls following
oral glucose challenge (15’: P= 0.000194, and
30’: P= 0.000034 by Repeated Measures ANOVA, with
Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test) (NSG mice,
n= 4 males; GKO-NSG mice, n= 5 males). (g)
Quantification of active GLP-1 present in islet lysates from 5–7
month old NSG (n= 3 males) and GKO-NSG (n=
3 males) mice (P= 0.035323 by two-tailed Student’s
t-test). Dashed lines indicate limit of detection. Scale bars, 50 μm.
Data are represented as mean of biological replicates with individual data
points overlaid and error bars indicate ± SEM. * P
≤ 0.05, ** P ≤ 0.01, *** P
≤ 0.001.
Blood glucose reduction following insulin challenge.
Related to Figure 2. Percent of
basal blood glucose 30-minutes post insulin injection (1U/kg body weight)
from 4.5–6.5 month old NSG, GKO-NSG, and GKO-NSG Tx
mice (P= 0.017712 by one-way ANOVA, with Tukey’s multiple comparison
test) (NSG mice, n= 5 males; GKO-NSG mice,
n= 2 males and 1 female; GKO-NSG Tx mice, n= 5 males). Data
are represented as mean of biological replicates with individual data points
overlaid and error bars indicate ± SEM. * P ≤
0.05.
Concentrations of individual plasma amino acids showing no change in
GKO-NSG mice.
Related to Figure 3.
Concentration of individual plasma amino acids that showed no significant
changes in 6–7 month old GKO-NSG mice
(NSG mice, n= 10 males and 2 females;
GKO-NSG mice, n= 5 males and 3 females;
GKO-NSG Tx mice, n= 6 males). Data are represented as
mean of biological replicates with individual data points overlaid and error
bars indicate ± SEM.
Further assessment of blood glucose, plasma insulin, and glucagon
phenotypes in GKO-NSG mice after human islet
transplantation.
Related to Figure 5. Data are
from 4–6 month old NSG control,
GKO-NSG, and GKO-NSG mice
post-transplantation (GKO-NSG Tx). (a) Plasma
glucagon levels in ad libitum fed mice
(NSG vs. GKO-NSG Tx:
P= 0.005112 by two-tailed Student’s t-test). Due
to the distribution of data from GKO-NSG mice, these data
points were omitted from statistical analysis. (NSG mice,
n= 10 males and 3 females; GKO-NSG mice, n= 12 males and 1
female; GKO-NSG Tx mice, n= 6 males). Blood glucose
(b) (P= 0.013846 by one-way ANOVA, with
Tukey’s multiple comparison test) (NSG mice, n= 10
males and 3 females; GKO-NSG mice, n= 8 males and 2
females; GKO-NSG Tx mice, n= 6 males) and plasma insulin
levels (c) (NSG mice, n= 10 males and 3
females; GKO-NSG mice, n= 7 males and 2 females;
GKO-NSG Tx mice, n= 6 males) in fasted mice.
(d) Mouse and human plasma insulin levels in ad
libitum fed GKO-NSG Tx mice (n=6 males).
Dashed lines indicate limit of detection (d: black dashed line
indicates limit of detection of mouseinsulin and red dashed line indicates
limit of detection of humaninsulin). Data are represented as mean of
biological replicates with individual data points overlaid and error bars
indicate ± SEM. * P ≤ 0.05, **
P ≤ 0.01, *** P ≤
0.001.
In vitro characterization of donor human islets and more
physiological assessment of GKO-NSG mice transplanted with
islets either non-diabetic or T2D diabetic donors.
Related to Figure 6.
(a) In vitro glucagon secretion assay on
islets from non-diabetic (n= 4 donors) and type 2 diabetic donors (n= 3
donors), shown as technical replicates from individual donors.
(b) Glucagon content of donor islets transplanted into
GKO-NSG mice (P=0.558605 by two-tailed Student’s
t-test; non-diabetic donor n= 5, type 2 diabetic donor n= 3). Data in
(c-e) are from 4–6 month old
GKO-NSG mice post-transplantation with islets from
non-diabetic (GKO-NSG Tx) or type 2 diabetic donors
(GKO-NSG Tx T2D). For data presented in
(c-e): GKO-NSG Tx mice, n= 6 males;
GKO-NSG Tx T2D mice n= 1 male and 2 females.
(c) Plasma glucagon levels in ad libitum
fed mice (P= 0.034687 by two-tailed Student’s
t-test). Blood glucose (d) (P= 0.042886 by
two-tailed Student’s t-test) and plasma insulin levels
(e) in 6-hour fasted mice. (f) Percent of
basal blood glucose 30-minutes post insulin injection (1U/kg body weight)
from 4.5–6.5 month old GKO-NSG Tx and GKO-NSG Tx T2D
mice (GKO-NSG Tx mice, n= 5 males; GKO-NSG
Tx T2D n= 1 male and 1 female). Dashed lines indicate limit of detection.
Data are represented as mean of biological replicates with individual data
points overlaid, except in a, where individual data points
represent technical replicates from single donors. Error bars indicate
± SEM. * P ≤ 0.05, ** P
≤ 0.01, *** P ≤ 0.001.
Authors: Leonard D Shultz; Bonnie L Lyons; Lisa M Burzenski; Bruce Gott; Xiaohua Chen; Stanley Chaleff; Malak Kotb; Stephen D Gillies; Marie King; Julie Mangada; Dale L Greiner; Rupert Handgretinger Journal: J Immunol Date: 2005-05-15 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: H Efsun Arda; Lingyu Li; Jennifer Tsai; Eduardo A Torre; Yenny Rosli; Heshan Peiris; Robert C Spitale; Chunhua Dai; Xueying Gu; Kun Qu; Pei Wang; Jing Wang; Markus Grompe; Raphael Scharfmann; Michael S Snyder; Rita Bottino; Alvin C Powers; Howard Y Chang; Seung K Kim Journal: Cell Metab Date: 2016-04-28 Impact factor: 27.287
Authors: Chunhua Dai; Nora S Kayton; Alena Shostak; Greg Poffenberger; Holly A Cyphert; Radhika Aramandla; Courtney Thompson; Ioannis G Papagiannis; Christopher Emfinger; Masakazu Shiota; John M Stafford; Dale L Greiner; Pedro L Herrera; Leonard D Shultz; Roland Stein; Alvin C Powers Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2016-04-11 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Rayner Rodriguez-Diaz; Robin Dando; M Caroline Jacques-Silva; Alberto Fachado; Judith Molina; Midhat H Abdulreda; Camillo Ricordi; Stephen D Roper; Per-Olof Berggren; Alejandro Caicedo Journal: Nat Med Date: 2011-06-19 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Romina J Bevacqua; Xiaoqing Dai; Jonathan Y Lam; Xueying Gu; Mollie S H Friedlander; Krissie Tellez; Irene Miguel-Escalada; Silvia Bonàs-Guarch; Goutham Atla; Weichen Zhao; Seung Hyun Kim; Antonia A Dominguez; Lei S Qi; Jorge Ferrer; Patrick E MacDonald; Seung K Kim Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-04-23 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Samantha N Piekos; Sadhana Gaddam; Pranav Bhardwaj; Prashanth Radhakrishnan; Ramanathan V Guha; Anthony E Oro Journal: PLoS Comput Biol Date: 2021-09-20 Impact factor: 4.475
Authors: Anna Veprik; Geoffrey Denwood; Dong Liu; Rula Bany Bakar; Valentin Morfin; Kara McHugh; Nchimunya N Tebeka; Laurène Vetterli; Ekaterina Yonova-Doing; Fiona Gribble; Frank Reimann; Kyle L Hoehn; Piers A Hemsley; Jonas Ahnfelt-Rønne; Patrik Rorsman; Quan Zhang; Heidi de Wet; James Cantley Journal: Commun Biol Date: 2022-03-18