Literature DB >> 32693178

Home smoking and vaping policies among US adults: results from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study, wave 3.

Dongmei Li1, Hangchuan Shi2, Zidian Xie2, Irfan Rahman3, Scott McIntosh4, Maansi Bansal-Travers5, Jonathan P Winickoff6, Jeremy E Drehmer7, Deborah J Ossip8.   

Abstract

We examined the prevalence of home smoking and vaping restrictions among US adults, and compared home policy differences for smoking and vaping among vapers, smokers, and dual users. Secondary data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study Wave 3 (2015-2016) with 28,148 adults were analyzed using weighted multivariable logistic regression models that account for complex sampling design to compare differences in home policies among non-users, vapers only, smokers only, and dual users. Compared to never-users, current vapers who were ex-smokers and dual users were more likely to allow home vaping (aOR = 11.06, 95% CI: 8.04-15.21; aOR = 6.44, 95% CI: 5.01-8.28) and smoking (aOR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.19-2.22; aOR = 3.58, 95% CI: 2.88-4.45). Current smokers were more likely to allow vaping (aOR = 3.53, 95% CI: 3.06-4.06) and smoking (aOR = 4.27, 95% CI: 3.73-4.89) inside the home than never-users. Current vapers who never smoked were more likely to allow vaping inside the home than never-users (aOR = 2.45, 95% CI: 1.53-3.93). Vapers reported much lower rates of vape-free home policies relative to both their smoke-free home policies and to vape-free home policies among smokers. Vapers may be using e-cigarettes in hopes of harm reduction, but interpreting "harm reduction" as safe, thus exposing non-users in their homes to second- and thirdhand aerosols. This underscores the need to healthcare providers to extend intervention with vapers to include implementing vape-free home policies.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adults; Home; PATH Wave 3; Smoking and vaping policies

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32693178      PMCID: PMC7494576          DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  50 in total

1.  Influential parameters on particle concentration and size distribution in the mainstream of e-cigarettes.

Authors:  F C Fuoco; G Buonanno; L Stabile; P Vigo
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 8.071

2.  Rules to prohibit the use of electronic vapor products inside homes and personal vehicles among adults in the U.S., 2017.

Authors:  Andrea S Gentzke; David M Homa; J Brandon Kenemer; Yessica Gomez; Brian A King
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Electronic cigarette chemicals transfer from a vape shop to a nearby business in a multiple-tenant retail building.

Authors:  Careen Khachatoorian; Peyton Jacob Iii; Neal L Benowitz; Prue Talbot
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Evidence, Policy, and E-Cigarettes--Will England Reframe the Debate?

Authors:  Sharon H Green; Ronald Bayer; Amy L Fairchild
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Indoor Air Quality and Passive E-cigarette Aerosol Exposures in Vape-Shops.

Authors:  Yeongkwon Son; Daniel P Giovenco; Cristine Delnevo; Andrey Khlystov; Vera Samburova; Qingyu Meng
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Home and workplace smoking bans in Italy, Ireland, Sweden, France and the Czech Republic.

Authors:  J E Heck; I Stücker; S Allwright; E R Gritz; M Haglund; C G Healton; E Kralikova; S Sanchez Del Mazo; E Tamang; C M Dresler; M Hashibe
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 16.671

7.  Vapors produced by electronic cigarettes and e-juices with flavorings induce toxicity, oxidative stress, and inflammatory response in lung epithelial cells and in mouse lung.

Authors:  Chad A Lerner; Isaac K Sundar; Hongwei Yao; Janice Gerloff; Deborah J Ossip; Scott McIntosh; Risa Robinson; Irfan Rahman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  The Messages Presented in Electronic Cigarette-Related Social Media Promotions and Discussion: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Kahlia McCausland; Bruce Maycock; Tama Leaver; Jonine Jancey
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression.

Authors:  Zoran Bursac; C Heath Gauss; David Keith Williams; David W Hosmer
Journal:  Source Code Biol Med       Date:  2008-12-16

10.  Impact of home smoking rules on smoking patterns among adolescents and young adults.

Authors:  Pamela I Clark; Michael W Schooley; Bennett Pierce; Jane Schulman; Anne M Hartman; Carol L Schmitt
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  1 in total

1.  Secondhand nicotine vaping at home and respiratory symptoms in young adults.

Authors:  Talat Islam; Jessica Braymiller; Sandrah P Eckel; Feifei Liu; Alayna P Tackett; Meghan E Rebuli; Jessica Barrington-Trimis; Rob McConnell
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 9.102

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.