In cystic fibrosis (CF), which occurs in people with two mutant copies of the CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator) gene, chronic airway infection and inflammation are the major causes of morbidity and mortality. Although the mechanisms underlying disease can be elegantly dissected using in vitro systems, a clear understanding of disease pathophysiology relies on effective animal models (1). A number of CF animal models have been developed through disruption of CFTR loci, with advantages and disadvantages to each (2). Mice and rats are less expensive to purchase and house, have faster reproductive cycles, and can be studied with commercially available reagents for immunologic evaluations. However, small mammals are more anatomically divergent from humans than larger mammals, and these models fail to develop all manifestations of CF pathophysiology (3). The ferret and pig CF models develop lung pathology more closely resembling humanCF lung disease, and manifest nonpulmonary disease manifestations of CF (pancreatic and hepatobiliary disease). However, intensive husbandry requirements and increased expense limit the availability of the pig and ferret models.With the approval of the newest combination of CFTR modulators (elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor), approximately 90% of people with CF in the United States are now eligible for highly effective CFTR modulator therapy (4, 5). The enthusiasm that CFTR modulators will lead to sustained improvements in quality and quantity of life for people with CF is coupled with an awareness that we have incomplete knowledge of the long-term effects of highly effective CFTR modulator therapy medications (6). Animal models that incorporate CFTR genotypes that respond to CFTR modulator therapy will help fill this knowledge gap. Although relatively uncommon in the population compared with the CFTR-ΔF508 mutation, the CFTR-G551D mutation was targeted first, because this mutation causes severe deficiency in CFTR activity and is highly responsive to ivacaftor alone (7, 8). Ivacaftor-sensitive models of both CF ferrets (9) and pigs (10) engineered to express the CFTR-G551D mutations exist. However, because ivacaftor does not potentiate rodent CFTR under most conditions tested (8, 11), development of smaller animal models in which to study modulator-induced restoration of CFTR activity has been more challenging.In this issue of the Journal, Birket and colleagues (pp. 1271–1282) describe the first modulator-responsive small animal model for studying restoration of CFTR activity in vivo (12). The authors generated an ivacaftor-responsive CF rat by inserting most of the humanCFTR-G551D variant into the rat genome under control of the endogenous rat promoter. Rats homozygous for the humanized CFTR-G551D (hG551D) construct demonstrated the same gross phenotypes as the authors’ previously developed CFTR-knockout rat (13, 14), including gastrointestinal obstruction, decreased pup size, poor weight gain, white incisor phenotype, and development of airway submucosal gland hypertrophy and mucous hyperviscosity. The authors verified expression and correct orientation of the hG551D construct in the rat lungs and confirmed impaired CFTR channel function using short-circuit measurements on excised rat tracheae. The addition of ivacaftor increased short-circuit current measurements in hG551D rats to approximately 50% of wild-type measurements, consistent with the effects of similar concentrations of ivacaftor to potentiate CFTR-G551D channel activity in human cells (7, 8). Finally, and most importantly, the authors demonstrated that ivacaftor potentiates hG551D CFTR channels in vivo and reverses findings associated with deficient CFTR activity. In juvenile rats, ivacaftor treatment normalized nasal potential differences and restored growth rate. In mature rats that had reached the age at which insufficient CFTR activity produces airway mucous abnormalities, ivacaftor treatment increased airway surface liquid depth, decreased mucous viscosity, and enhanced mucociliary transport.The hG115D rat adds to CF research capability by increasing the accessibility of animal models that respond to CFTR modulators and by complementing the CFTR-G551Dpig and ferret. Shorter gestational periods and decreased costs make the hG115D rat more amenable to prolonged experiments, such as the evaluation of outcomes of modulator initiation in animals with more advanced pathology. Although the CF rat does not develop all the hallmarks of the humanCF disease, notably pancreatic and hepatobiliary disease, it can be used to study gastrointestinal disease and many features of CF lung disease. One significant limitation of the CF rat model, like the CF mouse, is that it does not develop spontaneous airway infection when kept in specific pathogen-free housing. However, data from ferrets (15) and mice (16) deficient in CFTR activity demonstrate that deleterious hyperinflammatory immune responses are present in the CF airway even in the absence of colonizing bacteria. As immunologic reagents are more readily available for rats than pigs and ferrets, investigation of the impact of CFTR modulators on chronic airway inflammation is an area of research for which the hG551D rat model may be particularly well suited.Another potential use for the hG115D rat is the study of modulator therapy effects on CF airway infection. Unlike the mouse, the CF rat develops airway mucous abnormalities and impaired mucociliary transport, features that could predispose adult animals to develop airway colonization following direct inoculation with exogenous bacteria. Further studies are needed to determine if chronic infections can be achieved in CF rats. Because data indicate that adults with established infections who start modulators do not eradicate chronic bacterial infections (17), the ability to study chronic airway infections over time in a small animal model, and how CFTR modulator therapy affects these infections, will be a major advance.As the majority of people with CF start treatment with CFTR modulators, many questions remain regarding long-term consequences of these medications; the hG511D rat model will be an excellent model to investigate some of these concerns. Long-term sequelae of modulators may reflect consequences of prolonged pharmacologic enhancement of CFTR channel activity, off-target effects of individual modulators, or CFTR mutation class–dependent effects on cellular physiology. Data are emerging that different modulators have differential effects on cellular functions, particularly immune cell functions (18–20). The hG551D rat model, like CFTR-G551Dferret and pig models, uses ivacaftor to restore CFTR channel activity; other models will be needed to assess long-term effects of tezacaftor and elexacaftor. Two groups recently published generation of ΔF508 homozygous rats, by genetically altering native ratCFTR (21, 22); however, it is unclear if either model exhibits in vivo responses to CFTR modulator therapy. Comparison of phenotypes of multiple animal models with different mutations, and how they change with individual and combinations of modulators, will help predict outcomes for our patients and will help determine the ways modulators may alter cellular function beyond CFTR activity restoration.
Authors: Peter G Middleton; Marcus A Mall; Pavel Dřevínek; Larry C Lands; Edward F McKone; Deepika Polineni; Bonnie W Ramsey; Jennifer L Taylor-Cousar; Elizabeth Tullis; François Vermeulen; Gautham Marigowda; Charlotte M McKee; Samuel M Moskowitz; Nitin Nair; Jessica Savage; Christopher Simard; Simon Tian; David Waltz; Fengjuan Xuan; Steven M Rowe; Raksha Jain Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-10-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Bradley H Rosen; Marc Chanson; Lara R Gawenis; Jinghua Liu; Aderonke Sofoluwe; Alice Zoso; John F Engelhardt Journal: J Cyst Fibros Date: 2017-09-19 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Susan E Birket; Joy M Davis; Courtney M Fernandez-Petty; Alexander G Henderson; Ashley M Oden; LiPing Tang; Hui Wen; Jeong Hong; Lianwu Fu; Andre Chambers; Alvin Fields; Gojun Zhao; Guillermo J Tearney; Eric J Sorscher; Steven M Rowe Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2020-11-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Emanuela M Bruscia; Ping-Xia Zhang; Elisa Ferreira; Christina Caputo; John W Emerson; David Tuck; Diane S Krause; Marie E Egan Journal: Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol Date: 2008-09-05 Impact factor: 6.914
Authors: Alexandra McCarron; Patricia Cmielewski; Nicole Reyne; Chantelle McIntyre; John Finnie; Fiona Craig; Nathan Rout-Pitt; Juliette Delhove; John E Schjenken; Hon Y Chan; Bernadette Boog; Emma Knight; Rodney C Gilmore; Wanda K O'Neal; Richard C Boucher; David Parsons; Martin Donnelley Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2020-02-18 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Samuel J Bose; Georg Krainer; Demi R S Ng; Mathias Schenkel; Hideki Shishido; Jae Seok Yoon; Peter M Haggie; Michael Schlierf; David N Sheppard; William R Skach Journal: J Cyst Fibros Date: 2020-01-03 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Heledd H Jarosz-Griffiths; Thomas Scambler; Chi H Wong; Samuel Lara-Reyna; Jonathan Holbrook; Fabio Martinon; Sinisa Savic; Paul Whitaker; Christine Etherington; Giulia Spoletini; Ian Clifton; Anil Mehta; Michael F McDermott; Daniel Peckham Journal: Elife Date: 2020-03-02 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Erick Forno; Steven H Abman; Jagdev Singh; Mary E Robbins; Hiran Selvadurai; Paul T Schumacker; Paul D Robinson Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2021-08-01 Impact factor: 30.528