Literature DB >> 32691232

Endoscopic single versus double flap tympanoplasty: a randomized clinical trial.

Noha Ahmed El-Kholy1, Mohammed Abdelbadie Salem2, Abdelwahab Mohamed Rakha2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the results of endoscopic over-underlay tympanoplasty, single flap technique, with endoscopic over-underlay tympanoplasty combined with an anterior tab, double flap technique, in repair of the challenging total and subtotal tympanic membrane perforations with inadequate anterior remnant. This is to determine whether highly adequate visualization at the anterior meatal angle area offered by endoscopy can eliminate the need for anterior tab reinforcement. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized single-blinded study involving 104 patients with total or subtotal tympanic membrane perforations was conducted. Patients were randomized into two groups: 52 with endoscopic single flap tympanoplasty, first group, and 52 with endoscopic double flap tympanoplasty, second group, between August 2017 and February 2019. The main outcome is graft take rate. Secondary outcomes include hearing results, pain score assessment, operative time and postoperative complications.
RESULTS: Graft take rates were 94% and 98% for the first and second groups, respectively (P value = 0.307). Significant improvement was achieved in total air-bone gap from 21.45 ± 5.37 and 23.1 ± 4.47 preoperatively to 6.4 ± 5.46 and 6.15 ± 3.57 postoperatively for the first and second groups, respectively. Pain scores were not significantly different between the two groups. Mean operative time was significantly longer in the second group (P value = 0.010). There was no reported lateralization or anterior blunting in both groups.
CONCLUSION: In repair of total and subtotal tympanic membrane perforations with inadequate anterior remnant, endoscopic enrollment provides excellent visualization and good manipulation at the anterior meatal angle area with favorable results, eliminating the need for adding an anterior tab and alleviating the burden of longer operative time. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03922295) "retrospectively registered" at 18/4/2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior tab; Endoscopic tympanoplasty; Total and subtotal perforations; Tympanic membrane perforation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32691232     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06212-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   3.236


  5 in total

1.  Cutaneous sensory deficit following post-auricular incision.

Authors:  S J Frampton; M Pringle
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 1.469

2.  Thermal effects of endoscopy in a human temporal bone model: implications for endoscopic ear surgery.

Authors:  Elliott D Kozin; Ashton Lehmann; Margaret Carter; Ed Hight; Michael Cohen; Hideko H Nakajima; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Proposal of a guideline in reporting hearing results in middle ear and mastoid surgery.

Authors:  M Sakai
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1994-05

Review 4.  The role of mastoidectomy in outcomes following tympanic membrane repair: a review.

Authors:  Steven J Eliades; Charles J Limb
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Overlay versus underlay myringoplasty: report of outcomes considering closure of perforation and hearing function.

Authors:  B Sergi; J Galli; E De Corso; C Parrilla; G Paludetti
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.124

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.