Literature DB >> 32687682

A retrospective case series of patients who have undergone coeliac plexus blocks for the purpose of alleviating pain due to intra-abdominal malignancy.

Alix Dumitrescu1, Arun Aggarwal1,2, Richard Chye3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coeliac plexus block (CPB) is an interventional pain management option for patients with pancreatic or other upper abdominal malignancy. AIMS: To assess the safety, utilization, and outcomes of CPBs in the local context. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective case series of all patients with cancer who underwent CPB at 4 Sydney teaching hospitals from March 2010 to February 2016. We recorded baseline demographic data, details of the injectate, procedural approach and survival, as well as pain scores and analgesic use at 4 time points of interest. Thirty-nine procedures were performed during the study period. Twenty-four were performed endoscopically, 14 were performed via a bilateral percutaneous posterior approach by Pain Specialists or Radiologists and 1 was performed intraoperatively by a Surgeon. Patients had experienced pain for a mean of 17 weeks prior to CPB. Prior to CPB, the mean pain score was 8.8 out of 10. The mean pain score was reduced at 48 hours, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks following CPB (P < .01). The mean oral morphine equivalent daily dose prior to CPB was 362 mg which was reduced at 48 hours and 2 weeks but increased at the 4 weeks following CPB. One patient developed a bacteremia but otherwise no complications were observed.
CONCLUSION: CPB is performed by a number of approaches and is well tolerated. The approach selected appears to depend on patient anatomy, preference, and availability of local expertise. Local clinicians could consider CPB earlier in the management of malignant epigastric pain.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  celiac plexus; coeliac plexus; pain management; palliative care; pancreatic neoplasms

Year:  2020        PMID: 32687682      PMCID: PMC7941512          DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)        ISSN: 2573-8348


  26 in total

1.  Three posterior percutaneous celiac plexus block techniques. A prospective, randomized study in 61 patients with pancreatic cancer pain.

Authors:  S Ischia; A Ischia; E Polati; G Finco
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Chemical splanchnicectomy in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. A prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; J L Cameron; H S Kaufman; C J Yeo; H A Pitt; P K Sauter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Celiac plexus neurolysis for abdominal cancer pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Werner Nagels; Nikki Pease; Geertruida Bekkering; Filip Cools; Patrick Dobbels
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.750

4.  Impact of Celiac Plexus Neurolysis on Survival in Patients with Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective, Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Tak Kyu Oh; Woo Jin Lee; Sang Myung Woo; Nam Woo Kim; Jiyeon Yim; Dae Hyun Kim
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  A prospective study of EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis for pancreatic cancer pain.

Authors:  N T Gunaratnam; A V Sarma; I D Norton; M J Wiersema
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Impact of celiac neurolysis on survival in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Larissa L Fujii-Lau; William R Bamlet; Jason S Eldrige; Suresh T Chari; Ferga C Gleeson; Barham K Abu Dayyeh; Jonathan E Clain; Randall K Pearson; Bret T Petersen; Elizabeth Rajan; Mark D Topazian; Santhi S Vege; Kenneth K Wang; Maurits J Wiersema; Michael J Levy
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Effects of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs on patient-controlled analgesia morphine side effects: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Emmanuel Marret; Okba Kurdi; Paul Zufferey; Francis Bonnet
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 8.  Assessment of pain.

Authors:  H Breivik; P C Borchgrevink; S M Allen; L A Rosseland; L Romundstad; E K Breivik Hals; G Kvarstein; A Stubhaug
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  The Effectiveness of Alcohol Versus Phenol Based Splanchnic Nerve Neurolysis for the Treatment of Intra-Abdominal Cancer Pain.

Authors:  Dhanalakshmi Koyyalagunta; Mitchell P Engle; Jun Yu; Lei Feng; Diane M Novy
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 10.  Incidence of major complications of neurolytic coeliac plexus block.

Authors:  D D Davies
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 18.000

View more
  2 in total

1.  A retrospective case series of patients who have undergone coeliac plexus blocks for the purpose of alleviating pain due to intra-abdominal malignancy.

Authors:  Alix Dumitrescu; Arun Aggarwal; Richard Chye
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2020-07-20

Review 2.  The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Best Practices and Guidelines for the Interventional Management of Cancer-Associated Pain.

Authors:  Mansoor M Aman; Ammar Mahmoud; Timothy Deer; Dawood Sayed; Jonathan M Hagedorn; Shane E Brogan; Vinita Singh; Amitabh Gulati; Natalie Strand; Jacqueline Weisbein; Johnathan H Goree; Fangfang Xing; Ali Valimahomed; Daniel J Pak; Antonios El Helou; Priyanka Ghosh; Krishna Shah; Vishal Patel; Alexander Escobar; Keith Schmidt; Jay Shah; Vishal Varshney; William Rosenberg; Sanjeet Narang
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.133

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.