Literature DB >> 32687608

Full-count PET recovery from low-count image using a dilated convolutional neural network.

Karl Spuhler1, Mario Serrano-Sosa1, Renee Cattell1, Christine DeLorenzo1,2, Chuan Huang1,2,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Positron emission tomography (PET) is an essential technique in many clinical applications that allows for quantitative imaging at the molecular level. This study aims to develop a denoising method using a novel dilated convolutional neural network (CNN) to recover full-count images from low-count images.
METHODS: We adopted similar hierarchical structures as the conventional U-Net and incorporated dilated kernels in each convolution to allow the network to observe larger, more robust features within the image without the requirement of downsampling and upsampling internal representations. Our dNet was trained alongside a U-Net for comparison. Both models were evaluated using a leave-one-out cross-validation procedure on a dataset of 35 subjects (~3500 slabs), which were obtained from an ongoing 18 F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) study. Low-count PET data (10% count) were generated by randomly selecting one-tenth of all events in the associated listmode file. Analysis was done on the static image from the last 10 minutes of emission data. Both low-count PET and full-count PET were reconstructed using ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM). Objective image quality metrics, including mean absolute percent error (MAPE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and structural similarity index metric (SSIM), were used to analyze the deep learning methods. Both deep learning methods were further compared to a traditional Gaussian filtering method. Further, region of interest (ROI) quantitative analysis was also used to compare U-Net and dNet architectures.
RESULTS: Both the U-Net and our proposed network were successfully trained to synthesize full-count PET images from the generated low-count PET images. Compared to low-count PET and Gaussian filtering, both deep learning methods improved MAPE, PSNR, and SSIM. Our dNet also systematically outperformed U-Net on all three metrics (MAPE: 4.99 ± 0.68 vs 5.31 ± 0.76, P < 0.01; PSNR: 31.55 ± 1.31 dB vs 31.05 ± 1.39, P < 0.01; SSIM: 0.9513 ± 0.0154 vs 0.9447 ± 0.0178, P < 0.01). ROI quantification showed greater quantitative improvements using dNet over U-Net.
CONCLUSION: This study proposed a novel approach of using dilated convolutions for recovering full-count PET images from low-count PET images.
© 2020 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  U-net; convolutional neural network; dNet; positron emission tomography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32687608     DOI: 10.1002/mp.14402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  10 in total

Review 1.  Applications of artificial intelligence in nuclear medicine image generation.

Authors:  Zhibiao Cheng; Junhai Wen; Gang Huang; Jianhua Yan
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-06

Review 2.  A review on AI in PET imaging.

Authors:  Keisuke Matsubara; Masanobu Ibaraki; Mitsutaka Nemoto; Hiroshi Watabe; Yuichi Kimura
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.668

Review 3.  Application of artificial intelligence in brain molecular imaging.

Authors:  Satoshi Minoshima; Donna Cross
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.668

4.  Virtual high-count PET image generation using a deep learning method.

Authors:  Juan Liu; Sijin Ren; Rui Wang; Niloufarsadat Mirian; Yu-Jung Tsai; Michal Kulon; Darko Pucar; Ming-Kai Chen; Chi Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 4.506

Review 5.  Artificial Intelligence-Based Image Enhancement in PET Imaging: Noise Reduction and Resolution Enhancement.

Authors:  Juan Liu; Masoud Malekzadeh; Niloufar Mirian; Tzu-An Song; Chi Liu; Joyita Dutta
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2021-10

6.  Clinical and phantom validation of a deep learning based denoising algorithm for F-18-FDG PET images from lower detection counting in comparison with the standard acquisition.

Authors:  Gerald Bonardel; Axel Dupont; Pierre Decazes; Mathieu Queneau; Romain Modzelewski; Jeremy Coulot; Nicolas Le Calvez; Sébastien Hapdey
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2022-05-11

7.  Multitask Learning Based Three-Dimensional Striatal Segmentation of MRI: fMRI and PET Objective Assessments.

Authors:  Mario Serrano-Sosa; Jared X Van Snellenberg; Jiayan Meng; Jacob R Luceno; Karl Spuhler; Jodi J Weinstein; Anissa Abi-Dargham; Mark Slifstein; Chuan Huang
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 5.119

Review 8.  Deep learning-based image reconstruction and post-processing methods in positron emission tomography for low-dose imaging and resolution enhancement.

Authors:  Cameron Dennis Pain; Gary F Egan; Zhaolin Chen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Estimation of Nuclear Medicine Exposure Measures Based on Intelligent Computer Processing.

Authors:  Junfeng Wang; Fangxiao Wang; Yue Liu; Yuanfan Xu; Jiangtao Liang; Ziming Su
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 2.682

10.  3D Convolutional Neural Network-Based Denoising of Low-Count Whole-Body 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose and 89Zr-Rituximab PET Scans.

Authors:  Bart M de Vries; Sandeep S V Golla; Gerben J C Zwezerijnen; Otto S Hoekstra; Yvonne W S Jauw; Marc C Huisman; Guus A M S van Dongen; Willemien C Menke-van der Houven van Oordt; Josée J M Zijlstra-Baalbergen; Liesbet Mesotten; Ronald Boellaard; Maqsood Yaqub
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.