| Literature DB >> 32686275 |
Zhaoji Dai1,2, Rongrong He1,2, Mark A Bernards2, Aiming Wang1.
Abstract
To establish infection, plant viruses are evolutionarily empowered with the ability to spread intercellularly. Potyviruses represent the largest group of known plant-infecting RNA viruses, including many agriculturally important viruses. To better understand intercellular movement of potyviruses, we used turnip mosaic virus (TuMV) as a model and constructed a double-fluorescent (green and mCherry) protein-tagged TuMV infectious clone, which allows distinct observation of primary and secondary infected cells. We conducted a series of deletion and mutation analyses to characterize the role of TuMV coat protein (CP) in viral intercellular movement. TuMV CP has 288 amino acids and is composed of three domains: the N-terminus (amino acids 1-97), the core (amino acids 98-245), and the C-terminus (amino acids 246-288). We found that deletion of CP or its segments amino acids 51-199, amino acids 200-283, or amino acids 265-274 abolished the ability of TuMV to spread intercellularly but did not affect virus replication. Interestingly, deletion of amino acids 6-50 in the N-terminus domain resulted in the formation of aberrant virions but did not significantly compromise TuMV cell-to-cell and systemic movement. We identified the charged residues R178 and D222 within the core domain that are essential for virion formation and TuMV local and systemic transport in plants. Moreover, we found that trans-expression of the wild-type CP either by TuMV or through genetic transformation-based stable expression could not rescue the movement defect of CP mutants. Taken together these results suggest that TuMV CP is not essential for viral genome replication but is indispensable for viral intercellular transport where only the cis-expressed CP is functional.Entities:
Keywords: cell-to-cell movement; coat protein; potyvirus; protein stability; systemic infection; turnip mosaic virus; virion assembly
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32686275 PMCID: PMC7411659 DOI: 10.1111/mpp.12973
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Plant Pathol ISSN: 1364-3703 Impact factor: 5.663
Figure 1Effects of coat protein (CP) deletion mutations on TuMV replication, cell‐to‐cell movement, and systemic infection in Nicotiana benthamiana. (a) Schematic representation of TuMV infectious clones used in this study. Upper panel: Schematic representation of the infectious clone pCBTuMV‐GFP//mCherry for distinguishing between primary and secondary infection sites. Bottom panel: Schematic representation of the infectious clone pCamTuMV‐GFP for TuMV replication assay in protoplasts. mCh, mCherry tagged by the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) retention signal HDEL. (b) Schematic representation of wild‐type (WT) TuMV and CP deletion mutants. Green fluorescent protein (GFP) was inserted between P1 and HC‐Pro cistrons of the TuMV genome. (c) Analysis of systemic infection of CP deletion mutants. ΔGDD is a replication‐defective mutant that serves as a negative control. Top panels: visualization of GFP fluorescence in the upper new leaves of N. benthamiana plants inoculated under UV light at 9 days postinoculation (dpi). Bottom panel: photograph of the representative N. benthamiana plants inoculated with TuMV WT and mutants at 26 dpi. (d) Reverse transcription (RT)‐PCR analysis of viral RNA from systemic leaf of mutants‐inoculated plants at 14 dpi. (e) Replication analysis of CP deletion mutants in protoplasts. Total RNA was extracted from N. benthamiana protoplasts transfected with TuMV WT or mutants at 48 hours post‐transfection and viral (+)‐strand RNA (top panel) or (−)‐strand RNA (bottom panel) were quantified by quantitative RT‐PCR. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates. **p < .001. (f) Confocal microscopy analysis of cell‐to‐cell movement of CP deletion mutants at 4 dpi. Scale bar = 100 µm
Summary of the phenotypes of coat protein (CP) mutants in Nicotiana benthamiana
| Mutants | Mutation location | Replication | Cell‐to‐cell movement | Systemic movement | Assembly |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ΔCP | + | − | − | NT | |
| Δ6‐50 | N | + | + | + | + |
| Δ51‐199 | N + Core | + | − | − | NT |
| Δ200‐283 | Core + C | + | − | − | NT |
| Δ265‐274 | C | + | − | − | NT |
| R178A | Core, Helix 5 | + | − | − | − |
| R178D | Core, Helix 5 | + | − | − | NT |
| R195A | Core, Helix 6 | + | + | + | + |
| D222A | Core, Bend | + | − | − | − |
| D222R | Core, Bend | + | − | − | NT |
| DR | Core, Helix 5 + Bend | + | − | − | NT |
| D257A | C, NS | + | + | + | + |
| E265A | C, NS | + | + | + | + |
| E268A | C, NS | + | Slow | Slow | + |
| R269A | C, NS | + | Slow | Slow | + |
| ER | C, NS | + | Slow | Slow | + |
| D274A | C, NS | + | + | + | + |
Mutation location is determined based on the atomic model of TuMV CP (PDB: 6T34). N, N‐ terminus; Core, core domain; C, C‐terminus; NS, no secondary structure assigned.
Determined by the protoplasts transfection assay. +, no significant difference with the wild‐type (WT) virus.
Determined by confocal microscopy. +, similar with the WT virus; −, no cell‐to‐cell movement observed; Slow, remarkably slow cell‐to‐cell movement.
Determined by symptom appearance, UV light, and reverse transcription PCR. +, similar with the WT virus; −, no systemic infection observed; Slow, delayed long‐distance movement.
Determined by transmission electron microscopy from inoculated leaf samples or transfected protoplasts samples. +, virions observed; −, no virion observed; NT, not tested.
Figure 2Effects of deletion of a coat protein (CP) segment (amino acids 6–50) on virion assembly and analysis of the self‐interactions of different CP regions. (a) Immunoblotting analysis of total proteins extracted from TuMV wild‐type (WT) or Δ6–50‐infected plants at 12 days postinoculation (dpi). Total protein extracts were probed with TuMV CP antibody. (b) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis of virion assembly of Δ6–50 mutant. Crude virion preparations were obtained from the symptomatic tissue of WT or Δ6–50‐infected plants at 12 dpi. The preparation was subjected to negative staining and TEM. (c) Analysis of the self‐interactions of different CP regions. Top panel: schematic representation of truncated portions for protein–protein interaction assays. Middle panel: yeast two‐hybrid (Y2H) analysis in yeast. Yeast competent cells co‐transformed with bait and prey plasmids were plated on double dropout (DDO) medium lacking tryptophan and leucine to test for double transformation, and on quadruple dropout (QDO) medium lacking tryptophan, leucine, histidine, and adenine for protein–protein interaction. Yeast co‐transformed with AD‐CP and BD‐CP serves as a positive control. Yeast co‐transformed with AD‐CP and empty BD plasmid serves as a negative control. Bottom panel: bimolecular fluorescence complementation analysis of CP‐truncated mutants in Nicotiana benthamiana plants. Combination of CP‐YN/CP‐YC serves as a positive control and CP‐YN/YC as the negative control. Experiments were repeated three times. Bars = 40 µm
Figure 3Effects of coat protein (CP) point mutations on TuMV systemic infection. (a) Protein sequence alignment of CP derived from different potyviruses. The abbreviated species names and their GenBank accession numbers are as follows: TuMV, Turnip mosaic virus (NC_002509); TEV, Turnip etch virus (NC_001555); SMV, Soybean mosaic virus (FJ807700); PVA, Potato virus A (NC_004039); WMV, Watermelon mosaic virus (NC_006262); PPV, Plum pox virus (NC_001445); TVMV, Tobacco vein mottling virus (NC_001768). Asterisks indicate identical residues and amino acids subjected to substitution are coloured in green. (b) Schematic representation of the point mutations on TuMV CP. (c) Phenotypes of Nicotiana benthamiana plants inoculated with TuMV wild‐type (WT) and mutants at 26 days postinoculation (dpi). (d) Analysis of systemic infection of point mutants by visualization of green fluorescent protein (GFP) fluorescence under UV light at 10 and 14 dpi. (e) Reverse transcription‐PCR analysis of viral RNA from the upper new leaves of plants in (c) at 10 dpi. TuMV‐specific primers for the CP coding region were used to detect viral positive‐strand RNA. The Actin gene serves as an internal control. (f) Immunoblotting analysis of point mutants that can establish systemic infection in N. benthamiana plants. Total protein extracts from the upper leaf at 14 dpi were probed with TuMV CP antibody. The Coomassie brilliant blue (CBB)‐stained RuBisCO large subunit serves as a loading control
Effect of TuMV coat protein (CP) point mutations on systemic infection of Nicotiana benthamiana
| Inoculum | Infectivity | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 dpi (%) | 14 dpi (%) | 26 dpi (%) | |
| WT | 24/24 (100) | 24/24 (100) | 24/24 (100) |
| GDD | 0/24 (0) | 0/24 (0) | 0/24 (0) |
| R195A | 24/24 (100) | 24/24 (100) | 24/24 (100) |
| D257A | 23/24 (95.8) | 24/24 (100) | 24/24 (100) |
| E265A | 24/24 (100) | 24/24 (100) | 24/24 (100) |
| D274A | 24/24 (100) | 24/24 (100) | 24/24 (100) |
| E268A | 18/24 (75.0) | 24/24 (100) | 24/24 (100) |
| R269A | 11/24 (45.8) | 20/24 (83.3) | 22/24 (91.7) |
| ER | 12/24 (50.0) | 21/24 (87.5) | 23/24 (95.8) |
| R178A | 0/24 (0) | 0/24 (0) | 0/24 (0) |
| R178D | 0/24 (0) | 0/24 (0) | 0/24 (0) |
| D222A | 0/24 (0) | 0/24 (0) | 0/24 (0) |
| D222R | 0/24 (0) | 0/24 (0) | 0/24 (0) |
| DR | 0/24 (0) | 0/24 (0) | 0/24 (0) |
Infectivity is defined as the number of systemically infected plants/number of inoculated plants. Leaves were examined by symptom appearance, UV light, and reverse transcription‐PCR using TuMV CP‐specific primers. Results of four trials were combined. WT, wild type; dpi, days postinoculation.
Figure 4Analysis of replication and cell‐to‐cell movement of coat protein (CP) point mutants. (a) Replication analysis of CP point mutants in protoplasts. Total RNA was extracted from wild‐type (WT) or mutants‐transfected protoplasts at 48 hours post‐transfection and viral (+)‐strand RNA was quantified by quantitative reverse transcription PCR. Error bars represent the SD of three biological replicates. **p < .001. (b) Cell‐to‐cell movement analysis of group II mutants. Confocal images were taken from infiltrated leaves at 4 days postinoculation (dpi). Scale bar = 200 µm. (c) Infection foci sizes on Nicotiana benthamiana leaves inoculated with the WT virus or group II mutants. Green fluorescent areas were measured under a confocal microscope at 4 dpi. Areas are in square millimetres ± SD estimated by ImageJ software. Error bars represent the SD of three biological replicates. **p < .001. (d) Cell‐to‐cell movement analysis of group I and group III mutants. Confocal images were taken from infiltrated leaves at 4 dpi. Scale bar = 100 µm
Figure 5Effects of coat protein (CP) point mutations on virion assembly. (a) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis of virion assembly of group I and group II mutants. Crude virion preparations were obtained from the upper new leaves of the mutant‐infected Nicotiana benthamiana at 14 days postinoculation (dpi). Scale bar = 500 nm. (b) TEM analysis of virion preparations from N. benthamiana protoplasts transfected with wild‐type (WT) TuMV, R178A, or D222A mutants at 72 hours post‐transfection (hpt). Scale bar = 200 nm. (c) Immunoblotting analysis of N. benthamiana protoplasts transfected with WT, R178A, or D222A. Total protein extracts from protoplasts were probed with TuMV CP antibody. Coomassie brilliant blue staining (CBB) of RuBisCO large subunit serves as a loading control
Figure 6Effects of mutations on the coat protein (CP) stability in Nicotiana benthamiana plants. (a) Immunoblotting analysis of transient expression of wild‐type (WT) CP or CPs with point mutation(s). Total protein extracts from inoculated leaf at 48 hr postinoculation (hpi) were probed with TuMV CP antibody. Coomassie brilliant blue staining (CBB) of RuBisCO large subunit serves as a loading control. (b) Effects of the proteasome inhibitor MG132 on the accumulation level of CP. Total protein was extracted from infiltrated patches at 48 hpi. MG132 was infiltrated into N. benthamiana leaves 12 hr before harvesting
Figure 7Trans‐complementation assay in transgenic Arabidopsis plant expressing wild‐type (WT) coat protein (CP). (a) Immunoblotting and reverse transcription (RT)‐PCR analyses of TuMV CP in transgenic overexpression Arabidopsis plants. Actin II was used as an internal control for RT‐PCR analysis. (b) Analysis of systemic infection of movement‐defective mutants in nontransgenic and transgenic Arabidopsis plants by visualization of green fluorescent protein (GFP) fluorescence under UV light at 14 days postinoculation (dpi). (c) Confocal microscopy analysis of cell‐to‐cell movement ability of movement‐defective mutants in nontransgenic and transgenic Arabidopsis plants at 6 dpi. Scale bar = 50 μm
Figure 8Trans‐complementation assay in Nicotiana benthamiana plants with wild‐type (WT) TuMV. WT TuMV (without any fluorescent protein tag, TuMV‐WT) was co‐agroinfiltrated with pCBTuMV‐GFP//mCherry‐WT or one of the movement‐defective mutants ΔCP, R178A, and D222A into N. benthamiana leaves. Cell‐to‐cell movement of the movement‐defective mutants in the infiltrated leaves was monitored by confocal microscopy and systemic movement of the movement‐defective mutants was determined by visualization of green fluorescent protein (GFP) fluorescence under UV light and reverse transcription‐PCR analyses. Representative confocal images were taken (left panel) at 7 days postinoculation (dpi) and photographs of plants under UV or regular light were taken at 14 dpi. Scale bar in confocal images = 100 μm